Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Am Soc Echocardiogr ; 18(11): 1181-6, 2005 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16275527

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the usefulness of stress echocardiography in a chest pain department. METHODS: Consecutive patients (n = 487) with nontraumatic chest pain, with no signs of myocardial ischemia on arrival to the emergency department, 6 and 12 hours later, were recruited. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of stress echocardiography in the biased sample were 74% (95% confidence interval [CI] 63-85%) and 65% (95% CI 44-86%). After application of the method of Begg and Greenes to debias the sample, the calculated sensitivity was 24% (95% CI 19-29%) and specificity was 94% (95% CI 91-97%). After application of Diamond's method, sensitivity was 32% (95% CI 21-44%) and specificity (normalcy rate) was 99% (95% CI 88-100%). CONCLUSIONS: Stress echocardiography is an insensitive test when used to detect significant coronary artery stenosis in patients presenting with nontraumatic chest pain with no objective signs of myocardial ischemia.


Subject(s)
Chest Pain/diagnosis , Chest Pain/etiology , Coronary Stenosis/complications , Coronary Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Echocardiography/methods , Exercise Test , Risk Assessment/methods , Aged , Critical Care/methods , Emergency Medical Services/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Factors , Sensitivity and Specificity , Wounds and Injuries/complications , Wounds and Injuries/diagnosis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL