ABSTRACT
A cross-sectional study was performed to describe the prevalence of ocular abnormalities among six and seven year old children of Hispanic and Caucasian ancestry in Los Angeles County. Data were obtained from vision screenings of lower to middle income Hispanic and Caucasian children completed by the UCLA Mobile Eye Clinic at public neighborhood elementary schools and community centers between January and August of 1989, and January and March of 1990. Out of a total sample of 854 children, 64% were Hispanic; 36% were Caucasian; 51% were female and 49% were male. Ocular abnormalities observed were similar for both ethnic groups. Caucasians, however, showed non-significant, but consistently higher prevalences of most ocular abnormalities. Stronger associations between ethnicity and visual abnormalities were observed within the female subgroup. For example, hyperopia was found more commonly among female Caucasian children than among female Hispanic children (p < 0.01). This information can be used in planning for the eye care needs of communities with Caucasian and Hispanic components.
Subject(s)
Eye Diseases/ethnology , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Vision Screening , White People/statistics & numerical data , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Eye Diseases/diagnosis , Female , Health Planning , Health Services Needs and Demand , Hospitals, University , Humans , Income , Los Angeles/epidemiology , Male , Mobile Health Units , Prevalence , Sex FactorsABSTRACT
We compared the survival of 658 seriously injured patients treated in Los Angeles County in the Fall of 1982 (prior to the activation of the trauma system) with that of 766 such patients treated in the Fall of 1984 (when the system was young and composed of essentially a full complement of trauma centers). We demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in the adjusted odds of survival for 1984 over 1982 with regard to victims of motor vehicle collisions who sustained multiple serious injuries (1980 Injury Severity Score: 26-50) (p = 0.042). For the data set as a whole, although an improvement in survivorship over this period was suggested by the data, statistical significance could not be demonstrated.