Comparisons Between Young, Middle-Aged, and Older Adult Sexual and Gender Minority Male Sexual Assault Survivors.

OBJECTIVE: This study compared sexual abuse histories and depressive symptoms between younger, middle-aged, and older sexual and gender minority (SGM) male survivors. DESIGN: Participants completed a brief, online screener as part of a large comparative effectiveness psychotherapy trial. SETTING: SGM males 18 years or older, residing in the U.S. or Canada, were recruited online. PARTICIPANTS: This study included younger (aged 18-39; n = 1,435), middle-aged (aged 40-59; n = 546), and older (aged 60+; n = 40) SGM men who reported a history of sexual abuse/assault. MEASUREMENTS: Participants were asked about their sexual abuse history, experience of other traumas, symptoms of depression, and past 60-day mental health treatment engagement. RESULTS: Older SGM men reported a lower rate of occurrence of adult sexual assault, exposure to other traumas, and depression. However, older and younger groups did not differ on any childhood sexual assault variable, the frequency of or number of attackers for adult sexual assault, the frequency of accidents and other injury traumas, or the occurrence or frequency of mental health treatment. Trauma load, including childhood and adult sexual assault, were more strongly related to current depressive symptoms than age group. CONCLUSION: While there were some age-based or cohort differences in the rates of sexual trauma, the clinical response of both groups was similar. Implications for working clinically with middle-aged and older SGM men with untreated sexual assault-related mental health difficulties are discussed, including outreach and availability of gender- and older-inclusive survivor treatment and resources.

Training Male Sexual Abuse Survivors as Peer Leaders to Deliver Motivational Interviewing and Trauma-Informed Affirmative Care.

This paper provides a description and evaluation of training male sexual abuse survivors to deliver Motivational Interviewing (MI) and Motivational Interviewing with Trauma-Informed Affirmative Care (MI-AC) online to sexual and gender minority (SGM) men with sexual assault histories and depression. After a search and selection process, 26 men with lived experience of sexual abuse received MI training that included the use of role-playing, video demonstrations, and practice followed by weekly supervision while co-leading groups. Peer leaders completed several measures pre and post training, including beliefs about MI and self-reported learning of MI and satisfaction with the training. A sample of MI and MI-AC audio sessions were independently rated for adherence and competence. Peer leaders' beliefs about MI changed over time, while self-rated skill level stayed consistent. Peer leaders demonstrated good adherence to the MI and MI-AC conditions. Results suggest that men with lived experience of sexual trauma effectively learned to deliver MI and/or MI-AC to SGM male survivors in online groups. These interventions have the potential to expand the reach of limited services for this population as well as reduce their depression and assist in SGM men with histories of sexual abuse entering into formal mental health services.

Study design and interventions for a peer-delivered motivational interviewing group treatment for sexual and gender minority male sexual trauma survivors.

Sexual abuse of boys and men is a public health problem that has received relatively little attention from clinical scholars and researchers. Given unique pathways for development of and recovery from trauma-related emotional distress, sexual abuse survivors who identify as men may require distinct psychosocial interventions to engage in formal mental health care and assist in symptom reduction. This paper describes the rationale for and methodology of a randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of Motivational Interviewing (MI) versus MI with affirmative care (MI-AC) for sexual and gender minority men who have been sexually traumatized. This study is designed to randomly assign 356 participants to either condition of six online group sessions delivered by two trained peers with lived experience of sexual trauma. Assessments will be conducted at baseline, post-treatment, 60- and 120-day follow-up. The primary hypotheses are that participants assigned to MI-AC, compared to those in MI only, will report reduced symptoms of depression and increased levels of engagement in formal mental health treatment. Additional hypotheses relate to secondary outcome variables, including post-traumatic stress disorder, suicidality, and substance use.

Provider Perspectives on Choosing Prolonged Exposure or Cognitive Processing Therapy for PTSD: A National Investigation of VA Residential Treatment Providers.

As part of a longitudinal mixed-methods investigation on implementation of two evidence-based psychotherapies (EBPs) for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, 164 mental health providers from 38 Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) residential treatment programs across the U.S. were asked questions about their decision-making for using Prolonged Exposure and Cognitive Processing Therapy. Many providers viewed both EBPs as equally efficacious and encouraged veterans to decide for themselves which treatment they wished to engage in. Some providers said that it was hard to know which EBP would be the most effective for a given patient, and that occasionally they started work with a veteran thinking that a particular EBP would work and were surprised when the veteran did not receive the full potential benefit of the intervention. Other providers noted that their decision-making regarding which EBP to use depended on the type and nature of the veterans' index trauma, memory of the trauma, and traumatic stress symptoms (e.g., fear versus guilt). Additional factors that impacted the choice of EBP included whether the patient already had one of the treatments before or if a provider deemed one as more compatible with their previous training. Implications for clinical practice as well as the design and improvement of training and implementation efforts are discussed.

The role of evidence-based therapy relationships on treatment outcome for adults with trauma: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this paper was to systematically review and synthesize the empirical literature on the effects of evidence-based therapy relationship (EBR) variables in the psychological treatment for adults who experienced trauma-related distress. METHOD: Studies were identified using comprehensive searches of PsycINFO, Medline, Published International Literature on Traumatic Stress, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases. Included in the review were articles published between 1980 and 2015, in English that reported on the impact of EBRs on treatment outcome in clinical samples of adult trauma survivors. RESULTS: Nineteen unique studies met inclusion criteria. The bulk of the studies were on therapeutic alliance and the vast majority found that alliance was predictive of or associated with a reduction in various symptomotology. Methodological concerns included the use of small sample sizes, little information on EBRs beyond alliance as well as variability in its measurement, and non-randomized assignment to treatment conditions or the lack of a comparison group. CONCLUSIONS: More research is needed on the roles of client feedback, managing countertransference, and other therapist characteristics on treatment outcome with trauma survivors. Understanding the role of EBRs in the treatment of trauma survivors may assist researchers, clinicians, and psychotherapy educators to improve therapist training as well as client engagement and retention in treatment.