Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate Versus Bipolar Resection of the Prostate: A Prospective Randomized Study. "Pros and Cons".

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety, efficacy, and applicability of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURPb) procedures, whereas the secondary objective is to find out the advantages and disadvantages of each. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective randomized study included 120 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia that required intervention. The patients were randomized in 2 equal groups: group A managed by HoLEP and group B managed by TURPb. The mean age, International Prostate Symptom Score, maximum urine flow, residual urine, operative time, blood loss, resected volume, catheterization time, hospital stay, and costs were compared. RESULTS: Both groups were comparable regarding the preoperative parameters. The mean operative time was statistically significantly longer in the HoLEP group. The drop in the hemoglobin level was statistically significantly in group B. The mean resected prostatic volume was 61.167 g in the HoLEP group and 58.8 g in the TURPb group. The catheter was removed after 24 hours in 51 and 36 patients in groups A and B, respectively. The International Prostate Symptom Score at 1 and 12 months and the maximum urine flow at 12 months postoperatively were found to be better in the HoLEP group than in the bipolar group, and this difference was found to be statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Although the HoLEP technique is associated with a relatively longer operative time, it has proved to be effective in treating large prostates with minimal morbidity, better hemostasis, less blood loss, and better voiding pattern than TURPb after a 12-month follow-up.

Transurethral Holmium Laser Cystolithotripsy in Children: Single Center Experience.

PURPOSE: To evaluate prospectively safety and efficacy of transurethral cystolithotripsy (CL) in children using holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser. This is important in developing countries, because the risk of bladder stones in children is high. Open cystolithotomy (OC) was the main line of treatment. A gradual shift has occurred toward endourologic treatment after improvement of pediatric endoscopes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2010 and May 2011, 33 children <12 years old with vesical calculi were treated. Children with orthopedic deformities, urethral stricture, history of urethral operations or bladder reconstruction, or stones >4 cm were excluded. Cystoscopies were performed under general anesthesia using 9 to 11F cystoscopes. Stones were completely fragmented under video guidance. Ho:YAG was applied at a power of 30 W. RESULTS: Median age was 3 years (0.5-11). Mean stone size was 2.02±0.82 cm (1-4 cm). Mean operative duration was 31.21 minutes (20-50). All children were discharged within 24 hours. A single operative session was performed for each patient. No complications were detected. After a mean follow-up of 16.87±4.08 months, all children were stone free, without development of any urethral stricture or recurrence of stones. Operative duration was significantly longer in stones >20 mm (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Ho:YAG laser CL is a safe and successful minimally invasive treatment option for bladder stones in children. Success rate was 100% without development of any complications or recurrence.

Low-cost transobturator vaginal tape inside-out procedure for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence using ordinary polypropylene mesh.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study is to describe the use of ordinary polypropylene mesh and our modified helical passers through a transobturator vaginal tape inside-out technique (TVT-O) as a low-cost alternative to available commercial kits in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) with evaluation of its long-term safety and efficacy. This is important in developing countries due to limited health care resources. METHODS: Tailored (11 × 1.5 cm) polypropylene tape was inserted in 59 women from June 2006 to June 2009 at the Urology Department, Cairo University Hospitals as an open prospective study. SUI was diagnosed by positive cough stress test (CST) and abdominal leak point pressure (ALPP). Patients with post-void residual urine (PVRU) > 100 ml, bladder capacity < 300 ml, or neurological lesions were excluded. The Stress and Urge Incontinence and Quality of Life Questionnaire (SUIQQ), urodynamic parameters, and other variables were compared pre- versus postoperatively with paired t, Wilcoxon signed rank, McNemar, or chi-square tests. RESULTS: The mean age was 47.47 ± 8.52 years. Twenty-one (35.6 %) patients had intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD). The mean operative time was 21.22 ± 4.26 min (15-30). Procedures for prolapse were done in four (6 %) patients. Complications were vaginal discharge (6 %), dyspareunia (1 %), groin pain (20 %), urinary tract infection (3 %), obstructive symptoms (1 %), accidental cut of polypropylene suture (1 %) and felt subcutaneous polypropylene sutures (3 %). We had no cases of erosions or de novo urgency. SUIQQ indices improved significantly, while urodynamic parameters showed no significant difference postoperatively. Of the patients, 54 (91 %) were cured and 3 (5 %) improved, while failure was detected in 2 (3 %) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our technique is safe with excellent 5-year results. It should be considered as a low-cost alternative to available commercial kits in the treatment of SUI mainly for public health systems with few financial resources.

Ureteric stents vs percutaneous nephrostomy for initial urinary drainage in children with obstructive anuria and acute renal failure due to ureteric calculi: a prospective, randomised study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) tube vs JJ ureteric stenting as the initial urinary drainage method in children with obstructive calcular anuria (OCA) and post-renal acute renal failure (ARF) due to bilateral ureteric calculi, to identify the selection criteria for the initial urinary drainage method that will improve urinary drainage, decrease complications and facilitate the subsequent definitive clearance of stones, as this comparison is lacking in the literature. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A series of 90 children aged ≤12 years presenting with OCA and ARF due to bilateral ureteric calculi were included from March 2011 to September 2013 at Cairo University Pediatric Hospital in this randomised comparative study. Patients with grade 0-1 hydronephrosis, fever or pyonephrosis were excluded. No patient had any contraindication for either method of drainage. Stable patients (or patients stabilised by dialysis) were randomised (non-blinded, block randomisation, sealed envelope method) into PCN-tube or bilateral JJ-stent groups (45 patients for each group). Initial urinary drainage was performed under general anaesthesia and fluoroscopic guidance. We used 4.8-6 F JJ stents or 6-8 F PCN tubes. The primary outcomes were the safety and efficacy of both groups for the recovery of renal functions. Both groups were compared for operative and imaging times, complications, and the period required for a return to normal serum creatinine levels. The secondary outcomes included the number of subsequent interventions needed for clearance of stones. Additional analysis was done for factors affecting outcome within each group. RESULTS: All presented patients completed the study with intention-to-treat analysis. There was no significant difference between the PCN-tube and JJ-stent groups for the operative and imaging times, period for return to a normal creatinine level and failure of insertion. There were significantly more complications in the PCN-tube group. The stone size (>2 cm) was the only factor affecting the rates of mucosal complications, operative time and failure of insertion in the JJ-stent group. The degree of hydronephrosis significantly affected the operative time for PCN-tube insertion. Grade 2 hydronephrosis was associated with all cases of insertion failure in the PCN-tube group. The total number of subsequent interventions needed to clear stones was significantly higher in the PCN-tube group, especially in patients with bilateral stones destined for chemolytic dissolution (alkalinisation) or extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL). CONCLUSION: We recommend the use of JJ stents for initial urinary drainage for stones that will be subsequently treated with chemolytic dissolution or ESWL, as this will lower the total number of subsequent interventions needed to clear the stones. This is also true for stones destined for ureteroscopy (URS), as JJ-stent insertion will facilitate subsequent URS due to previous ureteric stenting. Mild hydronephrosis will prolong the operative time for PCN-tube insertion and may increase the incidence of insertion failure. We recommend the use of PCN tube if the stone size is >2 cm, as there was a greater risk of possible iatrogenic ureteric injury during stenting with these larger ureteric stones in addition to prolongation of operative time with an increased incidence of failure.

Management of obstructive calcular anuria with acute renal failure in children less than 4 years in age: a protocol for initial urinary drainage in relation to planned definitive stone management.

OBJECTIVES: To describe and evaluate our protocol for management of children≤4years old with obstructive calcular anuria (OCA) and acute renal failure (ARF) to improve selection of initial urinary drainage (ID) method and to facilitate subsequent definitive stone management (DSM) as studies discussing this special group of patients are still few. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with a contraindication to any method of ID were excluded. Decision (percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) or double J (JJ) stent) was based on degree of hydronephrosis and planned DSM. We used 4.8-5Fr JJ or 6-8Fr PCN under general anesthesia and fluoroscopic guidance. According to our protocol, JJ is inserted for hydronephrosis≤grade 1. When the hydronephrosis is >grade 1, patients with radiolucent stones were treated by JJ whatever the site of the stone. When the stones were radiopaque, PCN was reserved for stones in a solitary functioning kidney and bilateral ureteric stones prepared for subsequent bilateral ureterolithotomy (or stone prepared for ureterolithotomy in a solitary kidney). After normalization of renal functions, DSM was staged attacking only one side before discharge. Both sides were cleared at the same session in cases with bilateral ureterolithotomy. Renal or ureteric stones suitable for SWL in a solitary kidney were treated with percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PNL) or ureteroscopy. This was followed also in patients with bilateral stones suitable for SWL by clearing one side using ureteroscopy or PNL before discharge. Open surgery (OS) was reserved for cases with failed ureteroscopy or PNL, for ureteric stones>2.5 cm in size or very large volume complex renal stones. Stone free rate (SFR) was evaluated by CT. Our protocol was evaluated as regard recovery of renal functions, complications, and number of interventions to clear stones. RESULTS: This study included 62 boys and 22 girls presented with anuria for 1-4 days. JJ and PCN were inserted in 105 and 30 ureterorenal units (URU), respectively. Creatinine returns normal within 72 h. JJ insertion formed a part of DSM in 78/159 (49%) URU (stones prepared for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy or oral chemolytic dissolution therapy). PCN was the ideal tract for subsequent PNL in 11/159 (6.9%) URU. Accordingly, ID participated by 55.97% in DSM. Both operative and imaging times were slightly longer with PCN than JJ. There was no statistically significant difference in the insertion success or mean period to return to normal chemistry. Complications of both methods were mild and without any significant difference. Endourologic procedures constituted the majority of our interventions. Open surgical and endoscopic interventions for clearance of stones (including ID, treatment conversion and 2ry procedures) were done once for 25 patients, twice for 43 patients while it was needed three times for 16 patients. Total number of interventions was 149 procedures. SFR was 94%. CONCLUSION: Our protocol ensures adequate ID with minimal complications when using our selection criteria in children≤4 years in age with OCA and ARF. It also minimizes number of subsequent procedures to clear stones. Complications and success in insertion and drainage were equivalent in PCN and JJ groups.

Safety of ungated shockwave lithotripsy in pediatric patients.

OBJECTIVE: Ungated extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) in adults is associated with cardiac arrhythmias. We report on the safety and efficacy of this method for treatment of renal calculi in children. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Children under 14 years with radio-opaque renal stones were treated by ungated ESWL. Pre-treatment plain radiographs and intravenous urography and post-treatment ultrasonography and plain films were used to follow up clearance of fragments. All children were monitored for arrhythmias. RESULTS: Thirty-seven children (28 males, nine females) with a median age of 5 years (range 2-14 years) underwent 69 ungated ESWL sessions for renal calculi. Nineteen children had stones located in the left kidney, 17 had stones located in the right kidney and one child had bilateral renal stones. The stone size ranged from 6 to 25 mm (mean 9.9 mm). Shockwave number ranged from 800 to 3650 (mean of 2500 shockwaves per session). All children underwent lithotripsy with a gradual incremental energy increase from 14 to 20 kV. No patient had cardiac arrhythmias or other intra-procedural complications. No patient required conversion to gated ESWL. The overall stone-free rate was 86%. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that ungated ESWL is safe in children under 14 years. The efficacy was comparable to that of gated ESWL from previously published series.