Selective radioprotection of hepatocytes by systemic and portal vein infusions of amifostine in a rat liver tumor model.

PURPOSE: The tolerance of the liver to radiation is too low to permit an effective dose to be delivered to patients who have diffuse intrahepatic cancer. In this study we evaluated whether systemic or portal venous administration of the aminothiol compound, amifostine, could protect the normal liver from the effects of ionizing radiation without compromising tumor cell kill in a rat liver tumor model. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Rats implanted with liver tumors were infused with 200 mg/kg amifostine over 15 min via the femoral or portal vein. The livers were irradiated with a single 6-Gy fraction 15-20 min after the termination of amifostine infusion. Protection of the liver was assessed by an in vitro hepatocyte micronucleus assay and tumor protection by an in vivo-in vitro clonogenic survival assay. Tissue levels of the active metabolite, free WR-1065, were determined in the tumor and in the normal liver using a specific HPLC assay with electrochemical detection. RESULTS: After a 6-Gy fraction, the frequency of hepatocyte micronuclei after administration of saline, systemic amifostine, and portal venous amifostine was 18.7+/-1%, 6.8+/-1%, and 9.9+/-2%, respectively, corresponding to a radiation equivalent effect of 6 Gy +/- 0.5, 1.8 Gy +/- 0.3, and 2.5 Gy +/- 1.3, respectively. Both amifostine conditions showed considerably less radiation effect than saline-treated controls (p < 0.01); the two amifostine conditions did not differ (p = 0.3). The surviving fraction of tumor cells was not affected by amifostine treatment and was 0.03+/-0.02 and 0.05+/-0.03 for systemic and portal venous delivery and 0.06+/-0.02 for control animals (ANOVA analysis showed no significant difference of the means p = 0.34). Portal venous delivery produced significantly less WR-1065 in the tumor compared to systemic administration (54 microM +/- 36 vs. 343 microM +/- 88, respectively, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Both systemic and portal venous administration of amifostine effectively protect hepatocytes from ionizing radiation without compromising tumor cell kill in a clinically relevant animal model. These findings suggest that amifostine may be a selective normal tissue radioprotectant in liver cancer and that regional/portal infusions may be preferable to systemic dosing.

Escalated focal liver radiation and concurrent hepatic artery fluorodeoxyuridine for unresectable intrahepatic malignancies.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the response, time to progression, survival, and impact of radiation (RT) dose on survival in patients with intrahepatic malignancies treated on a phase I trial of escalated focal liver RT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From April 1996 to January 1998, 43 patients with unresectable intrahepatic hepatobiliary cancer (HB; 27 patients) and colorectal liver metastases (LM; 16 patients) were treated with high-dose conformal RT. The median tumor size was 10 x 10 x 8 cm. The median RT dose was 58.5 Gy (range, 28.5 to 90 Gy), 1.5 Gy twice daily, with concurrent continuous-infusion hepatic arterial fluorodeoxyuridine (0.2 mg/kg/d) during the first 4 weeks of RT. RESULTS: The response rate in 25 assessable patients was 68% (16 partial and one complete response). With a median potential follow-up period of 26.5 months, the median times to progression for all tumors, LM, and HB were 6, 8, and 3 months, respectively. The median survival times of all patients, patients with LM, and patients with HB were 16, 18, and 11 months, respectively. On multivariate analyses, escalated RT dose was independently associated with improved progression-free and overall survival. The median survival of patients treated with 70 Gy or more has not yet been reached (16.4+ months), compared with 11.6 months in patients treated with lower RT doses (P =.0003). CONCLUSION: The excellent response rate, prolonged intrahepatic control, and improved survival in patients treated with RT doses of 70 Gy or more motivate continuation of dose-escalation studies for patients with intrahepatic malignancies.

Interaction between gemcitabine and mitomycin-C in vitro.

Both gemcitabine (2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine; dFdCyd) and mitomycin-C (MMC) are active against several solid malignancies. dFdCyd is an attractive agent for use in combination with drugs which damage DNA and with radiation therapy because of its ability to inhibit DNA replication and repair as well as its radiosensitizing effect. We hypothesized that the repair of MMC adducts in DNA might be inhibited by dFdCyd leading to a synergistic effect. To test this possibility, we studied the effect of combining dFdCyd and MMC in HT29 human colon carcinoma cells in vitro. The cells were exposed to a variety of drug concentration ratios and schedules, then assessed for clonogenic survival. D50 values (drug concentration at which clonogenicity is inhibited by 50%) were calculated, and the interactive effects of the two drugs were evaluated using median effect analysis. In this approach, if the calculated combination index (CI) is < 1, 1, or > 1, it indicates synergism, additivity, or antagonism, respectively (Chou and Talalay 1984). We found that marked synergy (CI of 0.5-0.7) was produced by concurrent exposure to mitomycin and gemcitabine. In contrast, sequential treatment led only to additivity. These findings suggest that, when combined in an appropriate schedule, the chemosensitizing effect of gemcitabine may be beneficial in the treatment of malignancies which are sensitive to MMC.

Treatment of intrahepatic cancers with radiation doses based on a normal tissue complication probability model.

PURPOSE: To attempt to safely escalate the dose of radiation for patients with intrahepatic cancer, we designed a protocol in which each patient received the maximum possible dose while being subjected to a 10% risk of radiation-induced liver disease (RILD, or radiation hepatitis) based on a normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model. We had two hypotheses: H1; with this approach, we could safely deliver higher doses of radiation than we would have prescribed based on our previous protocol, and H2; the model would predict the observed complication probability (10%). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with either primary hepatobiliary cancer or colorectal cancer metastatic to the liver and normal liver function were eligible. We used an NTCP model with parameters calculated from our previous patient data to prescribe a dose that subjected each patient to a 10% complication risk within the model. Treatment was delivered with concurrent hepatic arterial fluorodeoxyuridine (HA FUdR). Patients were evaluated for RILD 2 and 4 months after the completion of treatment. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients completed treatment and were followed up for at least 3 months. The mean dose delivered by the current protocol was 56.6 +/- 2.31 Gy (range, 40.5 to 81 Gy). This dose was significantly greater than the dose that would have been prescribed by the previous protocol (46.0 +/- 1.65 Gy; range, 33 to 66 Gy; P < .01). These data are consistent with H1. One of 21 patients developed RILD. The complication rate of 4.8% (95% confidence interval, 0% to 23.8%) did not differ significantly from the predicted 8.8% NTCP (based on dose delivered) and excluded a 25% true incidence rate (P < .05). This finding supports H2. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that an NTCP model can be used prospectively to safely deliver far greater doses of radiation for patients with intrahepatic cancer than with previous approaches. Although the observed complication probability is within the confidence intervals of our model, it is possible that this model overestimates the risk of complication and that further dose escalation will be possible. Additional follow-up and accrual will be required to determine if these higher doses produce further improvements in response and survival.

Regional pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil in dogs: role of the liver, gastrointestinal tract, and lungs.

The purpose of this study was to determine the presence and extent of pulmonary elimination for 5-fluorouracil (FUra). A secondary aim was to characterize the relative importance of the liver, gastrointestinal tract, splanchnic region, and lungs toward the overall elimination of FUra. A total of 10 mixed-breed male and female dogs were used in these acute studies in which FUra was administered through a cephalic vein. Six dogs were studied at sequentially escalated dose rates of 0.125, 0.250, 0.500, 0.750, and 1.00 micromol/min/kg (8-fold range); four dogs were studied at sequentially escalated dose rates of 0.0625, 0.250, 0.750, 1.50, and 2.00 micromol/min/kg (32-fold range). Each infusion lasted 2 h, at which time steady-state plasma concentrations were obtained (i.e., portal vein, carotid artery, hepatic vein, and pulmonary artery), perfusion rates were measured (hepatic artery, portal vein, and cardiac output), and pharmacokinetic parameters were directly assessed. Pulmonary elimination of FUra was conclusively demonstrated. Although only 17% of the drug was extracted by the lungs at the lowest dose rate, pulmonary clearance (16.0 ml/min/kg) was on the order of splanchnic clearance (13.5 ml/min/kg), or larger. As the dose rate increased, pulmonary clearance was more easily saturated than splanchnic clearance. Thus, it appears that at increasing dose rates, the splanchnic region becomes a more significant pathway, whereas the lungs have a reduced role in the overall elimination of FUra.

A phase I trial of hepatic arterial bromodeoxyuridine and conformal radiation therapy for patients with primary hepatobiliary cancers or colorectal liver metastases.

PURPOSE: We have previously found that conformal radiation therapy (RT) and hepatic arterial fluorodeoxyuridine was associated with durable responses and long-term survival for patients treated for nondiffuse primary hepatobiliary tumors and colorectal liver metastases. Further improvements in hepatic control may result from the addition of selective radiosensitization using bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) infused through the hepatic artery (HA) concurrently with RT. This is a Phase I study of escalating doses of HA BrdU combined with our standard hepatic RT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with unresectable primary hepatobiliary cancer or colorectal liver metastases were treated with concurrent HA BrdU and conformal RT (1.5 Gy per fraction, twice a day). Three-dimensional treatment planning was used to define both the target and normal liver volumes. The total dose of RT (24, 48, or 66 Gy) was determined by the fractional volume of normal liver excluded from the high dose volume. HA BrdU was escalated in standard Phase I fashion with at least three patients receiving each combination of RT dose and BrdU dose. The starting dose of HA BrdU was 10 mg/kg/day, with two potential escalations to a maximum of 25 mg/kg/day (the maximum tolerable dose of HA BrdU when given alone on this same schedule). Grade > or = 3 toxicity was considered dose limiting. Patients receiving 24 Gy had one cycle of HA BrdU, while those receiving either 48 or 66 Gy had two cycles. Patients were followed for toxicity, complications, and response (when evaluable). RESULTS: A total of 41 patients (18 with colorectal liver metastases, 16 with cholangiocarcinoma and 7 with hepatoma) were treated. Five patients were removed from the protocol (three had HA catheter complications, one developed atrial fibrillation, and one was removed due to recurrent Grade 4 toxicity), although all five are included for toxicity purposes. Dose-limiting toxicity was primarily thrombocytopenia and there was no obvious relationship with the RT dose. Only 2 of 17 cycles given at 25 mg/kg/day had Grade > or = 3 toxicity. Complications developed in four patients, including one patient with radiation-induced liver disease. Response rates were not improved compared to our previous experience. CONCLUSIONS: The appropriate dose of HA BrdU for Phase II evaluation is 25 mg/kg/day. Neither the hepatic parenchyma nor the gastrointestinal mucosa appeared to be sensitized by this method of BrdU administration. It is anticipated that these, or still newer methods of therapy, can improve treatment results in the near future.

Long-term results of hepatic artery fluorodeoxyuridine and conformal radiation therapy for primary hepatobiliary cancers.

PURPOSE: We have previously shown that conformal radiation therapy (RT) combined with hepatic artery (HA) fluorodeoxyuridine (FdUrd) had encouraging hepatic control and survival rates for patients with nondiffuse primary hepatobiliary malignancies. With longer follow-up, we were particularly interested if long-term hepatic control and disease-free survival could be achieved, and if late hepatic complications due to radiation therapy were observed. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with unresectable primary hepatobiliary cancer were treated with concurrent HA FdUrd (0.2 mg/kg/day) and conformal RT (1.5-1.65 Gy per fraction, twice a day), directed only to the liver abnormalities. Three-dimensional treatment planning was used to define both the target and normal liver volumes. The total dose of radiation (48 or 66 Gy) was determined by the fractional volume of normal liver excluded from the high dose volume. Patients were followed routinely for response, patterns of failure, long-term toxicity, and survival. The median potential follow-up was 54 months. RESULTS: A total of 22 patients (11 with hepatocellular carcinoma and 11 with cholangiocarcinoma) were treated. There were 10 objective responses in the 11 evaluable patients. The overall freedom from hepatic progression at more than 2 years was about 50%. The median survival was 16 months with an actuarial 4-year survival of about 20%. Gastrointestinal bleeding was the most common long-term toxicity. Late hepatic toxicity was not observed; in fact, hypertrophy of the untreated liver was seen. CONCLUSIONS: Combined conformal RT and HA FdUrd can produce long-term freedom from hepatic progression and survival in patients with unresectable, nondiffuse primary hepatobiliary malignancies. There were no long-term liver complications observed.

A phase I trial of intravenous bromodeoxyuridine and radiation therapy for pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: Improved radiosensitization may lead to improved results of treatment for pancreatic cancer. This Phase I trial was designed to determine the maximum tolerable dose of intravenous bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) when given in an alternating weekly fashion with radiation therapy for patients with pancreatic cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with resected or locally unresectable pancreatic cancer were eligible if distant metastases were not present. A continuous intravenous infusion of BrdUrd was given on weeks 1, 3, 5, and 7. Twice a day radiation therapy (1.5 Gy per fraction) was given on weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8 to the pancreas/pancreatic bed (total dose 60 Gy) and draining regional lymph nodes (total dose 45 Gy). The starting dose of BrdUrd was 800 mg/m2/day with a planned escalation to 1000 mg/m2/day if at least six out of eight patients were without Grade > or = 3 toxicity. Patients were assessed weekly for toxicity, and were followed every 3 months after treatment for complications and survival. RESULTS: Fifteen patients with resected (six) or unresectable (nine) pancreatic cancer were enrolled. One patient failed to complete therapy due to tumor progression. One of 11 patients treated with 800 mg/m2/day had a Grade 3 toxicity, while Grade 3 or 4 toxicity was found in all 3 patients receiving 1000 mg/m2/day. The dose-limiting toxicities were hematologic. The acute gastrointestinal toxicity was minimal. Two patients, including one with unresectable disease, were without evidence of disease during exploration for complications (ulcer, small bowel obstruction). CONCLUSIONS: The recommended dose of BrdUrd for Phase II study is 800 mg/m2/day. The gastrointestinal mucosa did not appear to be sensitized by this method of BrdUrd administration. The presence of a pathologic complete response is encouraging. Further improvements in radiosensitization are possible and may lead to improved local control.

Teaching skills for accessing and interpreting information from systematic reviews/meta-analyses, practice guidelines, and the Internet.

Skills and practice related to accessing and interpreting clinical information from systematic reviews/meta-analyses, practice guidelines, and the Internet have been integrated into a new senior year elective designed to teach medical students how to critically appraise information from a variety of sources and evaluate it's applicability to patient care. Small groups of senior medical students under the direction of a multidisciplinary team (behavioral scientist, information specialist, physician) facilitate discussions of clinical articles using checklists designed to evaluate their quality. The central feature of the course is a demonstration of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), an electronic journal distributed by BMJ Publishing, and the requirement that students conduct a literature review on a topic of their choice and present an oral and written summary in the form of a "draft" meta-analysis. Students are provided with strategies to "surf" the Internet/WWW for information, e.g., practice guidelines/treatment protocols, descriptions of on-going clinical trials. A total of 52 students have participated to date. Students have selected project topics across a wide range of medical disciplines, including internal medicine, family practice, OB/GYN, pediatrics, surgery, neurology, emergency medicine, and psychiatry. The course is one of the most favorably evaluated of all senior electives and rated more favorably than the overall mean ratings for all electives combined on 8 of 9 scales, including "Quality of course overall" (4.39 vs. 3.92 on 5-point scale).

Effect of irradiation on bromodeoxyuridine incorporation in human colon cancer xenografts.

PURPOSE: Although we have characterized the incorporation of the thymidine analog bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) into human colon cancer xenografts under a wide variety of conditions, little is known about the effect of radiation on subsequent incorporation. Because clinical protocols include, as one component, BrdUrd administration after radiation, it was important to confirm that irradiation did not prevent subsequent BrdUrd incorporation. Therefore, we studied the effect of irradiation on BrdUrd incorporation into HT29 human colon cancer xenografts. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two types of experiments were performed. In the first, the effect of radiation on subsequent incorporation was measured. Tumors received doses of 0, 2, 8, and 12 Gy, animals were infused with BrdUrd for 4 days, and incorporation was assessed at the end of the infusion. In the second, the effect of radiation on the elimination of BrdUrd from tumors was determined. Animals were infused with BrdUrd, tumors were irradiated with either 0 or 12 Gy, and tumor incorporation of BrdUrd was measured 1 and 3 days later. RESULTS: Radiation affected neither the incorporation into nor the elimination of BrdUrd from human tumor xenografts. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the feasibility of clinical trials interdigitating BrdUrd infusion and radiation.

Pelvic radiation therapy combined with hepatic artery chemotherapy for resected rectal carcinoma with liver metastases.

PURPOSE: Patients with hepatic metastases from rectal cancer treated with hepatic artery (HA) chemotherapy have a life expectancy great enough to be at risk for pelvic failure. Therefore, a treatment plan was developed for patients with resected rectal cancer and unresectable hepatic metastases, when the pathologic features of transmural invasion and perirectal lymph node metastases were present. Treatment consisted of concurrent pelvic radiation therapy (RT) and HA 5-fluorouracil (FUra), as systemic levels of FUra are achievable with HA administration, followed by HA fluorodeoxyuridine (FdUrd). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifteen patients were offered combined pelvic RT and HA FUra. Radiation was given to an initial dose of 45 Gy to the pelvis, followed by boost treatment for an additional 5.4-10.8 Gy. Concurrent HA chemotherapy was given using FUra or FUra/leucovorin administered in two cycles of 14 days for each cycle. If HA chemotherapy could not be done, then intravenous FUra was given during RT. Following completion of RT and HA FUra, patients were evaluated for treatment with HA FdUrd. RESULTS: Eleven patients received concurrent HA FUra or FUra/leucovorin and pelvic RT. Of these, six continued to receive HA FdUrd after completion of RT, as five patients were found to have progressive hepatic disease. Four patients could not have therapy as outlined, but did receive pelvic RT with concurrent intravenous FUra (two patients), FUra/leucovorin (one patient), or sequential HA FUra (one patient). There were four pelvic recurrences at 1, 4, 14, and 17 months after RT. One was the first site of progression, two occurred simultaneously with other failure, and one occurred after hepatic progression. The liver was the most frequent site of first progression (alone in seven patients; as a component of progression in four patients). Treatment was well tolerated with three Grade > or = 3 toxicities. The median survival was 14 months. CONCLUSIONS: These data support the hypothesis that patients with metastatic rectal cancer are also at risk for pelvic recurrence. The frequency of hepatic progression supports continued aggressive therapy directed to this site. As systemic and regional therapy of metastatic rectal cancer improves, we anticipate that more patients will be at risk for a pelvic recurrence, making it increasingly important to explore the role of pelvic radiation therapy despite the presence of metastatic disease.

Incorporation of 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine into colorectal liver metastases and liver in patients receiving a 7-day hepatic arterial infusion.

Preclinical and clinical data suggest that the combination of hepatic arterial bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd), a thymidine analogue radiation sensitizer, and high-dose three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy offer a high potential for improving the local control of intrahepatic cancers. A key step in the design of a successful protocol is to determine in patients the conditions for BrdUrd administration that would be expected to produce selective radiosensitization of the tumor. Therefore, we designed a clinical trial to assess BrdUrd incorporation into the DNA of hepatic colorectal metastases and normal liver after a 7-day continuous BrdUrd infusion at a dose rate of 25 mg/kg/day (the maximal tolerated dose for a 14-day infusion) for patients undergoing laparotomy for either resection of liver metastases or hepatic arterial catheter and pump placement. Thirteen patients were entered into this study. We found that the average replacement of thymidine by BrdUrd in the tumor and normal liver were 11.6 +/- 1.2% and 1.1 +/- 0.2%, respectively. This extent of incorporation would be expected to produce a single fraction radiation enhancement of 1.5 in the tumor without detectable sensitization of the normal liver. Immunohistochemical staining for BrdUrd revealed heterogeneity of incorporation with a range of approximately 60-80% of the cells labeled in different regions of the specimens. These findings suggest that hepatic arterial BrdUrd given at this dose and schedule has a high likelihood of producing clinically significant radiosensitization for patients with hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. Furthermore, the demonstrated selectivity of tumor perfusion that can be obtained with hepatic arterial infusion combined with the high proliferative rate of colorectal metastases (versus normal liver) suggests that these patients may be good candidates for tumor-directed gene transfer therapy by using regionally delivered retroviral vectors.

The treatment of colorectal liver metastases with conformal radiation therapy and regional chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Whole-liver radiation, with or without chemotherapy, has been of modest benefit in the treatment of unresectable hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. A Phase I/II study combining escalating doses of conformally planned radiation therapy (RT) with intraarterial hepatic (IAH) fluorodeoxyuridine (FdUrd) was performed. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-two patients with unresectable hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer, 14 of whom had progressed after previous chemotherapy (2 with prior IAH FdUrd), were treated with concurrent IAH FdUrd (0.2 mg/kg/day) and conformal hepatic radiation therapy (1.5-1.65 Gy/fraction twice a day). The total dose of radiation given to the tumor (48-72.6 Gy) depended on the fraction of normal liver excluded from the high-dose volume. All patients were assessed for response, toxicity, hepatobiliary relapse, and survival. Median potential follow-up was 42 months. RESULTS: Eleven of 22 patients demonstrated an objective response, with the remainder showing stable disease. Actuarial freedom from hepatic progression was 25% at 1 years. The most common acute toxicity was mild to moderate nausea and transient liver function test abnormalities. There were three patients with gastrointestinal bleeding (none requiring surgical intervention) after the completion of treatment. Overall median survival was 20 months. The presence of extrahepatic disease was associated with decreased survival (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Combined conformal radiation therapy and IAH FdUrd can produce an objective response in 50% of patients with hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. However, response was not durable, and hepatic progression was frequent. Improvements in hepatic tumor control for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer may require higher doses of conformal radiation and/or improved radiosensitization. In an effort to increase radiosensitization, we have recently initiated a clinical trial combining IAH bromode-oxyuridine, a thymidine analog radiosensitizer, with conformal high dose radiation therapy.

Hepatic toxicity resulting from cancer treatment.

Radiation-induced liver disease (RILD), often called radiation hepatitis, is a syndrome characterized by the development of anicteric ascites approximately 2 weeks to 4 months after hepatic irradiation. There has been a renewed interest in hepatic irradiation because of two significant advances in cancer treatment: three dimensional radiation therapy treatment planning and bone marrow transplantation using total body irradiation. RILD resulting from liver radiation can usually be distinguished clinically from that resulting from the preparative regime associated with bone marrow transplantation. However, both syndromes demonstrate the same pathological lesion: veno-occlusive disease. Recent evidence suggests that elevated transforming growth factor beta levels may play a role in the development of veno-occlusive disease. Three dimensional treatment planning offers the potential to determine the radiation dose and volume dependence of RILD, permitting the safe delivery of high doses of radiation to parts of the liver. The chief therapy for RILD is diuretics, although some advocate steroids for severe cases. The characteristics of RILD permit the development of a grading system modeled after the NCI Acute Common Toxicity Criteria, which incorporates standard criteria of hepatic dysfunction.

Hepatic radioembolization with yttrium-90 containing glass microspheres: preliminary results and clinical follow-up.

UNLABELLED: The treatment of hepatic tumors remains unsatisfactory. These lesions receive most of their blood supply from the hepatic artery, therefore the hepatic artery administration of beta-emitting particulate radiopharmaceuticals is an attractive approach to deliver therapeutic irradiation to the liver and differentially to tumors within the liver. METHODS: A Phase I dose escalation study of the hepatic tolerance to radiation delivered by 90Y containing glass microspheres was carried out in 24 patients with hepatic malignancy. Doses of 90Y microspheres to achieve an estimated whole-liver nominal absorbed radiation dose of 5000 cGy (two patients), 7500 cGy (six patients), 10,000 cGy (seven patients), 12,500 cGy (six patients), and 15,000 cGy (three patients) were administered via the hepatic artery. The administered nominal absorbed radiation dose (NARD) was estimated based on liver volume determined from CT scans and the assumption of uniform distribution of microspheres throughout the liver. RESULTS: No hematologic, hepatic or pulmonary toxicity was encountered in the dose range examined during a mean follow-up period of up to 53 mo. Reversible gastritis or duodenitis was encountered in four patients without imaging or biopsy evidence for extrahepatic deposition of microspheres. Response data, based on CT scans obtained 16 wk after treatment, showed progressive disease in eight patients, stable disease in seven patients, minimal response in four patients and partial response in five patients. Subsequent follow-up revealed three long-term survivors at 204, 216 and 228 wk. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary data demonstrate that in the examined dose range, radiation may be safely delivered to liver tumors by means of 90Y glass microspheres with encouraging response data.

Radiosensitization with carotid intra-arterial bromodeoxyuridine +/- 5-fluorouracil biomodulation for malignant gliomas.

Bromodeoxyuridine (BUdR), a nonhypoxic radiosensitizing drug, is a halogenated pyrimidine analog that is incorporated into the DNA of dividing cells in a competitive process with thymidine. BUdR sensitizes cells to radiation therapy. 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) inhibits the endogenous synthesis of thymidine, resulting in increased incorporation of the BUdR. Neurons and glial cells have a very low mitotic rate; they will not incorporate BUdR and will not be sensitized. BUdR and 5-FU are best delivered intra-arterially (IA) because of their regional advantage. We infused BUdR +/- 5-FU over 8 1/2 weeks, before and during 59.4-Gy focal conformal external beam radiation therapy, through a permanently implanted pump with a catheter placed retrograde through the external carotid artery to the carotid bifurcation. Sixty-two patients with grades III or IV glioma were entered into one of two trials, with 23 patients receiving BUdR alone and 39 patients receiving BUdR + 5-FU. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of BUdR alone was 400 mg/m2/d for 8 1/2 weeks. The Kaplan-Meier median survival (KMS) was 20 months. In the BUdR + 5-FU trial, the MTD of BUdR was also 400 mg/m2/d and 5-FU was 5 mg/m2/d with a KMS of 17 months. The KMS of all 62 patients in both trials 1 and 2 was 18 months. Pathologic grading used both the original World Health Organization (WHO) and 1993 modified WHO systems. The KMS of grade IV patients was 13.8 months (48 patients) with the original system and 17 months (58 patients) with the modified system.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Kinetics of bromodeoxyuridine elimination from human colon cancer cells in vitro and in vivo.

We have previously shown that the thymidine analogue radiation sensitizer bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) is incorporated into human tumors to a greater extent than into the livers of athymic mice bearing these tumors as xenografts. However, incorporation into the intestine and bone marrow exceeds that of the tumor (T. S. Lawrence, M. A. Davis, J. Maybaum, S. K. Mukhopadhyay, P. L. Stetson, D. P. Normolle, P. E. McKeever, and W. D. Ensminger, Cancer Res., 52: 3698-3704, 1992). We hypothesized that the ratio of tumor incorporation to intestinal or bone marrow incorporation might increase during a period of drug elimination following the termination of an infusion. To test this hypothesis, we infused athymic mice bearing HT29 human colon cancer xenografts with BrdUrd and measured incorporation in the tumor and normal tissues up to 7 days after the infusion was discontinued. In addition, we assessed the effect of exposure to BrdUrd on subsequent incorporation in vitro and in vivo through the use of a stable isotope of BrdUrd ("isotopic BrdUrd"), which could be differentiated from normotopic BrdUrd using the gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric assay. We found a significant increase in the ratio of BrdUrd in the tumor compared to bone marrow and intestine during the drug elimination period. We also found that BrdUrd incorporation slowed the kinetics of subsequent BrdUrd incorporation and elimination. These findings suggest that when the radiation dose-limiting organ is rapidly proliferative, such as the intestine or bone marrow, delivering radiation during a drug elimination period may improve the therapeutic index.

Clinical pharmacology of hepatic arterial infusions of 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine.

This investigation was undertaken to determine the pharmacokinetic parameters relevant to hepatic arterial (HA) infusion of 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdUrd) and to ascertain the maximum tolerated dose and related toxicities of BrdUrd administered as a 14-day HA infusion. In the pharmacokinetic study, 6 patients received a 2-h i.v. infusion (to steady-state) of BrdUrd at each of 5 escalating dose rates (10 to 160 mg/kg/day) with simultaneous blood sampling for BrdUrd levels from HA and hepatic venous catheters. Dose dependent HA and hepatic venous drug levels, total body clearance, hepatic extraction, and estimated regional exposure advantage were determined. The total body clearance of BrdUrd was high and dose rate dependent, falling from 3340 ml/min with a 10-mg/kg/day infusion to 2180 ml/min at a 160-mg/kg/day dose rate. Hepatic extraction was high and dose rate dependent as well, declining from 80% extraction at 10 mg/kg/day to 68% at 160 mg/kg/day. The calculated estimate for the exposure advantage achievable with HA as compared with i.v. infusion reflects the dose rate dependence of total body clearance and hepatic extraction and decreases from a 70-fold advantage at 10 mg/kg/day to a 30-fold advantage at 160 mg/kg/day. In the Phase I study aimed at determining the maximum tolerated dose, successive groups of 3 patients were administered continuous HA infusions for 14 days at escalated BrdUrd dose rates (5, 10, 15, 25, and 35 mg/kg/day) in order to ascertain dose-limiting toxicity. The maximum tolerated dose of BrdUrd for a 14-day continuous HA infusion was found to be 35 mg/kg/day with reversible thrombocytopenia as the sole dose-limiting toxicity. Skin and other toxicities were infrequent, minor, reversible, and non-dose dependent. No hepatic toxicity was detected despite direct drug infusion into the liver. The high total body clearance and hepatic extraction of BrdUrd substantiate its administration via the hepatic artery as a means to achieve higher exposure with intrahepatic tumors than can be obtained by systemic administration. Despite higher hepatic exposures, no hepatic toxicity was noted, and readily reversible systemic toxicity (thrombocytopenia) was dose limiting for the 14-day continuous HA infusion. Thus, HA infusion of the potent radiosensitizer BrdUrd is both pharmacokinetically rational and well tolerated.