ABSTRACT
This article details team development within a longitudinal cohort study designed to bring team-based, whole person care early in the course of serious illness. The primary innovation of this approach is the use of nonclinically trained care guides who support patients and family members by focusing care around what matters most to patients, linking to resources, collaborating with other providers, and offering continuity through care transitions. By describing the development of this team, we document the kinds of questions others may ask during the process of team creation.
Subject(s)
Continuity of Patient Care/organization & administration , Patient Care Management/organization & administration , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Terminal Care/organization & administration , Advance Care Planning/organization & administration , Cooperative Behavior , Counseling/organization & administration , Family , Health Education/organization & administration , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Medication Reconciliation/organization & administrationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Improving the efficiency and effectiveness of primary care treatment of patients with chronic illness is an important goal in reforming the U.S. health care system. Reducing occupational conflicts and creating interdependent primary care teams is crucial for the effective functioning of new models being developed to reorganize chronic care. Occupational conflict, role interdependence, and resistance to change in a proof-of-concept pilot test of one such model that uses a new kind of employee in the primary care office, a "care guide," were analyzed. Care guides are lay individuals who help chronic disease patients and their providers achieve standard health goals. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine the development of occupational boundaries, interdependence of care guides and primary care team members, and acceptance by clinic employees of this new kind of health worker. METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: A mixed methods, pilot study was conducted using qualitative analysis; clinic, provider, and patient surveys; administrative data; and multivariate analysis. Qualitative analysis examined the emergence of the care guide role. Administrative data and surveys were used to examine patterns of interdependence between care guides, physicians, team members, and clinic staff; obtain physician evaluations of the care guide role; and evaluate the effect of care guides on patient perceptions of care coordination and follow-up. FINDINGS: Evaluation of implementation of the care guide model showed that (a) the care guide scope of practice was clearly defined; (b) interdependent relationships between care guides and providers were formed; (c) relational triads consisting of patient, care guide, and physician were created; (d) patients and providers were supported in managing chronic disease; and (e) resistance to this model among traditional employees was minimized. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The feasibility of implementing a new care model for chronic disease management in the primary care setting, identifying factors associated with a positive organizational experience, was shown in this study.
Subject(s)
Conflict, Psychological , Interprofessional Relations , Primary Health Care/methods , Professional Role , Health Personnel/organization & administration , Humans , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Patient Satisfaction , Physicians, Primary Care/organization & administration , Pilot Projects , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Primary Health Care/standards , Program DevelopmentABSTRACT
Lay persons ("care guides") without previous clinical experience were hired by a primary care clinic, trained for 2 weeks, and assigned to help 332 patients and their providers manage their diabetes, hypertension, and congestive heart failure. One year later, failure by these patients to meet nationally recommended guidelines was reduced by 28%, P < .001. Improvement was seen in tobacco usage, blood pressure control, pneumonia vaccination, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, annual eye examinations, aspirin use, and microalbuminuria testing. Care guides served an average of 111 patients at an annual per patient cost of $392. Further testing of this model is warranted.
