A ten-year retrospective analysis of decompressive craniectomy or craniotomy after severe brain injury and its implications for donation after brain death.

Craniotomy or decompressive craniectomy are among the therapeutic options to prevent or treat secondary damage after severe brain injury. The choice of procedure depends, among other things, on the type and severity of the initial injury. It remains controversial whether both procedures influence the neurological outcome differently. Thus, estimating the risk of brain herniation and death and consequently potential organ donation remains difficult. All patients at the University Hospital Münster for whom an isolated craniotomy or decompressive craniectomy was performed as a treatment after severe brain injury between 2013 and 2022 were retrospectively included. Proportion of survivors and deceased were evaluated. Deceased were further analyzed regarding anticoagulants, comorbidities, type of brain injury, potential and utilized donation after brain death. 595 patients were identified, 296 patients survived, and 299 deceased. Proportion of decompressive craniectomy was higher than craniotomy in survivors (89% vs. 11%, p < 0.001). Brain death was diagnosed in 12 deceased and 10 donations were utilized. Utilized donations were comparable after both procedures (5% vs. 2%, p = 0.194). Preserved brain stem reflexes as a reason against donation did not differ between decompressive craniectomy or craniotomy (32% vs. 29%, p = 0.470). Patients with severe brain injury were more likely to survive after decompressive craniectomy than craniotomy. Among the deceased, potential and utilized donations did not differ between both procedures. This suggests that brain death can occur independent of the previous neurosurgical procedure and that organ donation should always be considered in end-of-life decisions for patients with a fatal prognosis.

Post-COVID-19 pandemic organ donation activities in Germany: a multicenter retrospective analysis.

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic had a negative impact on the number of solid organ transplantations. After a global decline of 16% in 2020, their numbers subsequently returned to pre-pandemic levels. In contrast, numbers in Germany remained almost constant in 2020 and 2021 but fell by 6.9% in 2022. The reasons for this divergent development are unknown. Methods: The number of deceased with a severe brain damage, potential and utilized donors after braindeath and the intensive care unit treatment capacity were retrospectively compared for the years 2022 and 2021 at five university hospitals in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. Reasons for a donation not utilized were reviewed. To enable a comparison of the results with the whole of Germany and the pre-pandemic period, numbers of potential and utilized donors were extracted from official organ donation activity reports of all harvesting hospitals in Germany for the years 2019-2022. Results: The numbers of deceased with a severe brain damage (-10%), potential (-9%), and utilized donors after braindeath (-44%), and intensive care unit treatment capacities (-7.2%) were significantly lower in 2022 than 2021. A COVID-19 infection was a rarer (-79%), but donor instability (+44%) a more frequent reason against donation in 2022, whereas preserved brain stem reflexes remained the most frequent reason in both years (54%). Overall numbers of potential and utilized donations in Germany were lower in 2022 than in the pre-pandemic period, but this was mainly due to lower numbers in hospitals of lower care. The number of potential donors in all university hospitals were higher in 2022 but utilized donations still lower than in 2019. Conclusion: The decrease in potential and utilized donations was a result of reduced intensive care unit treatment capacities and a lower conversion rate at the five university hospitals. A COVID-19 infection did not play a role in 2022. These results indicate that ICU treatment capacities must be restored to increase donations. The lower number of potential donors and the even lower conversion rate in 2022 throughout Germany show that restructuring the organ procurement process in Germany needs to be discussed to increase the number of donations.

How Large is the Potential of Brain Dead Donors and what Prevents Utilization? A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis at Seven University Hospitals in North Rhine-Westphalia.

Organ donation after brain death is constantly lower in Germany compared to other countries. Instead, representative surveys show a positive attitude towards donation. Why this does not translate into more donations remains questionable. We retrospectively analyzed all potential brain dead donors treated in the university hospitals of Aachen, Bielefeld, Bonn, Essen, Düsseldorf, Cologne and Münster between June 2020 and July 2021. 300 potential brain dead donors were identified. Donation was utilized in 69 cases (23%). Refused consent (n = 190), and failed utilization despite consent (n = 41) were reasons for a donation not realized. Consent was significantly higher in potential donors with a known attitude towards donation (n = 94) compared to a decision by family members (n = 195) (49% vs. 33%, p = 0.012). The potential donor´s age, status of interviewer, and the timing of the interview with decision-makers had no influence on consent rates, and it was comparable between hospitals. Refused consent was the predominant reason for a donation not utilized. Consent rate was lower than in surveys, only a known attitude towards donation had a significant positive influence. This indicates that survey results do not translate well into everyday clinical practice and promoting a previously documented decision on organ donation is important.

[Organ donation after determination of brain death : Legal aspects and practical approach]. / Organspende nach irreversiblem Hirnfunktionsausfall : Rechtliche Aspekte und praktisches Vorgehen.

The prerequisites for post-mortem organ donation in Germany include the determination of irreversible loss of brain function, consent to organ donation, and the exclusion of medical contraindications. In addition, mainly because of the shortage of donor organs in Germany and the sometimes controversial social and media discussions on the topic of organ donation, all physicians involved in the donation process must be familiar with the relevant laws, guidelines, and procedural instructions. This applies especially to those who are to carry out the verification of irreversible brain death. Only then, can they act safely in this challenging situation and serve as competent consultants for all involved.

[Perioperative management of the brain-dead organ donor : Anesthesia between ethics and evidence]. / Perioperatives Management der postmortalen Organspende : Anästhesie zwischen Ethik und Evidenz.

BACKGROUND: The number of organs donated after brain death in Germany is far lower than the demand. This underlines the importance of providing the brain-dead donor with optimal medical care throughout the donation process to decrease the risk of graft dysfunction. Several international guidelines and national recommendations guide the intensivists in organ-protective intensive care management of the brain-dead donor. OBJECTIVE: The anesthetist is a key member during organ retrieval procedures and plays a crucial role in physiological donor management; however, evidence-based recommendations for the perioperative anesthetic management, drug treatment strategies and target values are lacking. Anesthesia literature about donor management is scarce and predominantly composed of reviews of practice, with little exploration of the scientific foundations. The aim of this review is to guide the anesthetist in the organ-protective perioperative therapy. The pathophysiological changes in patients who progress to brain death are briefly summarized. The available evidence, guidelines and expert opinions regarding medical treatment strategies and therapeutic goals in organ-protective therapy are reviewed. The ethical and pathophysiological considerations regarding the performance of anesthesia during organ retrieval are discussed. METHODS: This review is based on a selective literature search in PubMed for publications regarding organ donation after brain death (keywords: "brain dead donor", "organ procurement", "organ protective therapy", "donor preconditioning", "perioperative donor management", "ethical considerations of brain dead donor"). International guidelines, national recommendations and expert opinions were given special consideration. RESULTS: Overall, the evidence for optimal perioperative organ-protective care of the brain-dead donor is limited. Most elements in the current recommendations and guidelines are based on pathophysiological reasoning, epidemiological observations or extrapolations from general organ-protective management strategies, and not on evidence from randomized controlled trials. National and international recommendations on treatment goals and drug therapy differ considerably in some aspects. The therapy concepts applied are very heterogeneous. Apart from medical challenges, the ethical circumstances are an additional burden for the entire treatment team. Whether anesthesia is reasonable during organ retrieval remains unclear. There is uncertainty about possible organ-protective effects of anesthetic drugs. Furthermore, ethical considerations raise the question of whether the determination of brain death and the use of anesthetic drugs during the procedure of organ retrieval are compatible with each other. CONCLUSION: Due to the lack of evidence, perioperative treatment should be guided by intensive care therapy strategies. The discussion about using anesthetic drugs during organ retrieval remains controversial. Pathophysiological considerations support the use of volatile anesthetics because of possible organ-protective effects. The use of neuromuscular blocking is justified to control any possible motor response resulting from spinal cord reflexes, whereas there is no evidence for a benefit from using opioids. Apart from that, it seems ethically problematic to anesthetise a brain-dead donor. Consequently, knowledge about the pathophysiological processes caused by brain death and about organ-protective therapy concepts are just as much a basic requirement as the consideration of ethical problems in organ donation after brain death. Only then are the caregivers able to do justice to both the organ recipient and the organ donor, as well as their relatives in this challenging situation.