ABSTRACT
Recent randomized controlled studies have reported success for hospital at home for prevention and early discharge of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients using hospital based respiratory nurse specialists. This observational study reports results using an integrated hospital and community based generic intermediate care service. The length of care, readmission within 60 days and death within 60 days in the early discharge (9.37 days, 21.1%, 7%) and the prevention of admission (five to six days, 34.1%, 3.8%) are similar to previous studies. We suggest that this generic community model of service may allow hospital at home services for COPD to be introduced in more areas.
Subject(s)
Home Care Services, Hospital-Based/statistics & numerical data , Patient Discharge , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/prevention & control , Social Welfare , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Admission , Patient ReadmissionABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Appropriate resuscitation of hypoxic patients is fundamental in emergency admissions. To achieve this, it is standard practice of ambulance staff to administer high concentrations of oxygen to patients who may be in respiratory distress. A proportion of patients with chronic respiratory disease will become hypercapnic on this. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: A scheme was agreed between the authors' hospital and the local ambulance service, whereby patients with a history of previous hypercapnic acidosis with a Pao2 >10.0 kPa--indicating that oxygen may have worsened the hypercapnia--are issued with "O2 Alert" cards and a 24% Venturi mask. The patients are instructed to show these to ambulance and A&E staff who will then use the mask to avoid excessive oxygenation. The scheme was launched in 2001 and this paper present the results of an audit of the scheme in 2004. RESULTS: A total of 18 patients were issued with cards, and 14 were readmitted on 69 occasions. Sufficient documentation for auditing purposes was available for 52 of the 69 episodes. Of these audited admissions, 63% were managed in the ambulance, in line with card-holder protocol. This figure rose to 94% in the accident and emergency department. CONCLUSION: These data support the usability of such a scheme to prevent iatrogenic hypercapnia in emergency admissions.
Subject(s)
Acidosis, Respiratory/prevention & control , Emergency Medical Services , Hypercapnia/prevention & control , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy/adverse effects , Patient Identification Systems/standards , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/therapy , Aged , Chronic Disease , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Identification Systems/methods , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Respiratory InsufficiencyABSTRACT
Multidisciplinary teams (MDT) now review all cases of lung cancer. These teams include a Lung Cancer Nurse Specialist (LCNS). These Nurses help support the patient and should facilitate communication and liaise with other services. The LCNS is present when the diagnosis is given to the patient but also usually spends time afterwards with the patient and their family. We postulated that a separate letter from the LCNS to the General Practitioner (GP) after the consultations would convey extra information to the GP. In 58 new lung cancer patients reviewed in the clinic, the LCNS and Physician independently wrote separate letters after the consultation in which the diagnosis of lung cancer was given. The GPs were asked by questionnaire about the usefulness of the letter from the LCNS. This letter was considered by the GP to provide extra information in: (i) 69% concerning the patients reaction to the diagnosis; (ii) 85% concerning who attended the clinic with the patient; (iii) 85% about what referrals were made to community services; (iv) 86% about who the patient was living with; (v) 81% about who the patients carers were; (vi) 81% information on the patients condition; (vii) 70% concerning the information given to patients about benefits. Ninety-seven percent of the GPs found the LCNS letter useful or very useful and 92% of the GPs thought that the information in the letter would be useful or very useful when they next saw the patient. Separate and independent letters from the LCNS after "bad news" consultation in lung cancer provides added useful information for GPs. Ninety-one percent of the GPs wanted the letters from the LCNS to continue.
Subject(s)
Correspondence as Topic , Lung Neoplasms/psychology , Nurse Clinicians , Nurse's Role , Nurse-Patient Relations , Patient Care Team , Physicians, Family , Communication , Diagnosis, Differential , Family Health , Humans , Patient Education as Topic , Prognosis , Referral and Consultation , Social SupportABSTRACT
According to recent UK guidelines on the management of lung cancer, all cases should be reviewed prospectively by a lung cancer multidisciplinary team (MDT) and a thoracic surgeon should be readily available to liaise with the MDT. However, there is a shortage of thoracic surgeons in the UK. Over a one-year period, 28 MDT meetings were held at a district general hospital in Southend, at which 62 patients were presented to a tertiary cardiothoracic centre in London, 80 km away, via ISDN videoconferencing at 384 kbit/s. The annual resection rate increased by 30% following the introduction of the telemedicine MDTmeetings, and the mean time from first being seen in the clinic to surgery was reduced from 69 to 54 days.We estimate that the telemedicine meetings saved over three working weeks of thoracic surgical time during the year.
Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Telemedicine/methods , Thoracic Surgery/organization & administration , England , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Radiography , Teleradiology/methodsABSTRACT
This is a preliminary report of a co-operative study of 1,203 episodes of acute myocardial infarction in men under 70 years in four centres in the south west of England. The mortality at 28 days was 15%. A comparison is made between home care by the family doctor and hospital treatment initially in an intensive care unit: 343 cases were allocated at random. The randomized groups do not differ significantly in composition with respect to age; past history of angina, infarction, or hypertension; or hypotension when first examined. The mortality rates of the random groups are similar for home and hospital treatment. The group sent electively to hospital contained a higher proportion of initially hypotensive patients whose prognosis was bad wherever treated; those who were not hypotensive fared rather worse in hospital.For some patients with acute myocardial infarction seen by their general practitioner home care is ethically justified, and the need for general admission to hospital should be reconsidered.
