Drosophila as a Model for Human Diseases-Focus on Innate Immunity in Barrier Epithelia.

Epithelial immunity protects the host from harmful microbial invaders but also controls the beneficial microbiota on epithelial surfaces. When this delicate balance between pathogen and symbiont is disturbed, clinical disease often occurs, such as in inflammatory bowel disease, cystic fibrosis, or atopic dermatitis, which all can be in part linked to impairment of barrier epithelia. Many innate immune receptors, signaling pathways, and effector molecules are evolutionarily conserved between human and Drosophila. This review describes the current knowledge on Drosophila as a model for human diseases, with a special focus on innate immune-related disorders of the gut, lung, and skin. The discovery of antimicrobial peptides, the crucial role of Toll and Toll-like receptors, and the evolutionary conservation of signaling to the immune systems of both human and Drosophila are described in a historical perspective. Similarities and differences between human and Drosophila are discussed; current knowledge on receptors, signaling pathways, and effectors are reviewed, including antimicrobial peptides, reactive oxygen species, as well as autophagy. We also give examples of human diseases for which Drosophila appears to be a useful model. In addition, the limitations of the Drosophila model are mentioned. Finally, we propose areas for future research, which include using the Drosophila model for drug screening, as a validation tool for novel genetic mutations in humans and for exploratory research of microbiota-host interactions, with relevance for infection, wound healing, and cancer.

An intron enhancer activates the immunoglobulin-related Hemolin gene in Hyalophora cecropia.

Hemolin is the only insect member of the immunoglobulin (Ig) superfamily reported to be up-regulated during an immune response. In diapausing pupae of Hyalophora cecropia the gene is expressed in fat body cells and in haemocytes. Like the mammalian Ig kappa light chain gene, the Hemolin gene harbours an enhancer including a kappaB motif in one of its introns. This motif binds the H. cecropia Rel factor Cif (Cecropia immunoresponsive factor). The Hemolin third intron also mediates transient reporter gene expression in immunoresponsive Drosophila mbn-2 cells. Co-transfections of Drosophila SL2 cells showed that the Drosophila Rel factor Dif (Dorsal-related immunity factor), transactivates reporter gene constructs through the intron. Moreover, a 4.8-fold synergistic activation was obtained when Dif is combined with the rat C/EBP (CCAAT/enhancer element-binding protein) and human HMGI (high mobility group protein I). This is the first report of an insect immune-related gene that is up-regulated by an enhancer activity conferred through an intron.

Enteric bacteria counteract lipopolysaccharide induction of antimicrobial peptide genes.

The humoral immunity of Drosophila involves the production of antimicrobial peptides, which are induced by evolutionary conserved microbial molecules, like LPS. By using Drosophila mbn-2 cells, we found that live bacteria, including E. coli, Salmonella typhimurium, Erwinia carotovora, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, prevented LPS from inducing antimicrobial peptide genes, while Micrococcus luteus and Streptococcus equi did not. The inhibitory effect was seen at bacterial levels from 20 per mbn-2 cell, while antimicrobial peptides were induced at lower bacterial concentrations (< or =2 bacteria per cell) also in the absence of added LPS. Gel shift experiment suggests that the inhibitory effect is upstream or at the level of the activation of the transcription factor Relish, a member of the NF-kappaB/Rel family. The bacteria have to be in physical contact with the cells, but not phagocytosed, to prevent LPS induction. Interestingly, the inhibiting mechanism is, at least for E. coli, independent of the type III secretion system, indicating that the inhibitory mechanism is unrelated to the one earlier described for YopJ from Yersinia.

The imd gene is required for local Cecropin expression in Drosophila barrier epithelia.

Surfaces of higher eukaryotes are normally covered with microorganisms but are usually not infected by them. Innate immunity and the expression of gene-encoded antimicrobial peptides play important roles in the first line of defence in higher animals. The immune response in Drosophila promotes systemic expression of antimicrobial peptides in response to microbial infection. We now demonstrate that the epidermal cells underlying the cuticle of larvae respond to infected wounds by local expression of the genes for the antimicrobial peptide cecropin A. Thus, the Drosophila epidermis plays an active role in the innate defence against microorganisms. The immune deficiency (imd) gene was found to be a crucial component of the signal-induced epidermal expression in both embryos and larvae. In contrast, melanization, which is part of the wound healing process, is not dependent on the imd gene, indicating that the signalling pathways promoting melanization and antimicrobial peptide gene expression can be uncoupled.

The GATA factor Serpent is required for the onset of the humoral immune response in Drosophila embryos.

Innate immunity in Drosophila is characterized by the inducible expression of antimicrobial peptides. We have investigated the development and regulation of immune responsiveness in Drosophila embryos after infection. Immune competence, as monitored by the induction of Cecropin A1-lacZ constructs, was observed first in the embryonic yolk. This observation suggests that the yolk plays an important role in the humoral immune response of the developing embryo by synthesizing antimicrobial peptides. Around midembryogenesis, the response in the yolk was diminished. Simultaneously, Cecropin expression became inducible in a large number of cells in the epidermis, demonstrating that late-stage embryos can synthesize their own antibiotics in the epidermis. This production likely serves to provide the hatching larva with an active antimicrobial barrier and protection against systemic infections. Cecropin expression in the yolk required the presence of a GATA site in the promoter as well as the involvement of the GATA-binding transcription factor Serpent (dGATAb). In contrast, neither the GATA site nor Serpent were necessary for Cecropin expression in the epidermis. Thus, the inducible immune responses in the yolk and in the epidermis can be uncoupled and call for distinct sets of transcription factors. Our data suggest that Serpent is involved in the distinction between a systemic response in the yolk/fat body and a local immune response in epithelial cells. In addition, the present study shows that signal transduction pathways controlling innate and epithelial defense reactions can be dissected genetically in Drosophila embryos.

Involvement of Rel factors in the expression of antimicrobial peptide genes in amphibia.

Genes coding for antimicrobial peptides in amphibia reveal a remarkably high number of structural motifs for response elements, previously identified in the genes of insect antimicrobial peptides and in those of the mammalian acute phase response. This study focuses on the functional analysis of the bombinin gene promoter in a Drosophila blood cell line, and the identification of kappaB-binding factors in skin secretions of the frog Bombina orientalis. Transfection experiments demonstrated that the bombinin gene promoter was activated in a lipopolysaccharide-dependent manner, and that insect Rel factors target specific sequences in the amphibian gene promoter. After bathing frogs in bacteria, their skin secretions contained kappaB-specific binding complexes, indicating that Rel factors are crucial components in the response against gram-negative bacteria in this species. These results suggest that a common ancestral control mechanism governs the expression of the first line host-defence from insects to vertebrates.

Activation of the Drosophila NF-kappaB factor Relish by rapid endoproteolytic cleavage.

The Rel/NF-kappaB transcription factor Relish plays a key role in the humoral immune response in Drosophila. We now find that activation of this innate immune response is preceded by rapid proteolytic cleavage of Relish into two parts. An N-terminal fragment, containing the DNA-binding Rel homology domain, translocates to the nucleus where it binds to the promoter of the Cecropin A1 gene and probably to the promoters of other antimicrobial peptide genes. The C-terminal IkappaB-like fragment remains in the cytoplasm. This endoproteolytic cleavage does not involve the proteasome, requires the DREDD caspase, and is different from previously described mechanisms for Rel factor activation.

Induction and regulation of antimicrobial peptides in Drosophila.

Activation of the innate immune response involves recognition of the infectious agent and the subsequent activation of cellular and humoral reactions. In insects, a number of immunity genes are activated at the level of transcription leading to the synthesis of antimicrobial peptides. Genetic analyses in Drosophila have identified several signal transduction pathways that promote activation of these immunity genes. Recent data suggest that the insect immune system is able to discriminate between a bacterial and a fungal infection, and responds by higher levels of activation of the appropriate peptides to repel the infection. These and other recent data on transcription factors and regulation of antimicrobial genes are integrated into a model to suggest how differential activation of antifungal and antibacterial peptides can occur in response to fungal and bacterial infection.

Serpent regulates Drosophila immunity genes in the larval fat body through an essential GATA motif.

Insects possess a powerful immune system, which in response to infection leads to a vast production of different antimicrobial peptides. The regulatory regions of many immunity genes contain a GATA motif in proximity to a kappaB motif. Upon infection, Rel proteins enter the nucleus and activate transcription of the immunity genes. High levels of Rel protein-mediated Cecropin A1 expression previously have been shown to require the GATA site along with the kappaB site. We provide evidence demonstrating that the GATA motif is needed for expression of the Cecropin A1 gene in larval fat body, but is dispensable in adult fat body. A nuclear DNA-binding activity interacts with the Cecropin A1 GATA motif with the same properties as the Drosophila GATA factor Serpent. The GATA-binding activity is recognized by Serpent-specific antibodies, demonstrating their identity. We show that Serpent is nuclear in larval fat body cells and haemocytes both before and after infection. After overexpression, Serpent increases Cecropin A1 transcription in a GATA-dependent manner. We propose that Serpent plays a key role in tissue-specific expression of immunity genes, by priming them for inducible activation by Rel proteins in response to infection.

Dif and cactus are colocalized in the larval nervous system of Drosophila melanogaster.

The Rel protein Dif is a transcription factor suggested to control part of the immune response in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. In uninfected animals, Dif is normally located in the cytoplasm, most likely in a complex with an IkappaB molecule such as Cactus. Upon infection, Dif is enriched in the nucleus of immunoresponsive tissues such as fat body and blood cells. Rel proteins in mammals not only participate in the control of the immune response, but are also thought to play important roles in the function of the nervous system. Here, we demonstrate that both Dif and Cactus are expressed in the central nervous system (CNS) of Drosophila. Interestingly, Dif and Cactus colocalize in their distribution, suggesting a functional link between these proteins in the CNS. In the larval CNS, both Dif and Cactus are expressed at relatively low levels in most cells and at high levels in the mushroom bodies and in small subsets of neurosecretory cells. The cytoplasmic localization of Dif and Cactus in the CNS cells is not affected by bacterial challenge. Instead, we observed changes in nuclear versus cytoplasmic localization of Cactus (but not Dif) along the dark-light cycle, with a strong nuclear localization in perineurial glia toward the end of the dark period. In the CNS of the prepupa, the intensity of the immunostaining for both Dif and Cactus is higher than in the larva. Interestingly, in fat body of uninfected prepupae, the Dif localization was mainly nuclear, suggesting a function for Dif during the process of pupariation.

In vivo regulation of tissue-specific and LPS-inducible expression of the Drosophila Cecropin genes.

The inducible production of antibacterial cecropins in Drosophila fat body and haemocytes is controlled at the level of transcriptional induction. We demonstrate using germ-line transformation that a short, highly conserved, DNA region, including the insect kappaB motif, is necessary for tissue-specific expression in larvae and adults. Quantitative measurements of reporter gene activity in extracts from transgenic larvae confirmed the requirement of this proximal region for LPS-inducible expression in vivo. Transient expression in a blood cell line indicates the existence of positively acting elements further upstream of the conserved region. Furthermore, our in vivo data suggests that the distal upstream region contains negatively acting element(s).

Adjacent GATA and kappa B-like motifs regulate the expression of a Drosophila immune gene.

The GATA motif is a well known positive cis -regulatory element in vertebrates. In this work we report experimental evidence for the direct participation of a GATA motif in the expression of the Drosophila antibacterial peptide gene Cecropin A1 . Previously we have shown that a kappaB-like site is necessary for Cecropin A1 gene expression. Here we present evidence that the Drosophila Rel protein which binds to the kappaB-like site requires an intact GATA site for maximal Dif-mediated transactivation of the Cecropin A1 gene. We show that a Drosophila blood cell line contains factors binding specifically to the GATA motif of the Cecropin A1 gene. The GATA binding activity is likely to include member(s) of the GATA family of transcriptional regulators. We show that the promoters of several inducible insect immune genes possess GATA sites 0-12 base pairs away from kappaB-like sites in functionally important promoter regions. Clusters of GATA and kappaB sites are also observed in the promoters of two important mammalian immune genes, namely IL6 and IL3. The consistent proximity of GATA and kappaB sites appears to be a common theme in the immune gene expression of insects and mammals.

The dorsal-related immunity factor, Dif, is a sequence-specific trans-activator of Drosophila Cecropin gene expression.

A new member of the Rel family of transcription factors, the dorsal-related immunity factor, Dif, was recently cloned and suggested to be involved in regulating the immune response in Drosophila. Despite its classification as a Rel family member, the Dif cDNA-encoded product has not been proven previously to be a transcription factor. We now present evidence that the Dif gene product trans-activates the Drosophila Cecropin A1 gene in co-transfection assays. The transactivation requires a 40 bp upstream element including an insect kappa B-like motif. A dimer of the kappa B-like motif 5'-GGGGATTTTT inserted into a minimal promoter conferred high levels of reporter gene expression by Dif, while a multimer of several mutated versions of this motif was not activated, demonstrating the sequence specificity of Dif. Full trans-activation by Dif requires the C-terminal part of the protein. The morphogen dorsal (dl) can also activate the Cecropin A1 promoter, but to a lesser extent and in a less sequence-specific manner than Dif. Simultaneous overexpression of Dif and dl in co-transfection assays revealed that dl possesses a dominant negative effect on Dif transactivation. This study establishes that Dif is a sequence-specific transcription factor and is probably a key activator of the immune response in Drosophila.

Signals from the IL-1 receptor homolog, Toll, can activate an immune response in a Drosophila hemocyte cell line.

The Toll gene encodes an interleukin 1 receptor-like protein that mediates dorsoventral polarity in the Drosophila embryo. The possible involvement of Toll or Toll-like proteins also in the Drosophila immune response was investigated by overexpressing Toll10B, a constitutively active mutant protein, in the Drosophila blood cell line mbn-2. Induction of the Cecropin A1 (CecA1) gene, coding for a bactericidal peptide, was used as an indicator for the immune response. Toll10B was found to increase CecA1 transcription, as detected with a cotransfected CecA1-lacZ reporter gene construct. This effect depends on the presence of a kappa B-like site in the CecA1 promoter. The endogenous Toll gene is expressed in mbn-2 cells, indicating that this gene may normally play a role in Drosophila blood cells.

Dif, a dorsal-related gene that mediates an immune response in Drosophila.

There are striking parallels between the regulation of gene expression along the dorsoventral (DV) axis of Drosophila embryos and lymphoid-restricted expression in the mammalian immune system. Both depend on regulatory factors containing rel domains (dorsal and NF-kappa B) that are controlled at the level of nuclear transport. A novel Rel-containing gene in Drosophila, Dif (dorsal-related immunity factor), provides a potential link between these seemingly disparate processes. Although Dif maps close to dorsal, it does not appear to participate in DV patterning, but instead mediates an immune response in Drosophila larvae. Dif is normally localized in the cytoplasm of the larval fat body, but quickly accumulates in the nucleus upon bacterial infection or injury. Evidence is presented that once in the nucleus, Dif binds to kappa B-like sequence motifs present in promoter regions of immunity genes. These results suggest that mammalian and insect immunity share a common evolutionary origin.

kappa B-like motifs regulate the induction of immune genes in Drosophila.

The mammalian transcription factor NF-kappa B regulates a number of genes involved in immune and acute phase responses, by interacting with a nucleotide sequence element, the kappa B-motif. In this work we demonstrate the participation of similar motifs in the immune response of insects as well: kappa B-like motifs have a regulatory role in the synthesis of cecropins, a set of anti-bacterial peptides, triggered by the presence of bacterial cell wall components in the insect blood. We show that the upstream region of the Cecropin gene CecA1 contains elements responsible for inducible and tissue-specific expression. Furthermore, a trimer of kappa B-like motif confers high levels of inducible expression from the reporter gene, after transfection in a Drosophila blood cell line. As in the moth Hyalophora cecropia, stimulation with bacterial lipopolysaccharide induces a nuclear factor that specifically binds to the kappa B-like motif. Our data suggest a functional and evolutionary relationship between these insect immune response factors and the mammalian NF-kappa B.

Direct interaction of the Polycomb protein with Antennapedia regulatory sequences in polytene chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster.

The Polycomb (Pc) gene is responsible for the elaboration and maintenance of the expression pattern of the homeotic genes during development of Drosophila. In mutant Pc- embryos, homeotic transcripts are ectopically expressed, leading to abdominal transformations in all segments. From this it was suggested that PC+ acts as a repressor of homeotic gene transcription. We have mapped the cis-acting control sequences of the homeotic Antennapedia (Antp) gene regulated by Pc. Using Antp P1 and P2 promoter fragments linked to the E. coli lacZ reporter gene we show different expression patterns of beta-galactosidase (beta-gal) in transformed Pc+ and Pc- embryos. In addition we are able to visualize by immunocytochemical techniques on polytene chromosomes the direct binding of the Pc protein to the transposed cis-regulatory promoter fragments. However, short Antp P1 promoter constructs which are--due to position effects--ectopically activated in salivary glands, do not reveal a Pc binding signal.

Immunocytochemical evidence for the cytoplasmic localization and differential expression during the cell cycle of the M1 and M2 subunits of mammalian ribonucleotide reductase.

Mammalian ribonucleotide reductase consists of two non-identical subunits, proteins M1 and M2. We have produced and characterized rat polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies directed against protein M2 of mouse ribonucleotide reductase. Using these antibodies for immunocytochemical studies, an exclusively cytoplasmic localization of protein M2 was demonstrated both in cultured parent and hydroxyurea-resistant, M2-over-producing mouse TA3 cells, and in cells from various mouse tissues. These data, together with the previously demonstrated cytoplasmic localization of the M1 subunit, clearly show that ribonucleotide reductase is a cytoplasmic enzyme. Combining the anti-M2 antibodies with a monoclonal anti-M1 antibody allowed for double-labelling immunofluorescence studies of the two subunits in individual cells. Only approximately 50% of the cells in a logarithmically growing culture contained immunodetectable protein M2, while the M1-specific staining was present in all cells. The M2 staining correlates well with the proportion of cells in the S-phase of the cell cycle. In tissues, only actively dividing cells stained with either antibody and there were always fewer cells stained with the M2-antibodies than with the M1-antibody. Our data therefore present independent evidence for the earlier proposed model of a differential regulation during the cell cycle of the M1 and M2 subunits of ribonucleotide reductase.

Elevated expression of M1 and M2 components and drug-induced posttranscriptional modulation of ribonucleotide reductase in a hydroxyurea-resistant mouse cell line.

Ribonucleotide reductase, a rate-limiting enzyme in the synthesis of DNA, consists of two nonidentical subunits, proteins M1 and M2. Hydroxyurea, a specific inhibitor of DNA synthesis, acts by destroying the unique tyrosyl free radical of protein M2. In the past, we have described a mouse L cell line which exhibited a stable resistance to high concentrations of hydroxyurea [McClarty, G. A., Chan, A., & Wright, J.A. (1986) Somat. Cell Mol. Genet. 12, 121-131]. When this line was grown in the absence of hydroxyurea, the cells contained a modest but stable elevation in ribonucleotide reductase activity. However, the activity was further increased on the addition of drug to the culture medium. This was accompanied by an increase in protein M2 activity as shown by activity titration experiments. Likewise, removal of hydroxyurea resulted in a decrease in M2 activity. In the present study, we make use of recently isolated cDNAs and monoclonal antibodies for both the M1 and M2 proteins to further our understanding of the mechanism of hydroxyurea resistance at the molecular level in a subclone of this cell line. Our results indicated that protein M1 levels were elevated 2-3-fold and protein M2 levels were increased about 50-fold in the mutant cells when they were grown in the absence of hydroxyurea, compared to wild-type cells. These protein increases were accompanied by corresponding elevations in the levels of mRNAs for both subunits and increased rates of transcription of both genes. There was a 6-fold amplification in the gene copy number for protein M2.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Different cellular distribution of thioredoxin and subunit M1 of ribonucleotide reductase in rat tissues.

The cellular distribution of thioredoxin and protein M1 of ribonucleotide reductase in adult rat tissues was investigated with immunohistochemical techniques using specific antisera. Tissues with high or low frequency of either mitotic or meiotic cell divisions were compared. Thioredoxin was demonstrated in many cells types that showed no detectable protein M1 of ribonucleotide reductase. A few cell types with protein M1 immunoreactivity also contained immunoreactive thioredoxin. However, in most cells no such co-localization could be demonstrated. This lack of correlation between cells containing subunit M1 of ribonucleotide reductase and the thioredoxin indicates that thioredoxin is not the physiologist hydrogen donor for ribonucleotide reductase in rat tissues and that the expression of two enzymes is differently regulated.