ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The contingent negative variation (CNV) is a widespread electroencephalographic (EEG) potential that occurs during the interval between a warning stimulus and a subsequent imperative stimulus if a mental or motor response is required. The present study was designed to explore the impact of the previous trial on the CNV of the forthcoming trial, that is, how a previous movement affects brain activation preparing the next movement. Effects of alteration of finger (from index to middle, and vice versa) and hand (from left to right, and vice versa) were examined independently from each other. METHODS: CNV was recorded in 20 right-handed healthy subjects with electrodes placed at F7, F5, F3, F4, F6, F8, FC5, FC3, FC1, FC2, FC4, FC6, T7, C5, C3, C1, C2, C4, C6, T8, CP5, CP1, CP2, CP6, P7, P3, P4 and P8. In a visual/visual S1-choice paradigm, an earlier informative (S1) stimulus which instructed for side and finger of the following movement was followed 3 s later by an imperative (S2) stimulus providing the command to move. Subjects had to respond to each imperative stimulus with an appropriate button press made by brisk flexion movements with the index or middle finger of each hand. The CNV recorded in the interval between the informative and the imperative stimulus was analysed with respect to finger and hand of the present and the preceding movement. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: (1) A change of the side of movement is associated with a widespread increase of negativity contralateral to the currently prepared movement. (2) A change of finger is associated with a focal increase of negativity contralateral to the side of the current movement over temporoparietal and mid-parietal areas. (3) A change of finger results in a widespread increase of negativity over the left hemisphere.
Subject(s)
Contingent Negative Variation/physiology , Motor Cortex/physiology , Movement/physiology , Adult , Electroencephalography , Female , Fingers/physiology , Functional Laterality/physiology , Humans , Male , Motor Activity/physiology , Parietal Lobe/physiology , Reaction Time/physiologyABSTRACT
The EEG activity preceding self-paced voluntary movements (movement-related cortical potential, MRCP) is smaller if subjects make the same movement each time (regular task) compared with when different movements are made each time (random task). To test whether extra activity in the random task is due to increased motor preparation needed to switch between different movements, or to memory/attentional processes needed to select movements randomly, we compared regular and random movements with an additional alternating task. This alternating task required subjects to make different movements each time as in the random task, but since the task was very simple, the memory/attentional load was similar to that in the regular task. The MRCP was equally large over motor areas in both random and alternating tasks, suggesting that the extra activity over sensorimotor areas reflected processes involved in motor preparation rather than memory/attention. We speculate that, in the regular task, some part of the instructions for the previous movement remains intact, reducing the amount of preparation needed for the next repetition. Thus the MRCP is smaller than in the alternating and random tasks. Although the MRCPs in alternating and random tasks were similar over the motor areas, the random task had more activity than the alternating task in contralateral frontal areas. This part of the MRCP may therefore be related to memory/attentional processes required to randomize the sequence of movements. We conclude that the MRCP contains dissociable components related to motor preparation and memory/attention.
Subject(s)
Attention/physiology , Evoked Potentials, Motor/physiology , Memory/physiology , Motor Cortex/physiology , Movement/physiology , Adult , Behavior/physiology , Electroencephalography , Electromyography , Electrophysiology , Female , Fingers/physiology , Humans , Male , Random AllocationABSTRACT
In light of artifact-induced high variability of activation in fMRI repeat studies, we developed and tested a clinically useful plaster cast head holder (PCH) with improved immobilization, repositioning, and comfort. With PCH, there were considerably lower levels of translational and rotational head motion components compared to head fixation with conventional restraining straps (CRS). Rotational components cannot be fully compensated by realignment and lead to "false activations." In addition, task-correlated head motion, which highly increases the risk of artifacts, was considerably reduced with PCH, especially in a motion prone subject. Compared with PCH, head motion was 133% larger with CRS in a highly cooperative subject. With a motion prone subject, head motion range was increased by 769% (PCH: 0.9 mm, CRS: 7.8 mm), which may indicate the usefulness of PCH for restless patients. In functional activation maps, PCH alone yielded fewer residual motion artifacts than CRS + image registration. Subject tolerance of the head holder during the long measurement times of up to 2.5 hr was good, and slice orientation on different days confirmed the quality of repositioning.
Subject(s)
Artifacts , Brain Mapping/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Adult , Equipment Design , Head , Humans , Immobilization , Prone Position , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
We assessed serial event-related potentials (ERPs) as well as neuropsychological and clinical test findings in a group of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients (n = 14) treated with interferon beta-1b (INF-beta-1b) compared to normal controls (n = 14). All investigations were done within 1 week before INF-beta-1b therapy was started and 12 months later. An auditory oddball paradigm was employed. No significant differences in the N100, P200, N200 or P300 latencies between patients and control group were found, but 3 out of 14 MS patients developed abnormal P300 latencies (more than 2 standard errors from the mean) after 1 year of INF-beta-1b therapy. This was not reflected by the respective neurological impairment as assessed by the Expanded Disability Status Scale score. ERPs might be a useful tool in clinical studies in order to evaluate drug effects on cognition, but for a final statement, the analysis of ERPs in a larger group of patients is required.
Subject(s)
Adjuvants, Immunologic/administration & dosage , Cognition Disorders/diagnosis , Cognition Disorders/etiology , Interferon-beta/administration & dosage , Multiple Sclerosis/complications , Multiple Sclerosis/drug therapy , Adult , Cognition Disorders/drug therapy , Disability Evaluation , Disease Progression , Event-Related Potentials, P300/drug effects , Event-Related Potentials, P300/physiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Interferon beta-1a , Interferon beta-1b , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Sclerosis/physiopathology , Neuropsychological Tests/statistics & numerical data , Psychomotor Performance/drug effects , Psychomotor Performance/physiology , Reaction Time/drug effects , Reaction Time/physiology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Brain potentials were recorded from 15 healthy young subjects during the performance of a word recognition task. During the study phase, subjects had to intentionally memorise a series of words. These words were presented again together with the same number of new words in a following test phase where the instruction was to discriminate between repeated words and new words. We compared event-related potentials (ERPs) evoked by correctly identified repeated words (hits) and ERPs evoked by incorrectly classified new words (false alarms). Although both types of words were thought to be repeated the ERPs indicated differences between these two conditions starting at about 450 ms after the stimulus onset. These differences were mostly pronounced over frontal scalp locations but occurred also over parietal scalp locations (false alarms produced significantly more negative going ERPs than hits). We interpret that frontal and parietal brain areas show greater activation during false recognition because of a more intensive search for item representations.
Subject(s)
Cognition/physiology , Mental Recall/physiology , Verbal Learning/physiology , Adult , Electrooculography , Evoked Potentials/physiology , Eye Movements/physiology , Female , Frontal Lobe/physiology , Humans , Male , Parietal Lobe/physiologyABSTRACT
Parkinson's disease involves impaired activation of frontal cortical areas, including the supplementary motor area and prefrontal cortex, resulting from impaired thalamocortical output of the basal ganglia. Electrophysiologically, such impaired cortical activation may be seen as a reduced amplitude of the contingent negative variation (CNV), a slow negative potential shift reflecting cognitive processes associated with the preparation and/or anticipation of a response. Surgical interventions aimed at increasing basal ganglia-thalamic outflow to the cortex, such as electrical stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus with chronically implanted electrodes, have been shown to be effective in improving the clinical symptoms of Parkinson's disease. This study examined changes in cortical activity, as reflected in the CNV, associated with bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation in Parkinson's disease. The CNV was recorded from 10 patients with Parkinson's disease when on and off bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation, and was compared with the CNV of 10 healthy control subjects. Without subthalamic nucleus stimulation, Parkinson's disease patients showed reduced CNV amplitudes over the frontal and frontocentral regions compared with control subjects. With bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation, however, CNV amplitudes over the frontal and frontocentral regions were significantly increased. Results therefore suggest that impaired cortical functioning in Parkinson's disease, particularly within the frontal and premotor areas, is improved by subthalamic nucleus stimulation.
Subject(s)
Contingent Negative Variation/physiology , Evoked Potentials, Auditory/physiology , Frontal Lobe/physiology , Parkinson Disease/physiopathology , Subthalamic Nucleus/physiology , Adult , Aged , Electric Stimulation , Electrodes, Implanted , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Parkinson Disease/therapyABSTRACT
First, we recorded brain potentials from 15 healthy young subjects during the performance of a word/non-word discrimination task. During continuous visual presentation, some of the meaningful words were repeated after 86-94 s. We found a significant decrease of response time associated with the classification of repeated words which is an index for priming, an unconscious brain process. However, event-related potentials (ERPs) did not differ significantly between first and second presentations. Second, we recorded brain potentials during a following recognition test. Some of the meaningful words which were presented only once during the semantic discrimination task were repeated and had to be discriminated from randomly interspersed new words. We compared ERPs produced by incorrectly classified repeated words (misses) with ERPs produced by correctly classified new words (correct rejections). We found early ERP differences between 250 and 400 ms and later differences starting at about 500 ms after the stimulus onset. The early effect occurred over parietal scalp locations and the later effect over frontal, parietal and occipital scalp locations. This is evidence for unconscious brain activity related to the processing of missed repeated words. We suggest that the later frontal effect we found is due to an enhanced effort of the retrieval of item representations during word recognition and that the earlier parietal effect reflects partial recognition.
Subject(s)
Brain Mapping , Brain/physiology , Evoked Potentials/physiology , Memory/physiology , Reading , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Discrimination, Psychological , Electroencephalography , HumansABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: We investigated early brain activity (under 200 ms after the stimulus onset) related to the encoding and the retrieval of verbal information. METHODS: First, we compared ERPs produced by words which were encoded to ERPs produced by words from following test phases (correctly identified repetitions and correctly classified new words) in two different experiments. Experiment 1 consisted of an intentional learning paradigm and experiment 2 consisted of an incidental learning paradigm. In addition, we conducted a control experiment (experiment 3), which was a continuous recognition task with two different repetition intervals. Secondly, we conducted a magnetoencephalographic (MEG) study to further investigate early brain activity (experiment 4). The same intentional learning paradigm as in experiment 1 was used. RESULTS: We found that ERPs elicited by correctly classified test words (repeated words and new words) of both experiment 1 and experiment 2 were significantly more negative going than the ERPs elicited by the study words. This effect was apparent between 100 ms and 200 ms after the stimulus onset and was distributed over occipital and parietal scalp locations. In the control task (experiment 3), these early potential differences were missing (for both repetition intervals). Early event-related fields (ERFs) were also found to depend on the situation of the study phase and the test phase. This activity difference peaked at 120 ms after the stimulus onset. The distributions of the difference magnetic fields were occipito-parietal and thus consistent with the findings of experiment 1 (EEG-experiment). CONCLUSION: Whether the effect we defined in the present study is due to an increase of activity during the test situation or due to a decrease of activity during the study situation remains unclear. However, it might reflect attentional processes within a word recognition task depending on whether a word is encoded or an effort of word retrieval has to be made.
Subject(s)
Electroencephalography , Occipital Lobe/physiology , Parietal Lobe/physiology , Adult , Brain Mapping , Evoked Potentials/physiology , Female , Humans , Magnetoencephalography , Male , Reaction Time/physiology , Task Performance and Analysis , Time FactorsABSTRACT
In a recognition memory experiment we recorded event-related brain potentials (ERPs) following the presentation of faces. We compared correctly classified repetitions of faces (hits) with new faces classified as repeated (false alarms). Stimulus-related averaging yielded significantly more negative ERPs to false alarms between 750 and 900 ms after onset of stimulus presentation. With response-related averaging we found significantly more negative ERPs to false alarms within the last 100 ms before movement onset. The differential activity was distributed over central and frontal regions and was still present in the period after the response. We interpret the phenomenon as an electrophysiological manifestation of false recognition as described by Schacter et al. (Schacter, D.L., Norman, K.A. and Koutstaal, W., The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory, Annu. Rev. Psychol., 49 (1998) 289-318). False recognition could be the result of a preliminary decision based on illusionary familiarity and be associated with post-retrieval processing.
Subject(s)
Evoked Potentials/physiology , Face , Pattern Recognition, Visual/physiology , False Positive Reactions , Female , Humans , MaleABSTRACT
Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were used to investigate the time course of memory processes following the presentation of faces. Following a phase in which subjects were asked to memorize faces presented on a computer screen (study phase) they had to distinguish the previously presented faces from others new to the experiment (test phase). We found that in a time period from 250 to 350 ms after onset of stimulus presentation ERPs show higher negativity for both repeated and novel faces in the test phase compared to the study phase. This situation dependent effect is most pronounced in occipito-temporal regions. We conclude that memory retrieval for faces is a sequential process. The early part of this process constitutes preparation for the retrieval of stored information, and a later part of the process comprises the discrimination between repeated and novel faces.