Properties of iconic and visuospatial working memory in pigeons and humans using a location change-detection procedure.

Tests of visuospatial memory following short (<1 s) and medium (1 to 30 s) delays have revealed characteristically different patterns of behavior in humans. These data have been interpreted as evidence for different memory systems operating during short (iconic memory) and long delays (working memory). Leising et al. (2019, Behavioural Processes, 169, Article 103957 ) found evidence for both systems in pigeons and humans completing a location change-detection task using a visual mask that disrupted accuracy following a short (100 ms), but not a long (1,000 ms) delay. Another common finding is that adding to-be-remembered items should disrupt accuracy after a long, but not short, delay. Experiments 1a and 1b reported this memory system crossover effect in pigeons and people, respectively, tested on location change detection with delays of 0, 100, and 1,000 ms and displays of two to 16 items. Experiments 2a and 2b reported that the color of the items had little (pigeons) or no (humans) effect on change-detection accuracy. Pigeons tested in Experiment 3 with longer delays (2,000, 4,000, and 8,000 ms) and large set sizes demonstrated the crossover effect with most displays but did not demonstrate an abrupt drop in accuracy characteristic of iconic memory. In Experiment 4, accuracy with novel types of change (color, shape, and size) was better after a 0-ms delay and above-chance levels on color and shape trials. These data demonstrate the memory system crossover effect in both humans and pigeons and expand our knowledge of the properties of memory systems across species.

Devaluation of a conditioned reinforcer requires its reexposure.

A change in motivational state does not guarantee a change in operant behaviour. Only after an organism has had contact with an outcome while in a relevant motivational state does behaviour change, a phenomenon called incentive learning. While ample evidence indicates that this is true for primary reinforcers, it has not been established for conditioned reinforcers. We performed an experiment with rats where lever-presses were reinforced by presentations of an audiovisual stimulus that had previously preceded food delivery; in the critical experimental groups, the audiovisual stimulus was then paired a single time with a strong electric shock. Some animals were reexposed to the audiovisual stimulus. Lever-presses yielding no outcomes were recorded in a subsequent test. Animals that had been reexposed to the audiovisual stimulus after the aversive training responded less than did those that had not received reexposure. Indeed, those animals that were not reexposed did not differ from a control group that received no aversive conditioning of the audiovisual stimulus. Moreover, these results were not mediated by a change in the food's reinforcement value, but instead reflect a change in behaviour with respect to the conditioned reinforcer itself. These are the first data to indicate that the affective value of conditioned stimuli, like that of unconditioned ones, is established when the organism comes into contact with them.

Sensory and working memory in a spatial change-detection task by pigeons and humans.

Judgements of items viewed less than 100 ms prior are predominantly supported by a sensory, or iconic, memory system. Iconic memory is of high-capacity, but is also volatile and limited in duration. Judgements after longer delays increasingly rely on a working memory system, which is lower in capacity and volatility than sensory memory, but is longer in duration. In four experiments, several factors (e.g., length of delay, number of items, time to view items, presence of a visual mask) were manipulated during a spatial change-detection task conducted with humans and pigeons. Both species were exposed to trials with an array of colored circles (2, 3, and 4 circles in Experiment 1 and 2a; 4, 6, and 8 circles in Experiment 2b) followed by a brief delay (0, 50, and 100 ms in Experiment 1a; 0, 100, and 1000 ms in Experiments 1b and 2), and then were presented with a test display in which the position of one of the items had changed. Pigeons, like humans, were less accurate in selecting the changed item with more items in the display and after longer delays. Pigeons were equally accurate on trials with 0 and 100-ms delays, but worse on trials with a 1000-ms delay; whereas, humans were equally accurate on 100-ms and 1000-ms delays, but better on 0-ms delay trials. Accurate change detection was disrupted in both species when a visual mask was inserted between the sample and test display after a short (100 ms), but not a long (1000 ms) delay. The results support similarity between species in the functional relationships between delay and memory systems, despite time course differences related to sensory memory.