Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Appl Ergon ; 57: 17-27, 2016 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26826952

ABSTRACT

The overall aim of this paper is to draw combined, all-embracing conclusions based on a long-term multidisciplinary research programme on recycling centres in Sweden, focussing on working conditions, environment and system performance. A second aim is to give recommendations for their development of new and existing recycling centres and to discuss implications for the future design and organisation. Several opportunities for improvement of recycling centres were identified, such as design, layout, ease with which users could sort their waste, the work environment, conflicting needs and goals within the industry, and industrialisation. Combining all results from the research, which consisted of different disciplinary aspects, made it possible to analyse and elucidate their interrelations. Waste sorting quality was recognized as the most prominent improvement field in the recycling centre system. The research identified the importance of involving stakeholders with different perspectives when planning a recycling centre in order to get functionality and high performance. Practical proposals of how to plan and build recycling centres are given in a detailed checklist.


Subject(s)
Facility Design and Construction , Occupational Exposure , Occupational Health , Recycling , Waste Disposal Facilities , Conservation of Natural Resources , Efficiency, Organizational , Ergonomics , Humans , Recycling/standards , Sweden , Workplace
2.
Appl Ergon ; 44(6): 996-1003, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23647887

ABSTRACT

Meat cutters face higher risks of injury and musculoskeletal problems than most other occupational groups. The aims of this paper were to describe ergonomics changes implemented in three meat cutting plants and to evaluate effects related to ergonomics on the individual meat cutters and their work. Data was collected by interviews, observations, document studies and a questionnaire (n = 247), as a post intervention study. The changes implemented consisted of reducing knife work to a maximum of 6 h per day and introducing a job rotation scheme with work periods of equal length. Tasks other than traditional meat cutting were added. A competence development plan for each meat cutter and easy adjustment of workplace height were introduced. The questionnaire showed a reduction in perceived physical work load. In general, the changes were perceived positively. Figures from the company showed a positive trend for injuries and sick leave.


Subject(s)
Abattoirs , Ergonomics , Musculoskeletal Diseases/prevention & control , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control , Occupational Injuries/psychology , Program Evaluation , Adult , Animals , Attitude , Cattle , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Physical Exertion , Rest , Surveys and Questionnaires , Sweden , Swine , Time Factors , Workplace/organization & administration , Young Adult
3.
Ergonomics ; 54(4): 357-66, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21491278

ABSTRACT

Swedish recycling centres are manned facilities for waste collection. There is no special category in the official injury statistics for employees at recycling centres, which precludes a straightforward analysis of reported occupational injuries. This study aimed at identifying the frequency of reported accidents and diseases and the type of events that contribute to such injuries at recycling centres, based on official injury statistics. The employees were identified as being affected by more than three to five times as many accidents compared with the total workforce in Sweden. The reported accidents had occurred during a wide range of situations, but most frequently during manual handling of waste. Reported work-related diseases were mostly associated with musculoskeletal disorders, mainly due to heavy lifting. A more detailed classification of sanitation professions and workplaces in the official injury statistics would facilitate future studies of injuries in a specific professional category, e.g. employees at recycling centres. Suggestions for prevention are given. STATEMENT OF RELEVANCE: The present article describes all reported work accidents and diseases among employees at recycling centres from 1992 to February 2005. It also highlights the problem of identifying new working groups in the official statistics and gives advice for a detailed classification to facilitate such future studies of injuries.


Subject(s)
Occupational Exposure , Recycling , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology , Wounds and Injuries/etiology , Adult , Humans , Middle Aged , Population Surveillance , Sweden/epidemiology , Wounds and Injuries/prevention & control
4.
Appl Ergon ; 41(3): 336-46, 2010 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19660737

ABSTRACT

Recycling is a new and developing industry, which has only been researched to a limited extent. This article describes the development and use of instruments for data collection within a multidisciplinary research programme "Recycling centres in Sweden - working conditions, environmental and system performance". The overall purpose of the programme was to form a basis for improving the function of recycling centres with respect to these three perspectives and the disciplines of: ergonomics, safety, external environment, and production systems. A total of 10 instruments were developed for collecting data from employees, managers and visitors at recycling centres, including one instrument for observing visitors. Validation tests were performed in several steps. This, along with the quality of the collected data, and experience from the data collection, showed that the instruments and methodology used were valid and suitable for their purpose.


Subject(s)
Efficiency, Organizational , Industry , Occupational Health , Refuse Disposal/standards , Conservation of Natural Resources , Cooperative Behavior , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Surveys and Questionnaires , Sweden
5.
Epidemiology ; 11(5): 519-22, 2000 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10955403

ABSTRACT

We conducted a case-referent study to identify and quantify work-related and non-work-related risk indicators for reported over-exertion back injuries among nursing personnel. The source population was all nursing personnel employed in the Stockholm County hospitals during a 32-month period. The 240 cases and 614 referents completed questionnaires about occupation, type of clinic, working hours, shift work, patient transfers, perceived exertion, back pain, prior back injury, job strain, body mass index (BMI), smoking, immigrant status, physical training, and self-rated fitness. The highest relative risks (RR) were observed for work-related factors: working at an orthopedic clinic (RR = 5.2; 95% CI = 2.7-10.2), > or =1 patient transfer/shift (RR = 2.7; 95% CI = 1.6-4.5), and working full-time (RR = 2.4; 95% CI = 1.6-3.6). Training in the use of transfer devices, and regular use of transfer devices, reduced the relative risk from patient transfer. Among the non-work-related factors, only body mass index > or =25 kg/m2 and immigrant status was associated with a slight increase in relative risk.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Occupational/statistics & numerical data , Back Injuries/etiology , Nurses , Adult , Female , Humans , Lifting/adverse effects , Logistic Models , Middle Aged , Patient Transfer , Risk Factors , Sweden
6.
Scand J Work Environ Health ; 24(5): 367-75, 1998 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9869308

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This prospective dynamic-population-based study investigated factors involved in the accident process preceding overexertion back injuries among nursing personnel. METHODS: The study covered all reported occupational overexertion back injuries due to accidents among of the approximately 24 500 nurses in the Stockholm County hospitals during 1 year. It was assumed that several factors interact in the accident process. Detailed information was obtained for each injury by interviews with the injured nurse and head nurse. Risks in the physical environment were identified using an ergonomic checklist. RESULTS: During the study 136 overexertion back injuries were reported. Of the 130 nurses participating in the study, 125 had been injured in connection with patient work. Cluster analysis yielded 6 clusters and their pattern of contributing factors. The most frequent injury occurred during patient transfer in the bed or to or from the bed, without the use of transfer devices, when the patient suddenly lost his or her balance or resisted during the transfer and the nurse had to make a sudden movement. However, there were physical conditions, such as shortcomings in the physical work environment or a lack of a transfer device, that compelled the nurses to perform the tasks under unsafe conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The clusters showed a complexity of different kinds of accidents and indicated that the measures for preventing accidents, or for blocking an accident process once started, have to be of different kinds and placed at several different levels in the organization of a workplace.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Occupational/statistics & numerical data , Back Injuries/etiology , Lifting/adverse effects , Nursing , Adult , Cluster Analysis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Transfer , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sweden
7.
Appl Ergon ; 26(3): 213-20, 1995 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15677020

ABSTRACT

No documented strategy, including preventive strategies, for systematic investigation of overexertion back accidents among nursing personnel has yet been published. One aim of the present study was to develop standardized instruments for the systematic investigation of back accidents among nursing personnel in order to develop preventive strategies. Another aim was to produce a screening tool that could easily be used for identifying potential overexertion back accident hazards. Two structured interview protocols were developed, one for the injured person and one for the supervisor. An ergonomics checklist was designed for the most important spaces according to accident statistics: patient's room, corridor, toilet, and also one for 'other space', eg X-ray and treatment rooms. The instruments were developed by frequent discussions and adjustments in a task force of researchers and occupational health personnel. The protocols were tested in two steps before a final version was established. The construct validity and interobserver reliability of the checklist were tested by ten ergonomists, who checked a patient's room, a toilet and a corridor with some known hazards. The constructed validity agreement was 90% in 19 of 26 items in the checklist. The interobserver reliability had the same figures as the validity for all items in the checklist. The interview protocols and checklist appear to be suitable for systematic investigation of overexertion back accidents.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...