Nationwide comprehensive gastro-intestinal cancer cohorts: the 3P initiative.

BACKGROUND: The increasing sub-classification of cancer patients due to more detailed molecular classification of tumors, and limitations of current trial designs, require innovative research designs. We present the design, governance and current standing of three comprehensive nationwide cohorts including pancreatic, esophageal/gastric, and colorectal cancer patients (NCT02070146). Multidisciplinary collection of clinical data, tumor tissue, blood samples, and patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures with a nationwide coverage, provides the infrastructure for future and novel trial designs and facilitates research to improve outcomes of gastrointestinal cancer patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients aged ≥18 years with pancreatic, esophageal/gastric or colorectal cancer are eligible. Patients provide informed consent for: (1) reuse of clinical data; (2) biobanking of primary tumor tissue; (3) collection of blood samples; (4) to be informed about relevant newly identified genomic aberrations; (5) collection of longitudinal PROs; and (6) to receive information on new interventional studies and possible participation in cohort multiple randomized controlled trials (cmRCT) in the future. RESULTS: In 2015, clinical data of 21,758 newly diagnosed patients were collected in the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Additional clinical data on the surgical procedures were registered in surgical audits for 13,845 patients. Within the first two years, tumor tissue and blood samples were obtained from 1507 patients; during this period, 1180 patients were included in the PRO registry. Response rate for PROs was 90%. The consent rate to receive information on new interventional studies and possible participation in cmRCTs in the future was >85%. The number of hospitals participating in the cohorts is steadily increasing. CONCLUSION: A comprehensive nationwide multidisciplinary gastrointestinal cancer cohort is feasible and surpasses the limitations of classical study designs. With this initiative, novel and innovative studies can be performed in an efficient, safe, and comprehensive setting.

Maintenance treatment with capecitabine and bevacizumab versus observation in metastatic colorectal cancer: updated results and molecular subgroup analyses of the phase 3 CAIRO3 study.

BACKGROUND: The phase 3 CAIRO3 study showed that capecitabine plus bevacizumab (CAP-B) maintenance treatment after six cycles capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab (CAPOX-B) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients is effective, without compromising quality of life. In this post hoc analysis with updated follow-up and data regarding sidedness, we defined subgroups according to RAS/BRAF mutation status and mismatch repair (MMR) status, and investigated their influence on treatment efficacy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 558 patients with previously untreated mCRC and stable disease or better after six cycles CAPOX-B induction treatment were randomised to either CAP-B maintenance treatment (n = 279) or observation (n = 279). Upon first progression, patients were to receive CAPOX-B reintroduction until second progression (PFS2, primary end point). We centrally assessed RAS/BRAF mutation status and MMR status, or used local results if central assessment was not possible. Intention-to-treat stratified Cox models adjusted for baseline covariables were used to examine whether treatment efficacy was modified by RAS/BRAF mutation status. RESULTS: RAS, BRAF mutations, and MMR deficiency were detected in 240/420 (58%), 36/381 (9%), and 4/279 (1%) patients, respectively. At a median follow-up of 87 months (IQR 69-97), all mutational subgroups showed significant improvement from maintenance treatment for the primary end point PFS2 [RAS/BRAF wild-type: hazard ratio (HR) 0.57 (95% CI 0.39-0.84); RAS-mutant: HR 0.74 (0.55-0.98); V600EBRAF-mutant: HR 0.28 (0.12-0.64)] and secondary end points, except for the RAS-mutant subgroup regarding overall survival. Adjustment for sidedness instead of primary tumour location yielded comparable results. Although right-sided tumours were associated with inferior prognosis, both patients with right- and left-sided tumours showed significant benefit from maintenance treatment. CONCLUSIONS: CAP-B maintenance treatment after six cycles CAPOX-B is effective in first-line treatment of mCRC across all mutational subgroups. The benefit of maintenance treatment was most pronounced in patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type and V600EBRAF-mutant tumours. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV NUMBER: NCT00442637.

A randomized phase II study investigating the addition of the specific COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib to docetaxel plus carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy for stage IC to IV epithelial ovarian cancer, Fallopian tube or primary peritoneal carcinomas: the DoCaCel study.

BACKGROUND: In ovarian cancer, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) overexpression is prognostic for poor survival. We investigated the efficacy of celecoxib (C), a selective COX-2 inhibitor, added to docetaxel (Taxotere)/carboplatin (DC) in advanced ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a phase II, randomized study, 400 mg celecoxib b.i.d. was added to first-line DC treatment (DCC). Celecoxib was to be continued after DC termination up to 3 years. Study end points were tolerability, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: 151 of 196 eligible patients were diagnosed with stage IIIC/IV disease. Median follow-up for patients alive was 32.3 months. Celecoxib was used during a mean of 8.5 months. Twenty-three of 97 DCC patients stopped celecoxib prematurely, mainly due to skin reactions. Complete biochemical response was achieved in 51/78 DC patients (65%) versus 57/78 DCC patients (75%, not significant). In both study arms, median PFS was 14.3 months and median OS 34 months. COX-2 was expressed in 82% of 120 tumor samples retrospectively recovered. The PFS and OS of patients with intermediate/high COX-2 expression were similar to that in the other patients. CONCLUSION: Celecoxib did not influence PFS and OS, but interpretation of results is hampered by premature celecoxib discontinuation.

Epirubicin and paclitaxel with G-CSF support in first line metastatic breast cancer: a randomized phase II study of dose-dense and dose-escalated chemotherapy.

An increased dose-intensity can be achieved by either higher dose of chemotherapy per cycle (dose-escalation) or by shortening the interval between cycles (dose-dense). This multicenter randomized phase II study assessed the efficacy and safety of two different approaches: epirubicin 110 mg/m(2) combined with paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) every 21 days and epirubicin 75 mg/m(2) combined with paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) every 10 days, both supported with G-CSF. Patients with advanced breast cancer and without prior palliative chemotherapy were scheduled for 6 cycles. Evaluable for response were 101 patients and for toxicity 106 patients. Grade ≥ 3 toxicities occurred in 39% of patients in the dose-escalated arm and in 29% of the dose-dense arm, mainly febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, neurotoxicity and (asymptomatic) cardiotoxicity. The median delivered cumulative doses for epirubicin/paclitaxel were 656/1194 and 448/1045 mg/m(2), treatment durations were 126 and 61 days, and delivered dose intensities were 36/67 and 51/120 mg/m(2)/week for the dose-escalated and dose-dense arm, respectively. Response rates were 75 and 70%, the progression-free survival 6 and 7 months, respectively. Dose-dense chemotherapy with a lower cumulative dose, a halved treatment time, but a higher dose-intensity may be as effective and safe as dose-escalated chemotherapy. The value of dose-densification over standard scheduled chemotherapy regimes yet needs to be determined.

A randomised phase III study on capecitabine, oxaliplatin and bevacizumab with or without cetuximab in first-line advanced colorectal cancer, the CAIRO2 study of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG). An interim analysis of toxicity.

BACKGROUND: Targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor or the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has shown efficacy in advanced colorectal cancer (ACC), but no data are available on the combination of these strategies with chemotherapy in the first-line treatment. The CAIRO2 study evaluates the effect of adding cetuximab, a chimeric mAb against EGFR, to capecitabine, oxaliplatin and bevacizumab in the first-line treatment of ACC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 755 patients were randomly assigned between treatment with capecitabine, oxaliplatin and bevacizumab with or without cetuximab. The primary end point is progression-free survival. We here present the toxicity results in the first 400 patients that entered the study. RESULTS: The incidence of overall grade 3-4 toxicity was significantly higher in arm B compared with arm A (81% versus 72%, P = 0.03). This difference is fully attributed to cetuximab-related skin toxicity. The addition of cetuximab did not result in an increase of gastrointestinal toxicity or treatment-related mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of cetuximab to capecitabine, oxaliplatin and bevacizumab in the first-line treatment of ACC appears to be safe and feasible. No excessive or unexpected toxicity in the cetuximab-containing treatment arm was observed.

[Brain metastases in breast cancer: a special disease course for HER2 positive tumors]. / Hersenmetastasen bij het mammacarcinoom: een bijzonder beloop bij HER2-positieve tumoren.

HER2 positive breast cancers are characterized by their aggressive course of disease. Treatment with trastuzumab has significantly improved survival of patients with these cancers. Trastuzumab has few side effects, although in 10-15% of cases it is necessary to interrupt therapy because of cardiotoxicity, in most cases temporarily. It has become clear that patients receiving trastuzumab more frequently develop brain metastases than patients with a HER2 negative tumor. It is important to realize that patients with brain metastases from a HER2 positive breast tumor have a more favorable prognosis than patients with brain metastases from a HER2 negative tumor. Continuation of treatment with trastuzumab should be considered, next to the surgical intervention and/ or radiotherapy. Recently, lapatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, was registered by EMEA for patients with a HER2 positive tumor after previous treatment with anthracyclines, taxanes and trastuzumab. In combination with capacitabine, this agent leads to partial responses of cerebral metastases. More HER2 targeting drugs are expected to be introduced.

Thorium dioxide-related haemangiosarcoma of the liver.

Rare tumours of the liver are occasionally seen; thorium dioxide-related haemangiosarcoma of the liver, with an estimated frequency of 0.14 to 0.25 per million in the normal population, is one of these. Causes, epidemiology and pathobiology are described related to a clinical case of angiosarcoma. A differentiation of hepatic tumours with imaging techniques is presented. Last, a short review on up-to-date treatment of haemangiosarcoma is discussed. Lessons can always be learned from history: will the contrast agent gadolinium be the Th232 of this era?

Sclerosing peritonitis: an unusual cause of ascites in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Sclerosing peritonitis is a rare condition characterised by fibrosis and adhesion of the peritoneum to loops of the small intestine. It is generally associated with continuous peritoneal dialysis, peritoneo-venous shunts or &beta-adrenergic blocking agents. In this case we report a female patient with idiopathic sclerosing peritonitis and systemic lupus erythematosus.

Randomised study of sequential versus combination chemotherapy with capecitabine, irinotecan and oxaliplatin in advanced colorectal cancer, an interim safety analysis. A Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG) phase III study.

BACKGROUND: Results on overall survival in randomised studies of mono- versus combination chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer patients may have been biased by an imbalance in salvage treatments. This is the first randomised study that evaluates sequential versus combination chemotherapy with a fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan and oxaliplatin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 820 patients were randomised between first-line capecitabine, second-line irinotecan and third-line capecitabine + oxaliplatin (arm A) versus first-line capecitabine + irinotecan, and second-line capecitabine + oxaliplatin (arm B). The primary end point was overall survival. We present the results of an interim analysis on the safety data in the first 400 patients. RESULTS: In first-line the incidence of grade 3-4 diarrhoea, nausea, vomiting and febrile neutropenia was significantly higher in arm B. However, when toxicity over all lines was considered only grade 3 hand-foot syndrome occurred more frequently in arm A (12% versus 6%, respectively, P = 0.041). The incidence of cardiovascular toxicity was low. In two out of five patients with sudden death (one in arm A, four in arm B) cardiovascular risk factors were present. CONCLUSIONS: Both treatment arms had an acceptable safety profile. These data imply that the results on survival will be the major determinant for the selection of either strategy. Capecitabine plus irinotecan appears to be a feasible first-line treatment for patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma.

Reversible migratory osteoporosis in renal oncocytoma mimicking renal cell carcinoma with bone metastases.

We report a case in which initially the wrong diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma with bone metastases was made. Nephrectomy and bone biopsy led to the right diagnosis of oncocytoma with transient osteoporosis. This report stresses the importance of pathological investigation and points to oncocytoma in the differential diagnosis of solid renal masses. In addition, the possible relationship between this tumour and migratory osteoporosis, which disappeared after surgery, is described.

The effect of optimal treatment on elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: more patients treated with unaffected response rates.

A substantial part of elderly patients (with good performance) with intermediate or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) are not treated with the standard chemotherapy of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP). If NHL patients are not treated with CHOP, the outcome is inferior. By adding granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to CHOP chemotherapy, we aimed at treating more patients with less toxicity. We performed a multicenter population-based study (in the southeast of the Netherlands) in which elderly patients (> or = 60 years) with intermediate or high-grade stage > or = IIB NHL were treated with CHOP chemotherapy and growth factor G-CSF to increase the number of patients treated according to standard protocols. We also evaluated elderly NHL patients who were not treated with CHOP chemotherapy. Adequate therapy was defined as > or = six cycles or a total of five cycles when complete remission was achieved after three cycles. Seventy-nine NHL patients fulfilled the selection criteria. The patients were treated with CHOP plus G-CSF (n=46), CHOP (n=19), cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone (COP) (n=2), chlorambucil and prednisone (n=2), or prednisone (n=1). Nine patients were not treated with chemotherapy. The median age was 72 years (60-87). Of the 79 NHL patients, 65 were treated with CHOP chemotherapy (82%); 38 of 65 patients (59%) were adequately treated. The complete remission rate in the NHL group treated with CHOP was 65% (42 of 65 patients). The overall 3-year survival was 50%. Most of the patients died from progressive NHL (53% in the CHOP and 77% in the group not treated with CHOP). The treatment-related mortality was 15% in the CHOP group. The most important reason for not treating patients with CHOP (with or without G-CSF) was poor performance (WHO > or = 2). A significant subset of patients can be treated with CHOP chemotherapy with acceptable toxicity. The combination of CHOP plus G-CSF increased the absolute number of treatable elderly patients, resulting in more (absolute) patients with complete remission and overall survival compared to our previous study.

Treatment of elderly patients with intermediate- and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a retrospective population-based study.

PURPOSE AND METHODS: Nowadays more people are becoming older. The median age of a patient with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) at diagnosis is over 60 years. The incidence of NHL in elderly has increased in the last decades. Therefore, in the future, NHL will be diagnosed more often in the elderly. Data of all patients in the south-east of the Netherlands with newly diagnosed NHL between January 1991 and January 1995 were analysed in a retrospective multicentre population-based study to investigate if and how elderly patients (> 60 years) with advanced NHL (Ann Arbor Staging > or = IIB) of intermediate- and high-grade malignancy were treated. Treatment modalities applied, outcome, and causes of death were evaluated. Treatment was considered inadequate if it deviated from the standard anthracycline-containing chemotherapy (CNOP/CHOP) for a minimum of six cycles. RESULTS: The entry criteria were met by 68 patients. Of these patients, 57 (83.8%) were treated and 11 (16.2%) were not treated. The treatment consisted of CHOP (36 patients), CNOP (6 patients), chlorambucil (13 patients), or COP (2 patients). Forty-two of 68 patients had adequate treatment, but 14 of 42 (33.3%) patients had a suboptimal numbers of cycles (< 6). Of 28 patients with adequate chemotherapy, only 16 had the optimal number of cycles and dose; the result is that the treatment of 76.5% (52/68) of patients differed from that of their younger counterparts. The most important reason for treatment not being optimal was high age (23%) or poor performance (35%). In the appropriately treated patients, 62.5% (10/16) had a complete response. Survival in the CHOP/CNOP-treated group was better than in other groups. The main cause of death in the total study group was NHL. The results cannot be explained by the different international prognostic index. CONCLUSION: A significant subset (76.5%) of elderly people with intermediate/high-grade NHL received suboptimal therapy, mainly because of a suboptimal performance status. However, a significant part of the patients (23%) were not treated optimally because of high age, despite a good performance. For improving the overall survival in the elderly, it is not only the schedule that is important, but also the intention to treat the elderly patient.