Is Surgical Intervention the Optimal Therapy for the Treatment of Aortic Valve Stenosis for Patients With Intermediate Society of Thoracic Surgeons Risk Score?

BACKGROUND: Patients at intermediate risk (IR) according to The Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score are today frequently oriented toward the transfemoral aortic valve replacement (TAVR) option. Our goal was to evaluate the best treatment strategies for IR patients with severe aortic stenosis. METHODS: Of a consecutive series of 1,144 surgical aortic valve replacements (AVRs) performed in our institution between 2008 and 2014, we reviewed the early and late outcomes of two different groups: a low-risk (LR) group of 470 patients, and an IR group of 620. We eliminated from the analysis 54 high-risk patients who were currently candidates for TAVR. All patients underwent surgical AVR with or without concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting. Social Security database interrogation provided long-term information. RESULTS: The early mortality rate (30 days) between LR and IR patients was similar (1.70% vs 2.74%, p = 0.25) and both lower than predicted mortality rates. However, cumulative 5-year survival was significantly higher in LR patients (86.3%) than in IR patients (75.4%; p = 0.0007 by log-rank test), although excellent in IR group. Comparing IR survivors and nonsurvivors, ages at operation were 69.5 ± 12.7 years for survivors vs 75.4 ± 9.6 years for those experiencing late deaths (p = 0.002). Risk factors for late deaths after multivariate analysis were age, hemodialysis, and chronic lung disease. CONCLUSIONS: Most IR patients today should undergo surgical AVR, but because of survival rates combined with still unavailable late structural deterioration rates in TAVR valves, patients in the IR group with high Society of Thoracic Surgeons scores and known risk factors may be better served with TAVR as data regarding late percutaneous valve function accrue.

Epicardial ultrasonic ablation of atrial fibrillation during concomitant cardiac surgery is a valid option in patients with ischemic heart disease.

BACKGROUND: Surgical therapy of atrial fibrillation concomitant to coronary bypass grafting using epicardial Ultrasound technology was assessed after a minimum 6-month follow-up. METHODS AND RESULTS: A cohort of 98 consecutive patients with a mean age of 72+/-7.58 years and a primary diagnosis of ischemic heart disease had surgery for structural disease. Coronary artery bypass grafting was isolated (n=51) or associated (n=47) with various combinations of aortic, mitral, tricuspid, and left ventricular restoration surgery. Atrial fibrillation duration ranged from 6 to 360 months (mean 71 months) and was permanent in 47 patients, paroxysmal in 34, and persistent in 17. Left atrial mean diameter was 48+/-6.71 mm. A circumferential ablation was performed off-pump, before the concomitant procedure, and was always associated with an epicardial mitral line lesion using the same technology. At 3-, 6-, and 12-month visits, patients were routinely evaluated by physical examination, ECG, chest X-ray, and 24-hour Holter. There were 1 early death (1%) and 4 extracardiac late deaths. A pacemaker was implanted in 4 patients. Mean follow-up time was 325 days, 2 patients being lost to follow-up. Freedom from atrial fibrillation and flutter at the 6-month visit was 84% for the entire population, 76% in patients with permanent, and 91% in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. At the 1-year visit, 85% were free from atrial fibrillation or flutter. CONCLUSIONS: Epicardial beating heart ablation using therapeutic ultrasound is safe, reliable, and can easily treat atrial fibrillation in a difficult surgical population of patients with primary ischemic heart disease.

Ultrasonic cardiac ablation for atrial fibrillation during concomitant cardiac surgery: long-term clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic ultrasound as an alternative to the maze procedure was evaluated in this large US experience. Safety and efficacy were assessed at 6-, 12-, and 18-month visits with systematic 24-hour Holter monitoring. METHODS: From February 2005 to February 2007, 220 patients were prospectively enrolled in a single center study, and among them 129 patients with concomitant cardiac surgery and at least 6-month follow-up were reviewed. Primary procedures were mitral surgery in 50% of the cases, coronary bypass in 32%, and aortic surgery in 16%. Atrial fibrillation was permanent in 66 (51.1%), paroxysmal in 43 (33.3%), and persistent in 20 (15.5%) patients. An epicardial and circumferential left atrial encircling line was created on the beating heart. Routinely a mitral isthmus line was also created from the left atrium epicardium using an ultrasonic handheld device. RESULTS: No morbidity or mortality was device-related. There were four (2.33%) early deaths and six late extra-cardiac deaths. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 670 days with a mean follow-up of 358.5 days, median 340 days with two patients lost to follow-up. Freedom from atrial fibrillation or left-sided flutter was 83.2%, 84.4%, and 86.2% at 6, 12, and 18 months, respectively. A pacemaker was implanted in seven patients (5.4%). Male gender and left atrial dimension were significant risk factors for failure. CONCLUSIONS: The study confirms the excellent safety record of the technology, and the efficacy at the level reported in a previous European multicenter study. Efficacy is also maintained at longer (12 and 18 months) follow-up.