The impact of a previous cesarean section on the risk of perioperative and postoperative complications during vaginal hysterectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether a previous cesarean section increases the risk of perioperative and postoperative complications during vaginal hysterectomy. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of women who had undergone a vaginal hysterectomy for benign indications between 2014 and 2019 was conducted, comparing patients with or without a previous cesarean section. Perioperative and postoperative complications during vaginal hysterectomy were assessed according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system within 30 days of surgery. Duration of surgery, estimated blood loss, and postoperative hospitalization days were also recorded. A two-sided P value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 185 women were included, 25 (13.5%) patients had undergone a previous cesarean section (study group) and 160 (86.5%) had no history of cesarean section (comparison group). We found no significant differences in demographic and clinical characteristics as well as postoperative complications and interventions, duration of surgery, estimated blood loss, and postoperative hospitalization days (P > 0.05). However, patients who underwent two or more cesarean sections had a significantly (P = 0.01) higher rate and grade of complications during vaginal hysterectomy, compared with women with only one previous cesarean section. All women who underwent two or more cesarean sections had mild complications during vaginal hysterectomy (40% grade I and 60% grade II, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Vaginal hysterectomy is a safe procedure with few severe complications, regardless of a previous cesarean section. More than one previous cesarean section may increase the risk of minor complications during a vaginal hysterectomy. Patients who underwent a previous cesarean section could be reassured that they do not face an increased risk of complications during a vaginal hysterectomy.

Positive pathological margins after loop electrosurgical excision procedure - Management and outcome.

OBJECTIVE: Pathological involvement of cervical conization margins is a risk factor for recurrence, although management of these patients is controversial. We aimed to define risk factors for positive margins and compare recurrence following additional surgical intervention compared to conservative management. METHODS: A retrospective study of all conizations at our center between 2010 and 2019. Univariate analysis identified characteristics associated with positive margins. Women were stratified by mode of management comparing three groups (surveillance, repeat conization or hysterectomy) then two groups (surveillance vs. additional surgery). Kaplan Meyer survival curves compared cumulative recurrence stratified by mode of management. Pathological results of subsequent surgical procedures were examined for residual disease. RESULTS: Of 448 conizations performed, 131 (29.2%) had positive margins which were associated with menopause, high-grade cytology and endocervical gland involvement. Women who underwent surveillance (n = 45) were more likely to be nulliparous, with low-grade histology and less endocervical gland involvement. Women who underwent hysterectomy (n = 61) were more likely to be postmenopausal and parous. Recurrence did not differ significantly in the three-group (p = 0.073) or two-group model (6.4% vs. 7.1% p = 0.869). Kaplan Meyer survival curves depicting cumulative recurrence did not differ significantly in either model (log rank test p = 0.642 for the three-group model, and p = 0.868 for the two-group model). Residual disease was found in 51.6% of hysterectomy specimens and 52.6% of repeat conizations. CONCLUSION: Surveillance is non-inferior to additional surgery in cases with positive conization margins and constitutes a valid option specifically for younger women at risk of future obstetric complications and those susceptible post-hysterectomy complications.

Is there a correlation between pelvic floor dysfunction symptoms during pregnancy and the duration of the second stage of labor?

BACKGROUND: Pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) most commonly results from weakened or injured muscles and ligaments whose purpose is to support the pelvic floor. Many studies have placed vaginal delivery and prolonged second stage of labor (SSL) as major risk factors for PFD, supposedly through generating enhanced pressure in the pelvic area. Although many studies describe the effects of vaginal delivery and labor on structure and function of the pelvic floor, not much is known regarding PFD deriving from pregnancy and its prevalence and severity in the postpartum. We aimed to evaluate whether a correlation exists between PFD symptoms during pregnancy and the duration of the SSL. METHODS: We conducted a cross sectional study of 200 women who gave birth at Soroka University Medical Center, Beer-Sheva, Israel. Those who had consented completed the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20), a condition specific questionnaire developed to measure quality-of-life and the extent of injury to the pelvic floor in women with all forms of PFD. The duration of the SSL and clinical and obstetrical characteristics were retrieved from the participants' medical records. We assessed correlations using Spearman's correlation coefficient. RESULTS: PFD during pregnancy was found to be correlated to the duration of the SSL (R = -0.183, p = .021). When evaluating each component of the PFDI-20 separately, CRAD was significantly correlated with the duration of the SSL (R = -0.195, p = .014). CONCLUSIONS: There is a correlation between PFD symptoms during pregnancy, specifically symptoms of CRAD and the duration of the SSL.

Adhesion barriers and topical hemostatic agents are risk factors for post-cesarean section infections.

BACKGROUND: Cesarean sections are the most common surgery worldwide, and post-cesarean section infections and hemorrhage are a major cause for morbidity and mortality. In recent years, many surgeons use adhesion barriers as well as hemostatic agents during primary and repeated cesarean section. The data regarding the safety of these agents is relatively limited. The objective of this study was to investigate whether the use of adhesion barriers and topical hemostatic agents pose a risk for post-cesarean section infections. METHOD: A case-control study composed of women who were admitted to the Soroka University Medical Center between the years 2012 and 2016 was conducted. The study group was composed of women admitted owing to post-cesarean section infections (cases) and those who underwent cesarean sections without post-cesarean section infection (control subjects). Matching was done according to date and surgery setting (elective versus emergency). A univariate analysis was followed by a multiple regression model in order to examine the association between adhesion barriers/hemostatic agents and post-cesarean section infections. RESULTS: During the study period, 113 patients developed postoperative infection (cases); 71.7% were diagnosed with surgical site infection, 7.1% with endometritis, and 21.2% with other infections. These were compared with 226 control subjects. In the univariate analysis, the use of adhesion barriers/hemostatic agents were found to be associated with post-cesarean section infection. Using a multivariable analysis controlling for previous cesarean section, skin closer technique, preterm delivery, and duration of surgery >60 minutes, the use of adhesion barriers as well as hemostatic agents was found to be independently associated with post-cesarean section infection (adjusted odds ratio = 2.11, 95% confidence interval = 1.17-3.84; adjusted odds ratio = 2.29, 95% confidence interval = 1.37-3.8, respectively) CONCLUSION: Adhesion barriers and hemostatic agents were found to be independently associated with post-cesarean section infections. Further larger studies are needed to reinforce our findings. The use of these materials should be carefully considered, and their cost-effectiveness re-examined.

Early prediction of post cesarean section infection using simple hematological biomarkers: A case control study.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate whether the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) may assist in the prediction of post CS infections. STUDY DESIGN: This was a case control study performed at the Soroka University Medical Center, a large tertiary teaching medical center, between the years 2012-2016. Cases (post CS infection) were matched to controls (without post CS infection) in a proportion of 2:1. Matching was done according to surgery setting (elective vs. urgent) and date of surgery. Various demographic, clinical and obstetrical characteristics were collected. Laboratory tests that were taken 6-24 h postoperatively were compared between the study groups. Univariate analysis was followed by a multivariate one. Area under the curve was calculated for selected indices. RESULTS: During the study period 113 patients who developed postoperative infection were compared with 224 healthy controls. Among patients in the study group, 71.7 % were diagnosed with surgical site infection, 7.1 % with endometritis and 21.2 % with other infections. Total neutrophil and lymphocyte counts were significantly higher among patient in the study group. NLR as well as platelet to lymphocyte (PLR) ratio were significantly higher among patients during the first 24 postoperative hours. NLR and PLR were found to be independently associated with post CS infection controlling for surgery length, use of hemostatic agents/adhesion barrier and skin closure technique (aOR 1.11 95 % CI 1.06-1.17, aOR 1.004 95 % CI 1.001-1.006, respectively). A performance analysis for NLR showed an area-under-the receiver operating curve (AUC) of 67 % (P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: NLR is an easy readily available tool that may have a predictive value in early detection of post CS infection. Further studies are needed in order to support our findings before clinical implications of these findings can be recommended.

Recovery from pelvic floor dysfunction symptoms in the postpartum is associated with the duration of the second stage of labor.

PURPOSE: Pregnancy and labor are known risk factors for pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD). Yet not much is known regarding recovery from PFD. We hypothesized that the recovery from PFD during the postpartum period would be associated with the duration of the second stage of labor (SSL). METHODS: We conducted a case-control study of patients who gave birth at the Soroka University Medical Center, Beer-Sheva, Israel. Those who consented completed the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20), a questionnaire developed to measure the extent of injury to the pelvic floor, after delivery and 3-month postpartum. The difference between the scores was calculated, representing recovery of symptoms. The duration of the SSL, and clinical and obstetrical characteristics were retrieved from the patients' medical records. Wilcoxon rank test was used, assessing the significance of the recovery. The association between the degree of the recovery and the duration of SSL was tested using Mann-Whitney ranking. RESULTS: A total of 92 patients completed the PFDI-20 after delivery and 3-month postpartum. We found a significant difference between PFD symptoms during pregnancy and 3-month postpartum (P < 0.001). This difference remained consistent in all components of the PFDI-20. In addition, a more profound recovery of colorectal and anal dysfunction (CRAD) symptoms was associated with a shorter duration of the SSL (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: There is a statistically significant recovery of PFD symptoms in the postpartum period. Furthermore, greater recovery from CRAD symptoms is associated with a shorter duration of the SSL.

Chorioamnionitis caused by Serratia marcescens in a healthy pregnant woman with preterm premature rupture of membranes: A rare case report and review of the literature.

The incidence of chorioamnionitis varies widely. The highest incidence is reported in preterm deliveries. Among preterm deliveries, chorioamnionitis usually occurs after preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM). To date, only five cases of chorioamnionitis due to Serratia marcescens were reported. Here we present a case of a pregnant woman with chorioamnionitis due to Serratia marcescens who delivered a premature neonate at 28 weeks and four days of gestation. We also conducted a review of the literature in order to identify and characterize the clinical presentation and outcomes of this rare infection. A 36 year old female (gravida 9, para 6) was admitted with cervical effacement of 16mm and intact membranes at gestational age of 25 weeks and five days. One week following her admission PPROM was noticed. Treatment with the standard antibiotic regimen for PPROM was initiated. Thirteen days after the diagnosis of PPROM (28 weeks and four days) she developed chills, abdominal pain, sub febrile fever, tachycardia, leukocytosis and fetal tachycardia, and a clinical diagnosis of chorioamnionitis was made. An urgent CS was performed. In the first post-operative day the patient developed surgical sight infection. Cultures obtained from the purulent discharge of the wound, as well as cultures from the placenta and uterine cavity that were obtained during surgery grew Serratia marcescens. The patient was treated with Meropenem for six days, with a good clinical response. We present a rare case of nosocomialy acquired Serratia marcescens chorioamnionitis in a patient with PPROM. This case emphasizes the need for good infection control measures. Our favorable outcome together with the scares reports in the literature, add insight into this type of rare infection.

Effect of dexamethasone eyedrops on blood glucose profile.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of dexamethasone eyedrops on blood glucose. METHODS: Two hundred eighty-five patients who underwent cataract surgery were prospectively randomized to receive treatment with topical dexamethasone or diclofenac for 1 month. A capillary blood sample was collected before surgery, immediately after, 1 week later, and 1 month later. RESULTS: A significant increase in blood glucose levels was noted only in the diabetic dexamethasone group, from 170 +/- 55.5 (mg/dl) before surgery to 229 +/- 76.8 (mg/dl) 1 month later (p = 0.05, 95% confidence interval of -13 to -83.2). The latter level was significantly higher than the 1-month level in the diabetic patients treated with diclofenac drops (198.4 +/- 66.5 mg/dl, p = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative dexamethasone eyedrops have a greater effect on the blood glucose profile of diabetic patients than on nondiabetic patients. Clinicians should be alerted to this risk and may initiate appropriate follow-up in this patient subgroup.