Second-generation Langerhans cells originating from epidermal precursors are essential for CD8+ T cell priming.

In vivo studies questioned the ability of Langerhans cells (LCs) to mediate CD8(+) T cell priming. To address this issue, we used intradermal immunization with plasmid DNA, a system in which activation of CD8(+) T cells depends on delayed kinetics of Ag presentation. We found that dendritic cells (DCs) located in the skin at the time of immunization have limited ability to activate CD8(+) T cells. This activity was mediated by a second generation of DCs that differentiated in the skin several days after immunization, as well as by lymph node-resident DCs. Intriguingly, CD8(+) T cell responses were not affected following treatment with clodronate liposomes, immunization of CCR2(-/-) mice, or local neutralization of CCL20. This suggests that local, rather than blood-derived, DC precursors mediate CD8(+) T cell priming. Analysis of DC differentiation in the immunized skin revealed a gradual increase in the number of CD11c(+) cells, which reached their maximum 2 wk after immunization. A similar differentiation kinetics was observed for LCs, with the majority of differentiating LCs proliferating in situ from epidermal precursors. By using B6/Langerin-diphtheria toxin receptor chimeric mice and LC ablation, we demonstrated that epidermal LCs were crucial for the elicitation of CD8(+) T cell responses in vivo. Furthermore, LCs isolated from lymph nodes 2 wk after immunization contained the immunization plasmid and directly activated Ag-specific CD8(+) T cells ex vivo. Thus, these results indicate that second-generation Ag-expressing LCs differentiating from epidermal precursors directly prime CD8(+) T cells and are essential for optimal cellular immune responses following immunization with plasmid DNA.

Diminished Memory T-Cell Expansion Due to Delayed Kinetics of Antigen Expression by Lentivectors.

Memory CD8(+) T lymphocytes play a central role in protective immunity. In attempt to increase the frequencies of memory CD8(+) T cells, repeated immunizations with viral vectors are regularly explored. Lentivectors have emerged as a powerful vaccine modality with relatively low pre-existing and anti-vector immunity, thus, thought to be ideal for boosting memory T cells. Nevertheless, we found that lentivectors elicited diminished secondary T-cell responses that did not exceed those obtained by priming. This was not due to the presence of anti-vector immunity, as limited secondary responses were also observed following heterologous prime-boost immunizations. By dissecting the mechanisms involved in this process, we demonstrate that lentivectors trigger exceptionally slow kinetics of antigen expression, while optimal activation of lentivector-induced T cells relays on durable expression of the antigen. These qualities hamper secondary responses, since lentivector-encoded antigen is rapidly cleared by primary cytotoxic T cells that limit its presentation by dendritic cells. Indeed, blocking antigen clearance by cytotoxic T cells via FTY720 treatment, fully restored antigen presentation. Taken together, while low antigen expression is expected during secondary immunization with any vaccine vector, our results reveal that the intrinsic delayed expression kinetics of lentiviral-encoded antigen, further dampens secondary CD8(+) T-cell expansion.

Tumor necrosis factor-α blocks differentiation and enhances suppressive activity of immature myeloid cells during chronic inflammation.

Elevated concentrations of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) are detected in pathologies characterized by chronic inflammation. Whether TNF-α plays a role in manipulating the host's immune system toward generating an immunosuppressive milieu, typical of ongoing chronic inflammation, is unclear. Here we showed that TNF-α exhibited a dual function during chronic inflammation: arresting differentiation of immature myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) primarily via the S100A8 and S100A9 inflammatory proteins and their corresponding receptor (RAGE) and augmenting MDSC suppressive activity. These functions led to in vivo T and NK cell dysfunction accompanied by T cell antigen receptor ζ chain downregulation. Furthermore, administration of etanercept (TNF-α antagonist) during early chronic inflammatory stages reduced MDSCs' suppressive activity and enhanced their maturation into dendritic cells and macrophages, resulting in the restoration of in vivo immune functions and recovery of ζ chain expression. Thus, TNF has a fundamental role in promoting an immunosuppressive environment generated during chronic inflammation.

Langerhans cells down-regulate inflammation-driven alveolar bone loss.

Excessive bone resorption is frequently associated with chronic infections and inflammatory diseases. Whereas T cells were demonstrated to facilitate osteoclastogenesis in such diseases, the role of dendritic cells, the most potent activators of naive T cells, remains unclear. Using a model involving inflammation-driven alveolar bone loss attributable to infection, we showed that in vivo ablation of Langerhans cells (LCs) resulted in enhanced bone loss. An increased infiltration of B and T lymphocytes into the tissue surrounding the bone was observed in LC-ablated mice, including receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL)-expressing CD4(+) T cells with known capabilities of altering bone homeostasis. In addition, the absence of LCs significantly reduced the numbers of CD4(+)Foxp3(+) T-regulatory cells in the tissue. Further investigation revealed that LCs were not directly involved in presenting antigens to T cells. Nevertheless, despite their low numbers in the tissue, the absence of LCs resulted in an elevated activation of CD4(+) but not CD8(+) T cells. This activation involved elevated production of IFN-γ but not IL-17 or IL-10 cytokines. Our data, thus, reveal a protective immunoregulatory role for LCs in inflammation-induced alveolar bone resorption, by inhibiting IFN-γ secretion and excessive activation of RANKL(+)CD4(+) T cells with a capability of promoting osteoclastogenesis.

Intradermal naked plasmid DNA immunization: mechanisms of action.

Plasmid DNA is a promising vaccine modality that is regularly examined in prime-boost immunization regimens. Recent advances in skin immunity increased our understanding of the sophisticated cutaneous immune network, which revived scientific interest in delivering vaccines to the skin. Intradermal administration of plasmid DNA via needle injection is a simple and inexpensive procedure that exposes the plasmid and its encoded antigen to the dermal immune surveillance system. This triggers unique mechanisms for eliciting local and systemic immunity that can confer protection against pathogens and tumors. Understanding the mechanisms of intradermal plasmid DNA immunization is essential for enhancing and modulating its immunogenicity. With regard to vaccination, this is of greater importance as this routine injection technique is highly desirable for worldwide immunization. This article will focus on the current understanding of the mechanisms involved in antigen expression and presentation during primary and secondary syringe and needle intradermal plasmid DNA immunization.

Dendritic cells in distinct oral mucosal tissues engage different mechanisms to prime CD8+ T cells.

Although oral dendritic cells (DCs) were shown to induce cell-mediated immunity, the identity and function of the various oral DC subsets involved in this process is unclear. In this study, we examined the mechanisms used by DCs of the buccal mucosa and of the lining mucosa to elicit immunity. After plasmid DNA immunization, buccally immunized mice generated robust local and systemic CD8(+) T cell responses, whereas lower responses were seen by lining immunization. A delayed Ag presentation was monitored in vivo in both groups; yet, a more efficient presentation was mediated by buccal-derived DCs. Restricting transgene expression to CD11c(+) cells resulted in diminished CD8(+) T cell responses in both oral tissues, suggesting that immune induction is mediated mainly by cross-presentation. We then identified, in addition to the previously characterized Langerhans cells (LCs) and interstitial dendritic cells (iDCs), a third DC subset expressing the CD103(+) molecule, which represents an uncharacterized subset of oral iDCs expressing the langerin receptor (Ln(+)iDCs). Using Langerin-DTR mice, we demonstrated that whereas LCs and Ln(+)iDCs were dispensable for T cell induction in lining-immunized mice, LCs were essential for optimal CD8(+) T cell priming in the buccal mucosa. Buccal LCs, however, failed to directly present Ag to CD8(+) T cells, an activity that was mediated by buccal iDCs and Ln(+)iDCs. Taken together, our findings suggest that the mechanisms engaged by oral DCs to prime T cells vary between oral mucosal tissues, thus emphasizing the complexity of the oral immune network. Furthermore, we found a novel regulatory role for buccal LCs in potentiating CD8(+) T cell responses.

Directly transfected langerin+ dermal dendritic cells potentiate CD8+ T cell responses following intradermal plasmid DNA immunization.

Dendritic cells (DCs) play a critical role in CD8(+) T cell priming following DNA vaccination. In contrast to other DNA injection routes or immunization with viral vectors, Ag presentation is delayed following needle injection of plasmid DNA into the skin. The contribution of various skin DC subsets to this process is not known. In this study, we show that dermal CD11c(+) cells are the most important transgene-expressing cells following immunization. Using langerin- diphtheria toxin receptor mice we demonstrated that langerin(+) dermal DCs (Ln(+) dDCs) were crucial for generating an optimal CD8(+) T cell response. Blocking migration of skin cells to the lymph node (LN) ablated immunogenicity, suggesting that migration of dDC subsets to the LN is essential for generating immunity. This migration generated a weak Ag-presenting activity in vivo until day 5 postimmunization, which then increased dramatically. We further found that Ln(+) dDCs and dDCs were the only DC populations directly presenting Ag to CD8(+) T cells ex vivo during the initial 8-d period postimmunization. This activity changed on the following days, when both skin DCs and LN-resident DCs were able to present Ag to CD8(+) T cells. Taken together, our in vivo and ex vivo results suggest that activation of CD8(+) T cells following intradermal plasmid DNA immunization depends on directly transfected Ln(+)dDCs and dDCs. Moreover, the type of DCs presenting Ag changed over time, with Ln(+)dDCs playing the major role in potentiating the initial CD8(+) T cell response.

The role of skin-derived dendritic cells in CD8+ T cell priming following immunization with lentivectors.

Although skin dendritic cells (DCs) have been shown to directly present Ag to CD8(+) T cells after intradermal immunization with lentivectors, the contribution of the different skin DC subsets to this process remains unclear. Using langerin-diphtheria toxin receptor transgenic mice we demonstrated that ablation of langerhans cells and langerin-expressing positive dermal DCs (Ln(+)dDCs) did not interfere with the generation of CD8(+) T cells by lentiviral vectors. Consistent with these findings, the absence of langerhans cells and Ln(+)dDCs did not hamper the presentation level of lentiviral-derived Ag by skin DCs in vitro. We further demonstrated that only dDCs and Ln(+)dDCs were capable of presenting Ag, however, the number of dDCs migrating to the draining lymph nodes was 6-fold higher than that of Ln(+)dDCs. To study how the duration of DC migration influences CD8(+) T cell responses, we analyzed the kinetics of Ag expression at the injection site and manipulated DC migration by excising the injected skin at various times after immunization. A low level of Ag expression was seen 1 wk after the immunization; peaked during week 2, and was considerably cleared by week 3 via a perforin-dependent fas-independent mechanism. Removing the injection site 3 or 5 d, but not 10 d, after the immunization, resulted in a reduced CD8(+) T cell response. These findings suggest that dDCs are the main APCs active after intradermal lentiviral-mediated immunization, and migration of dDCs in the initial 10-d period postimmunization is required for optimal CD8(+) T cell induction.

X4 human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp120 down-modulates expression and immunogenicity of codelivered antigens.

In order to increase the immune breadth of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) vaccines, strategies such as immunization with several HIV antigens or centralized immunogens have been examined. HIV-1 gp120 protein is a major immunogen of HIV and has been routinely considered for inclusion in both present and future AIDS vaccines. However, recent studies proposed that gp120 interferes with the generation of immune response to codelivered antigens. Here, we investigate whether coimmunization with plasmid-encoded gp120 alters the immune response to other coadministered plasmid encoded antigens such as luciferase or ovalbumin in a mouse model. We found that the presence of gp120 leads to a significant reduction in the expression level of the codelivered antigen in vivo. Antigen presentation by antigen-presenting cells was also reduced and resulted in the induction of weak antigen-specific cellular and humoral immune responses. Importantly, gp120-mediated immune interference was observed after administration of the plasmids at the same or at distinct locations. To characterize the region in gp120 mediating these effects, we used plasmid constructs encoding gp120 that lacks the V1V2 loops (DeltaV1V2) or the V3 loop (DeltaV3). After immunization, the DeltaV1V2, but not the DeltaV3 construct, was able to reduce antigen expression, antigen presentation, and subsequently the immunogenicity of the codelivered antigen. The V3 loop dependence of this phenomenon seems to be limited to V3 loops known to interact with the CXCR4 molecule but not with CCR5. Our study presents a novel mechanism by which HIV-1 gp120 interferes with the immune response against coadministered antigen in a polyvalent vaccine preparation.

A matter of timing: unsynchronized antigen expression and antigen presentation diminish secondary T cell responses.

Despite the low and short expression of secondary Ag, prime-boost immunizations using homologous or heterologous vectors are capable of amplifying memory CD8(+) T cells. This is mainly attributed to the rapid presentation of Ag by APCs and the high proliferative capacity of memory CD8(+) T cells. Nevertheless, certain viruses and vectors often require prolonged Ag presentation for optimal T cell priming, and the influence of such a prolonged presentation during secondary immune induction is not clear. To address this issue, we primed and boosted mice intradermally (i.d.) with plasmid DNA that was recently reported to require prolonged Ag presentation for maximal CD8(+) T cell priming. Although functional memory CD8(+) T cells were present in the mice after i.d. priming, the secondary CD8(+) T cell response elicited was limited and reached a similar level of that observed during priming. The initial levels of secondary Ag expressed in the boosted mice were sufficient to prime CD8(+) T cell response in naive hosts, suggesting that lower Ag load alone does not explain the limited secondary immune responses observed. Removal of the injection site 5 or 10 days after i.d. boosting immunization resulted in diminished Ag presentation and no expansion of memory CD8(+) T cells. In fact, Ag-presenting activity following boost occurred mainly two weeks postimmunization, a time when the Ag was no longer expressed in situ. These findings suggest that when the boosting vector triggers prolonged Ag presentation, the lack of synchronicity between Ag accessibility and Ag presentation limits secondary immune responses.