Comparability and imprecision of 8 frequently used commercially available immunoassays for therapeutic drug monitoring.

BACKGROUND: The development of new immunoassays for therapeutic drug monitoring and the adaptation of current assays on new analytical platforms has led to a plethora of different tests. This variability may influence comparability between the methods and affect interpretation of test results used for guiding drug treatment. METHODS: Comparability and imprecision of 8 immunoassays for therapeutic drug monitoring were evaluated using 6 different analyzers from 3 manufacturers. Current and previous generation analytical systems used were Architect and AxSym (Abbott Laboratories), cobas c 501 module and COBAS INTEGRA 800 analyzer (Roche Diagnostics GmbH), and Dimension Vista and Dimension Xpand (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc). Carbamazepine, digoxin, phenobarbital, phenytoin, theophylline, tobramycin, vancomycin, and valproic acid were measured using leftover routine samples. RESULTS: Good performance and comparability of the drug assays was seen on all systems for carbamazepine, phenytoin, and valproic acid except for phenytoin on the Dimension Vista. Deviations from the acceptance criteria were found with digoxin, phenobarbital, theophylline, tobramycin, and vancomycin. Despite a change of the analytical principle on the Roche systems for most drugs, the results demonstrated a very good between-system comparability of the concentration measured. Systematic deviations were found between AxSYM and ARCHITECT for digoxin, phenobarbital, and tobramycin, and between Dimension Xpand and Dimension Vista for digoxin and vancomycin. CONCLUSIONS: The study revealed differences between assays, platforms, and assay principles. Care should be taken if methods or instruments are replaced in a laboratory. Laboratories are advised to perform their own method comparison studies and to inform their customers about the effect on the therapeutic ranges in case of observed clinically significant deviations.

Pre-analytical effects of different lithium heparin plasma separation tubes in the routine clinical chemistry laboratory.

BACKGROUND: In this study the pre-analytical effects of sample storage on frequently used routine clinical chemistry assays were evaluated by comparing four different lithium heparin plasma separation tubes to a reference collection procedure. METHODS: Blood was collected from 20 healthy volunteers using plasma separation tubes from four different manufacturers together with manually separated plasma as reference. In total, 15 clinical chemistry parameters were determined at 0 h, 24 h, and 72 h. Samples were stored at 4°C. Statistical differences were evaluated using a generalized estimating equation regression model. RESULTS: Significant differences could be demonstrated for almost every parameter when comparing the separation tubes to the reference collection system. The estimated maximum allowable storage time in the primary tube was considerably reduced using separation tubes, e.g., for glucose the maximum storage time was reduced from >72 h to 7-15 h, and for potassium from 60 h to 10-13 h, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that sample storage in the primary tube using plasma separation tubes is associated with clinically relevant changes for certain parameters. Therefore, storing samples for retesting should be avoided when using plasma separation tubes, in particular for parameters susceptible to interference by erythrocyte or platelet contamination.

Clinical utility of a new enzymatic assay for determination of mycophenolic acid in comparison with an optimized LC-MS/MS method.

The goal of this study was to investigate the clinical utility of a new enzymatic assay for use on COBAS INTEGRA systems (Roche Total MPA assay). From 134 patients, plasma mycophenolic acid (MPA) concentrations were measured with both the enzymatic method and a validated liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) procedure, to compare these assays. The test principle of the enzymatic assay is inhibition of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase. Method comparison studies revealed good agreement of results (r > 0.99), overall and in patients with delayed graft function or hypoalbuminemia. MPA area under the concentration-time curve (AUCs) obtained with LC-MS/MS (x) and the enzymatic method (y) compared excellent in patients on cyclosporine (y = 1.04x - 1.05, r = 0.992) or tacrolimus (y = 1.02x - 0.63, r = 0.987). MPA exposure determined with either method at different time points after transplantation agreed well (eg, 25th/50th/75th percentile of day 10 AUCs-LC-MS/MS: 25.8/33.8/45.2 versus enzymatic assay: 26.2/34.4/45.3 mg.h/L). AUCs calculated for both methods were lower at the first 3 time points in patients on cyclosporine compared with tacrolimus (week 4 median cyclosporine/tacrolimus: LC-MS/MS 39.6/56.4 versus enzymatic assay 40.5/56.0 mg.h/L). Both LC-MS/MS and the enzymatic methods revealed a tendency toward lower AUCs and predose levels in patients with biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) (day 10 median: 0.9 mg/L with BPAR and 1.7 mg/L without BPAR). The Roche Total MPA assay is a reliable alternative to LC-MS/MS. It can be applied in the clinical setting allowing for easy, fast, and optimized patient management.

Multicenter evaluation of analytical performance of the Liaison troponin I assay.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the analytical characteristics of the Liaison immunoassay for cardiac troponin I (cTnI). DESIGN AND METHODS: The protocol consisted of eight sections: evaluation of antibody specificity, linearity, detection limit and imprecision, method comparison, evaluation of endogenous interferents, anticoagulant interference, sample stability, and reference values. RESULTS: The assay equally measured free and complexed cTnI. The minimum detectable cTnI concentration was 0.021 microg/l. The cTnI concentration corresponding to a total CV of 10% was 0.056 microg/l. Linearity of response was demonstrated along the entire dynamic range of the assay. Assay interferences were minimal. cTnI concentrations in serum and heparinized plasma were significantly different. Values in EDTA plasma were on average approximately 5% higher than in matched serum, but this difference was not significant. The 99th percentile cTnI value in healthy subjects was 0.036 microg/l. CONCLUSIONS: Being sensitive, specific, and precise, the Liaison cTnI assay meets current requirements to aid in the diagnosis of myocardial necrosis.