Discrepancies between two total IgE assays and difference in reference intervals in healthy adults.

OBJECTIVE: To compare total immunoglobulin (Ig) E assay performance characteristics between Abbott Architect and Siemens Immulite test systems. Reference intervals were also determined for both platforms in an American population of healthy adults. METHODS: Agreement of the two total IgE assays was evaluated in a cohort of 331 subjects with normal complete blood count (CBC) and comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP) results. Reference intervals were established in 302 subjects after exclusion of atopic individuals on the Abbott Architect and Siemens Immulite test systems. RESULTS: We demonstrated a 32% positive bias for total IgE quantitation on the Siemens Immulite platform compared to the Abbott Architect, despite both methods calibrated against the same WHO international reference material (75/502), Furthermore, the upper limit of the reference interval (95th percentile) was determined to be higher for the Siemens Immulite assay compared to the Abbott Architect (132 and 102 IU/mL, respectively). CONCLUSION: Despite the use of a common WHO reference material for total IgE assay calibration, significant differences in quantitation was observed between two FDA-cleared test systems. Given that, it is warranted for clinical laboratories to verify vendor established reference intervals and adjust accordingly based on internal assessment of the normal range.

Defect in Automated Antigen Excess Detection Discovered after Reviewing Serum Free Light Chain Results in Context with Clinical Findings.

Serum κ and λ free light chains can be markedly elevated in monoclonal gammopathies; consequently, serum free light chain (sFLC) immunoassays are susceptible to inaccuracies caused by antigen excess. As a result, diagnostics manufacturers have attempted to automate antigen excess detection. A 75-year-old African-American woman had laboratory findings consistent with severe anemia, acute kidney injury, and moderate hypercalcemia. Serum and urine protein electrophoresis and sFLC testing were ordered. The sFLC results initially showed mildly elevated free λ light chains and normal free κ. The pathologist noted that sFLC results were discrepant with the bone marrow biopsy, electrophoresis, and immunofixation results. After manual dilution of the serum, repeat sFLC testing revealed significantly higher λ sFLC results. Antigen excess causing falsely low sFLC quantitation may not be detected by immunoassay instruments as intended. Correlation with clinical history, serum and urine protein electrophoresis results, and other laboratory findings is essential when interpreting sFLC results.

Falsely decreased vancomycin caused by rheumatoid factor: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Vancomycin is associated with potential nephrotoxicity and trough concentrations need to be monitored in certain patients. Falsely decreased vancomycin measurement may result in overtreatment and need to be identified promptly by clinicians and pharmacists to avoid toxicities. METHODS AND RESULTS: We report a case of rheumatoid factor-mediated falsely low vancomycin measurement with Abbott particle-enhanced turbidimetric inhibition immunoassay (PETINIA) method. Reanalyzing the sample using an alternative method, removing the interferences using heterophile blocking reagent as well as rheumatoid factor clean-up solution all helped to solve the false results. Results from alternative method and interference studies showed vancomycin concentrations reached toxic concentrations in the patient and administration of the drug was immediately terminated. The patient experienced a transient increase in serum creatinine. CONCLUSIONS: Even though most modern immunoassays use blocking agents to neutralize interfering antibodies such as rheumatoid factor, it is important for health care professionals to understand that occasional interference still occurs due to the heterogeneous nature of rheumatoid factor.