Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Simul Healthc ; 18(1): 64-70, 2023 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35307712

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Recent work has highlighted communication difficulties when wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) in the clinical setting, but currently, there are little objective data on its effects. We assessed the impact of PPE on verbal communication in a simulated operating room and evaluated use of an audio communication device. METHODOLOGY: Frontline health professionals across specialties including surgery, anesthetics, and nursing undertook speech discrimination testing with and without standardized levels of PPE in a simulated operating room environment. Background noise (30- and 70-a-weighted decibel multitalker babble) at 2 distances (2 and 4 m) were selected representative of operating room environments. Bamford-Kowal-Bench (BKB) scoring (192 sentences per participant) was performed. A Digital Multichannel Transceiver System (DMTS) was evaluated. We assessed the effects of PPE use, distance, and use of the DMTS with pairwise comparisons, using a Bonferroni correction, and assessed participant experience via Likert scales. RESULTS: Thirty-one healthcare professionals were tested. Without PPE in 70-a-weighted decibel "babble," median BKB sentence scores were 90% and 76% at 2 and 4 m (adjusted P < 0.0005). The median BKB sentence scores dropped to 8% and 4% at 2 and 4 m in PPE (adjusted P < 0.0005). Improved speech discrimination was achieved with DMTS use to 70% and 76% at 2 and 4 m. Personal protective equipment led to a statistically significant reduction in BKB scores across all conditions compared with baseline. Overall participant confidence in PPE clinical communication was low. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of PPE dramatically impairs speech discrimination and communication in high levels of background noise characteristic of clinical environments, which can be significantly improved using DMTS. Measures should be taken by teams through both through reduction of background noise and consideration of assistive technologies maximizing patient safety. This may be further rehearsed in a simulation environment.


Subject(s)
Speech Perception , Humans , Operating Rooms , Communication , Noise , Personal Protective Equipment
2.
Otol Neurotol ; 41(8): 1060-1065, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32569131

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cochlear implantation with preservation of residual low-frequency hearing enables patients to utilize acoustic and electrical stimulation. It is widely accepted that preservation of residual low-frequency hearing is beneficial in both background noise and for music appreciation. The extent to which patients may benefit is not fully understood, but the importance of these concepts is reflected in electrode design developments and also refinement of surgical technique. Greater understanding is needed around factors that may affect hearing preservation. This study reports experience in adults using standard length cochlear implant arrays. OBJECTIVE: The study reviews hearing preservation outcomes using the HEARRING GROUP method for factors such as gender, electrode type, insertion depth, laterality, preoperative hearing level, and time between surgery and audiogram. Furthermore, the study reviews rates of electroacoustic stimulation use in those with postoperative functional residual low-frequency hearing. METHODOLOGY: Retrospective case series. INCLUSION CRITERIA: preoperative ≤ 85 dB HL at 250 Hz and aged ≥ 18 years. The hearing preservation percentages were calculated using the HEARRING group formula S=[1 - ((PTApost - PTApre)/(PTAmax - PTApre))*100]%. Preservation of > 75% was considered complete, 25 to 75% partial, and 1 to 25% minimal. Standardized operative technique with facial recess approach, posterior tympanotomy, and minimally traumatic round window insertion was performed for each implant. RESULTS: Fifty-three implantations in 52 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age at implantation was 55.5 years. The average time since the last audiogram was 10 months. The mean average total pre and postoperative pure-tone averages were 92.4 dB, 99.2 dB, respectively, using minimum reporting standards for adult cochlear Implant (CI). Thirty percent demonstrated complete hearing preservation, 35.8% partial hearing preservation, and 20.8% minimal hearing preservation. Overall, mean hearing preservation was 52.9%. Sex, age at implantation, insertion depth, lateral versus perimodiolar electrode, and preoperative hearing level did not statistically significantly affect rates of hearing preservation in our study. There was a statistically significant deterioration in hearing preservation outcomes difference at 3 months compared with 12 months postoperatively. Only two patients within our study out of 17 with functional postoperative hearing went on to use electroacoustic stimulation. CONCLUSION: Hearing preservation varies between patients and postoperative outcomes are difficult to predict. This study adds to existing literature in terms of likelihood of hearing preservation following cochlear implantation. In turn, this improves our ability to counsel patients as to the chances of preserving residual low-frequency hearing postoperatively and their ability to use electroacoustic stimulation.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Speech Perception , Adult , Aged , Audiometry, Pure-Tone , Auditory Threshold , Hearing , Humans , Reference Standards , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
3.
Otol Neurotol ; 39(9): 1109-1114, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30080762

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Preserving low frequencies following cochlear implantation improves outcomes and allows patients to use a combination of electrical and acoustic stimulation. This importance has been reflected in advances in electrode design and refined surgical techniques. Full insertion of standard length electrodes may be advantageous over shortened electrodes because more electrodes can be activated over time if low frequency hearing loss progresses. Surgeons must counsel patients over this choice but data is lacking regarding the degree and likelihood of hearing preservation achievable with standard length electrodes in children. We report our experience using standard length cochlear implant arrays for hearing preservation in children. METHODS: Retrospective case series. INCLUSION CRITERIA: preoperative hearing ≤85 dB HL at 250 Hz and aged ≤18 years. Hearing preservation percentages are calculated using the HEARRING group formula. (Equation is included in full-text article.)Preservation of > 75% was considered complete, 25 to 75% partial, and 1 to 25% minimal. Patients were implanted with either MED-EL FLEX28 or Cochlear Nucleus CI522. Standardized operative technique with facial recess approach, posterior tympanotomy and minimally traumatic round window insertion. RESULTS: Fifty-two implantations in 27 pediatric patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age at implantation: 9.8 years. Average latest audiogram: 8 months. Mean total pre- and postoperative pure-tone averages were 82.8 and 92.6 dB. Seventeen (33%) ears demonstrated complete hearing preservation, 22 (42%) ears partial hearing preservation, 7 (13%) minimal hearing preservation, and 6 (12%) exhibited no acoustic hearing postoperatively. Mean hearing preservation was 55.5%. CONCLUSION: Hearing preservation is achievable to varying degrees in pediatric cochlear implantation using standard length electrodes though it is difficult to predict preoperatively which children may benefit. This study is among the largest additions to the knowledge base for this patient group.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Cochlear Implants , Hearing Loss/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Acoustic Stimulation , Adolescent , Child , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Female , Hearing/physiology , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies
4.
BMJ Glob Health ; 3(2): e000665, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29662693

ABSTRACT

Published reviews of national physician strikes have shown a reduction in patient mortality. From 5 December 2016 until 14 March 2017, Kenyan physicians in the public sector went on strike leaving only private (not-for-profit and for-profit) hospitals able to offer physician care. We report on our experience at AIC-Kijabe Hospital, a not-for-profit, faith-based Kenyan hospital, before, during and after the 100-day strike was completed by examining patient admissions and deaths in the time periods before, during and after the strike. The volume of patients increased and exceeded the hospital's ability to respond to needs. There were substantial increases in sick newborn admissions during this time frame and an additional ward was opened to respond to this need. Increased need occurred across all services but staffing and space limited ability to respond to increased demand. There were increases in deaths during the strike period across the paediatric medical, newborn, paediatric surgical and obstetric units with an OR (95% CI) of death of 3.9 (95% CI 2.3 to 6.4), 4.1 (95% CI 2.4 to 7.1), 7.9 (95% CI 3.2 to 20) and 3.2 (95% CI 0.39 to 27), respectively. Increased mortality across paediatric and obstetrical services at AIC-Kijabe Hospital correlated with the crippling of healthcare delivery in the public sector during the national physicians' strike in Kenya.

5.
AANA J ; 70(3): 219-25, 2002 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12078470

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to describe the perceptions of nurse anesthesia students (NAS) who used a MedSim simulator (MedSim USA, Inc, Ft Lauderdale, Fla) as part of their educational training. A convenience sample of 12 NAS in their first year of clinical training was researched. The researcher analyzed data qualitatively from observations made during 4 different sessions. Session 1 introduced the students to the simulator. Session 2 involved each student performing an anesthetic induction. A minor incident such as hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia or tachycardia occurred in session 3, and a major incident such as cardiac ischemia, anaphylaxis, bronchospasm, or malignant hyperthermia occurred in session 4. Data collection involved observation by the primary investigator, journal entries by the anesthesia students, and focus group interviews with the students. Results of the study indicate that, although students experience feelings of apprehension, uneasiness, or fear during the sessions, they felt it was very educational. Disadvantages include the lack of reality, lack of knowledge on handling crisis events, possibility of fixation errors, and the presence of anxiety. Advantages include improved critical thinking and decision-making skills, increased confidence, and improved clinical preparation. Results can be used to assist instructors in improving the students' learning experiences and to teach more effectively.


Subject(s)
Manikins , Nurse Anesthetists/education , Students, Nursing/psychology , Attitude , Educational Measurement , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...