Are the outcomes of single-stage open reduction and Dega osteotomy the same when treating DDH in patients younger than 8 years old? A prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The primary objective was to report our early results after a one-stage procedure [open reduction (OR), Dega pelvic osteotomy (DPO), and femoral osteotomy (FO) when needed] for surgical management of a cohort of patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). The secondary objective was to compare the functional, radiological, and complications among patients younger and older than 30 months. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective cohort study included 71 hips with DDH in 61 patients with a mean age of 34.3 ± 19.5 months. All patients underwent one-stage surgical procedures, including OR + DPO and FO, if needed. Functional and radiographic assessment at the last follow-up was conducted using the modified Severin grading system and the Severin classification system, respectively, in addition to assessing the acetabular index (AI), osteotomies healing, and presence of complications. We divided patients into two groups, younger than 30 months (group I) and older than 30 months (group II). RESULTS: We included 35 hips in group I and 36 in group II. All hips received OR + DPO, while 25 (69.4%) hips in group II had FO. The operative time was significantly longer in group II (103.19 ± 20.74 versus 72.43 ± 11.59 min, p < 0.001). After a mean follow up of 21.3 ± 2.3 months, the functional outcomes were satisfactory in 62 (87.3%) hips (94.3% in group I and 80.6% in group II, p = 0.35). There was a significant improvement in the AI in all patients compared with preoperative values (27.2° ± 2.9 versus 37° ± 4.2, p < 0.05). Furthermore, 63 (88.7%) hips had satisfactory radiographic outcomes (94.3% in group I and 83.3% in group II, p = 0.26), and all osteotomies showed radiographic healing. The overall complications incidence was significantly lower in group I compared with group II (5.7% versus 30.6%, p < 0.05), and avascular necrosis occurred in 4 (5.6%) hips, all in group II (p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: One-stage procedure entailing open reduction, Dega pelvic osteotomy, and femoral osteotomy when needed for managing DDH in patients younger than eight years old revealed acceptable clinical and radiological outcomes. However, there was a higher need for a concomitant femoral osteotomy in patients older than 2.5 years, and complications were more frequent.

Posterior cruciate ligament tibial insertion avulsion, management by open reduction and internal fixation using plate and screws through a direct posterior approach.

PURPOSE: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes after ORIF of PCL tibial insertion avulsion through the modified direct posterior approach using a small set plate and screws. METHODS: Between January 2017 to September 2019, 31 patients with isolated PCL tibial insertion bony avulsion were identified. Twenty-one (68%) patients presented within one week of the injury, 8 (26%) patients presented after injury by a mean 7.5 weeks (range 3:12), and two (6%) patients presented late at 7- and 9-months after injury. RESULTS: The mean age was 28.3 ± 6.3 years, 26 (84%) males, and 5 (16%) females. The mean operative time was 39.8 ± 7.9 min. In all patients, a one-third tubular plate was used. Fracture union was achieved in all patients after a mean 8 ± 2.1 weeks. The mean knee flexion at last follow up was 120.7° ± 4.3 with full extension in all patients. The knee Lysholm scoring was excellent in 27 (87%) patients, good in 3 (10%) patients, and fair in one (3%); the mean score was 93.4 ± 3.9. The PDT was positive in 4 patients (13%), three grade I, and one grade II. No neurovascular bundle or hardware related complications were reported. Two (6.5%) patients had a superficial wound infection with no further intervention. CONCLUSION: Using small set plates and screws for ORIF of PCL tibial avulsion fractures through a direct posterior approach revealed good results in terms of surgical exposure, safety, radiological and clinical outcomes.

All types of component malrotation affect the early patient-reported outcome measures after total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), whether clinical, radiological or survival analysis, have been well-studied. Still, there are some concerns about patient satisfaction with the outcome of the surgery and factors that might contribute to a suboptimal result. This study aims to determine if there is correlation between primary TKA malalignment and early patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty patients, who had primary TKA and a minimum of 2 years of follow up, were recruited for a detailed clinical and radiological examination. Knee alignment was measured in the coronal, sagittal and axial planes. Normal and the outlier measurements of the patients' knees were defined and the clinical results (PROMs) compared to see if there was a statistically significant difference. RESULTS: Correlation between postoperative limb malalignment in the coronal and the sagittal planes and PROMs was not significant. Conversely, there was significant negative correlation between all types of malrotation and PROMs. CONCLUSIONS: Although malalignment has been linked to inferior outcome and implant survival, our results showed that coronal and sagittal limb malalignment has no significant effect on early PROMs. However, all types of component rotational malalignment significantly worsen early PROMs.