Standardization of compounded oral liquids for pediatric patients in Michigan.

PURPOSE: The development, dissemination, and adoption of standard concentrations for compounded oral liquids for pediatric patients in Michigan are described. SUMMARY: A baseline assessment of current practices in Michigan revealed significant variations in the concentrations of commonly used oral liquid medicines for pediatric patients. A statewide collaborative initiative in Michigan was created to standardize the concentrations of compounded oral liquids for pediatric patients. Standard concentrations were proposed and adopted by key stakeholders. These standards were then disseminated across the state to prescribers and pharmacists, with encouragement to voluntarily adopt the standards as a patient safety measure. A follow-up survey was conducted to evaluate adoption of the standards. A total of 263 pharmacists responded to the survey. Standardization of the concentrations of compounded oral liquids in Michigan was welcomed by most pharmacies and is perceived to have reduced the risk for errors at transitions of care for children receiving compounded oral liquids. Awareness of the standardization initiative was acknowledged by 77% of survey respondents, and adoption of the standards was observed to some degree by 57% of survey respondents. In addition, 70% of survey respondents agreed or strongly agreed that adoption of the standards has improved patient safety in Michigan. CONCLUSION: Standard drug concentrations for compounded oral liquids were developed for pediatric patients in Michigan. A survey after dissemination of the recommended standards confirmed general awareness of the initiative and adoption of the standards by a substantial proportion of respondents. Most respondents indicated a belief that creation of the standards improved patient safety.

Comparison and alignment of an academic medical center's strategic goals with ASHP initiatives.

PURPOSE: An academic medical center's strategic goals were compared and aligned with the 2015 ASHP Health-System Pharmacy Initiative and the Pharmacy Practice Model Initiative (PPMI). METHODS: The department's pharmacy practice model steering committee identified potential solutions to narrow prioritized gaps using a modified nominal group technique and a multivoting dot technique. RESULTS: Five priority solutions were identified and assigned to work groups to develop business plans, which included admission medication history and reconciliation for high-risk patients and those with complex medication regimens, pharmacist provision of discharge counseling to high-risk patients and those with complex medication regimens, improved measurement and reporting of the impact of PPMI programs on patient outcomes, implementation of a departmentwide formalized peer review and evaluation process, and the greeting of every patient at some time during his or her visit by a pharmacy team member. Stakeholders evaluated the business plans based on feasibility, financial return on investment, and anticipated safety enhancements. The solution that received the highest priority ranking and was subsequently implemented was "improved measurement and reporting of the impact of PPMI programs on patient outcomes." CONCLUSION: A defined process was followed for identifying gaps among current practices at an academic medical center and the 2015 ASHP Health-System Pharmacy Initiative and the PPMI. A key priority to better document the impact of pharmacists on patient care was identified for our department by using a nominal group technique brainstorming process and a multivoting dot technique and creating standardized business plans for five potential priority projects.

Nursing, Pharmacy, and Prescriber Knowledge and Perceptions of High-Alert Medications in a Large, Academic Medical Hospital.

BACKGROUND: High-alert medications pose a greater risk of causing significant harm to patients if used in error. The Joint Commission requires that hospitals define institution-specific high-alert medications and implement processes to ensure safe medication use. METHOD: Nursing, pharmacy, and prescribers were asked to voluntarily complete a 34-question survey to assess their knowledge, experience, and perceptions regarding high-alert medications in an academic hospital. RESULTS: The majority of respondents identified the organization's high-alert medications, the consequences of an error involving a high-alert medication, and the reversal agent. Most of the risk-reduction strategies within the institution were viewed as being effective by respondents. Forty-five percent of the respondents utilized a high-alert medication in the previous 24 hours. Only 14.2% had experienced an error with a high-alert medication in the previous 12 months, with 46% being near misses. The survey found the 5 rights for medication administration were not being utilized consistently. Respondents indicated that work experience or hospital orientation is the preferred learning experience for high-alert medications. CONCLUSIONS: This study assessed all disciplines involved in the medication use process. Perceptions about high-alert medications differ between disciplines. Ongoing discipline-specific education is required to ensure that individuals accept accountability in the medication use process and to close knowledge gaps on high-alert medications and risk-reduction strategies.

Variability in compounding of oral liquids for pediatric patients: a patient safety concern.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the degree in variation of oral liquid pediatric compounding practices in Michigan pharmacies. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey study. SETTING: All types of inpatient and outpatient pharmacies across the state of Michigan, excluding nuclear pharmacies and long-term care facilities. PARTICIPANTS: 244 Michigan pharmacies. INTERVENTION: An online survey tool was used to assess the current compounding practices of 147 oral liquid pediatric medications. The survey was e-mailed or faxed to hospitals, chain pharmacies, and independent pharmacies. Pharmacists were also mailed a follow-up postcard, and the Michigan Pharmacists Association publicized the project through its journal and annual meeting. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pharmacy demographics; number of compounding pharmacies; number of medications compounded; awareness of compounding errors; results of compounding errors; and number of concentrations compounded per medication. RESULTS: The majority of respondents were from outpatient pharmacies, but inpatient and other types of pharmacies were also represented. The majority of participating pharmacies compound fewer than five oral liquid medications per week. Awareness of errors was low overall, with no errors believed to result in permanent harm or death. The number of concentrations compounded per medication ranged from 1 to 9, with the majority of pharmacies compounding more than 3 concentrations per medication. CONCLUSION: There is a considerable degree of variation in current oral pediatric liquid compounding practices in Michigan pharmacies. This variability poses a significant risk to patient safety.