Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Heliyon ; 6(6): e04264, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32613126

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Most stroke care expenses are inhospital costs. Given the previously reported inaccuracy of conventional costing, the purpose of this study was to provide an accurate analysis of inpatient costs of stroke care in an acute care hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used activity-based costing (ABC) for calculating the costs of ischemic stroke patients. We collected the activity data at the Helsinki University Central Hospital. Persons involved in patient care logged their activities on survey forms for one week. The costs of activities were calculated based on information about salaries, material prices, and other costs obtained from hospital accounting data. We calculated costs per inpatient days and episodes, analyzed cost structure, made a distinction in cost for stroke subtypes according to the Oxford and TOAST classification schemes, and compared cost per inpatient episode with the diagnoses-related group (DRG) -price of the hospital. RESULTS: The sample comprised 196 inpatient days of 41 patients. By using the ABC, the mean and median costs of an inpatient day were 346 € and 268 €, and of an inpatient episode 3322 € and 2573 €, respectively. Average costs differed considerably by stroke subtype. The first inpatient day was the most expensive. Working time costs comprised 63% of the average inpatient day cost, with nursing constituting the largest proportion. The mean cost of an inpatient episode was 21% lower with ABC than with DRG pricing. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that there are differences in cost estimates depending on the methods used. ABC revealed differences among patients having the same diagnosis. The cost of an episode was lower than the DRG price of the hospital. Choosing an optimal costing method is essential for both reimbursements of hospitals and health policy decision-making.

2.
Swed Dent J ; 40(1): 21-32, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27464379

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to compare treatment provided to adult heavy and low users of dental services in the Finnish Public Dental Service (PDS) and to analyse changes in patients' oral health status. We assigned all adults who attended the PDS in Espoo in 2004 to a group of heavy users (n = 3,173) if they had made six or more dental visits and to a comparison group of low users (n = 22,820), if they had made three or fewer dental visits. Data were obtained from the patient register of the PDS. A sample of 320 patients was randomly selected from each group. Baseline information (year 2004) on age, sex, number and types of visits, oral health status and treatment provided was collected from treatment records. Both groups were followed-up for five years. Restorative treatment measures dominated the heavy and low users'treatments; 88.8% of heavy users and 79.6% low users had received restorations during the five-year period. Fixed prosthetic treatments were provided to just 2% of the heavy users and 0.8% of the low users. Emergency visits were more common for heavy users (74.8%) than for low users (21.6%) (p < 0.001). Fewer than half of the heavy (46.1%) or low (46.5%) users were examined twice. Typical for heavy use of oral health services was a cycle of repetitive repair or replacement of restorations, often as emergency treatment, a lack of proper examinations and preventive care; crown therapy was seldom used. Immediately after the major dental care reform in Finland, the PDS in Espoo had problems providing good quality dental care for the new adult patients. Older patients with lower social class background were not accustomed to regular dental care and the PDS did not actively propose proper comprehensive regular care for adults.


Subject(s)
Dental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Emergencies , Female , Finland/epidemiology , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Medical Overuse/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Oral Health
3.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 14: 26, 2014 Jan 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24444378

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In Finland diabetologists have long been concerned about the level of diabetes care as the incidence of type 1 diabetes and complicated type 2 diabetes is exceeding the capacity of specialist clinics. We compared the outcome of diabetes care in two middle-sized Finnish municipalities with different models of diabetes care organisation in public primary health care. In Kouvola the primary health care of all diabetic patients is based on general practitioners, whereas in Nurmijärvi the follow-up of type 1 and most complicated type 2 diabetic patients is assigned to a general practitioner specialised in diabetes care. METHODS: Our study population consisted of all adult diabetic patients living in the municipalities under review.We compared the use and costs of public diabetes care, glycemic control, blood pressure, LDL-cholesterol level, the application of the national guidelines and patient satisfaction. The main outcome measures were the costs and use of health care services due to diabetes and its complications. RESULTS: In Nurmijärvi, where diabetes care was centralised, more type 1 diabetic patients were followed up in primary health care than in Kouvola, where general practitioners need more specialist consultations. The centralisation resulted in cost savings in the diabetes care of type 1 diabetic patients. Although the quality of care was similar, type 1 diabetic patients were more satisfied with their follow-up in the centralised system. In the care of type 2 diabetic patients the centralised system required fewer specialist consultations, but the quality and costs were similar in both models. CONCLUSIONS: The follow-up of most diabetic patients - including type 1 diabetes - can be organised in primary health care with the same quality as in secondary care units. The centralised primary care of type 1 diabetes is less costly and requires fewer specialist consultations.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Quality of Health Care , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Delivery of Health Care/economics , Delivery of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Diabetes Complications/epidemiology , Diabetes Complications/prevention & control , Diabetes Mellitus/economics , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/economics , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/economics , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Finland/epidemiology , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Middle Aged , Models, Organizational , Primary Health Care/economics , Primary Health Care/standards , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
4.
BMC Oral Health ; 13: 18, 2013 Apr 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23617730

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A reform to Dental Care legislation in 2002 abolished age limits restricting adults' use of public dental services in Finland. In the Public Dental Service (PDS) unit of Espoo, the proportion of adult patients rose from 36% to 57%. The aim of this study was to investigate heavy use of dental services by adults and its determinants. METHODS: A longitudinal cohort study was undertaken based on a PDS patient register. Of all adults who attended the PDS in Espoo in 2004, those who had six or more visits (n=3,173) were assigned to the heavy user group and a comparison group of low users (n=22,820) had three or fewer dental visits. A sample of 320 patients was randomly selected from each group. Baseline information (year 2004) on age, sex, number and type of visit, oral health status and treatment provided was collected from treatment records. Each group was followed-up for five years and information on the number and types of visit was recorded for each year from 2005 to 2009. RESULTS: Most heavy users (61.6%) became low users and only 11.2% remained chronic heavy users. Most low users (91.0%) remained low users. For heavy users, the mean number of dental visits per year (3.0) during the follow-up period was significantly lower than initially in 2004 (8.3) (p<0.001) but 74.8% of heavy users had had emergency visits compared with 21.6% of the low users (p<0.001).A third (33%) of the visitors in each group had no proper examination and treatment planning during the 5-year follow-up period and two or more examinations were provided to fewer than half of the heavy (46.1%) or low (46.5%) users.The mean number of treating dentists was 5.7 for heavy users and 3.8 for low users (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Frequent emergency visits were characteristic of heavy users of dental services. Treatment planning was inadequate, probably partly due to the many dentists involved and too many patients requesting care. Better local management and continuous education are needed to ensure good quality adult dental care and to reduce heavy consumption.


Subject(s)
Dental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Age Factors , Chi-Square Distribution , Dentists/statistics & numerical data , Female , Finland , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Logistic Models , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Social Class , Statistics, Nonparametric
5.
Clin Oral Investig ; 16(2): 571-80, 2012 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21340603

ABSTRACT

The aim of our study was to investigate how teenage smoking affects the prevalence of periodontal bacteria and periodontal health with the hypothesis that smoking increases the prevalence of the bacteria. Oral health of 264 adolescents (15- to 16-year-olds) was clinically examined, and their smoking history was recorded. The participants also filled in a structured questionnaire recording their general health and health habits. Pooled subgingival plaque samples were taken for polymerase chain reaction analysis of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Tannerella forsythia, Prevotella intermedia, Prevotella nigrescens, and Treponema denticola. The prevalence of P. intermedia (21% vs. 4%, p = 0.01) and T. forsythia and T. denticola (23% vs. 8%, p < 0.05, for both) was higher among female smokers than among non-smokers. T. forsythia and T. denticola were more often associated with bleeding on probing (29% vs. 12%; 25% vs. 10%, respectively) and deep pockets (25% vs. 15%; 23% vs. 10%, respectively) with smokers than non-smokers. Among the girls, a significant association was found between pack-years and the prevalence of P. nigrescens (p < 0.007). In both genders, A. actinomycetemcomitans and P. gingivalis were rare in this study. To conclude, periodontal bacteria were associated with higher periodontal index scores among all teenage smokers. Smoking girls harbored more frequently certain periodontal bacteria than non-smokers, but this was not seen in boys. Hence, our study hypothesis was only partly confirmed.


Subject(s)
Gram-Negative Bacteria/isolation & purification , Periodontal Diseases/microbiology , Smoking , Adolescent , Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans/isolation & purification , Bacterial Load , Bacteroides/isolation & purification , Cohort Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dental Calculus/microbiology , Dental Plaque/microbiology , Female , Gingival Hemorrhage/microbiology , Health Behavior , Health Status , Humans , Male , Oral Health , Periodontal Attachment Loss/microbiology , Periodontal Pocket/microbiology , Periodontitis/microbiology , Porphyromonas gingivalis/isolation & purification , Prevotella intermedia/isolation & purification , Prevotella nigrescens/isolation & purification , Sex Factors , Toothbrushing , Treponema denticola/isolation & purification
6.
Inform Prim Care ; 19(1): 25-32, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22118333

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The volume of emails is rising rapidly everywhere. However, there is no data available concerning how primary healthcare physicians feel about the use of email communication between themselves, with their managers and with other people contacting them. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to find out what the attitudes of primary care physicians are towards email at work. METHODS: The use of email was studied among a convenience sample of primary healthcare physicians. RESULTS: Physicians thought that email was a good instrument for delivering information but not as an instrument for leadership. Physicians in lead positions thought more often than ordinary general practitioners (GPs) that email is good for information. The leaders used email more actively than other GPs. The contents of the emails received by the GPs differed depending on the site of work. The total number of emails was higher in urban areas than in rural areas. Emails relating to administration, educational information and meeting materials were more often sent in rural than in urban primary healthcare settings. Information about daily work arrangements and about social events were more frequently emailed in urban than in rural surroundings. Email was considered important for information inside the system but a somewhat difficult tool for discussing complicated subjects. Generally, it was agreed that there was some unimportant information filtering through this medium to the target GPs. GPs were uncertain whether important data reached everybody who needed it or not. Still, almost everybody used the email system regularly and the use of it was considered relatively easy. GPs were generally prone to adopt advice and instructions given via email and implemented those in their working routines. The use of the email system was related to technical ability to use the system. The easier the GP thought that the email system was the more he used it. Rural GPs were more critical in applying advice shared via email than their counterparts in urban areas. In general, physicians thought that email was a good method for reaching many people at the same time. However, the main points of the messages may be missed and the whole email may sometimes not be read. CONCLUSION: Especially during periods of change in the workplace, it is very important that management is conducted personally. Care must be taken so that disinformation does not spoil the informative value of email in the administration of primary health care. The needed technical assistance should be given to everyone in order to get the best advantage from the use of the email system.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Electronic Mail , General Practitioners/psychology , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Communication , Finland , Health Education , Humans , Practice Management , Residence Characteristics
7.
Scand J Prim Health Care ; 29(3): 165-70, 2011 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21675825

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To study one-year incidence and risk factors of severe hypoglycaemias (SH) in adult drug-treated diabetic patients living in two Finnish communities. DESIGN: The episodes of SH and their risk factors were identified from local ambulance registers, from the databases of local health care units, and from patient questionnaires. SETTING: The target population consisted of all drug-treated diabetic patients from the two middle-sized communities in southern Finland, altogether 1776 patients. The study was retrospective. SUBJECTS: A total of 1469 patients (82.7% of the target population) gave informed consent for the use of their medical records and 1325 patients (74.6% of the target population) returned the detailed 36-item questionnaire. RESULTS: Of type 1 and type 2 insulin-treated diabetic patients, 14.6% and 1.0%, respectively, needed ambulance or emergency room care (incidence of 30.5 and 3.0 per 100 patient years). However, 31.0% of type 1 and 12.3% of type 2 diabetic patients reported at least one episode of SH (incidence of 72.0 and 27.0 per 100 patient years). Of all insulin-treated patients, 53 (7.8%) reported three or more episodes of SH. Significant independent risk factors for SH were depression, daily exercise, and nephropathy but not glycaemic control. CONCLUSION: The incidence of SH was high in both types of insulin-treated diabetic patients. However, the recurrent episodes of SH were clustered in a small minority of insulin-treated patients with diabetes. The risk of SH should be considered when assessing the treatment target for an individual diabetic patient.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Hypoglycemia/etiology , Adult , Aged , Cohort Studies , Emergencies , Humans , Hypoglycemia/diagnosis , Hypoglycemia/therapy , Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage , Hypoglycemic Agents/adverse effects , Insulin/administration & dosage , Insulin/adverse effects , Insulin Coma/diagnosis , Insulin Coma/etiology , Insulin Coma/therapy , Middle Aged , Recurrence , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Self Report , Surveys and Questionnaires
8.
Traffic Inj Prev ; 11(3): 258-62, 2010 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20544569

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We studied retrospectively the current driving license status in insulin-treated diabetic patients, who had severe hypoglycemia (SH) within an observation period of one year and who lived in two Finnish communities. METHODS: The episodes of SH were identified from local ambulance registers, the databases of local health care units and from patient questionnaires in 680 insulin-treated diabetic patients. The data on current driving licenses were obtained from local police authorities. RESULTS: Of type 1 and type 2 insulin-treated diabetic patients 31.0 and 12.3 percent, respectively, had at least one self-reported SH, whereas 53 (7.8%) of them reported even three or more episodes of SH. Of insulin-treated patients with clustering of SH 68 percent still held a driving license, and 21percent of them held even a license for commercial vehicles up to 3.5 tons. CONCLUSIONS: Recurrent episodes of SH occur in a minority of insulin-treated diabetic patients. However, two thirds of them still held a valid driving license even for commercial vehicles, which violates the medical standards for diabetes and driving.


Subject(s)
Automobile Driving/legislation & jurisprudence , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Hypoglycemia/epidemiology , Insulin/therapeutic use , Aged , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Female , Finland/epidemiology , Humans , Hypoglycemia/etiology , Licensure/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL