The efficacy and tolerability of risedronate once a week for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

This study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of risedronate once a week (35 mg and 50 mg) compared with risedronate 5 mg once daily in women with osteoporosis. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, 2-year study; the primary efficacy assessment was performed after 1 year. Subjects were women aged 50 years or older who had been postmenopausal for at least 5 years, with either a bone mineral density (BMD) T-score of -2.5 or lower (lumbar spine or proximal femur) or a T-score lower than -2 and at least one prevalent vertebral fracture. Subjects received risedronate 5 mg once daily, 35 mg once a week or 50 mg once a week. All subjects also received 1 g daily of elemental calcium supplementation and supplemental vitamin D if the baseline serum levels were low. The primary efficacy measure was percent change in lumbar spine BMD at 12 months. A total of 1,456 women were randomized and received medication; 1,209 (83%) women completed 12 months. The mean percent change (SE) in lumbar spine BMD after 12 months was 4.0% (0.2%) in the 5 mg daily group, 3.9% (0.2%) in the 35 mg group, and 4.2% (0.2%) in the 50 mg group; each once-a-week treatment was determined to be as effective as the daily treatment. Outcomes of the secondary efficacy measurements and safety assessments were also similar in all 3 groups after 12 months. Risedronate 35 mg and 50 mg once a week provide the same efficacy and safety as the daily 5 mg regimen; therefore, the lower dose, 35 mg once a week, is considered optimal for women with postmenopausal osteoporosis who desire a once-a-week regimen.

Two-year effects of alendronate on bone mineral density and vertebral fracture in patients receiving glucocorticoids: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled extension trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the continued efficacy and safety of alendronate (ALN) for up to 2 years in patients receiving glucocorticoids. METHODS: This is a 12-month extension of a previously completed 1-year trial of daily ALN, performed to evaluate the effects of ALN over a total of 2 years in 66 men and 142 women continuing to receive at least 7.5 mg of prednisone or equivalent daily. All patients received supplemental calcium and vitamin D. The primary end point was the mean percentage change in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) from baseline to 24 months. Other outcomes included changes in hip and total body BMD, biochemical markers of bone turnover, radiographic joint damage of the hands, and vertebral fracture incidence. RESULTS: The mean (+/-SEM) lumbar spine BMD increased by 2.8 +/- 0.6%, 3.9 +/- 0.7%, and 3.7 +/- 0.6%, respectively, in the groups that received 5 mg, 10 mg, and 2.5/10 mg of ALN daily (P < or = 0.001) and decreased by -0.8 +/- 0.6% in the placebo group (P not significant) over 24 months. In patients receiving any dose of ALN, BMD was increased at the trochanter (P < or = 0.05) and maintained at the femoral neck. Total body BMD was increased in patients receiving 5 or 10 mg ALN (P < or = 0.01). These 2 dose levels of ALN were more effective than placebo at all sites (P < or = 0.05). Bone turnover markers (N-telopeptides of type I collagen and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase) decreased 60% and 25%, respectively, during treatment with ALN (P < or = 0.05). There were fewer patients with new vertebral fractures in the ALN group versus the placebo group (0.7% versus 6.8%; P = 0.026). The safety profile was similar between treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Alendronate is an effective, well-tolerated therapy for the prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, with sustained treatment advantages for up to 2 years.

Risedronate therapy prevents corticosteroid-induced bone loss: a twelve-month, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study.

OBJECTIVE: Risedronate, a new pyridinyl bisphosphonate, is a potent antiresorptive bone agent. This study examines the safety and efficacy of daily, oral risedronate therapy for the prevention of corticosteroid-induced bone loss. METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study was conducted in 224 men and women who were initiating long-term corticosteroid treatment. Patients received either risedronate (2.5 mg or 5 mg) or placebo daily for 12 months. Each patient also received 500 mg of elemental calcium daily. The primary outcome measure was the percentage of change in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD). Secondary measures included proximal femur BMD and incidence of vertebral fractures. RESULTS: After 12 months, the lumbar spine BMD (mean +/- SEM) did not change significantly compared with baseline in the 5-mg (0.6 +/- 0.5%) or the 2.5-mg (-0.1 +/- 0.7%) risedronate groups, while it decreased in the placebo group (-2.8 +/- 0.5%; P < 0.05). The mean differences in BMD between the 5-mg risedronate and the placebo groups were 3.8 +/- 0.8% at the lumbar spine (P < 0.001), 4.1 +/- 1.0% at the femoral neck (P < 0.001), and 4.6 +/- 0.8% at the femoral trochanter (P < 0.001). A trend toward a decrease in the incidence of vertebral fracture was observed in the 5-mg risedronate group compared with the placebo group (5.7% versus 17.3%; P = 0.072). Risedronate was well tolerated, and the incidence of upper gastrointestinal adverse events was comparable among the 3 groups. CONCLUSION: Risedronate therapy prevents bone loss in patients initiating long-term corticosteroid treatment.

Use of bone alkaline phosphatase to monitor alendronate therapy in individual postmenopausal osteoporotic women.

BACKGROUND: Biochemical bone markers are sensitive to the changes in bone turnover that result from treatment of postmenopausal osteoporotic women with antiresorptive therapies. Although information is available on the use of bone markers in monitoring therapy in groups of subjects, less is known regarding how these markers perform in individual patients. METHODS: Serum bone alkaline phosphatase (bone ALP) concentrations, measured with the Tandem(R) Ostase(R) assay, were used to monitor the biochemical response of bone in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis receiving either 10 mg/day alendronate therapy (n = 74) or calcium supplementation (n = 148) for 24 months. RESULTS: Bone ALP decreased significantly from baseline at 3 months (P

Effect of three years of oral alendronate treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVE: Oral alendronate sodium is a potent, specific inhibitor of osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. To assess its efficacy and safety, a 3-year, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of 478 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis was conducted. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Subjects received either placebo, alendronate 5 or 10 mg/day for 3 years, or 20 mg/day for 2 years followed by 5 mg/day for 1 year (20/5 mg). All subjects received 500 mg/day of supplemental calcium. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). RESULTS: After 3 years, alendronate 10 mg induced marked increases in BMD of the lumbar spine (9.6 +/- 0.4%), femoral neck (4.7 +/- 0.7%) and trochanter (7.4 +/- 0.6%) (mean +/- SE; each P < or = 0.001) versus decreases of 0.8 to 1.6% with placebo. Progressive increases at these sites in the alendoronate 10 mg group were significant during both the second and third years. Alendronate 10 mg increased total body BMD (1.6 +/- 0.3%, P < or = 0.001), and prevented loss but did not increase BMD at the 1/3 forearm site. Alendronate 20/5 mg was no more effective, whereas alendronate 5 mg was significantly less effective than 10 mg at all sites. Bone turnover decreased to a stable nadir over 3 months for resorption markers (urine deoxypyridinoline) and over 6 months for formation markers (alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin). Mean loss of stature was reduced by 41% in alendronate treated subjects (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: The safety profile of alendronate was similar to that of placebo. At 10 mg, there were no trends toward increased frequency of any adverse experience except for abdominal pain, which was usually mild, transient, and resolved with continued treatment. Thus, alendronate appears to be an important advance in the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

The systemic effect of intraarticular administration of corticosteroid on markers of bone formation and bone resorption in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of intraarticular (IA) corticosteroid use on bone metabolism in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Levels of the bone turnover markers, serum osteocalcin (BGP) and urinary pyridinoline (PYD), were monitored in RA patients for 4 weeks following a single IA administration of xylocaine alone or in combination with triamcinolone acetonide. RESULTS: Levels of the bone resorption marker, PYD, did not show any significant change, whereas BGP levels were drastically decreased 1 day after IA administration of corticosteroid, and then returned to pretreatment levels by day 14. The efficacy of IA corticosteroid treatment lasted for 4 weeks. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that IA administration of corticosteroid has no net effects on bone resorption and only a transient systemic effect on bone formation. IA corticosteroid administration may be better for bone metabolism than continuous use of orally administered corticosteroid.

Prospective 5-year followup of recombinant interferon-gamma in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To define clinical and laboratory outcomes of longterm recombinant interferon-gamma (rIFN-gamma) treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Patients with RA (70) completing a 12-week multicenter double blind trial comparing rIFN-gamma with placebo were enrolled in a longterm prospective protocol evaluating rIFN-gamma in RA. RESULTS: The majority of patients sustained clinical improvement for one year. Eight (11%) patients with RA continued to receive rIFN-gamma after 5 years. One patient fulfilled remission criteria. rIFN-gamma was well tolerated with remarkably few suspected adverse drug reactions. Forty-seven (67%) patients discontinued rIFN-gamma because of lack of efficacy, 7 (10%) because of concurrent illnesses, 5 (7%) were not compliant to study protocol, 3 (4%) developed suspected adverse drug reactions for a total of 62 (89%) withdrawals over the 5 years of followup. Patients continuing rIFN-gamma treatment for 5 years had lower initial total leukocyte and neutrophil counts and higher hemoglobin and hematocrit levels than patients who discontinued rIFN-gamma during the 5-year followup. CONCLUSIONS: Longterm treatment of RA with rIFN-gamma was generally well tolerated. Although many patients maintained sustained clinical improvement for at least one year, the main reason for discontinuing the drug over 5 years was the lack of continued benefit.

Prospective two-year followup of recombinant interferon-gamma in rheumatoid arthritis.

Seventy patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) completing a 12-week multicenter double blind trial comparing recombinant human interferon-gamma (r-IFN-gamma) with placebo were enrolled in a longterm prospective protocol evaluating r-IFN-gamma in RA. Forty (57%) patients after 1 year and 26 (37%) patients after 2 years continued the drug with sustained clinical benefit. Over 2 years, r-IFN-gamma was discontinued in 44 patients (lack of efficacy--25, withdrawn consent--7, noncompliant--4, suspected adverse drug reactions--2, concurrent illness--6). Two years of treatment with r-IFN-gamma were well tolerated with sustained clinical benefit in some patients with few significant adverse drug reactions.

Double-blind trial of recombinant gamma-interferon versus placebo in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

One hundred five patients were enrolled in a 12-week, randomized, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of recombinant human gamma-interferon (rHu gamma-IFN) for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Fifty-four patients received rHu gamma-IFN and 51 received placebo. Forty-two patients in each group completed the 12-week trial. Some clinical improvement occurred in both groups of patients. Although the improvement with rHu gamma-IFN was greater than that with placebo, the differences were generally not statistically significant.

Low dose prednisone therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: a double blind study.

Prednisone, 5 mg taken each morning, was added to other drugs in 18 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Sixteen patients were given a placebo in this double blind study. After 24 weeks, all patients were given the placebo. Slight functional improvement was noted in the prednisone group during the 24-week period, but deterioration after switching to placebo was sustained for at least 8 weeks. Progression of hand erosions occurred in 1 prednisone-treated patient, and in 4 controls. An asymptomatic vertebral spine compression fracture developed in 2 patients given prednisone; this was the only toxicity noted possibly due to this therapy. Minimal dose prednisone may be useful as "bridge" therapy between nonsteroidal antiinflammatory therapy and use of disease-modifying drugs.

Aspirin and renal disease.

Historic data has suggested a relationship between aspirin ingestion and the subsequent occurrence of renal papillary necrosis. In most case reports, analgesic mixtures containing aspirin, phenacetin, and caffeine were taken. This resulted in the term "analgesic nephropathy." In clinical studies, phenacetin has been the major common denominator, whereas experimental data in rats implicate aspirin as the major nephrotoxin. Except with massive doses, attempts at producing nephrotoxicity in laboratory animals with phenacetin have failed; however, a high proportion of rats fed aspirin alone have developed renal papillary necrosis. Acute reversible effects of aspirin on renal function in patients with active lupus nephritis have been demonstrated. Data are presented in 46 patients who took aspirin continuously for 10 or more years (mean total dosage 35 kg) in whom there was no evidence of significant renal dysfunction. These data suggest that, while aspirin may cause minor histologic or functional renal abnormalities, it is unlikely that long-term salicylate consumption causes serious renal disease.

Aspirin and analgesic nephropathy.

To assess the effects of long-term aspirin ingestion on renal function, we studied all of the patients at the Massachusetts General Hospital Arthritis Clinic who had been taking aspirin continuously for ten or more years. Aspirin ingestion was documented by multiple, random, unannounced blood salicylate levels. Most of these 46 patients had seropositive rheumatoid arthritis. All creatinine and BUN levels were normal. Maximum recorded specific gravities were greater than 1.019 in 43 of 46 patients. These data suggest that long-term salicylate ingestion does not cause renal damage.