Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Cutis ; 99(4): 245-249, 2017 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28492599

ABSTRACT

Allergy as a cause of adverse outcomes in patients with implanted orthopedic hardware is controversial. Allergy to titanium-based implants has not been well researched, as titanium is traditionally thought to be inert. We highlight the case of a patient who developed systemic dermatitis and implant failure after surgical placement of a titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V) plate in the left foot. The hardware was removed and the eruption cleared in the following weeks. The plate and screws were submitted for metal analysis. The elemental composition of both the plate and screws included 3 major elements-titanium, aluminum, and vanadium-as well as trace elements. Metal analysis revealed that the plate and screws had different microstructures, and electrochemical studies demonstrated that galvanic corrosion could have occurred between the plate and screws due to their different microstructures, contributing to the release of vanadium in vivo. The patient was patch tested with several metals including components of the implant and had a positive patch test reaction only to vanadium trichloride. These findings support a diagnosis of vanadium allergy and suggests that clinicians should consider including vanadium when patch testing patients with a suspected allergic reaction to vanadium-containing implants.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Internal Fixators/adverse effects , Vanadium/adverse effects , Alloys/adverse effects , Bone Plates/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Diagnosis, Differential , Equipment Failure , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis/surgery , Patch Tests , Toe Phalanges
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...