ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic splenectomy for patients with portal hypertension is associated with a high risk of bleeding. The use of vessel-sealing devices and automatic sutures is important for bleeding control. However, a rare complication of abdominal surgery is the direct communication between the arterial and portal circulation related to surgical procedures such as simultaneous ligature of an artery and adjacent vein. We describe a rare case of omental arteriovenous fistula (AVF) after laparoscopic splenectomy treated with transarterial embolization. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case of a 46-year-old male patient with an omental AVF after a laparoscopic splenectomy 6 years ago for splenomegaly associated with alcoholic cirrhosis. Follow-up abdominal dynamic computed tomography accidentally revealed a vascular sac (25 mm in the major axis) that formed an omental AVF with anastomosis to the left colonic vein. The communication was considered to be caused by using a vessel-sealing device. No symptoms related to the AVF were observed. The AVF was embolized with microcoils using the transarterial approach. A 4-axis catheter system was used for accurate embolization due to the long and tortuous distance from the celiac artery. No recurrence or symptoms were observed after 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of arterioportal fistula is mandatory, even in asymptomatic patients. Embolization is a less invasive alternative to surgical approaches. The 4-axis catheter system was useful for accurate embolization via a long and tortuous artery.
ABSTRACT
Scars developing on body surfaces not only restrict body movement, but are also problematic from a cosmetic standpoint. Hence, revision is conducted by removing the scar and re-suturing the resultant defects. In performing scar revision, care should be taken to prevent the re-sutured wounds from developing hypertrophy again. Scars often present a pattern where hard, red parts are separated by soft parts in between. As the hard and soft parts may be analogized as islands and seas respectively, we call this the "Island-Like" scar. Two strategies can be taken to treat scars of this type. The first is to remove the entire scar-including both hard and soft parts; the second is to remove only the hard parts and leave the soft parts untouched. The authors conducted a biomechanical study using finite element analyses and found that as a body moves, greater stresses occur in the peri-wound regions with the first strategy than with the second strategy. A wound's likelihood to develop hypertrophy increases as the stresses working on it increase. Hence, it is hypothesized that the second strategy carries less risk of the operated wounds developing re-hypertrophy than the first strategy. Based on this logic, in performing scar revision for scars consisting of hard and soft parts, it is recommended only to remove only hard parts and not to operate on soft parts in between.
