Evaluation of serial QuantiFERON-TB Gold in tube test results and tuberculosis infection status in patients with psoriasis receiving anti-IL-17 treatment (secukinumab and ixekizumab): Real-world data from a tuberculosis-endemic country.

BACKGROUND: In comparison with TNF-α inhibitors, anti-IL-17A agents are considered to have a lower risk of active tuberculosis (TB) or latent TB infection (LTBI) reactivation. METHODS: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the TB infection status and serial QuantiFERON-TB-Gold in tube test (QFT) results of psoriasis patients using IL-17 inhibitors (secukinumab [SEC] and ixekizumab [IXE]) in a real-world setting from a tuberculosis-endemic country. Patients who used an anti-IL-17 agent for at least 3 months in our follow-up were included in the study. Patients' clinical and demographic features, baseline QFT results and latest QFT results (if any), and TB infection status were noted from the past medical records. RESULTS: A total of 717 patients, of whom 333 (46.4%) were female, were included in the study. The cumulative exposure time to an anti-IL-17 agent was 14,147 patient-months, 9743 patient-months for SEC and 4404 patient-months for IXE. Also, 459 (SEC = 305/IXE = 154) patients used an anti-IL-17 agent for ≥ 12 months. Of these, 125 had positive baseline QFT results. In all, 334 had negative baseline QFT results. The latest QFT result of 309 was also negative (persistent seronegative group). During follow-up, the QFT results of 10 patients changed from negative to positive (positive seroconversion group). Seven of them were using SEC and three were using IXE, respectively. No case of active TB infection was detected. CONCLUSION: In our study, the positive seroconversion rate of 10/334 seems high, but this did not translate to active disease. However, closer monitoring may be required, especially in patients with advanced age, the presence of PsA, long disease duration and long anti-IL-17 treatment duration.

Scabies Affects Quality of Life in Correlation with Depression and Anxiety.

INTRODUCTION: Scabies is a highly contagious disease affects many people worldwide each year and a major public health problem. A small number of studies have shown that scabies causes impairment in the quality of life in adult patients. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study are to assess the impact of scabies on adult patients quality of life (QoL) and evaluate the relationship between depression and anxiety levels and impairment in life quality. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included adult patients diagnosed with scabies in our dermatology outpatient clinic. The effect of scabies on QoL was evaluated by Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and the levels of depression and anxiety were evaluated by Beck Depression Scale (BDS) and Beck Anxiety Scale (BAS). RESULTS: Totally, 85 patients included to the study. QoL of 72.2% of the patients was moderate to extremely large affected. There was a positive correlation between the duration of the disease, the total DLQI score and the severity of the disease impact on QoL (rs= 0.287, P = 0.01 and rs=0.280, P = 0.008, respectively). A positive correlation was found between the number of treatments received and the total DLQI (rs= 0.223, P = 0.042). There was a positive correlation between BDS and BAS, and total DLQI score (rs=0.448 and P = 0.000; rs=0.456 and P = 0.000, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Scabies has a moderate to severe effect on QoL. There was a positive correlation between impairment QoL and anxiety and depression scores.

Omalizumab treatment in combination with any other biologics: Is it really a safe duo?

BACKGROUND: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a mast cell-mediated disease, which is sometimes associated with various inflammatory disorders. Omalizumab is a commonly used biological agent, which is a recombinant, humanized, monoclonal antibody against human immunoglobulin E. However, there are only few reports about the combination of omalizumab for CSU with any other biologics for accompanying inflammatory diseases in the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate the patients whose treatment of omalizumab for CSU were combined with any other biologics for associated inflammatory disorders and to describe whether these combinations might have any safety concerns. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with CSU treated with omalizumab concurrently using another biological agent for their other dermatological conditions. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients, 19 women and 12 men, were evaluated. The mean age was 45.13 years. The median duration of omalizumab was 11 months. Biological agents which patients were treated other than omalizumab were as follows: adalimumab biosimilar (n = 3), ustekinumab (n = 4), secukinumab (n = 17) and ixekizumab (n = 7). The median duration of concurrent use of omalizumab and other biologics was 8 months. None of the drug combinations was stopped because of side effects. CONCLUSION: This observational study demonstrated that omalizumab treatment for CSU in combination with any other biological agents for dermatological disorders appeared to be well tolerated without any major safety concerns.

Merkel cell number and distribution, and CD200 expression in patients with lichen planopilaris and discoid lupus erythematosus.

BACKGROUND: Immune mechanisms are considered to be responsible for the pathogenesis of cicatricial alopecia in lichen planopilaris (LPP) and discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) diseases. CD200 has an immunomodulatory function in hair follicles. The functions of Merkel cells (MCs) in hair follicles remain to be fully understood. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the number and distribution of MCs as well as CD200 expression in patients with DLE and LPP. METHODS: Using immunohistochemistry, the number and distribution of MCs (staining with CK20) and CD200 expression in biopsy specimens of LPP and DLE patients were compared with control group patients. RESULTS: The number of follicular MCs, total MCs, mean follicular MCs, and CD200 expression were significantly lower in the case groups compared to the control group. In CD200- cases, the number of follicular MCs and mean follicular MCs were significantly lower than in CD200+ cases. Retrospective design, lack of data regarding the history of alopecia in the control group, and unknown stage of disease in patients were the limitations. CONCLUSION: MC loss might play a role in immune privilege collapse in hair follicles. This study is novel in terms of investigating MCs in DLE and LPP patients.

Ixekizumab treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in a real-world clinical setting.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety reports of ixekizumab for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis may vary between clinical trials and real-world studies. AIM: To analyze the real-world data of ixekizumab therapy to evaluate its efficacy and safety and highlight the factors influencing the treatment response in the real-world scenario. PATIENTS/METHODS: Data of 82 adult patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis are included in this study. Psoriasis area severity index (PASI) 75/90/100 responses at 4, 16, 24, and 48 weeks were analyzed retrospectively from patient charts by examining demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients, especially their previous biologic experience, obesity, and involvement of hard-to-treat areas. RESULTS: PASI75, PASI90, and PASI100 responses were achieved in 92.4%, 86.1%, and 26.6% patients at week 16 and maintained till week 48 in 92.3%, 86.5%, and 17.3% patients. PASI90 responses in obese patients were significantly lower than non-obese patients at week 4 (33.3% vs. 69.6%, p = 0.042), but this difference was minimized by week 16 (82.4% vs. 90%, p = 0.405). PASI90 responses in biologic-naive patients were significantly higher than biologic-experienced patients at week 16 (p = 0.015). Involvement of hard-to-treat areas was negatively associated with PASI90 responses at week 16 (OR: 1591805.842; 95% CI: 1.223-2071404486740.201; p = 0.047). CONCLUSION: Ixekizumab provides an effective and safe biologic treatment option to patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Obesity, though it affects the early treatment response (till week 4), does not upset the overall treatment response beyond week 16. Previous biologic exposure and involvement of hard-to-treat areas are important prognostic factors for achieving high PASI responses in psoriatic patients.

A real life experience with ustekinumab: The effectiveness of 45 mg on patients greater than 80 kg but lower than 100 kg.

Ustekinumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody has been demonstrated efficacious and safe in clinical trials. However, there are few real-life data evaluating the efficacy of ustekinumab. The aim of this retrospective follow up study was showing the efficacy in 58 adult patients with moderate to severe psoriasis treated at least 24 weeks with ustekinumab. The efficacy was evaluated as PASI75, PASI90, and PASI100 response rates at week 4, 12, 24, and 36 in patient groups according to the treatment dose, weight, biologic treatment naivety, and obesity. PASI75, PASI90, and PASI100 response rates were 79.3%, 62.1%, and 8.6% respectively, at week 12 and, 92.5%, 71.7% and 9.4%, respectively, at week 36. PASI75, PASI90, and PASI100 responses were generally higher in naive patients to the biologic therapy. Also, the responses were generally higher in non-obese patients at 4 and 12 weeks. According to the weight categories, PASI100 response rates were higher in the 81-99 kg group at week 12. In conclusion, ustekinumab is an effective and safe treatment option for moderate to severe psoriasis patients. It seems to be more effective in biologic treatment naive patients and non-obese patients. A 45 mg dose of ustekinumab seems to be effective in patients weighing 99 kg or less.

Evaluation of patients with telogen effluvium during the pandemic: May the monocytes be responsible for post COVID-19 telogen effluvium?

INTRODUCTION: Telogen effluvium (TE) is one of the causes of non-scarring hair loss that occurred commonly 2-3 months after a triggering factor. It was reported that the incidence of TE increased during the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic. However, to date, there is no study evaluating the status of COVID-19 before the onset of hair loss in patients with TE. The aim of this study is to evaluate the patients with TE whether they had COVID-19 or not before the onset of their hair loss and to compare the demographic and clinical characteristics and laboratory parameters of those with and without a history of COVID-19. METHOD: We conducted an observational cohort study of TE patients. The diagnosis of TE depended on anamnesis and physical examination of the patients. Also, hair pull test was performed. Demographic data and the results of COVID-19 real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) were recorded from the electronic medical records. RESULTS: Totally, 181 patients with TE were included in the study. Sixty-four of patients (35.4%) had been diagnosed with COVID-19 before the hair loss started. The median duration of development of hair loss was 2 months (range 1-11 months, IQR 3) after COVID-19 diagnosis. In this group, 87.5% of patients (n = 56) had acute TE and 12.5% of patients (n = 8) had chronic TE. The rate of acute TE and the use of vitamin supplements were ignificantly higher (p < 0.001 and p = 0.027, respectively) and the monocyte count in peripheral blood was lower (p = 0.041) in the group diagnosed with COVID-19. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: It was stated that monocytes and macrophages infected by SARS-CoV-2 can produce pro-inflammatory cytokines that play a crucial role in the development of COVID-19-related complications. Also, it was suggested that the number of monocytes tends to be lower in the late recovery stage. The lower monocyte count in patients with a history of COVID-19 in our study may be related to evaluating the patients in the late period of recovery and the migration of circulating monocytes to hair follicles. The history of COVID-19 must be questioned in patients with TE. It should be kept in mind that hair loss that develops after COVID-19 may be presented as chronic TE form too. The exact mechanisms of hair loss induced by COVID-19 are not fully explained; the roles of monocytes on the hair follicles may be one of the responsible mechanisms.

Is dupilumab effective in adult-onset atopic dermatitis: Real-life experience of 16 patients.

BACKGROUND: Dupilumab is approved for the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD). However, there are few studies demonstrating its efficacy and safety, particularly in the treatment of adult-onset AD. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the real-life experience regarding the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in the treatment of adult-onset AD. METHODS: This study is a case series in retrospective design. Patients with the diagnosis of adult-onset AD, using dupilumab at a standard dose for at least 3 months, were included in the study. Demographic and laboratory data of the cases, data regarding to dupilumab treatment, were recorded. The eczema area severity index (EASI) and the visual analog scale (VAS) for itch were used to evaluate treatment efficacy. RESULTS: A total of 16 patients, 6 female and 10 male, were included. The median age was 41 years, the median age of the disease onset was 37.5 years, and the median duration of the disease was 90 months. The median duration of the dupilumab treatment was 10.5 months. The mean percent reduction from baseline in EASI score was 85.8 ± 12.2 at 3 months, 90.7 ± 9.3 at 6 months, and 93.1 ± 5 at 12 months. The mean percent reduction from baseline in VAS itch score was 82.2 ± 8.6 at 3 months. Acute vestibular neuritis was developed in one patient during the dupilumab therapy and resolved with anti-inflammatory therapy. CONCLUSION: Dupilumab seems to be highly effective and safe in the treatment of adult-onset AD. The present study is important as it is the first study to evaluate this patient group specifically.

Retrospective evaluation of patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria using omalizumab during the COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: Omalizumab (OMZ) is a monoclonal anti-immunoglobulin E antibody used in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). The data about using OMZ during the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic are limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the status of having COVID-19 and relationships between COVID-19, vaccination, and urticaria symptoms of CSU patients on OMZ. METHOD: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 36 adult CSU patients treated with OMZ. Demographic data, the results of COVID-19 real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and vaccination status were recorded from the electronic medical records. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients, 23 women, and 13 men were evaluated. The mean age was 45.81 years. Two patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 while using OMZ. Four patients interrupted their OMZ treatment during the pandemic, and OMZ treatments were restarted in all patients. There were 28 patients who had at least one dose of vaccine (inactive and/or mRNA vaccine). Only one patient had an urticaria exacerbation after the first dose of mRNA vaccine. CONCLUSION: As a result, our findings have shown that omalizumab treatment in CSU patients during the COVID-19 pandemic does not increase the risk of COVID-19 infection and omalizumab can be used safely.

Oral isotretinoin treatment in patients with acne vulgaris during the COVID-19 pandemic: A retrospective cohort study in a tertiary care hospital.

BACKGROUND: Patients with acne vulgaris continue to present increasingly in dermatology outpatient clinics and seek treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic. As far as we know, the effect of isotretinoin on COVID-19 has not been studied before. AIM: We aimed to evaluate whether patients receiving oral isotretinoin are at increased risk of COVID-19 infection by comparing them with patients on topical treatment for acne vulgaris. METHODS: The data were collected retrospectively from a cohort of 267 acne vulgaris patients, who were under follow-up for acne vulgaris treatment during the pandemic period. RESULTS: Total of 227 patients (141 receiving isotretinoin treatment and 86 receiving topical treatment) were included of whom 29 patients had COVID-19 infection during acne vulgaris treatment. Fifteen (10.6%) patients were receiving oral isotretinoin and 14 (16.3%) were receiving topical acne treatment at the time of COVID-19 infection. The mean cumulative dose was 2340 ± 1988 mg at the time of COVID-19 infection. The mean elapsed time between the onset of isotretinoin treatment and positive PCR result for COVID-19 was 13.3 ± 10.3 weeks. Nine patients (64.3%) receiving isotretinoin treatment and 9 patients (60%) under topical treatment had loss of taste and smell during COVID-19 infection. Isotretinoin treatment was not found to be associated with a significant increased risk of getting COVID-19 (odds ratio, 0.671; 95% confidence interval, 0.247-1.823; P  = 0.434). CONCLUSION: As a conclusion, the results of this study encourage dermatologists and acne vulgaris patients to initiate oral isotretinoin treatment safely during the pandemic period.

Dermatologic comorbidities of the patients with severe COVID-19: A case-control study.

The current studies focus on the association between COVID-19 and certain comorbidities. To the best of our knowledge, the association between severe COVID-19 and dermatologic comorbidities has not been reported yet. In this study, we aimed to describe the dermatologic comorbidities of patients with severe COVID-19 and compare it with the control group. Patients who have died at Usak Training and Research Hospital due to COVID-19 and other diseases in the COVID-19 Intensive Care Units and Internal Medicine Intensive Care Units were recruited into the study. Two groups were compared with each other regarding the most common dermatologic comorbidities. A total of 198 patients including 111 patients with COVID-19 and 87 age and sex-matched patients with other diseases were enrolled in the study. The most common dermatologic comorbidities were pruritus (8.1%), eczema (6.3%), skin infections (3.6%), leukocytoclastic vasculitis (1.8%), and urticaria (0.9%) in the COVID-19 group while they were skin infections (9.2%), eczema (3.4%), pruritus (2.3%), and urticaria (1.1%) in the control group. None of patients in the control group had leukocytoclastic vasculitis. There were no significant differences between COVID-19 and control groups in terms of pruritus, eczema, skin infections, and urticaria (P values were .117, .517, .181, .505, and 1.000, respectively). In conclusion, although it is not statistically significant, it appears that pruritus and leukocytoclastic vasculitis are more common in severe COVID-19 patients. These cytokines-related diseases in the immuno-cutaneous systems may give some clues on the COVID-19 severity. Further studies are required to elucidate the relationship between the immuno-cutaneous system and COVID-19 severity.