Extrusion of debris after use of rotary nickel-titanium files with different pitch: a pilot study.

The aim of this investigation was to quantitatively compare the amount of debris extruded apically from curved canals when using rotary nickel-titanium files with different pitches and sequences of use under the same preparation technique. Thirty-six extracted human maxillary and mandibular molars with curved root canals were used. They were divided into two groups of 18 teeth each prepared by one of two different sequences with NRT files (MANI Inc., Tochigi, Japan). Each group was further divided into three subgroups according to file pitch length (short, medium and long). The debris extruded apically was collected in glass vials. The liquid inside was dried and the debris in each group was weighed and compared. Two-way analysis of variance and Fisher's PLSD test were used to evaluate differences between the extruded debris weights among the experimental groups. No statistically significant difference was observed between two sequences. There were significant differences in sequence 1 between the short pitch group and the others. Also, there were significant differences between the long pitch and others in sequence 2, except between the short and medium pitches. In conclusion, short pitch design resulted in significantly less amount of debris extrusion compared with the other pitch lengths.

Debris retention and wear in three different nickel-titanium rotary instruments.

The aim of this in vitro study was to compare three nickel-titanium (Ni-Ti) rotary instruments: EndoWave, K3 and ProFile, with respect to their debris retention and wear. Thirty simulated root canal models made from resin blocks with 40 degrees canal curvature were used. They were divided into three groups of 10 samples each; EndoWave, K3 and ProFile were used in Groups A, B and C respectively. They were prepared with four serial size files. The weight of each file was measured to evaluate debris retention and wear at four representative time points: prior to root canal preparation (W1), immediately after root canal preparation (W2), after ultrasonic cleaning (W3), after further additional cleaning (W4). The weight of debris on each file after root canal instrumentation and ultrasonic cleaning was calculated as D1: (W2 - W4) and D2: (W3 - W4) respectively. Also, wear of the file was calculated as WF: (W1 - W4). There was a significant difference in the amount of debris remaining on the file among the three files; EndoWave retained more debris (D1) than K3 and ProFile (P < 0.001, one-way anova). ProFile had the largest amount of debris (D2) remaining after ultrasonic cleaning (P < 0.001). Wear was not detectable in this study. Under the conditions of this study, immediately after root canal preparation, EndoWave retained the largest amount of debris, while ProFile retained the most debris even after ultrasonic cleaning.