Quality of Life Evaluation in Saudi Arabian Pediatric Patients with Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases Receiving 20% Subcutaneous IgG Infusions at Home.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) home infusion is widely used as an alternative to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). This study aimed to determine the quality of life (QoL) of patients with primary immunodeficiency (PID) after switching to home-based SCIG. METHODS: In this prospective open-label single-center study, QoL was determined using the validated Arabic version of the Child Health Questionnaire at baseline and 3 and 6 months after switching from IVIG to SCIG. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were recruited from July 2018 to August 2021, including 14 females and 10 males. The median age of the patients was 5 years (range, 0-14 years). The patients' diagnoses included severe combined immunodeficiency, combined immunodeficiency, agammaglobulinemia, Omenn syndrome, immunodysregulation, hyper-IgE syndrome, common variable immunodeficiency, and bare lymphocyte syndrome. The median duration on IVIG before inclusion was 40 months (range, 5-125 months). The QoL score showed a significant improvement in the patients' global health at 3 and 6 months compared with those at baseline and a significant improvement in the patients' general health at 3 and 6 months compared with that at baseline. The mean baseline serum IgG trough level was 8.8 ± 2.1 g/L. The mean serum IgG level was significantly higher on SCIG at both 3 and 6 months (11.7 ± 2.3 and 11.7 ± 2.5 g/L, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study involving an Arab population to show improvement in the QoL of patients with PID after switching from hospital-based IVIG to home-based 20% SCIG.

Graft Versus Host Disease Following HLA-Matched Sibling Donor Compared with Matched Related Donor for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for the Treatment of Severe Combined Immunodeficiency Disease.

BACKGROUND: One of the limiting factors for successful hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is graft versus host disease (GVHD). The EBMT/ESID guidelines for HSCT in severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) recommend no GVHD prophylaxis for a matched sibling donor (MSD). OBJECTIVE: To determine the risk of GVHD in MSD HSCT for SCID patients compared to matched related donor (MRD). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study compares MSD with MRD and the outcome of GVHD in all SCID patients who underwent HSCT between 1993 and 2013. All statistical analyses were done using IBM SPSS statistics software. RESULTS: One hundred forty-five SCID patients underwent 152 HSCTs while 82 (54%) received GVHD prophylaxis. GVHD occurred in 48 patients (31.5%); 20/48 (42%) had GVHD prophylaxis compared to 28/48 (58%) that did not, P = 0.022. Acute GVHD occurred at a higher trend in MSD, 37/120 (30.8%), compared to MRD, 6/32 (18.8%), P = 0.17. We also analyzed the outcome according to the period of HSCT. The first period was 1993 to 2003, 48 HSCTs, 43 MSD, 5 MRD; all patients had GVHD prophylaxis, and there was no difference in GVHD. The second period was 2004 to 2013: of 104 HSCTs, 77 had MSD and 27 had MRD; GVHD prophylaxis was used in 22.1% of MSD and 63% of MRD, P = 0.000. GVHD was significantly higher in the MSD (40.2%) compared to MRD (18.5%) patients, P = 0.041. CONCLUSION: GVHD prophylaxis in MSD transplant should be considered in SCID patients.

Unbiased targeted next-generation sequencing molecular approach for primary immunodeficiency diseases.

BACKGROUND: Molecular genetics techniques are an essential diagnostic tool for primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDs). The use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) provides a comprehensive way of concurrently screening a large number of PID genes. However, its validity and cost-effectiveness require verification. OBJECTIVES: We sought to identify and overcome complications associated with the use of NGS in a comprehensive gene panel incorporating 162 PID genes. We aimed to ascertain the specificity, sensitivity, and clinical sensitivity of the gene panel and its utility as a diagnostic tool for PIDs. METHODS: A total of 162 PID genes were screened in 261 patients by using the Ion Torrent Proton NGS sequencing platform. Of the 261 patients, 122 had at least 1 known causal mutation at the onset of the study and were used to assess the specificity and sensitivity of the assay. The remaining samples were from unsolved cases that were biased toward more phenotypically and genotypically complicated cases. RESULTS: The assay was able to detect the mutation in 117 (96%) of 122 positive control subjects with known causal mutations. For the unsolved cases, our assay resulted in a molecular genetic diagnosis for 35 of 139 patients. Interestingly, most of these cases represented atypical clinical presentations of known PIDs. CONCLUSIONS: The targeted NGS PID gene panel is a sensitive and cost-effective diagnostic tool that can be used as a first-line molecular assay in patients with PIDs. The assay is an alternative choice to the complex and costly candidate gene approach, particularly for patients with atypical presentation of known PID genes.

Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases in Saudi Arabia: a Tertiary Care Hospital Experience over a Period of Three Years (2010-2013).

PURPOSE: Primary immunodeficiencies (PID) are a group of heterogeneous diseases. Epidemiological studies from databases worldwide show geographical variation. In this study the objective is to determine the spectrum of PID in Saudi Arabia by analyzing the database in a referral tertiary hospital. METHODS: This is a prospective data collection by interviews and medical chart review for all PID patients followed at the King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center (KFSH&RC) from May 2010 to April 2013. RESULTS: A total of 502 patients presented (53 % male and 47 % female). Combined immunodeficiencies were the most common (59.7 %), followed by predominantly antibody deficiencies (12.3 %), congenital defects of phagocyte (9.4 %), combined immunodeficiencies with associated or syndromic features (6.2 %), disease of immune dysregulation (6 %), complement deficiencies (5.8), and defects in innate immunity (0.6 %). The most common combined immunodeficiencies phenotype was T-B-SCID (17 %). The patients' ages ranged from less than 1 year old to 78 years, and 394 patients (78.2 %) are in the paediatrics age group (<14 years). The overall mean age of symptoms onset was 17 months and the overall mean delay in diagnosis was 21.6 months. Recurrent infections were the most common occurring clinical presentation (66 %), followed by family history (26 %). Consanguinity was found in 75 % of the patients. A total of 308 (61 %) patients had undergone stem cell transplantation (SCT). CONCLUSION: The study revealed that combined immunodeficiencies are not uncommon and are the most frequent occurring diagnosis in our patient population. This study is a prerequisite to establish a national registry of primary immunodeficiency in Saudi Arabia.