ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: We aimed to find out whether the Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF) can predict mortality up to 7 years when compared with the Mini Nutritional Assessment-Long Form (MNA-LF) in geriatric outpatients. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted in patients (≥65 years) who were admitted to the geriatric outpatient clinic of a university hospital. MNA-SF and MNA-LF results were available for all patients. Patients were grouped as normal nutrition status (score 12-14), at risk of malnutrition (score between 8 and 11), or malnourished (score ≤7) according to MNA-SF. Based on MNA-LF, patients had normal nutrition status (score ≥24), were at risk of malnutrition (score 17-23.5), or were malnourished (score <17). Survival of the patients was assessed retrospectively. RESULTS: The study included 209 patients (62.2% female). During the 7-year follow-up, 77 (36.8%) patients died. After adjusting for age, sex, and Charlson comorbidity index, MNA-SF was significantly associated with all-cause mortality during 6-month, 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, and 7-year follow-up time. MNA-LF was superior to MNA-SF to estimate 6-month (P = 0.004) and 1-year mortality (P = 0.031). There was no difference between MNA-SF and MNA-LF regarding 3-year, 5-year, and 7-year mortality. CONCLUSION: MNA-SF can predict short-term and long-term mortality in geriatric outpatients as well as MNA-LF. A cut-off value of 11, indicating risk of malnutrition according to MNA-SF, may be used for the risk estimation of 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year mortality. Therefore, this study highlights the importance of screening all geriatric outpatients for malnutrition and especially the risk of malnutrition for early intervention and treatment.
