Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Oral Radiol ; 37(4): 567-572, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33180266

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Lip and palate deformities are an important craniofacial congenital anomaly that negatively affects the anatomy of the nasal cavity and maxilla. This study aimed to evaluate the nasal septum deviation in individuals with a unilateral cleft lip and palate. METHODS: The sample consists of 22 unilateral cleft lip-palate patients and 20 controls with non-cleft skeletal Class III. Maximal septal deviation angle and linear dimension were measured on cone-beam computed tomography images. The localization of maximal septal deviation was determined. The data were analyzed and compared between unilateral cleft lip-palate patients and skeletal Class III individuals. RESULTS: For septal deviation, a significant discrepancy between unilateral cleft patients and skeletal Class III subjects was detected at the anterior nasal spine (ANS) level, the posterior nasal spine (PNS) level and the ANS-PNS midpoint level (p < 0.05). The maximum septal deviation angle of individuals with a unilateral cleft was significantly greater than individuals with skeletal Class III (p < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were found in the localization of maximum septal deviation between the unilateral cleft patients and the Class III individuals. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrated that the maximum septal deviation angle and dimension had significant differences in individuals with a unilateral cleft, compared to a skeletal Class III control group. However, no statistically significant discrepancy was observed between three levels (ANS, PNS and ANS-PNS middle levels) in the unilateral cleft patients.


Subject(s)
Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Cleft Lip/diagnostic imaging , Cleft Palate/diagnostic imaging , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Humans , Nasal Septum/diagnostic imaging
2.
Surg Radiol Anat ; 42(9): 977-983, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32356044

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The main aim of the present study was to investigate the dimensions and morphological appearance of the sella turcica in cleft lip and palate patients using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images, compared to non-cleft individuals. METHODS: CBCT images of 40 (20 females and 20 males) cleft lip and palate patients and 60 (27 males and 33 females) non-cleft individuals were assessed, retrospectively. The linear dimensions (depth, diameter and length) of the sella turcica and inter-clinoid distance were measured. Sella turcica shapes were examined in the cleft lip and palate patients and non-cleft individuals. Non-cleft individuals were divided into skeletal malocclusion classes. All variables were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test, Mann-Whitney U tests and Chi-square test. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed between individuals with and without cleft in the linear dimensions (depth, diameter and length) of the sella turcica (p > 0.05). However, a significant difference was found in the inter-clinoid distance between patients with cleft and non-cleft individuals (p < 0.05). Comparison of the sella turcica shape between skeletal malocclusion classes and patients with cleft showed significant differences (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: No significant difference was determined in the depth, diameter, or length of the sella turcica in cleft patients when compared with non-cleft individuals. The inter-clinoid distance was lower in cleft patients than in non-cleft individuals, and this difference was statistically significant.


Subject(s)
Anatomic Landmarks , Cephalometry/methods , Cleft Lip/diagnostic imaging , Cleft Palate/diagnostic imaging , Malocclusion/diagnostic imaging , Sella Turcica/anatomy & histology , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Female , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Sella Turcica/diagnostic imaging , Young Adult
3.
Surg Radiol Anat ; 42(9): 985, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32444936

ABSTRACT

In the original publication of the article, the given name and family name of the author were swapped. The correct author name is given in this erratum.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL