Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Type of study
Language
Publication year range
1.
JBJS Case Connect ; 10(1): e0033, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31899721

ABSTRACT

CASE: The authors present 3 cases of humerus fracture after biceps tenodesis performed by 3 different surgeons with radiographs and outcome scores with a minimum of 30 months follow-up. Fractures occurred between 7 days and 4 months postoperatively and include 2 fractures where tenodesis had been performed with interference screw fixation and one fracture where tenodesis had been performed with a bicortical endobutton technique. CONCLUSIONS: These case reports highlight the risk of this complication in biceps tenodesis with bony fixation. The authors review the previously reported cases and relevant biomechanical studies that elucidate risk factors for humerus fracture and discuss alternative means to treat biceps tendon pathology.


Subject(s)
Humeral Fractures/etiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Tenodesis/adverse effects , Adult , Arthroscopy , Humans , Male
2.
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) ; 45(6): E352-E354, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27737299

ABSTRACT

Intramedullary tibial fixation is a commonly used and highly successfully treatment in acute fractures, nonunion settings, and correctional procedures. In the setting of a nonunion, removal of a failed implant can add to operative time and surgeon frustration while further compromising bone in an area already at risk for failure. Here we present a technique, using readily accessible equipment, for removing a distal solid tibial nail fragment in a manner that preserves bone.


Subject(s)
Bone Nails , Device Removal/methods , Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary , Humans , Male , Tibia/surgery , Tibial Fractures/surgery , Young Adult
3.
J Orthop Trauma ; 30 Suppl 3: S7-S10, 2016 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27661426

ABSTRACT

Debridement is an integral step in the orthopaedic management of traumatic wounds, from open soft tissue injuries and routine open fracture care to the management of extensive high-energy blast injuries. While the necessity of debridement has been well established, the level of energy and degree of contamination of blast wounds encountered in recent armed conflict has offered a challenge and a new opportunity for military surgeons to revisit the most recent literature to guide our practice with the best evidence currently available. While the core tenants of removing the nonviable tissue and preserving the viable to maintain the best functional outcome have not changed, new wound care therapies and advances in prosthetics and salvage techniques and the ability to rapidly evacuate casualties have changed the approach to care provided on the front lines. This paper seeks to review the core principles of debridement and guide treatment using evidence-based methods that can be applied to contaminated open injuries on the battlefront and disaster and intentional violence injuries abroad and at home.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...