Randomized controlled trial of stroke volume optimization during elective major abdominal surgery in patients stratified by aerobic fitness.

BACKGROUND: The benefits of stroke volume optimization during surgery are unclear, with recent data not replicating the positive effects of earlier studies. METHODS: This was a randomized controlled trial of standard fluid therapy with or without supplementary blinded intraoperative stroke volume optimization in 220 patients having major elective rectal resection or cystectomy with ileal conduit. All patients were treated using a contemporary enhanced recovery pathway. Interventional fluid challenges used Gelofusine (B Braun, Germany), guided by stoke volume variability measured by LiDCOrapid (LiDCO, UK). Participants were stratified by aerobic fitness (characterized by preoperative cardiopulmonary exercise test), surgical specialty, and intended surgical approach (open or laparoscopic). The primary outcome was the prevalence of moderate or severe complications on day 5 after surgery, defined using the postoperative morbidity survey (POMS) criteria. RESULTS: Patients received ∼13 ml kg(-1) h(-1) of i.v. fluids during surgery. The intervention group received an additional mean (sd) 956 (896) ml Gelofusine. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in any primary or secondary end point. A positive POMS on postoperative day 5 was noted in 54 of 111 control subjects (48.6%) and 55 of 109 participants in the intervention group [50.5%; adjusted odds ratio 0.90 (95% confidence interval 0.52-1.57), P=0.717]. Mean (sd) hospital length of stay was 9.6 (6.8) days in the control group and 11.8 (11.5) days in the intervention group (adjusted difference -2.1 (-4.6 to 0.3) days, P=0.091). There was no statistical interaction between stroke volume optimization and aerobic fitness in terms of rate of complications or length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Algorithm-driven stroke volume optimization is of no benefit when superimposed on a liberal baseline fluid regimen in patients having elective major abdominal surgery, when stratified to minimize differences in fitness and surgical approach between groups. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN21597243.

Randomized controlled trial of intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy in aerobically fit and unfit patients having major colorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative fluid therapy regimens using oesophageal Doppler monitoring (ODM) to optimize stroke volume (SV) (goal-directed fluid therapy, GDT) have been associated with a reduction in length of stay (LOS) and complication rates after major surgery. We hypothesized that intraoperative GDT would reduce the time to surgical readiness for discharge (RfD) of patients having major elective colorectal surgery but that this effect might be less marked in aerobically fit patients. METHODS: In this double-blinded controlled trial, 179 patients undergoing major open or laparoscopic colorectal surgery were characterized as aerobically 'fit' (n=123) or 'unfit' (n=56) on the basis of their performance during a cardiopulmonary exercise test. Within these fitness strata, patients were randomized to receive a standard fluid regimen with or without ODM-guided intraoperative GDT. RESULTS: GDT patients received an average of 1360 ml of additional intraoperative colloid. The mean cardiac index and SV at skin closure were significantly higher in the GDT group than in controls. Times to RfD and LOS were longer in GDT than control patients but did not reach statistical significance (median 6.8 vs 4.9 days, P=0.09, and median 8.8 vs 6.7 days, P=0.09, respectively). Fit GDT patients had an increased RfD (median 7.0 vs 4.7 days; P=0.01) and LOS (median 8.8 vs 6.0 days; P=0.01) compared with controls. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative SV optimization conferred no additional benefit over standard fluid therapy. In an aerobically fit subgroup of patients, GDT was associated with detrimental effects on the primary outcome. TRIAL REGISTRY: UK NIHR CRN 7285, ISRCTN 14680495. http://public.ukcrn.org.uk/Search/StudyDetail.aspx?StudyID=7285.

The use of end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring to confirm endotracheal tube placement in adult and paediatric intensive care units in Australia and New Zealand.

The use of end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring to assist in confirming endotracheal tube placement is currently not mandatory in intensive care units (ICUs) in Australia and New Zealand. Early detection of failed tracheal intubation is vital to optimize management and to prevent complications. Questionnaires were sent to the lead clinician/head of department of all 66 intensive care units approved for training purposes by the Joint Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine in Australia and New Zealand. The methods used to confirm correct endotracheal tube placement, the availability of end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring and its role in confirming endotracheal tube placement in the intensive care unit were explored. Completed questionnaires were received from 61 of the 66 centres (92.4%). Wide variation in the method of confirmation of endotracheal tube position was demonstrated, with 23 (37.7%) of units using sub-optimal methods. Sixty (98.3%) of units had end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring available. Thirty-eight (62%) units shared monitors between several beds; and 22 (36%) had one monitor per bed. End-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring was used routinely to confirm endotracheal tube placement in 42 (68.8%) units. Fifty-two respondents (83.3%) felt that end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring was superior to other methods for confirming endotracheal tube placement in critically ill patients. Thirty-eight respondents (62.3%) thought that end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring should be mandatory to confirm tracheal intubation in the intensive care unit. If it were available, 42 respondents (68.8%) would use end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring for confirmation of every intubation. Mandatory end-tidal carbon dioxide confirmation of endotracheal tube placement was policy in 33 (54.1%) of the intensive care units.