Improving cardiovascular risk reduction for primary prevention--utility of lifetime risk assessment.

The objective of this article is to review the evidence basis for short-term risk assessments of overall coronary heart disease (CHD) burden as compared with lifetime risk estimates of CHD, based on the current medical literature. We reviewed literature published in the last 6 years using the terms "cardiovascular prevention," "Framingham risk scoring," "lifetime risk," and "cardiovascular risk assessment," and subsequently evaluated 98 publications to determine the variation in these approaches to estimate cardiovascular risk factors and impact on clinical decision making. The current evidence base suggests that lifetime risk estimates offset the significant impact of age on traditional, short-term risk estimates of cardiovascular risk. We conclude that the use of lifetime risk estimates may be more clinically meaningful than traditional, short-term risk estimates to assess an individual's overall risk burden, and may prevent the potential delay of therapeutic interventions to reduce cardiovascular events. For primary care, this difference may be of relevance to patients and should be communicated to them.

Collaborative Initiatives in the Care of Early Stage Breast Cancer: Reduction in Variation of Breast-Conserving Therapy.

Breast-conserving therapy (BCT) has survival results comparable to those obtained with modified radical mastectomy (MST). However, studies suggest variations in the rates of breast-conserving therapy that are not explained by comorbidities or age. The Virginia Health Quality Center collaborated with 40 Virginia hospitals to address patterns of breast cancer treatment. Medicare Peer Review Organization data files were used to identify all Medicare beneficiaries with a primary diagnosis of breast cancer from January 1, 1992, through June 30, 1993. Explicit chart review was performed on a random sample of patients with early stage disease receiving either BCT or MST. At baseline, the BCT rate was 21.1% after controlling for access to radiation facilities, medical conditions, and demographic variables. Hospitals with the highest rates of appropriate BCT served as resources for the project. We provided data on BCT rates to 40 participating hospitals. Hospitals then submitted comprehensive plans to address the performance of BCT. A four-step cooperative improvement intervention was employed to initiate and sustain changes at the hospital level. Interventions included individual hospital feedback, dissemination of model cancer care processes at high-performing institutions, and integration of oncology services for breast cancer treatment decisions. One year after implementation, the overall BCT rate in Virginia increased to 25.5%. Hospitals with the lowest BCT rates increased their average rate from 6.6% to 21.2%. Middle tercile hospitals increased BCT rates by 10%. Variation between the lowest and highest terciles was reduced to 9%. Variation in BCT rates can be reduced by a collaborative program centered on addressing processes of care for breast cancer treatment for Medicare patients with early stage disease.