Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 21
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Science ; 384(6694): eadp2402, 2024 Apr 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38662816

ABSTRACT

As a seven-year-old child, I experienced war in Cyprus. Armed conflict has not been far from my conscience ever since. At a time when there are active conflicts in many parts of the world, war is unlikely to be far from many children's minds globally today. Can a "war" theme be included in science lessons and play a role in helping young children develop into socially responsible scientists and peaceful citizens?

2.
Science ; 382(6677): eadm9788, 2023 12 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38127735

ABSTRACT

There is growing interest in the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in science education. Many issues and questions raised about the role of AI in science education target primarily science learning objectives. They relate to AI's capacity to generate tools for teaching, learning, and assessment, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of using such tools. But another important discussion receiving far too little attention in science education concerns how AI is transforming the nature of science (NOS) itself and what such transformation implies for the education of young children. For education, it is critical to ask what AI-informed NOS is, what skills it demands of learners, and how schools can aim to achieve them.


Subject(s)
Artificial Intelligence , Science , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Learning , Schools , Science/education
3.
Science ; 381(6659): eadk1509, 2023 08 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37590356

ABSTRACT

In many parts of the world, secondary school science curricula continue to be dominated by learning objectives about scientific knowledge and investigations, when actually there is more to science. These curricula-the educational frameworks that include objectives and content for teaching and learning-may state, for example, that students are to be taught knowledge such as "matter is made of tiny, indivisible particles" and "photosynthesis produces oxygen." They may highlight scientific processes such as "carrying out an experiment to determine the relationship between volume and pressure of a gas at constant temperature." Some curricula may situate science topics in socially relevant scenarios-for example, teaching about local chemical industries and their impact on the environment. Some curriculum topics may be linked to students' everyday lives, such as by referring to family genetics. Yet there is a critical aspect of science that is often ignored in the science curriculum, and that is the inherent social and institutional character of science itself. When science curricula underrepresent or do not include such social and institutional dimensions of science, which play a key role in the validation and communication of scientific processes, it is as if a fundamental element of science has been dismantled, projecting an image of science that is idealized, reconstructed, and distorted. In democratic societies in which people have the power to influence policy decisions, understanding how scientific communities function can only help with the public responsibility in shouldering collective societal challenges.

4.
Humanit Soc Sci Commun ; 10(1): 282, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37305352

ABSTRACT

News media plays a vital role in communicating scientific evidence to the public during the COVID-19 pandemic. Such communication is important for convincing the public to follow social distancing guidelines and to respond to health campaigns such as vaccination programmes. However, newspapers were criticised that they focus on the socio-political perspective of science, without explaining the nature of scientific works behind the government's decisions. This paper examines the connections of the nature of science categories in the COVID-19 era by four local newspapers in the United Kingdom between November 2021 to February 2022. Nature of science refers to different aspects of how science works such as aims, values, methods and social institutions of science. Considering the news media may mediate public information and perception of scientific stories, it is relevant to ask how the various British newspapers covered aspects of science during the pandemic. In the period explored, Omicron variant was initially a variant of concern, and an increasing number of scientific evidence showed that the less severity of this variant might move the country from pandemic to endemic. We explored how news articles communicate public health information by addressing how science works during the period when Omicron variants surge. A novel discourse analysis approach, epistemic network analysis is used to characterise the frequency of connections of categories of the nature of science. The connection between political factors and the professional activities of scientists, as well as that with scientific practices are more apparent in left-populated and centralist outlets than in right-populated news outlets. Among four news outlets across the political spectrum, a left-populated newspaper, the Guardian, is not consistent in representing relations of different aspects of the nature of scientific works across different stages of the public health crisis. Inconsistency of addressing aspects of scientific works and a downplay of the cognitive-epistemic nature of scientific works likely lead to failure in trust and consumption of scientific knowledge by the public in the healthcare crisis.

5.
Sci Educ (Dordr) ; : 1-18, 2023 Mar 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37359258

ABSTRACT

Nine years after reconceptualizing the nature of science for science education using the family resemblance approach (FRA) (Erduran & Dagher, 2014a), the time is ripe for taking stock of what this approach has accomplished, and what future research it can facilitate. This reflective paper aims to accomplish three goals. The first addresses several questions related to the FRA for the purpose of ensuring that the applications of FRA in science education are based on robust understanding of the framework. The second discusses the significance of the FRA by highlighting its capacity to support science educators with the exploration of a wide range of contemporary issues that are relevant to how teachers and learners perceive and experience science. The third goal of the paper offers recommendations for future directions in FRA research in the areas of science identity development and multicultural education as well as curriculum, instruction, and assessment in science education.

6.
Res Sci Educ ; 53(1): 193-212, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36627971

ABSTRACT

This article utilizes a framework for classifying different scientific methods suggested by a philosopher of science (Brandon Synthese, 99, 59-73, 1994) called Brandon's Matrix. It presents findings from teachers who took part in a funded project in England that looked at the nature of scientific methods in science investigations. Science investigations are an integral aspect of science education and, as such, are often included in high stakes examinations. Therefore, teachers need to have a good understanding of  a range of scientific methods and their purposes in science investigations. The framework was used to ask teachers to classify science investigations based on how they teach them. It was also employed to devise assessments to measure students' understanding of scientific methods. The teachers were introduced to the new approaches and their perceptions were gathered to understand if they supported this as a framework for their classroom practice. Evidence from the study suggested that Brandon's Matrix appealed to teachers as a framework for practical science in schools, and they see potential benefits for its use in the teaching, learning, and assessment of science. Findings from the study showed it appealed to the teachers as a tool for classifying scientific methods, and how they also recognized the importance of assessing practical work and had an appreciation of the constraints and drivers in the current curriculum and assessment requirements in England. Implications for teachers' professional development are discussed.

7.
Res Sci Educ ; 53(1): 121-137, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36644106

ABSTRACT

Teachers' understanding and teaching of argumentation is gaining more attention in science education research. However, little is known about how science teachers engage in argumentation with teachers of different subject taking an interdisciplinary perspective that may inspire new pedagogical ideas or strategies. In particular, the positioning of argumentation at the juncture of science and religion is rare. This paper reports an empirical study involving science and religious education (RE) teachers who collaborated on teaching argumentation in three secondary schools in England. Their interdisciplinary collaboration was sustained by a series of professional development sessions over 18 months. Analysis of the interview data unfolds how the teachers' collaboration impacted their understanding of argumentation and views of teaching their subject. Through working relationally in exploring and teaching argumentation, the science teachers reflected more notable changes than their RE counterparts. Science teachers came to appreciate student voice in the learning process and the role of argumentation in fostering students' scientific reasoning. The paper is a salient step to researching argumentation in a cross-curricular terrain, particularly in relation to RE. It also sheds light on how collaborating with teachers of another subject bolstered science teachers' professional development and broke subject barriers.

8.
Sci Educ (Dordr) ; 31(6): 1425-1427, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36466315
9.
Sci Educ (Dordr) ; 31(5): 1101-1104, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36089922
10.
Sci Educ (Dordr) ; : 1-37, 2022 Aug 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36039351

ABSTRACT

The paper reports about the outcome of a systematic review of research on family resemblance approach (FRA) to nature of science in (NOS) science education. FRA is a relatively recent perspective on NOS being a system of cognitive-epistemic and social-institutional aspects of science. FRA thus consists of a set of categories such as aims and values, practices, knowledge and social organizations in relation to NOS. Since the introduction of the FRA, there has been increasing interest in investigations about how FRA can be of use in science education both empirically and practically. A journal content analysis was conducted in order to investigate which FRA categories are covered in journal articles and to identify the characteristics of the studies that have used FRA. These characteristics included the target level of education and focus on pre- or in-service teachers. Furthermore, epistemic network analysis of theoretical and empirical papers was conducted to determine the extent to which the studies incorporated various key themes about FRA, such as its transferability to other domains and differentiation of the social-institutional system categories. The findings illustrate an increasing number of empirical studies using FRA in recent years and broad coverage in science education. Although the social-institutional system categories included intraconnections, these were not as strong as those intraconnections among categories within the cognitive-epistemic system. Future research directions for the use of FRA in K-12 science education are discussed.

11.
Sci Educ (Dordr) ; 31(3): 563-567, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35469346
12.
Sci Educ (Dordr) ; 30(2): 345-364, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34720429

ABSTRACT

Recent reforms in science education have promoted students' understanding of how science works, including the methodological approaches used by scientists. Given that teachers are expected to teach and promote methodological pluralism, it is worth examining how teachers understand and view scientific methods, particularly when scientific methods are presented as a diverse array and not as a linear model based exclusively on hypothesis testing. The empirical study presented in the paper examines science teachers' understanding of scientific methods, particularly the diversity of scientific methods. Brandon's Matrix, a philosopher's account of scientific methods, has been adapted for educational purposes, and two tasks were developed in order to investigate teachers' understanding of scientific methods. Fifty-six science teachers (25% male, 75% female) from different regions in the UK responded to an online survey. The results showed that the majority of the teachers showed satisfactory understanding of basic components of Brandon's Matrix. However, more than half of the sample held naïve understanding of scientific methods. By providing insight into teachers' misconceptions about scientific methods, the study provides suggestions for the design of teacher training programmes and highlights the need for explicit instruction about scientific methods. In addition, we suggest the use of heuristics such as Brandon's Matrix for the development of pedagogical tools as well as research instruments.

13.
Sci Educ (Dordr) ; 30(4): 783-784, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34312575
14.
Sci Educ (Dordr) ; 30(3): 441-444, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34054224
16.
Int J Sci Educ ; 43(18): 2885-2910, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35399299

ABSTRACT

The incorporation of epistemic aspects of science in science education continues to be a challenge for researchers and practitioners. The paper presents an empirical study investigating how epistemic framing of scientific methods can be incorporated in science teaching, learning and summative assessment, and what impact such framing has on student learning outcomes. The study was conducted with 969 secondary students taught by 152 teachers from a national sample in England. Teaching videos and summative assessments were framed by Brandon's Matrix, a theoretical framework derived from the work of a philosopher of science and focusing on the diversity of scientific methods ranging from hypothesis testing to non-manipulative parameter measurement. The findings are discussed, including (a) the students' views on the teaching videos and summative assessments, (b) the impact of the teaching videos on students' understanding of the epistemic aspects of scientific methods and (c) students' performance on summative assessments in the context of science topics covered in high-stakes examinations in England. The findings suggest that the students' understanding of scientific methods significantly improved after watching the videos. Furthermore, the students' performance on the summative assessment items indicated a high level of accuracy in responses.

17.
20.
Int J Sci Educ ; 42(9): 1544-1567, 2020 Aug 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33633433

ABSTRACT

High stakes examinations can have profound implications for how science is taught and learned. Limitations of school science such as the 'cookbook problem' can potentially be addressed if high stakes assessments target learning outcomes that are innovative. For example, less mindless procedural engagement and more thoughtful consideration of practical science can potentially improve science learning. In this paper, we investigate how practical work is represented in the assessment frameworks of several countries that demonstrate above average performance in the latest PISA science assessments. The main motivation is the need to understand if there are aspects of high stakes summative assessments in these countries that can provide insight into how best to structure national examinations. Assessment documents from a set of selected countries have been analysed qualitatively guided by questions such as 'what is the construct of practical science' and 'what is the format of assessment?' The examined jurisdictions used different approaches from traditional external pen-and-paper tests to internal teacher assessments that included different formats (e.g. laboratory report). Innovative approaches to the assessment of practical skills (e.g. PISA computer-based tasks) do not seem to be represented in these high-stakes assessments. Implications for innovative assessments for high-stakes purposes are discussed.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...