Trends in the use of evidence-based treatments for coronary artery disease among women and the elderly: findings from the get with the guidelines quality-improvement program.

BACKGROUND: Significant disparities have been reported in the application of evidence-based guidelines in the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD) in women and the elderly. We hypothesized that participation in a quality-improvement program could improve care for all patients and thus narrow treatment gaps over time. METHODS AND RESULTS: Treatment of 237 225 patients hospitalized with CAD was evaluated in the Get With the Guidelines-CAD program from 2002 to 2007. Six quality measures were evaluated in eligible patients without contraindications: aspirin on admission and discharge, beta-blockers use at discharge, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor antagonist use, lipid-lowering medication use, and tobacco cessation counseling along with other care metrics. Over time, composite adherence on these 6 measures increased from 86.5% to 97.4% (+10.9%) in men and 84.8% to 96.2% (+11.4%) in women. There was a slight difference in composite adherence by sex that remained significant over time (P<0.0001), but this was confined to patients <75 years. Composite adherence in younger patients (<75 years) increased from 87.1% to 97.7% (+10.6%) and from 83.0% to 95.1% (+12.1%) in the elderly (>or=75 years) over time. CONCLUSIONS: Among hospitals participating in Get With the Guidelines-CAD, guideline adherence has improved substantially over time for both women and men and younger and older CAD patients, with only slight age and sex differences in some measures persisting.

Improved treatment of hospitalized coronary artery disease patients with the get with the guidelines program.

Adherence to evidence-based interventions for hospitalized cardiovascular disease patients is not optimal. This study assesses the impact of a national quality improvement program on adherence to guidelines in these patients. Data from 92 hospitals from across the United States participating in the Get With The Guidelines program for at least 1 year for 11 acute and secondary prevention measures from a preintervention baseline period and the subsequent 4 quarters of a quality improvement intervention were analyzed. A patient group of 45,988 patients with acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina, revascularization, or peripheral vascular disease was included in this evaluation. Significant improvement from baseline was seen in 10 of 11 measures by the fourth quarter: use of early aspirin for acute myocardial infarction, 76.4% to 88.0% (P < 0.0001); early beta-blocker for acute myocardial infarction, 64.4% to 79.5% (P < 0.0001); beta-blocker at discharge, 75% to 82.1% (P < 0.0001); smoking cessation counseling, 58.7% to 74.3% (P < 0.0001); angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor use for acute myocardial infarction, 64.5% to 69.9% (P < 0.0001); lipid treatment, 58.5% to 63.4% (P < 0.0001); lipid treatment for low-density lipoprotein > or =100 mg/dL, 60.4% to 67.0% (P < 0.0001); low-density-lipoprotein measurement, 48.8% to 53.2% (P < 0.0001); discharge blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg, 65.9% to 68.0% (P = 0.03); and referral to cardiac rehabilitation or exercise counseling, 65.0% to 88.3% (P < 0.001). Discharge aspirin use at 89.9% did not change. Statistically and clinically significant improvement in 10 of 11 quality-improvement measures for the treatment of patients hospitalized for cardiovascular disease was seen in hospitals participating in Get With The Guidelines.

Get with the guidelines for cardiovascular secondary prevention: pilot results.

BACKGROUND: The use of Web-based technology and a collaborative model to improve hospital adherence to secondary prevention guidelines has not been previously evaluated. METHODS: Twenty-four hospitals in Massachusetts participated in a collaborative that met quarterly, with didactic and best-practice presentations and interactive multidisciplinary team workshops. A customized tool kit and interactive, Web-based management tool were used for data collection and on-line feedback. Data from 1738 patients admitted with coronary artery disease were collected by hospital staff from July 1, 2000, to June 30, 2001. Outcome measures included differences between baseline and 10- to 12-month follow-up measurements of use of aspirin, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, cholesterol measurement and treatment, smoking cessation counseling, blood pressure control, and cardiac rehabilitation referral. RESULTS: Clinically and statistically significant increases from baseline to 10- to 12-month follow-up were demonstrated in smoking cessation counseling (48% [95% confidence interval [CI], 36.6%-58.4%] to 87% [95% CI, 73.1%-100.7%]), lipid treatment (54% [95% CI, 46.6%-70.2%] to 79% [95% CI, 70.2%-88.3%]), lipid measurement (59% [95% CI, 51.5%-66.0%] to 81% [95% CI, 72.0%-89.5%]), and cardiac rehabilitation referral (34% [95% CI, 25.9%-39.7%] to 73% [95% CI, 63.2%-82.9%]). An improving trend was seen in blood pressure control (60% [95% CI, 55.3%-65.6%] to 68% [95% CI, 60.2%-76.1%]). High baseline use was maintained for use of aspirin, beta-blockers, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a collaborative quality improvement initiative, interactive training of hospital teams with physician champions, and the use of an interactive Web-based Patient Management Tool enhanced adherence to prevention guidelines in hospitalized patients with coronary artery disease.

Using "get with the guidelines" to improve cardiovascular secondary prevention.

BACKGROUND: "Get With The Guidelines (GWTG)" was developed and piloted by the American Heart Association (AHA), New England Affiliate; MassPRO, Inc.; and other organizations to reduce the gap in the application of secondary prevention guidelines in hospitalized cardiovascular disease patients. Collaborative learning programs and technology solutions were created for the project. THE PATIENT MANAGEMENT TOOL (PMT): The interactive Web-based patient management tool (PMT) was developed using quality measures derived from the AHA/American College of Cardiology secondary prevention guidelines. It provided data entry, embedded reminders and guideline summaries, and online reports of quality measure performance, including comparisons with the aggregate performance of all hospitals. LEARNING SESSIONS: Multidisciplinary teams from 24 hospitals participated in the 2000-2001 pilot. Four collaborative learning sessions and monthly conference calls supported team interaction. Best-practices sharing and the use of an Internet tool enabled hospitals to change systems and collect data on 1,738 patients. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS: The GWTG program, a template of learning sessions with didactic presentations, best-practices sharing, and collaborative multidisciplinary team meetings supported by the Internet-based data collection and reporting system, can be extended to multiple regions without requiring additional development. Following the completion of the pilot, the AHA adopted GWTG as a national program.

Translating evidence into practice: pursuing perfection in pneumococcal vaccination in a rural community.

There are many challenges to effectively and efficiently translating evidence into practice. Potential strategies include (1) training more evidence-based practitioners in the art and science of evidence-based medicine, (2) enhancing the quality and availability of systematic reviews, and (3) more effectively linking evidence-based practitioners and evidence users through comprehensive behavioral change initiatives. Herein we explore the third strategy and highlight the key elements of success for a program using behavioral change strategies. We present a clinical model based on clear understanding of the "problem," a systematic approach to diagnosis, selection of scientifically sound treatment options, and effective evaluation with appropriate modification of the treatment plan. A successful program begins with effective team leadership, the expression of a clinically compelling case for change, and commitment to the pursuit of perfection in the delivery of key evidence-based interventions. The team must then diagnose behavioral barriers to change, using a systematic approach based on a published rigorous differential diagnosis framework. This diagnostic step provides the foundation for selection of effective dissemination and implementation strategies (treatments) proven to improve processes of care and clinical outcomes. Finally the team must evaluate progress toward perfection, reviewing interim data and adjusting the treatment regimen to newly diagnosed barriers. We then present a specific project (improving pneumococcal immunization rates in our rural community) and interim results to demonstrate the use of the framework in the real world.

Asthma severity and adequacy of management in accident and emergency departments in France: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Recent guidelines have enabled doctors to establish accident and emergency department management strategies for acute asthma on the basis of severity of exacerbations at presentation. However, there is no available information on acute asthma patients classified according to severity of disease. Our aim was to describe the severity of such exacerbations at presentation, and the adequacy of treatment and management. METHODS: We did a 12-month multicentre cross-sectional observational cohort study in adult patients with acute asthma who attended one of 37 accident and emergency departments in France. The doctors who examined the patients obtained information using a formatted chart. We classified exacerbations according to severity (life-threatening, severe, or mild to moderate), on the basis of clinical findings and peak expiratory flow value, as defined by currently used guidelines. FINDINGS: Of 3772 patients with acute asthma, 975 (26%) had life-threatening attacks, 1834 (49%) had severe exacerbations without life-threatening features, and 963 (26%) had mild to moderate exacerbations. Initial treatment included nebulised b2 agonists, anticholinergics, and systemic corticosteroids in 3492 (93%), 1841 (49%), and 2252 (60%), respectively. According to severity classification, anticholinergics were used in 494 (51%), 913 (50%), and 434 (45%) of patients in life-threatening, severe, and mild to moderate exacerbations groups, respectively; corticosteroids were given in 666 (68%), 1117 (61%), and 468 (49%), respectively. The overall admission rate was 54.2%, and mean stay was 6.1 (SD 6.0) days. Patients were admitted in 747 (77%), 1018 (55%), and 278 (29%) of cases in life-threatening, severe, and mild to moderate groups, respectively. Three patients died in hospital. INTERPRETATION: Acute asthma exacerbations are often life-threatening in patients who attend accident and emergency departments, and management of patients is not ideal, mainly because of underuse of corticosteroids and inappropriate admission rates according to severity.

[Evaluation of plain abdominal radiography prescriptions in a university hospital center]. / Evaluation de la prescription des radiographies de l'abdomen sans préparation dans un centre hospitalier.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prescription, impact and diagnostic utility of plain abdominal radiography in a University Hospital. METHODS: Plain abdominal radiography series performed over 15 consecutive days were evaluated for quality and agreement with the patient's clinical status. Agreement between the final diagnosis and the radiographic findings were also compared. Contribution of plain abdominal radiography to final diagnosis was assessed on the basis of the conclusions on the hospital discharge report or from those drawn from a telephone survey. The same relationship was also assessed in terms of clinician status (medical student, resident physician, senior physician). RESULTS: The series included 175 radiography series (11.6 per day). In 86% of the cases, the choice of views was adapted to the clinical context. In 14% it was not. The quality of the x-rays was found to be unsatisfactory in 17%, good in 63% and excellent in 20%. The radiography was considered to be contributive to the final diagnosis in 13% of the cases and non-contributive in 87%. Clinician status was not correlated with the degree of usefulness for final diagnosis. Finally, the prescription was in agreement with standard guidelines in 28% of the cases and not in agreement in 72%. CONCLUSION: Plain abdominal radiographs are neither sensitive nor specific, frequently misleading, and costly per specific and correct diagnosis. Better physician awareness is required to limit the number of unnecessary examinations.

[Evaluation of radiological medical practice at a hospital during night duty]. / Evaluation de l'activité radiologique de garde dans un centre hospitalier.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the radiological activity during night duty, in a University Hospital. Materials and methods. During 100 days, the radiological activity has been evaluated from examinations requiring radiologist (including US and CT, special X-ray examinations). The urgent nature and the agreement between the suspected disease and the final diagnose have been compared with the level of the clinician (medical student, resident, senior). RESULTS: 981 radiological examinations were performed on an emergency basis. In 39%, the examination was urgent or very urgent and for 61%, little urgent or non-urgent. The level of the clinician was correlated with the degree of emergency evaluated by the radiologist and with the agreement between suspected disease and the final diagnose (p<0. 0001). CONCLUSION: During night duty, the medical activity in radiology is not justified only by emergency, but also by the continuous hospital activities. Better formation of the physician is required to limit the number of examinations.

Can practice guidelines safely reduce hospital length of stay? Results from a multicenter interventional study.

BACKGROUND: Although practice guidelines about appropriate lengths of stay have been widely promulgated, their effects on patient outcomes are not clear. Our objective was to study the effects of length of stay practice guidelines on patient outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective, nonrandomized, interventional trial in six geographically distributed hospitals, among consecutively hospitalized "low-risk" patients with total hip replacement, hip fracture, or knee replacement. Case managers provided physicians with patient risk information based on guideline recommendations. We measured length of stay, compliance with recommended guideline length of stay, health status, hospital readmission rates, return to emergency department, return to work and recreation, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 560 patients were included in the study. For patients with knee replacement, there was a statistically significant increase in practice guideline compliance (27% baseline versus 53% intervention, P <0.0001) and reduction in length of stay (5.2 days versus 4.6 days, P <0.001) when compared with the baseline period. For hip replacement patients, there similarly was an increase in practice guideline compliance (66% baseline versus 82% intervention, P = 0.01) and reduction in length of stay (5.1 days versus 4.8 days, P = 0.03). Significant reductions in length of stay were not observed for patients recovering after hip fracture despite a significant increase in guideline compliance. There were few statistically significant changes in patient outcomes related to reductions in lengths of stay, including health status, hospital readmission rates, return to emergency department, return to work and recreation, and patient satisfaction. For patients undergoing hip replacement, very short lengths of stay (shorter than the guideline recommendation) were associated with an increased rate of discharging patients to nursing homes and rehabilitation facilities (21% versus 7%, P = 0.01), and hip fracture patients with very short lengths of stay required more visits to the doctor after discharge (56% versus 25%, P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Reductions in lengths of stay were most often associated with no significant change in patient outcomes. However, very short lengths of stay were associated with increased intensity of care following discharge for patients undergoing hip surgery, indicating possible cost shifting (the cost incurred by transferring patients to rehabilitation facilities may have been greater than had the patients remained in the acute care hospital for an additional 1 or 2 days and been sent directly home). These results emphasize the importance of monitoring the effects of cost containment and other systematic efforts to change patient care at the local level.

How to use practice guidelines in the intensive care unit: Diagnosis and management of unstable angina.

OBJECTIVE: Practice guidelines are often based on expert opinion, and are sometimes based on research evidence, but are usually a mix of both. The goal of this article is to aid in the evaluation of the validity of practice guidelines. DATA SYNTHESIS: The Agency for Health Care Policy and Research Practice Guideline on Management of Unstable Angina and other relevant primary and synthetic research. METHODS: Critical appraisal of guidelines requires understanding how guideline developers identified, appraised, and summarized the evidence, and how they chose the values reflected in their recommendations. To determine whether guidelines are applicable in our practice, we look for clear and concise recommendations about specific populations, describing common options linked to clinically important outcomes. Guidelines must be considered in light of local skills, culture, and resources, and need to be individualized to different patients and settings. CONCLUSIONS: As better evidence and new clinical insights emerge, guidelines require updating. The ultimate value of a guideline is determined by evaluating its effect on process of care, resource utilization, and most importantly, patient outcomes.

The clinical benefit of in-hospital observation in 'low-risk' pneumonia patients after conversion from parenteral to oral antimicrobial therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the benefit of in-hospital observation in "low-risk" patients with community-acquired pneumonia. DESIGN: Retrospective review of data from a prospective study. SETTING: Teaching community hospital. PATIENTS: We studied 717 consecutive, adult patients admitted to the hospital for pneumonia. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: One hundred forty-five patients were classified at low-risk for complications using previously studied criteria; 144 (99%) charts were available for review. Two patients had "obvious reasons for continued hospitalization" on the day of antibiotic conversion and were excluded. One hundred two patients were observed, and 40 were not observed in-hospital after switch to oral antibiotics. No patient from either group required medical intervention within 24 h after hospital discharge. Five "observed" patients (5%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 2 to 11%) returned to the emergency department, three (3%; 95% CI, 0 to 9%) with respiratory complaints. Two (2%; 95% CI, 0 to 7%) "observed" patients were admitted to the hospital with recurrent pneumonia. One (3%; 95% CI, 0 to 13%) "not observed" patient returned to the emergency department with a nonrespiratory complaint and was not admitted. No patient from either group died within 30-day clinical follow-up. The length of stay for the "observed" and "not observed" groups was 98+/-33 h and 83+/-49 h, respectively. The difference in length of stay was 15 h (95% CI, 3 to 27). CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital observation for low-risk patients admitted with community-acquired pneumonia after switch from parenteral to oral antibiotics is of limited benefit, and elimination of this practice could potentially reduce length of stay by almost 1 day per patient. This could translate into a cost savings of $57,200 for the 22-month study period. These results require prospective validation in a larger study.

The relation between systematic reviews and practice guidelines.

Clinical practice guidelines have been developed to improve the process and outcomes of health care and to optimize resource utilization. By addressing such issues as prevention, diagnosis, and treatment, they can aid in health care decision making at many levels. Several other decision aids are cast in the guideline lexicon, regardless of their focus, formulation, or format; this can foster misunderstanding of the term "guideline." Whether created or adapted locally or nationally, most guidelines are an amalgam of clinical experience, expert opinion, and research evidence. Approaches to practice guideline development vary widely. Given the resources required to identify all relevant primary studies, many guidelines rely on systematic reviews that were either previously published or created de novo by guideline developers. Systematic reviews can aid in guideline development because they involve searching for, selecting, critically appraising, and summarizing the results of primary research. The more rigorous the review methods used and the higher the quality of the primary research that is synthesized, the more evidence-based the practice guideline is likely to be. Summaries of relevant research incorporated into guideline documents can help to keep practitioners up to date with the literature. Systematic reviews have also been published on the dissemination and implementation strategies most likely to change clinician behavior and improve patient outcomes. These can be useful in more effectively translating research evidence into practice.

Peripherally inserted central catheters in general medicine.

OBJECTIVE: To report the success rate and complications associated with peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) and to compare costs between PICCs and centrally inserted central catheters. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We undertook a cohort study of the first 1,000 patients referred to the PICC service of a large tertiary-care, university-affiliated, community hospital. The data were analyzed for insertion success rate, insertion mode, complication rate, successful completion, insertion costs, and applicability of PICCs in "high-risk" groups (transplant, human immunodeficiency virus-infected, intensive-care unit, and pediatric populations). RESULTS: Of 1,000 consecutive PICC attempts, 963 (96.3%) were successful. Cutdown procedures were necessary in 141 insertions (14.6%). Complications of PICC placement occurred in 170 cases (17.7%). Among the major complications were a need for multiple attempts at insertion in 92 cases, malpositioning in 56, mechanical phlebitis in 37, clotting in 37, and bleeding in 5. The rate for completion of therapy was 68.9%. Frequent reasons for early termination were dislodgment (in 85 cases) and infection (in 72-37 confirmed and 35 potential cases). The rate of confirmed infection was 11 per 10,000 catheter days. The costs of PICC insertion were less than those associated with centrally inserted central catheters. CONCLUSIONS: PICCs can satisfy long-term vascular needs and are safe in many patient populations. The infection rate did not depend on insertion mode, lumen number, or patient's immune status. Use of total parenteral nutrition was the most important risk factor in all patient subsets. Cost and safety considerations strongly favor PICCs as alternatives to other vascular access devices.

An evidence-based medicine approach to the diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal complaints.

Evidence-based medicine is an approach to clinical practice and teaching that emphasizes decision-making based on rigorous analysis of clinical research tailored to the individual characteristics of a specific patient. As such, it can be considered the scientifically grounded art of medicine. Through evidence-based guidelines, pathways, and algorithms, the care of populations of patients may also be facilitated by informing individual practitioners of optimal decision-making in specific situations or providing the foundation for comprehensive "disease management" programs. These programs coordinate care for patients with chronic conditions, such as rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis, across time and multiple disciplines. We present an approach to the development of decision-making aids, including guidelines and algorithms, which should be helpful in the care of individual patients and populations for whom physicians and other healthcare practitioners are responsible.

Prospective evaluation of a clinical guideline recommending hospital length of stay in upper gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage.

CONTEXT: Upper gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage (UGIH) is a common and potentially life-threatening disorder. Resource utilization can vary without adverse effect on patient outcome. Clinical practice guidelines are a potential solution to reduce variation in practice while improving patient outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To validate prospectively the safety, acceptability, and impact of a clinical practice guideline defining the medically appropriate length of stay (LOS) for patients hospitalized with UGIH. DESIGN: Prospective, controlled time-series study with an alternate-month design. Outcome surveyors and patients were blinded to study group allocation. GUIDELINE: A retrospectively validated scoring system using 4 independent variables: hemodynamics, time from bleeding, comorbidity, and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) findings to predict risk of adverse events. The quantitative risk for the low-risk subset was 0.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.0%-2.0%) for subsequent complications and 0% (95% CI, 0.0%-0.9%) for life-threatening complications from this retrospective evaluation. SETTING: A 1000-bed, not-for-profit, university-affiliated teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Consecutive adult patients hospitalized for acute UGIH. INTERVENTION: Concurrent feedback of guideline recommendation (same-day hospital discharge) to physicians caring for patients at low risk for complication. No risk information was provided during control months. RESULTS: Seventy percent (209/299) of UGIH patients achieved low-risk status according to the guideline and were therefore potentially suitable for early discharge from the hospital. Providing real-time quantitative risk information (intervention group only) was associated with an increase in guideline compliance from 30% to 70% (P<.001) and a decrease in mean (SD) LOS from 4.6 (3.5) days to 2.9 (1.3) days (mean reduction of 1.7 days per patient; P<.001). No differences in complications, patient health status, or patient satisfaction were found when measured 1 month after discharge. An independent variable predicting decreased hospital LOS for low-risk UGIH patients was early EGD. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the clinical practice guideline safely reduced hospital LOS for selected low-risk patients with acute UGIH. Further prospective validation in other settings is warranted.

Systematic reviews, economic evaluations, and practice guidelines: can research synthesis help us care for the critically ill?

Blending the art and science of medicine in the ICU setting is a growing challenge, given modern technological advances, spiraling healthcare costs, and the need to carefully consider evidence from the biomedical literature in our practice. Rather than keeping up to date with all primary research relevant to critical care, intensivists are increasingly seeking synthetic research to help with their day-to-day decision-making. Synthetic research includes systematic reviews, practice guidelines, and economic evaluations. These publications can address questions of prevention, diagnosis, treatment, rehabilitation, and/or palliation, thereby helping intensivists to integrate the results of sound research at the bedside.