Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Vopr Onkol ; 51(2): 192-6, 2005.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16222999

ABSTRACT

Main indices of efficacy such as objective response and stabilization frequency, objective response median and survival rate were evaluated in 84 patients with disseminated breast cancer receiving different doses of cytostatics: high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) plus transplantation of peripheral blood stem cells, standard-dose (SDC), dose reduced by 20% (RDC20) or by 50% (RDC50). There was an inverse correlation between complete+partial response frequency, on the one hand, and dosage, on the other: highest dose--70% and lowest dose--11.1%. Objective response median in both groups was pretty close--8.5 +/- 5.5 and 5 +/- 0.4% months, respectively. The lowering of dose involved a higher risk of tumor progression from 15% after HDC, 46.6%--SDC and 44.4%--RDC20 to 61.1% after RDC50, with likelihood of objective response decreasing. Nether median nor mean survival rates depended on dosage, nor the difference was significant (p = 0.72). Hence, adequate dose proved to be an important factor, as far as treatment efficacy is concerned. Escalation to high dose was followed by an increase in objective response rates to 70%, SDC - 35.7%, RDC20--33.4% and RDC50--11.1%. Yet, nether dose escalation nor dose reduction involved significant variation in survival (p = 0.72).


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Adult , Aged , Disease Progression , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Proportional Hazards Models , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...