Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 25
Filter
1.
Ann Surg ; 275(1): 45-53, 2022 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33630475

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of algenpantucel-L [HyperAcute-Pancreas algenpantucel-L (HAPa); IND# 12311] immunotherapy combined with standard of care (SOC) chemotherapy and chemoradiation to SOC chemotherapy and chemoradiation therapy alone in patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: To date, immunotherapy has not been shown to benefit patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced unresectable PDAC. HAPa is a cancer vaccine consisting of allogeneic pancreatic cancer cells engineered to express the murine α(1,3)GT gene. METHODS: A multicenter, phase 3, open label, randomized (1:1) trial of patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced unresectable PDAC. Patients received neoadjuvant SOC chemotherapy (FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel) followed by chemoradiation (standard group) or the same standard neoadjuvant regimen combined with HAPa immunotherapy (experimental group). The primary outcome was overall survival. RESULTS: Between May 2013 and December 2015, 303 patients were randomized from 32 sites. Median (interquartile range) overall survival was 14.9 (12.2-17.8) months in the standard group (N = 158) and 14.3 (12.6-16.3) months in the experimental group (N = 145) [hazard ratio (HR) 1.02, 95% confidence intervals 0.66-1.58; P = 0.98]. Median progression-free survival was 13.4 months in the standard group and 12.4 months in the experimental group (HR 1.33, 95% confidence intervals 0.72-1.78; P = 0.59). Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 105 of 140 patients (75%) in the standard group and in 115 of 142 patients (81%) in the experimental group (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Algenpantucel-L immunotherapy did not improve survival in patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced unresectable PDAC receiving SOC neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01836432.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Cancer Vaccines/therapeutic use , Immunotherapy , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/therapy , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Cancer Vaccines/adverse effects , Deoxycytidine/adverse effects , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Deoxycytidine/therapeutic use , Female , Fluorouracil/adverse effects , Fluorouracil/therapeutic use , Humans , Immunotherapy/adverse effects , Irinotecan/adverse effects , Irinotecan/therapeutic use , Leucovorin/adverse effects , Leucovorin/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy/adverse effects , Oxaliplatin/adverse effects , Oxaliplatin/therapeutic use , Paclitaxel/adverse effects , Paclitaxel/therapeutic use , Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Progression-Free Survival , Standard of Care , Survival Analysis , Gemcitabine
2.
Invest New Drugs ; 40(1): 81-90, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34417914

ABSTRACT

Background RX-3117 is an oral small molecule antimetabolite, cyclopentyl pyrimidyl nucleoside that is activated by cancer cells over-expressing uridine cytidine kinase 2 (UCK2). Single agent RX-3117 demonstrated efficacy in a phase I trial in patients with metastatic (met) pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PC). RX-3117 plus nab-paclitaxel (nab-Pac) was evaluated as a first line treatment in met-PC cancer. Methods This was a multicenter open label phase I/II 2-stage study investigating the combination of RX3117 plus nab-Pac in the frontline treatment of patients with met-PC. The phase I portion comprised a dose de-escalation design with primary objectives of determining the safety, tolerability and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of RX-3117 (orally 700, 600, or 500 mg/day for 5 consecutive days with 2 days off/week) plus nab-Pac (intravenous (IV) 125 mg/m2 once weekly) for 3 weeks with 1 week off per a 4-week cycle. The primary objective was to determine the antitumor efficacy. Results 46 patients were enrolled (22 male/24 female; median age 67; 91% Caucasian). The RP2D of RX-3117 plus nab-Pac was 700 mg/day. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed (DLTs). The overall response rate (ORR) was 23.1% and disease control rate (DCR) 74.4%. RX-3117 pharmacokinetics (PK) results were similar to previously reported monotherapy phase 1 trial. All patients experienced a treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) with the most common diarrhea, nausea, and fatigue.10.9% of patients experienced a serious adverse event (SAE) related to the combination. Conclusion RX-3117 plus nab-Pac in newly diagnosed met-PC patients demonstrated tolerability, safety, and early treatment efficacy.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Albumins/pharmacokinetics , Albumins/therapeutic use , Paclitaxel/pharmacokinetics , Paclitaxel/therapeutic use , Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Area Under Curve , Cytidine/analogs & derivatives , Cytidine/pharmacokinetics , Cytidine/pharmacology , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Half-Life , Humans , Male , Maximum Tolerated Dose , Metabolic Clearance Rate , Middle Aged
3.
Support Care Cancer ; 30(3): 2755-2766, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34825982

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To characterize and compare both the outcome and cost of treatment of outpatient (OP) and inpatient (IP) ifosfamide therapy. METHODS: A single-center retrospective chart review of patients 18 years and older receiving ifosfamide therapy. The primary endpoint compares and evaluates the side effect profiles of ifosfamide-treated patients in the OP/IP settings. The adverse event grading system was characterized using the CTCAE Version 5.0. The highest grade was documented per cycle. The secondary endpoint of this study compares the costs of OP/IP therapy. It was assumed that the cost of medication was equivalent for IP/OP treatments. The cost saved with OP administration was determined by the average cost of hospital stay for IP admission. RESULTS: Ifosfamide therapy of 86 patients (57 OP, 29 IP) was reviewed. The predominant OP regimens were doxorobucin-ifosfamide-mesna (AIM) with 43.9% and ifosfamide-etoposide (IE) with 29.8%. Grade 4 anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia were most frequent in IP vs OP therapies (22.9% IP vs 4.3% OP, 21.6% IP vs 9.2% OP, and 22.8% IP vs 19.6% OP respectively). Neutropenic fever (NF) occurred in 20 OP patients which were predominantly treated with AIM or IE and led to average hospital stay of 6 days. Neurotoxicity, treated with methylene blue (MB) occurred in 4 OP patients. OP therapy saved a total of 783 hospital days, leading to a cost savings of $2,103,921. CONCLUSIONS: Transitioning ifosfamide to the OP setting is feasible for academic and community infusion centers with the OP administration being safe, well-tolerated, and associated with decreased total cost of care. The current processes allow for safe transition of chemotherapy of chemotherapy under times of COVID.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Ifosfamide , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Cost Savings , Etoposide , Humans , Ifosfamide/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
4.
CA Cancer J Clin ; 71(1): 34-46, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32997807

ABSTRACT

The delivery of cancer care has never changed as rapidly and dramatically as we have seen with the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. During the early phase of the pandemic, recommendations for the management of oncology patients issued by various professional societies and government agencies did not recognize the significant regional differences in the impact of the pandemic. California initially experienced lower than expected numbers of cases, and the health care system did not experience the same degree of the burden that had been the case in other parts of the country. In light of promising trends in COVID-19 infections and mortality in California, by late April 2020, discussions were initiated for a phased recovery of full-scale cancer services. However, by July 2020, a surge of cases was reported across the nation, including in California. In this review, the authors share the response and recovery planning experience of the University of California (UC) Cancer Consortium in an effort to provide guidance to oncology practices. The UC Cancer Consortium was established in 2017 to bring together 5 UC Comprehensive Cancer Centers: UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, UC Los Angeles Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, UC Irvine Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, and the UC San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center. The interventions implemented in each of these cancer centers are highlighted, with a focus on opportunities for a redesign in care delivery models. The authors propose that their experiences gained during this pandemic will enhance pre-pandemic cancer care delivery.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cancer Care Facilities/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Neoplasms/therapy , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Testing , California/epidemiology , Global Health , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Infection Control/organization & administration , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Pandemics , Telemedicine/methods , Telemedicine/organization & administration
5.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32313882

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Only 15-20% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients are upfront surgical candidates at presentation, and for this cohort of patients, the 5-year survival is a mere 20% despite adjuvant therapy. Previous data indicate that in clinical practice most of these cases are "borderline-resectable," and there is currently no mature data on perioperative treatment. METHODS: We performed a retrospective electronic chart review of patients with "borderline-resectable"PDAC treated at an academic comprehensive cancer center, dividing them into groups based on surgery alone, surgery plus neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or neoadjuvant plus adjuvant perioperative treatment groups. The objectives were to determine the median overall survival (mOS), progression-free survival (PFS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Statistical analysis was performed to assess the association of demographic, tumor traits, and interventions with OS, PFS and DFS. RESULTS: Only surgery followed by adjuvant therapy showed an increase in mOS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.22; 95% CI, 0.09-0.51; P<0.001), after adjustment for radiation (yes vs. no), resection margins (R0 vs. R1 or R2), and tumor location (head vs. body or tail). Patients who received adjuvant therapy after surgery had 2.1 times greater odds to be alive at 24 months after diagnosis than those who had surgery alone (P=0.015). PFS and DFS were not statistically significantly different among treatment groups after adjustment. Those whose disease was located in the head of the pancreas had a significantly improved OS (HR =0.27; 95% CI, 0.11-0.64; P=0.003), PFS (HR =0.40; 95% CI, 0.17-0.94; P=0.035), and DFS (HR =0.30; 95% CI, 0.13-0.67; P=0.004). Negative margins led to a significant improvement in PFS (HR =0.30; 95% CI, 0.16-0.57; P<0.001) and DFS (HR =0.30; 95% CI, 0.16-0.57; P<0.001). Those who received radiation had a non-significantly improved OS, PFS, and DFS (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our study corroborated that patients treated with adjuvant therapy after surgical resection had an mOS benefit as reported on prior phase III clinical trials. Patients with "borderline-resectable" pancreatic cancer are encouraged to participate in a clinical trial or clinically be treated with adjuvant therapy until more mature results from the ongoing perioperative prospective study are available.

6.
Am J Surg ; 219(4): 578-582, 2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32081411

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate patient factors that contribute to increased incidence of early onset rectal cancer and analyze the short-term surgical outcomes of patients undergoing surgery. METHODS: A 2-year review (2015-2016) of the ACS-NSQIP included patients with rectal cancer who underwent surgical management. Patients were stratified into early-onset RC (<50-years) and late-onset RC (≥50-years). RESULTS: We included a total of 7538 patients in the analysis. Overall, 14% of the patients had early-onset RC. Patients with early-onset RC were more likely to be Black and Hispanic. Additionally, they were more likely to present with higher TNM stages. Patients with early-onset RC had lower 30-day complications and lower 30-day mortality. There was no difference between the two groups regarding hospital length of stay or 30-day readmission. On regression analysis, there was no difference between the two groups regarding patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Racial disparities do exist in the incidence of RC. Young patients tend to have more aggressive disease, however, surgical outcomes between the two groups are comparable.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Adult , Aged , Body Mass Index , Comorbidity , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Dyspnea/epidemiology , Female , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Humans , Hypertension/epidemiology , Laparoscopy/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Metastasis , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/epidemiology , Racial Groups/statistics & numerical data , Renal Dialysis/statistics & numerical data , Sepsis/epidemiology , Smoking/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology , Weight Loss
7.
J Gastrointest Cancer ; 51(1): 254-259, 2020 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31054106

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: An accurate clinical and radiological staging is the pyramid of treatment decisions in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Guidelines recommended neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) followed by surgical resection for fit patients with LARC. Determining the aggressiveness of intervention while avoiding needless morbidity according to patient risk remains an unmet pre-operative decision-making need. With newer magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques and image acquisition available at our Cancer Center, we seek to retrospectively review the correlation between pre- and post-CRT MRI response to the surgical pathological stage in order to aide multidisciplinary team decision making. METHODS: Our Cancer Center Rectal Cancer Registry between 2011 and 2015 included 57 patients with LARC, 20 completed standard CRT with surgery, and of those 10 had repeated MRI after CRT. RESULTS: Our retrospective case series revealed that 90% of the patients had a downstage tumor response on surgical specimen compared to radiological evaluation after CRT, and furthermore, all patients who were re-staged with MRI prior to surgery correlated with the gold standard pathological stage (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Post-CRT MRI could potentially aide decision making to further avoid 20% of patients with a complete pathological response from a morbid surgery, whereas 10% of patients with an upstaged disease state may require a more aggressive neoadjuvant or planned surgical intervention. We concluded that future multidisciplinary oncology care treatment decision making would benefit from a repeat MRI after neoadjuvant CRT of LARC.


Subject(s)
Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Rectal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Rectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Decision Making , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies
8.
World J Gastrointest Oncol ; 11(10): 866-876, 2019 Oct 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31662825

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal cancer (GICA) is associated with a higher incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) compared to other solid tumors, moreover, recurrent VTE and major bleeding (MB) complications during anticoagulation treatment have an associated increase rate. GICA-VTE remains a challenging clinical scenario with MB concerns for utilization of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC), especially with active cancer therapies. AIM: To evaluate patient risk factors, effectiveness (VTE) and safety (MB) of DOACs and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in patients with active GICA-VTE. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients receiving DOACs and LMWH with GICA and symptomatic or incidental VTE treated at comprehensive cancer center from November 2013 to February 2017 was performed. Inclusion criteria included active GI cancer diagnosed at any stage or treatment +/- 6 mo of VTE diagnosis, whom were prescribed 6 mo or more of DOACs or LMWH. The Chi-squared test was used for overall and the Fisher exact test for pairwise comparisons of the proportions of patients experiencing recurrent VTE and MB events. Odds ratios were used to compare the relative odds of the occurrence of the outcome given exposure to the risk factor. RESULTS: A total of 144 patients were prescribed anticoagulation, in which 106 fulfilled inclusion criteria apixaban (27.3%), rivaroxaban (34.9%) and enoxaparin (37.7%), and 38 were excluded. Patients median age was 66.5 years at GICA diagnosis and 67 years at CAVTE event, with 62% males, 80% Caucasian, 70% stage IV, pancreatic cancer (40.5%), 30% Khorana Score (≥ 3 points), and 43.5% on active chemotherapy. Sixty-four percent of patients completed anticoagulation therapy (range 1 to 43 mo). Recurrent VTE at 6 mo was noted in 7.5% (n = 3), 6.8% (n = 2) and 2.7% (n = 1) of patients on enoxaparin, apixaban and rivaroxaban, respectively (all P = NS). MB at 6 mo were 5% (n = 2) for enoxaparin, 6.8% (n = 2) for apixaban and 21.6% (n = 8) for rivaroxaban (overall P = 0.048; vs LMWH P = 0.0423; all other P = NS). Significant predictors of a primary or secondary outcome for all anticoagulation therapies included: Active systemic treatment (OR = 5.1, 95%CI: 1.3-19.3), high Khorana Score [≥ 3 points] (OR = 5.5, 95%CI: 1.7-17.1), active smoker (OR = 6.7, 95%CI: 2.1-21.0), pancreatic cancer (OR = 6.8, 95%CI: 1.9-23.2), and stage IV disease (OR = 9.9, 95%CI: 1.2-79.1). CONCLUSION: Rivaroxaban compared to apixaban and enoxaparin had a significantly higher risk of MB on GICA-VTE patients with equivocal efficacy.

9.
J Gastrointest Oncol ; 10(5): 896-901, 2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31602327

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Rectal cancer (RC) among young patients (≤50 years) is on the rise. The factors associated with development of RC are established however; factors leading to early RC remain unclear. The aim of this study was to assess factors associated with RC among young patients. METHODS: National estimates for patients with RC were abstracted from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database [2010-2012]. Patients were divided into two groups: young (≤50 years) and old (>50 years). Demographic, comorbidities, procedures performed, and hospital outcomes were collected. Regression analysis was performed to compare both groups. RESULTS: A total of 68,699 patients with RC were included. Incidence of RC among young patients increased significantly over the study period (2.4% vs. 3.4%; P=0.04). Majority of young patients with RC were white females. Bleeding was the most common presentation among young patients (P=0.03). Younger patients were more likely to have a family history of RC (P=0.01) and were more likely to undergo elective surgery (P=0.04) and laparoscopic surgery (P=0.02) compared to the older patients. Younger patients with RC were also more likely to use alcohol (P=0.03), be obese (P=0.02) compared to elder patients. There was no difference in the other co-morbidities between the two groups. After controlling for all factors in a regression model, younger patients had a lower complication rate (P=0.01), hospital LOS (P=0.02), and mortality rate (P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: RC in younger patients appears as a different disease with different outcomes. There appears to be multifactorial and environmental factors contributing to this trend. Race and gender also play a role in the incidence of RC in the young. Identifying these risk factors will lead to a more robust intervention plan to help improve care among younger patients with RC.

10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31360919

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Post-surgical pathology (SP) staging correlates with long-term survival. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have been shown to predict prognosis and extent of tumor in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This study aimed to correlate NLR and PLR to radiological clinical staging (CS), carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 tumor marker and SP staging in patients with resectable-PDAC (R-PDAC); and to investigate NLR and PLR as potential markers to guide neoadjuvant therapy. METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively from R-PDAC patients who received upfront surgery from November 2011 to December 2016. NLR and PLR values on the day of diagnosis and surgery were collected. SP, tumor size, location, resected margins (RM), lymphovascular/perineural invasion (LVI/PNI), lymph node involvement, and AJCC/TNM 8th Edition staging were obtained. Associations were assessed using linear, ordinal logistic, and poison regressions or Kruskal Willis Rank Sum Test per the nature of outcome variables, with statistical significance at p-value <0.05. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were identified with resectable stage I (61%) and II (38%). They had a mean age of 66 years (48-87 years) and were 47.2% male, 83.6% white, 90.9% non-Hispanic and 89% with ECOG 0-1. NLR/PLR at diagnosis for R0, R1 and R2 were 6.7/241, 4.8/224, and 2.9/147 (P=0.01/0.002), respectively. NLR/PLR for N0 and N1 were 5.1/212 and 2.7/138.3 (P=0.03/0.009) at diagnosis. No other significant association was detected. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that NLR/PLR inversely correlates with RM and lymph node status in patients with R-PDAC, but require prospective evaluation in clinically defined scenarios.

11.
J Am Coll Surg ; 229(1): 79-90, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30995524

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The overall incidence of colon cancer (CC) is decreasing, but with increasing early-onset colon cancer (EOCC < 50 years old). Our recent study revealed unique overexpression of cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) in EOCC and its association with aggressiveness. The aim of this study was to assess CC biology, especially in the young, by evaluating the role of COMP in CC carcinogenesis and cancer progression, detecting COMP in serum and its association with disease stage. STUDY DESIGN: Cancer and matching noninvolved tissue blocks from 12 sporadic EOCC and late-onset colon cancer (LOCC) patients of 4 disease stages were obtained from pathology archives. Ribonucleic acid expression profiling of 770 cancer-related genes using nCounter platform was performed. The COMP levels from 16 EOCC and LOCC serum samples were measured by ELISA. Carcinoembryonic antigen levels from these 16 samples were taken at the time of diagnosis. Transwell assay was performed to elucidate the role of COMP in motility and metastases. RESULTS: Expression profiling revealed increased COMP levels in higher disease stage. There was 7-fold higher COMP expression (p ≤ 0.05) in stage III compare to stage I and its coexpression with GAS1, VEGFC, MAP3K8, SFRP1, and PRKACA. Higher COMP expression was seen in stage II compared with stage I (p = 0.07) and its coexpression withTLR2, IL8, RIN1, IRAK3, and CACNA2D2, and COMP was detectable in serum and showed significantly higher levels in EOCC compared with LOCC. Similar correlation was seen with CEA levels, but the difference was not significant. Transwell assay revealed significantly increased motility of HT-29 cells after treatment with recombinant COMP. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest different tumor biology between EOCC and LOCC. Cartilage oligomeric matrix protein plays a significant role in CC carcinogenesis and has potential as biomarker for CC, especially aggressive EOCC.


Subject(s)
Cartilage Oligomeric Matrix Protein/genetics , Colonic Neoplasms/epidemiology , DNA, Neoplasm/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Neoplasm Staging/methods , Propensity Score , Age Factors , Arizona/epidemiology , Biomarkers, Tumor/biosynthesis , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Cartilage Oligomeric Matrix Protein/biosynthesis , Colonic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colonic Neoplasms/metabolism , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged
12.
J Gastrointest Oncol ; 10(2): 254-258, 2019 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31032092

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Studies have explored the relationship between inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD)] and colon cancer (CC). Additionally, racial disparities in the incidence of CC is well known. However, the impact of racial disparity in IBD patients who develop CC remains unclear. The aim of this study is to address the knowledge gap in this particular group of patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was done using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2011. We included patients with IBD over age ≥18 years with a diagnosis of CC. Patients were stratified by race, gender, age, presence of IBD and CC. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the groups. RESULTS: A total of 57,542 patients were included (CD: 36,357, UC: 21,001). Of all patients with and without IBD, advanced age, Black and Asian race conferred an increased risk of developing CC, whereas female gender, Hispanic and Native American race conferred a protective effect. In patients with IBD, advanced age conferred an increased risk for developing CC while female gender conferred a protective effect. In this subset of patients, black race conferred a protective effect. CONCLUSIONS: Racial disparity exists in the overall incidence of CC and among patients with IBD who develop CC. Interestingly, black race conferred a protective effect for patients with IBD, contrary to what is seen in the general population. These findings could be attributed to the environmental factors and genetic makeup between racial groups. Further studies are warranted to better understand these disparities.

13.
Support Care Cancer ; 27(3): 873-878, 2019 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30090991

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Practice patterns of same-day versus next-day pegfilgrastim vary in numerous practice settings across the country. Current utilization with same-day pegfilgrastim reduced overall visits and reduced treatment time for chemotherapy administration. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of same-day versus next-day pegfilgrastim in patients with colorectal cancer. METHODS: Patient data was extracted through electronic health records (EHR) search of ICD-9 codes that matched patients with CRC and treated with FOLFOX or FOLFIRI from November 2013 to January 2016. The incidence rates of primary and secondary endpoints were estimated for patients who received either FOLFOX or FOLFIRI and same-day pegfilgrastim with 2-sided 95% confidence intervals. Fisher's exact test for 2 × 2 contingency tables was used to compare the incidence of primary and secondary endpoints between the two study groups performed at the α = 0.05 significance level. A study by Hecht et al. served as a historical control for next-day pegfilgrastim. RESULTS: A total of 109 out of an initial 330 patients with appropriate ICD-9 criteria were eligible for study inclusion. The primary endpoint of incidence of FN recorded over 4 chemotherapy cycles with either FOLFOX6 or FOLFIRI occurred in 3.7% of patients (95% CI, 1.1-9.4%). Secondary endpoints also occurred with a relatively low incidence: 13 patients developed grades 3/4 neutropenia (11.9%; 95% CI, 7.0-19.5%); 11 patients required dose reductions because of neutropenia or FN (10.1%; 95% CI, 5.6-17.3%); and 5 patients were hospitalized due to neutropenia or FN (4.6%; 1.7-10.6%). There were 4 reported events of FN (3.2%; 95% CI, 1.0-8.3%) for those who received next-day pegfilgrastim compared to 11 events in the placebo group (9.4%; 95% CI, 5.1-16.4%). The incidence of dose delays or dose reductions due to neutropenia or FN were 5 (4.1%, 95% CI, 1.5-9.4%) in the next-day pegfilgrastim group versus 26 (22.1%, 95% CI, 15.5-30.4%) in the placebo group. LIMITATIONS: The study was retrospective in design and utilized a historical control for the comparator. CONCLUSIONS: Our study results suggest that same-day pegfilgrastim administration may be a safe and effective alternative to 24-h post-chemotherapy administration in patients with esophageal, gastric, appendiceal, or colorectal cancer undergoing treatment with FOLFOX or FOLFIRI.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Febrile Neutropenia/prevention & control , Filgrastim/administration & dosage , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/administration & dosage , Polyethylene Glycols/administration & dosage , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Camptothecin/administration & dosage , Camptothecin/adverse effects , Camptothecin/analogs & derivatives , Drug Administration Schedule , Febrile Neutropenia/chemically induced , Female , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Fluorouracil/adverse effects , Humans , Leucovorin/administration & dosage , Leucovorin/adverse effects , Leukopenia/chemically induced , Male , Middle Aged , Organoplatinum Compounds/administration & dosage , Organoplatinum Compounds/adverse effects , Recombinant Proteins/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
15.
Case Rep Oncol Med ; 2018: 7127048, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29686913

ABSTRACT

The low prevalence rate and limited literature on eccrine carcinoma (EC) pose a challenge to properly diagnosing and treating this rare malignancy. EC lesions tend to present similarly to other cutaneous neoplasms and dermatitis-like conditions. Efficacious treatment guidelines have not been established for patients diagnosed with EC, and few treatment regimens have demonstrated clinical benefit. Due to the high metastatic potential of EC, recognizing the clinical presentation, properly diagnosing, and utilizing beneficial treatment options are important for managing this disease. We report a case of a 66-year-old female who presented with lesions that her primary care provider misdiagnosed as basal cell carcinoma. The disease responded poorly to taxane- and platinum-based chemotherapies as well as an isolated limb perfusion of an alkylating agent. However, continuous dosing of oral capecitabine achieved an 18-month period of progression free survival (PFS) and ameliorated quality of life. We wish to highlight this rare disease and discuss presentation, diagnosis, and management as it is most often misdiagnosed leading to advanced metastatic disease when patients present to the oncologist. In addition, it is crucial to study and report potentially efficacious regimens considering the lack of clinical trials in this disease.

16.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 75(9): e246-e258, 2018 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29691269

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Implementation of a pharmacy-managed program for the transition of chemotherapy to the outpatient setting is described. SUMMARY: The University of Arizona Cancer Center and Banner-University Medical Center Tucson are affiliated not-for-profit academic medical centers in Tucson, Arizona, whose facilities include a hospital and ambulatory care clinics that maintain 3 outpatient infusion centers. The cancer center pharmacy currently employs 25 pharmacists, with 4 clinical pharmacists serving both the inpatient and outpatient treatment sites. A multidisciplinary team of staff members was assembled to address the transition of chemotherapy from inpatient to outpatient that included physicians, ambulatory clinical oncology pharmacists, finance, social workers, pharmacy staff, nursing staff, and information technology. The program was initiated in May 2014, with a 2-year postimplementation evaluation of our transition of chemotherapy to the outpatient setting. Chemotherapy order sets were developed in our electronic medical record for transitioning rituximab to the outpatient setting for inpatient chemotherapy orders as well as transitioning leukemia, lymphoma, and solid tumor chemotherapy regimens to be administered in the outpatient setting. Eighteen rituximab-containing regimens and 14 chemotherapy protocols were switched to the outpatient setting, with numerous variants of these regimens also created for outpatient only administration. The realized savings for high-cost chemotherapy transitioned to the outpatient setting with rituximab and clofarabine was $1,902,890. Over 747 inpatient bed days were saved, with an approximated cost savings to the health system of $1,402,866, with a cumulative cost savings to our health system of $3,305,756. CONCLUSION: This model for transitioning chemotherapy from the hospital to the outpatient setting enhanced access to care, decreased bed utilization in the hospital, and improved clinical and financial metrics.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care/methods , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Pharmacists/organization & administration , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Academic Medical Centers , Ambulatory Care/economics , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/economics , Arizona , Cost Savings , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/economics , Neoplasms/pathology , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Patient Transfer/organization & administration , Rituximab/administration & dosage
17.
Dig Liver Dis ; 48(10): 1105-11, 2016 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27289334

ABSTRACT

Cancer may be a complication of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) or its treatments. In older Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis patients, the risk of malignancy is of particular concern. IBD diagnosis at an advanced age is associated with earlier development of colitis-associated colorectal cancer. Thiopurine use in older IBD patients is tied to an increased risk of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, nonmelanoma skin cancer, and urinary tract cancers. Additionally, older age is accompanied by multimorbidity, an increased risk of malnutrition, and decreased life expectancy, factors that complicate the management of cancer in the elderly. The optimal approach to the increased risk of malignancy in older age IBD is appropriate cancer screening and medical treatment. This may include age-specific colorectal cancer screening and limiting UV radiation exposure. With a growing number of older IBD patients, further studies are necessary to delineate the risk of cancer in this population.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/complications , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/epidemiology , Mercaptopurine/adverse effects , Age Factors , Aged , Early Detection of Cancer , Humans , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/drug therapy , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/chemically induced , Skin Neoplasms/epidemiology , Urologic Neoplasms/epidemiology
18.
Cancer Invest ; 34(2): 57-63, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26810581

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and safety profile of bi-weekly Pemetrexed (PEM) when combined with weekly cisplatin (CDDP) and standard dose external beam radiation (EBRT) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic esophageal and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) carcinomas. METHODS: We conducted an open label, single institution, phase I dose escalation study designed to evaluate up to 15-35 patients with advanced or metastatic esophageal and GEJ carcinomas. RESULTS: 10 patients were treated with bi-weekly PEM, weekly CDDP, and EBRT. The MTD of bi-weekly PEM was determined to be 500 mg/m(2).


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma/therapy , Chemoradiotherapy/methods , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Esophagogastric Junction/drug effects , Esophagogastric Junction/radiation effects , Pemetrexed/administration & dosage , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Arizona , Carcinoma/mortality , Carcinoma/secondary , Chemoradiotherapy/adverse effects , Chemoradiotherapy/mortality , Cisplatin/adverse effects , Disease Progression , Drug Administration Schedule , Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophagectomy , Esophagogastric Junction/pathology , Female , Humans , Male , Maximum Tolerated Dose , Middle Aged , Pemetrexed/adverse effects , Radiotherapy Dosage , Remission Induction , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
19.
Am J Surg ; 212(3): 485-92, 2016 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26582247

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of racial and socioeconomic disparities in the development of colorectal cancer (CRC) is well known; however, statewide variability exits across the United States. The aim of our study was to determine the overall incidence, socioeconomic and racial disparities in the development of CRC in the state of Arizona. METHODS: We performed a 16-year (1995 to 2011) retrospective review of the Arizona Cancer Registry including all patients with CRC. Patient demographics, stage of CRC disease, and patient outcomes were recorded. The outcome measures were incidence of CRC and the difference in racial and economic characteristics among patients. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with the incidence of CRC. RESULTS: A total of 40,314 patients with CRC were included of which 16% (n = 6,450) were stage IV. The overall incidence of CRC decreased 17% over the study period. The highest incidence rates were seen in White non-Hispanic and African American populations. Right-sided tumors were more common in White non-Hispanic and African Americans whereas American Indians had higher incidence of rectal tumors and Asian/Pacific Islanders more commonly had left-sided tumors. African Americans had the highest occurrence (42.8%) of more advanced disease (stage III and stage IV). A negative correlation existed between socioeconomic status and the incidence of CRC. CONCLUSIONS: Overall CRC incidence decreased in Arizona by 17%, with greatest decrease rate among, White non-Hispanic and African American populations. Educated patients with higher economic earnings experienced a lower decrease in the incidence of CRC.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/ethnology , Racial Groups , Social Class , Arizona/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Retrospective Studies , Socioeconomic Factors , Survival Rate/trends
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...