The pathology of hepatitis C as a function of mode of transmission: blood transfusion vs. intravenous drug use.

We reviewed the clinical records of 140 consecutively evaluated patients with chronic hepatitis C infection. One hundred twenty-four patients (89%) contracted infection through blood transfusion or intravenous drug use. The liver biopsy specimens of 83 patients (43 blood transfusion cases and 40 intravenous drug abuse cases) were examined without knowledge of the mode of disease transmission. The mean histological activity index score was significantly higher in the blood transfusion group (10.2 +/- 4.2) than in the intravenous drug use group (6.9 +/- 4.5) (p = 0.001). The transfusion group had more periportal bridging necrosis (p = 0.0015) and fibrosis (p = 0.0016) than did the intravenous drug use group, whereas significant differences between lobular degeneration and portal inflammation were not achieved across the two groups. The distribution of final biopsy interpretations also differed significantly between the two groups (p < 0.001), with chronic active hepatitis more frequent in the transfusion group. Moreover, lymphoid aggregates and bile duct damage were more common in patients with chronic hepatitis due to blood transfusion. Multivariate analysis showed that the mode of viral transmission was the most powerful predictor of histological activity index score when tested against patient gender, duration of disease or age at biopsy. One year after completion of this study, 9 of 70 transfused patients and 1 of 54 intravenous drug users had died of liver disease or are awaiting liver transplantation at this writing (p = 0.03). We conclude that transfusion-acquired hepatitis C is associated with more aggressive histological inflammatory activity than hepatitis resulting from intravenous drug use.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Foregut ischemia and odynophagia in a patient with a type III aortic dissection.

We report a case of ischemia of the distal esophagus with secondary odynophagia that occurred as a result of a type III aortic dissection. A 56-yr-old hypertensive male presented with acute chest pain radiating to his back. A dissection of the descending aorta was found to begin just distal to the left subclavian artery and end in the region of the iliac arteries. The patient was treated medically and remained stable, but then developed odynophagia to solids. Upper endoscopy showed erythematous friable esophageal mucosa, and biopsies were consistent with ischemia. Aortography and barium fluoroscopy provided further evidence of foregut ischemia. The patient recovered on oral omeprazole with no residual symptoms. Ischemic compromise of the esophagus secondary to aortic dissection has not been previously described, nor have the associated endoscopic findings. Knowledge of this rare condition may help in the recognition and management of esophageal mucosal ischemia.

The clinical utility of provocative radionuclide oesophageal transit in the evaluation of non-cardiac chest pain.

We combined edrophonium provocative testing with the technique of radionuclide oesophageal transit (RET) in 30 consecutive patients with non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP) and 12 controls. The oesophageal transit time of aqueous technetium-99m sulfur colloid was determined before and after intravenous infusion of 80 micrograms/kg edrophonium chloride (ED). Patient symptoms during provocative RET (P-RET) were recorded. Thirteen (43%) of the patients had abnormal study results, whereas all control subjects had normal results. Three groups considered abnormal were observed: (a) in two patients (6%), the pain was reproduced and transit pre- and post-ED administration was prolonged (greater than 15 s); (b) in six patients (20%), the pain was reproduced, but transit was normal pre- and post-ED; (c) in five patients (17%), transit pre- and post-ED was prolonged, but no pain was reproduced. In five patients (17%), ED prolonged the transit time greater than 15 s without pain, but the baseline transit was normal. Transit time was measurable in 23 patients. Mean pre-ED transit time was 10.2 +/- 7.4 s (mean +/- SD) and post-ED, 12.4 +/- 8.0 s (P = 0.3). We conclude that ED has no significant effect on transit time, and the pain induced by ED rarely correlates with an abnormal transit; P-RET provides additional information to baseline RET, increasing sensitivity, and may be a useful screening method in the evaluation of patients with NCCP.