Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Affect Disord ; 185: 8-11, 2015 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26142688

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The growing awareness that so many do not respond adequately to antidepressant (AD) pharmacotherapy has sparked research seeking to characterize those who do. While the pharmacological mechanisms of AD treatment have been extensively evaluated, much remains unknown about the placebo component of the response to medication. This study examined the association between suggestibility levels and response to ADs amongst depressed patients. METHODS: Twenty unipolar depression outpatients, recruited before starting AD monotherapy, received clear, standardized instructions that the therapeutic effects of AD, though not side effects, would require 2-4 weeks. At baseline (T1), 1 week (T2), and 1 month (T3), participants were evaluated for depressive symptoms, using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-17 items (HAM-D); for anxiety by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A); for side effects by the Antidepressant Side Effect Checklist (ASEC); and for suggestibility, using the Multidimensional Iowa Suggestibility Scale (MISS). RESULTS: High levels of baseline suggestibility were associated with less improvement in depression level and more side-effects during the first week. In accordance with our hypothesis the more suggestible patients improved more between T2 and T3. No significant correlations were found between baseline suggestibility levels and change in anxiety. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size and a self-report questionnaire assessing suggestibility were limitations. CONCLUSION: This study offers a potentially new and clinically useful approach to understanding and predicting who will respond to AD treatment. Suggestibility seems to play a role, presumably by shaping expectation, in response to AD treatment. We hope that this avenue will be further explored.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Depressive Disorder/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Suggestion , Female , Humans , Iowa , Male , Middle Aged , Outpatients , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
2.
Arch Osteoporos ; 7: 247-55, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23095987

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: The goal of the present study was to examine the relationships of depression, anxiety and stress with bone mineral density (BMD). We hypothesized negative relations between those mood variables and BMD in three assessed areas. The study showed association between depression and decreased BMD. The hypothesis regarding anxiety and stress was partially confirmed. INTRODUCTION: In the last decade, the relationship of osteoporosis to psychological variables has been increasingly studied. The accumulating evidence from these studies supports the conclusion that depression is related to decreased BMD. Nevertheless, several studies found no support for this relationship. Moreover, only a small number of studies examined the association between anxiety or stress and decreased BMD. The goal of the present study was to examine the relationships of depression, anxiety and stress with BMD by means of adequate measuring instruments, while controlling for background factors known to be related to BMD decrease (e.g., body mass index, family history). METHOD: The study included 135 post-menopausal female participants, who arrived for BMD screening, between the years 2006 and 2009. Several days prior to the examination, participants completed a series of questionnaires assessing depression and anxiety. BMD was measured using DXA, in spine, right and left hip. RESULTS: The study showed negative associations between depression and BMD variables in the three assessed areas. There were negative correlations between anxiety, stress and spine BMD, as well as a tendency towards negative relations in the right and left hip BMD. Concurrent hierarchical regressions showed that the addition of the three psychological variables increased the explained variance by 6­8 %. In addition, depression was found to have a unique significant contribution to the explained variance in right and left hip BMD. CONCLUSIONS: The findings provide supporting evidence for the existence of associations between mood variables and decreased BMD. Further research is required for gaining deeper insight into these relationships.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/epidemiology , Depression/epidemiology , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/epidemiology , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/psychology , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Affect/drug effects , Aged , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Anxiety/diagnosis , Bone Density/drug effects , Bone Diseases, Metabolic/epidemiology , Bone Diseases, Metabolic/psychology , Depression/diagnosis , Depression/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Postmenopause/psychology , Predictive Value of Tests , Regression Analysis , Stress, Psychological/diagnosis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL