Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Exp Ther Med ; 26(6): 554, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37941592

ABSTRACT

At present, there is no relevant expert consensus indicating which ventilation device is more efficient for general anesthesia. The present literature review and meta-analysis compared the effects of the laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal intubation on airway complications during general anesthesia. The keywords 'laryngeal mask airway', 'endotracheal tube', 'tracheal tube', 'children', 'pediatric', 'anesthesia', 'randomized controlled trials' (RCTs) and 'randomized' were used to perform the literature search in PubMed. Quality assessment was performed by two reviewers according to domains defined by the Cochrane Collaboration tool. Data extraction, risk of bias assessment and quality of evidence assessment were performed with the Cochrane tool. A total of 16 RCTs were included. The results indicated that the effects of the laryngeal mask airway group on heart rate variability [mean difference=-13.76; 95% CI, -18.19-(-9.33); P<0.00001], the incidence of hypoxemia [odds ratio (OR)=0.52; 95% CI, 0.28-0.97; P=0.04] and the incidence of postoperative cough (OR=0.22; 95% CI, 0.12-0.40; P<0.0001) were significantly lower than those of the endotracheal intubation group. The success rate of one-time implantation in the laryngeal mask airway group was significantly higher than that noted in the endotracheal intubation group (OR=0.20; 95% CI, 0.07-0.59; P=0.003). However, no significant differences were noted between the two groups in bronchospasm, sore throat, mucosal injury, nausea and vomiting and reflux aspiration. In conclusion, the results indicated that laryngeal mask airway application can reduce complications during general anesthesia compared with endotracheal intubation.

2.
Ann Palliat Med ; 10(11): 11464-11472, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34872271

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To observe the analgesic effect of different ultrasound-guided methods of serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) after surgery in patients who have undergone thoracoscopic lobectomy with general anesthesia combined with thoracic paravertebral nerve block. METHODS: A total of 120 patients aged 18-65 years old scheduled for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) were selected. Patients were randomly divided into 3 groups: patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) group, serratus anterior plane block (SPB) group and continuous serratus anterior plane block (CSPB) group (n=40 each). All patients were treated with general anesthesia combined with double-point (T4, T7) thoracic paravertebral block. The SPB group received an ultrasound-guided single serratus plane block. The CSPB group underwent the same procedure as the SPB group, with an epidural catheter inserted. Both the PCIA and SPB groups received PCIA after surgery. Patients in the CSPB group were connected to a continuous serratus block automatic analgesia pump after surgery. RESULTS: There were no significant differences among the 3 groups in terms of the general condition. Compared with the PCIA group, the resting and exercise VAS pain scores at T2, T3, T4, and T5, cortisol level at T1, T4 and T5 in SPB group and CSPB group were lower (P<0.05), the times of the first analgesia were significantly prolonged, and the times of pressing the PCA pump and opioid use were significantly less in the SPB and CSPB groups, and the CSPB group used no opioids (P<0.05), the SPB group and CSPB group had shorter times of the first postoperative activity, longer mobilization distance and the total number of days in hospital was significantly lower (P<0.05). Postoperative complications in the SPB and CSPB groups were significantly less and the CSPB group had an even lower incidence of postoperative complications (P<0.05). Compared with the SPB group, active VAS pain scores at T4 and T5 were higher in the CSPB group (P<0.05). Compared with the PCIA group, the total QoR-40 score at T6 was significantly higher in the SPB and CSPB groups, and compared with the SPB group, this data was higher in the CSPB group (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Single ultrasound-guided SAPB combined with PCIA can provide a better analgesic effect, improve the quality of early postoperative recovery, and accelerate ERAS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2000041350.


Subject(s)
Nerve Block , Pain, Postoperative , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Analgesia, Patient-Controlled , Anesthesia, General , Humans , Middle Aged , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Ultrasonography, Interventional , Young Adult
3.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 33(8): 2163-2169, 2019 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31060939

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To observe the effect of collecting and retransfusing autologous platelet rich plasma (aPRP) on the amount of allogeneic blood usage in total arch replacement (Sun's surgery) and the outcomes 30 days after surgery. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized trial. SETTING: A tertiary university hospital specialized in cardiovascular diseases. PARTICIPANTS: The study comprised 120 patients undergoing Sun's surgery for Stanford type A acute aortic dissection. INTERVENTIONS: aPRP was harvested before incision and was re-transfused after heparin neutralization for patients in the treatment group. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There was no significant difference in preoperative demographic data between the 2 study groups. Intraoperative transfusions of erythrocyte (p = 0.009), plasma (p = 0.017), cryoprecipitate (p = 0.002), and platelets (p < 0.001) in the treatment group were reduced significantly. In addition, less blood loss was observed in the treatment group (p = 0.002). The durations of postoperative mechanical ventilation (p = 0.029) and hospitalization (p = 0.002) of the treatment group were significantly shorter. There were no statistically significant differences in the length of intensive care unit stay, the incidence of complications, and mortality 30 days after surgery. CONCLUSION: In total arch replacement (Sun's surgery), collecting and retransfusing aPRP reduced intraoperative transfusions of erythrocyte, plasma, and cryoprecipitate and decreased the duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation and hospitalization. This technique had no significant effect on the incidence of complications and mortality 30 days postoperatively.


Subject(s)
Aortic Dissection/blood , Aortic Dissection/therapy , Blood Transfusion, Autologous/methods , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/methods , Intraoperative Care/methods , Platelet-Rich Plasma , Adult , Aged , Aortic Dissection/diagnosis , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Platelet-Rich Plasma/physiology , Prospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...