Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Chemother ; 20(1): 87-92, 2008 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18343749

ABSTRACT

In response to the recent increase in Aspergillus infections, new antifungal agents have become available accompanied by studies on antifungal susceptibility tests for epidemiological follow-up. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M 38-A broth microdilution test with the disk diffusion and E-test in determining the susceptibility of Aspergillus spp. to amphotericin B, itraconazole and voriconazole. The study was carried out on 18 A. fumigatus, 7 A. flavus, 5 A. niger and 2 A. versicolor strains isolated from clinical samples. The microdilution method was performed by following the instructions of CLSI M 38-A. The E-test and disk diffusion tests were performed according to the instructions of their manufacturers. The percent agreement between the E-test and CLSI M38-A broth microdilution test at 24 (48) h within +/- 2 dilutions was, respectively, 81% (69%) for amphotericin B, 75% (72%) for itraconazole and 85% (81%) for voriconazole. The disk diffusion test showed good correlation with the E-test but poor correlation with the broth microdilution test for the three antifungal agents we tested. In conclusion, E-test and disk diffusion test have their advantages such as ease of application and interpretation, but their correlation with the broth microdilution should be improved.


Subject(s)
Amphotericin B/pharmacology , Antifungal Agents/pharmacology , Aspergillus/drug effects , Itraconazole/pharmacology , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Pyrimidines/pharmacology , Triazoles/pharmacology , Aspergillus/isolation & purification , Disk Diffusion Antimicrobial Tests , Humans , Voriconazole
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...