Posterior spinal fusion with lowest instrumented vertebra at L4 in idiopathic scoliosis: optimizing radiographic outcomes using pre-operative flexibility radiographs.

PURPOSE: In idiopathic scoliosis (IS), there is general agreement ending PSFs at L3 or more cranial is preferred to optimize spinal motion, and extending PSFs to L4 may be necessary; however, this may also cause coronal imbalance or caudal disc wedging post-operatively due to leveling of L4 tilt. The purpose of this study was to identify a pre-operative radiographic measurement, which can be used to quantify the optimal amount of L4 tilt for ideal post-operative radiographic alignment. METHODS: The study was a retrospective analysis of IS patients who underwent PSF to L4, with minimum 2-year follow-up post-operatively. Optimal outcome was defined by coronal balance, and L4-5 and L5-S1 disc wedging. RESULTS: 44 patients (84% females, mean age 13.6 years) were included. Analysis of pre-operative flexibility radiographs determined only the L5 tilt on the right side-bending (RSB) radiograph correlated with optimal outcome 2 (p = 0.03). To confirm the validity, the RSB value was subtracted from the post-operative C7-L4 tilt and the odds ratio analysis which was significantly correlated with optimal outcome 1 at final follow-up (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1-1.09). CONCLUSIONS: In PSF to L4 for IS, L5 tilt measured from the pre-operative supine RSB radiograph can be used to optimize radiographic outcomes. Matching the pre-operative L5 tilt on RSB radiograph by leaving L4 tilted at the end of the PSF construct during surgery, quantified by the C7-L4 acute angle tilt, appears to be a useful method to achieve the desired post-operative alignment.

Impact of Spinal Deformity Characteristics on Patient-reported Outcome Measurement Information System Scores in Patients With Idiopathic Scoliosis Undergoing Posterior Spinal Fusion.

INTRODUCTION: The impact of posterior spinal fusion (PSF) on physical function and pain and mental health in pediatric patients as quantified by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), developed by the National Institute of Health, is largely unknown. The purpose of this study is to report the changes of PROMIS scores for upper extremity (UE), pain interference (PI), mobility (MOB), and peer relationships (PR) after PSF in patients with idiopathic scoliosis (IS), compare postoperative changes in PROMIS PI and Scoliosis Research Society-30 pain scores, and evaluate associations between curve characteristics and PROMIS scores. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 122 patients (<18 years old) who underwent PSF for IS was identified through electronic medical record search. PROMIS scores were obtained preoperatively and 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 years, 2 years, and 3 years postoperatively. RESULTS: The mean age of the cohort was 14.2 ± 1.6 years, and the mean Cobb angle was 62.9 ± 13.8° at surgery. Eighty patients had preoperative PROMIS data. UE and MOB scores were statistically lower at 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively and returned to baseline with a longer follow-up. PI scores were significantly lower at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. PR was unchanged up to 2 years postoperatively and then showed significant improvement. There was a statistically significant negative relationships between lowest instrumented vertebra and PROMIS UE and MOB scores at 6 weeks and 1 year postoperatively, but not at a longer follow-up. There were no significant differences noted in PI and PR PROMIS scores and lowest instrumented vertebra. PROMIS scores were not statistically associated with the Lenke Classification, number of vertebral levels fused, or percentage coronal correction. DISCUSSION: Changes in PROMIS functional domains (UE and MOB) postoperatively normalize at longer follow-ups. Changes in PI and PR demonstrated improvements over preoperative values at 1 to 2 years postoperatively. Preoperative coronal and sagittal measures, and the percentage correction did not correlate with any PROMIS scores.

Striving for Inclusive Excellence in the Recruitment of Diverse Surgical Residents During COVID-19.

The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically altered the 2020 residency application cycle and resulted in many changes to the usual application processes. Particular attention should be placed on the obstacles faced by applicants who are underrepresented in medicine (URiM) as they may be disproportionately affected by the changes in 2020. These challenges are especially relevant in competitive surgical specialties, where racial and gender diversity already lags behind other medical specialties. Inclusive excellence is a guiding philosophy in creating equitable resident selection processes. It focuses on the multilayered processes that form the foundation of inclusive institutional culture, while recognizing that excellence and inclusivity are mutually reinforcing and not mutually exclusive. A key tenant in inclusive excellence for resident recruiting involves applying an equity lens in all decision making. An equity lens allows programs to continuously evaluate resident selection policies and processes through an intentional equity-forward approach. In addition to using an equity lens, programs should emphasize the importance of equity-focused skill building, which ensures that all individuals engaged in the resident selection process have the tools and knowledge to recognize biases. Finally, institutions should implement specific programming for URiM applicants to provide them with information about key aspects of department culture and mechanisms of support for URiM trainees. Every residency program should adopt a sustained perspective of inclusive excellence, in this application cycle and beyond. The status quo has existed for far too long, and COVID-19 offers institutions and their residency programs a unique opportunity to try new and innovative equity-forward practices.

Hyperglycemia as a risk factor for postoperative early wound infection after bicondylar tibial plateau fractures: Determining a predictive model based on four methods.

OBJECTIVES: Identify a glucose threshold that would put patients with isolated bicondylar tibial plateau fractures at risk of early wound infection (i.e. < 90 days). DESIGN: Retrospective review of medical records. SETTING: Academic American College of Surgeons (ACS) Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS: Adult patients between 2010 and 2015 with an operatively treated isolated bicondylar tibial plateau fracture and at least three glucose measurements during their hospitalization. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: To predict infection using four different methods: maximum preoperative blood glucose (PBG), maximum blood glucose (MGB), Hyperglycemic Index (HGI), and Time-Weighted Average Glucose (TWAG). RESULTS: 126/381 patients met our inclusion criteria. Fifteen (12%) patients had an open fracture and 30/126 (23%) developed an infection. Median glucose for each predictive method studied was 114 (IQR 101.2-137.8) mg/dL for PBG, 144 (IQR 119-169.8) mg/dL for MBG, 0.8 (IQR 0.20-1.60) mmol/L for HGI, and 120.4 (IQR 106.0-135.6) mg/dL for TWAG. As expected, infected patients had higher PBG, MGB, and TWAG. HGI was similar in both groups. None of these differences prove to be statistically significant (p > .05). Logistic regression models for all the methods showed that having an open fracture was the strongest predictor of infection. CONCLUSION: It is well known that stress-induced hyperglycemia increases the risk of infection, we present and compare four models that have been used in other medical fields. In our study, none of the methods presented identified a glucose threshold that would increase the risk of infection in patients with bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective review, Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Opiate Prescribing Practices After Common Isolated Lower Extremity Injuries.

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective study aimed at identifying opiate prescribing practices, the number of morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) prescribed by orthopaedic and nonorthopaedic providers in patients with operatively treated isolated lower extremity fractures, and provide opiate prescribing recommendations. METHODS: Patients older than 18 years with isolated lower extremity (unicondylar, bicondylar, tibial shaft, pilon, and ankle) fractures between 2005 and 2016 were identified. Prescribing information was obtained from the State Controlled Substance Monitoring Database. Descriptive statistics were calculated for each injury and plotted for MME use. Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon tests were used for data analysis. To aid in clinical relevance, MMEs were converted to number of pills of oxycodone 10 mg (OC 10 mg). RESULTS: Three hundred forty-one patients met our inclusion criteria. Mean age was 45 years; 56% (192/341) were men. Forty-seven percent (159/341) were prescribed opiates before their injury. Orthopaedic providers prescribed more opiates to patients with pilon fractures compared with unicondylar (P = 0.010), tibial shaft (P < 0.001), and ankle (P < 0.001) fractures. Bicondylar plateau fracture patients also received more opiates when compared with unicondylar (P = 0.001), tibial shaft (P < 0.001), and ankle (P < 0.001) fractures. Nonorthopaedic providers prescribed more opiates to patients with pilon fractures when compared with unicondylar (P = 0.006), bicondylar (P < 0.001), tibial shaft (P < 0.001), and ankle fractures (P = 0.006). Differences between orthopaedic and nonorthopaedic MMEs prescribed are significantly different for each injury type (<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with pilon or bicondylar tibial plateau fractures are currently being prescribed more opiates when compared with other isolated fractures. We have developed an opiate prescription guideline based on what is being prescribed by orthopaedic providers.

Opioid Prescribing Practices After Isolated Pilon Fractures.

The purpose of our study was to identify the opioid-prescribing practices after operative treatment of isolated pilon fractures at a level 1 trauma center. Patients ≥ 18 years of age with an operatively treated isolated pilon fracture between 2005 and 2015 were identified. Total morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) were then calculated. Mean and standard deviations were calculated for patients without a history of opiate use and for patients with a history of opiate use within 1 year prior to injury. Data were obtained from the State Controlled Substance Monitoring Database. Seventy-two patients met our inclusion criteria; of these, 54% (39/72) were opiate exposed at the time of injury. Median MMEs prescribed were 2738 (range 375 to 12,360). Orthopedic providers prescribed 61% of all the MMEs (median 2010; range 113 to 6825), while nonorthopedic providers prescribed a median of 338 MMEs (range 0 to 10,080) (p < .05). Combined, patients with exposure 1 year before the injury received more MMEs (median 3600; range 840 to 12,360) than opiate-naive patients (median 2520; range 375 to 10,610) (p < .05). Twenty-eight (38.9%) patients continued using opiates for more than 6 months after their injury; 25% (7/28) were not previously exposed. There is great variability regarding the quantity of opiates being prescribed after isolated pilon fractures, and 39% of opiate prescriptions are coming from nonorthopedic prescribers. Opiate-exposed patients are more likely to be prescribed more opiates by orthopedists and outside physicians and for a longer duration. We believe that adequate pain control can be obtained by prescribing 40 pills of oxycodone 10 mg with a maximum of 1 additional refill. In cases in which a staged procedure is planned, an additional refill is expected (total of 3 refills).