Low carotid calcium score is associated with higher levels of glycosaminoglycans, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and parathyroid hormone in human carotid plaques.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Computed tomography (CT) is used to study coronary artery plaques, but little is known about its potential to characterize plaque composition. This study assesses the relation between carotid calcium score (CCS) by CT and plaque composition, namely extracellular matrix, inflammatory mediators, and calcium metabolites. METHODS: Thirty patients with significant carotid stenosis underwent preoperative CT. CCS was quantified by Agaston calcium score. Plaque components were studied histologically and biochemically (collagen, elastin, and glycosaminoglycans). Fraktalkine, interferon-γ, interleukin-10, interleukin-12 p70, interleukin-1ß, interleukin-6, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, platelet-derived growth factor-AB/BB, RANTES and tumor necrosis factor-α, and parathyroid hormone were measured using Luminex technology. RESULTS: Plaques with CCS ≥400 had more calcium (P=0.012), less glycosaminoglycan (P=0.002), tumor necrosis factor-α (P=0.013), and parathyroid hormone (P=0.028) than those with CCS <400. CCS correlated with plaque content of calcium (r=0.62; P<0.001) and inversely with glycosaminoglycan (r=-0.49; P=0.006) and tumor necrosis factor-α (r=-0.56; P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Human carotid plaques with high CCS are richer in calcium and have lower amounts of glycosaminoglycan, parathyroid hormone, and tumor necrosis factor-α, which is one of the main proinflammatory cytokines involved in atherosclerosis. This suggests that CCS not only reflects the degree of calcification, but also other important biological components relevant for stability such as inflammation.

Iodine contrast iso-attenuating with diagnostic gadolinium doses in CTA and angiography results in ultra-low iodine doses. A way to avoid both CIN and NSF in azotemic patients?

OBJECTIVES: To establish iodine (I) contrast medium (CM) doses iso-attenuating with gadolinium (Gd) CM doses regarded diagnostic in CTA and percutaneous catheter-angiography/vascular interventions (PCA/PVI) in azotemic patients. METHODS: CT Hounsfield units (HU) were measured in 20-mL syringes containing 0.01/0.02,/0.05/0.1 mmol/mL of iodine or gadolinium atoms and placed in phantoms. Relative contrast were measured in 20-mL syringes filled with iohexol at 35/50/70/90/110/140 mg I/mL and 0.5 M gadodiamide using radiofluoroscopy (RF), digital radiography (DX) and x-ray angiography (XA) systems. Clinical doses of Gd-CM at CTA/PCA/PVI were reviewed. RESULTS: At CT 91-116 and 104-125 mg I/mL in the chest and abdominal phantoms, respectively, were iso-attenuating with 0.5 M Gd at 80-140 kVp. At RF/DX/XA systems 35-90 mg I/mL were iso-attenuating with 0.5 M gadodiamide at 60-115 kVp. Clinically, 60 mL 91-125 mg I/mL (5.5-7.5 gram-iodine) at 80-140 kVp CTA and 60 mL of 35-90 mg I/mL (2.1-5.4 gram-iodine) at 60-115 kVp PCA/PVI would be iso-attenuating with 60 mL 0.5 M Gd-CM (=0.4 mmol Gd/kg in a 75-kg person). CONCLUSIONS: Meticulous examination technique and judicious use of ultra-low I-CM doses iso-attenuating with diagnostic Gd-CM doses in CTA and PCA/PVI may minimise the risk of nephrotoxicity in azotemic patients, while there is no risk of NSF.

Iodixanol 320 results in better renal tolerance and radiodensity than do gadolinium-based contrast media: arteriography in ischemic porcine kidneys.

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare nephrotoxicity and radiodensity of plasma hyperosmotic gadolinium chelates (attenuation-osmotic ratio of 1:1) with those of plasma iso-osmotic iodine-based contrast media (attenuation-osmotic ratio of 3:1 or 6:1) after renal arteriography in ischemic porcine kidneys. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The local animal care committee approved this study. The following contrast media were used: (a) iodixanol (150 mg of iodine per milliliter and 320 mg I/mL, 0.29 osm/kg H(2)O), (b) iopromide (150 mg I/mL, 0.34 osm/kg), (c) 0.5 mol/L gadodiamide (0.78 osm/kg), and (d) 1.0 mol/L gadobutrol (1.6 osm/kg). After left-sided nephrectomy, contrast media (3 mL per kilogram of body weight) were injected (20 mL/min) in a noncrossover design into the right renal artery of pigs during a 10-minute ischemic period. There were eight pigs in each group and one group for each contrast medium. We compared histomorphology, radiographic contrast medium excretion, subjective radiodensity of nephrograms (70 kVp) at the end of injection, and contrast medium plasma half-life elimination times 1-3 hours after injection. Longer elimination times resulted in lower glomerular filtration rates. RESULTS: Gadobutrol caused extensive tubular necrosis and moderate glomerular necrosis; gadodiamide and iopromide, minimal to mild tubular necrosis; and iodixanol, no necrosis. Gadobutrol was the only contrast medium to show no sign of excretion, and its plasma half-life elimination time (median, 1103 minutes; P < .001) was significantly longer than that of other contrast agents. Gadodiamide had a significantly longer plasma half-life elimination time (median, 209 minutes; P = .01) than did iodine-based contrast media (median, 136-142 minutes). The 320 mg I/mL dose of iodixanol had the highest radiodensity, whereas gadodiamide had the lowest radiodensity. The radiodensity of the 320 mg I/mL dose of iodixanol was greater than that of the 150 mg I/mL dose of iodixanol, which was equal to the radiodensities of the 150 mg I/mL dose of iopromide and 1.0 mol/L gadobutrol, which in turn were greater than that of 0.5 mol/L gadodiamide. CONCLUSION: Plasma iso-osmotic iodine-based contrast media used at commercially available concentrations have superior attenuation and nephrotoxic profiles compared with equal volumes of hyperosmotic nonionic 0.5-1.0 mol/L gadolinium-based contrast media when performing renal arteriographic procedures.

Gadolinium contrast media are more nephrotoxic than iodine media. The importance of osmolality in direct renal artery injections.

A study was undertaken of the role of osmotoxicity in gadolinium (Gd) and iodine contrast media (CM) nephrotoxicity in ischemic porcine kidneys. Test solutions: mannitol iso-osmotic to 0.5 M: gadopentetate (1.96 Osm/kg H2O), 0.5 M: gadodiamide (0.78 Osm/kg H2O) and 0.5 M: iohexol (190 mg I/ml, 0.42 Osm/kg H2O). Each solution was injected [3 ml/kg body weight (BW)] into the balloon-occluded (10 min) renal artery of eight left-sided nephrectomized pigs. The plasma half-life of a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) marker was used to compare their effects on GFR 1-3 h post-injection. The median half-lives of the GFR marker after injection of gadopentetate (1,730 min) and mannitol 1.96 Osm/kg H2O (2,782 min) did not differ statistically (P = 0.28), but were significantly longer than after all other solutions (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference (P = 0.06) between gadodiamide (218 min) and mannitol 0.82 Osm/kg H2O (169 min), while there was (P = 0.03) between iohexol (181 min) and mannitol 0.43 Osm/kg H2O (148 min). The difference between gadodiamide and iohexol was significant (P = 0.01). Reduction in GFR, as a marker of nephrotoxicity, induced by gadopentetate correlated with its high osmolality, while the effect of gadodiamide and iohexol may include chemotoxicity. Iohexol molecules were less nephrotoxic than the Gd-CM molecules and contain three-times the number of attenuating atoms per molecule.

Gadolinium contrast media are more nephrotoxic than a low osmolar iodine medium employing doses with equal X-ray attenuation in renal arteriography: an experimental study in pigs.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To investigate in a unilaterally nephrectomized porcine model whether gadolinium contrast media (Gd-CM) are less nephrotoxic than iodine media (I-CM) in x-ray arteriography of a kidney made temporarily ischemic by arterial balloon occlusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a noncrossover design, 3 mL of each test solution were injected in eight pigs (mean weight 19 kg) at a rate of 20 mL/min into the right renal artery at the start of a 10-minute period of ischemia. In group 1 (40 pigs) we injected 0.5 M gadopentetate, 0.5 M gadodiamide, 0.5 M iohexol (190 mg I/mL), 0.18 M iohexol (70 mg I/mL; with an x-ray attenuation equal to that of 0.5 M Gd-CM at 80 kV), and saline. In group 2 (24 pigs), we tested 0.18 M iohexol with ischemia and saline with and without ischemia. Gd- and iodine contrast media functioned as markers of glomerular filtration rate (GFR). When saline was tested, a low dose of iohexol (3 mL per pig; 300 mg I/mL) was injected as GFR marker intravenously in group 1 and into the renal artery in group 2. The plasma half-life elimination times of the CM 1-3 hours after injection were used to compare the effects of the different test solutions on GFR. Longer half-life means lower GFR. RESULTS: Group 1: median plasma half-life elimination time of the GFR marker was 3 340 minutes after injection of 0.5 M gadopentetate, 256 after 0.5 M gadodiamide, 179 after 0.5 M iohexol, 143 after 0.18 M iohexol, and 133 minutes after saline. All differences except that between 0.18 M iohexol and saline were statistically significant (P < .01). Group 2: median plasma half-life was 174 minutes after 0.18 M iohexol with ischemia, 196 minutes after saline with ischemia, and 195 minutes after saline without ischemia. There were no significant differences between the test solutions in group 2 (P > .05). CONCLUSION: In pigs, 0.5 M Gd-CM were more nephrotoxic than both equal-attenuating (70 mg I/mL) and equimolar (190 mg I/mL) concentrations of the I-CM iohexol. These results do not support the "off-label" use of Gd-CM for renal x-ray arteriography in man instead of commercially available concentrations of iodine contrast media at 140, 150 and 180 mg I/mL or diluted to 70 mg I/mL.

Are gadolinium-based contrast media really safer than iodinated media for digital subtraction angiography in patients with azotemia?

Gadolinium chelates, intended as intravenous contrast media for magnetic resonance imaging, have been regarded as nonnephrotoxic and recommended to replace iodinated contrast media in patients with azotemia who are undergoing digital subtraction angiography (DSA). High intraarterial doses (up to 220 mmol of gadodiamide) have been used, with a 40% incidence of nephropathy. The authors discourage the use of gadolinium for DSA for several reasons. (a) There exist no randomized studies comparing the nephrotoxic effects of gadolinium-based and iodinated media at equal-attenuating concentrations and doses. (b) Gadolinium-based media are hypertonic, a pathogenetic factor in contrast medium-induced nephropathy after renal angiography, with an osmolality two to seven times that of plasma. Iodinated media in concentrations that are equally attenuating with gadolinium-based media can be made isotonic. (c) In vitro measurements indicate that 0.5 mol/L gadolinium chelates are equally attenuating with 60-80 mg iodine per milliliter at the commonly used 70-90-kV range used for DSA. Thus, 50 mL of 0.5 mol/L gadolinium chelate ( approximately 0.3 mmol/kg in an 80-kg person) would be equally attenuating with a dose of 3-4 g of iodine in an iodinated medium (eg, 50 mL iohexol at 60-80 mg I/mL or 10-13 mL at 300 mg I/mL). (d) By combining these data on attenuation and results of toxicity studies in mice, the general toxicity of gadolinium chelates may be six to 25 times higher than that of equal-attenuating doses of iodinated media at 70-kV DSA. Thus, the authors believe that at equal-attenuating doses for DSA, modern iodinated contrast media should result in a lower toxic load on the body than with presently available gadolinium chelates.