The long-term fate of renal and visceral vessel reconstruction after open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVES: In the ever-advancing era of endovascular thoracoabdominal aneurysm (TAAA) repair, understanding long-term patency of renovisceral reconstructions after open TAAA repair provides important benchmarks. METHODS: Institutional open TAAA repair patient data were queried. Patients dying during index admission or with incomplete operative detail were excluded. Visceral and renal reconstructions were categorized as bypass, incorporation into a proximal or distal beveled aortic anastomosis, inclusion button, Carrel patch, or hybrid stent along with endarterectomy/stent adjuncts. Axial imaging or angiography determined long-term patency. Vessel event was defined as new occlusion or reintervention after repair. Overall time-to-event analysis was performed as well as separate analyses for each vessel (celiac, superior mesenteric artery [SMA], right renal, left renal) by reconstruction type utilizing Kaplan-Meier methods. Log-rank testing was employed to compare reconstructive strategies. RESULTS: Over 28 years, 604 repairs (type I, 106 [18%]; type II, 73 [12%]; type III, 195 [32%]; and type IV, 230 [38%]) were identified. Follow-up (median, 500 days) was available in 410/570 (72%) celiac, 406/573 (71%) SMA, 379/532 (71.2%) right renal, and 370/515 (72%) left renal reconstructions. There were five celiac, one SMA, eight right renal, and 10 left renal events. No type of reconstruction or adjunct was significantly associated with event. Overall 5-year patency of all renal/visceral reconstructions was 94% (95% confidence interval, 90%-96%). Estimated 5-year patency of the celiac, SMA, left renal, and right renal were similar, and were 99%, 100%, 97%, and 96%, respectively (P = .09). CONCLUSIONS: Visceral and renal long-term patency after open TAAA repair is excellent regardless of reconstructive technique. No differences are appreciated even when target vessel disease is addressed at the time of reconstruction. These findings continue to substantiate the effective long-term durability of open TAAA repair and are particularly germane to the ongoing evolution of endovascular strategies.

Multispecialty surgical management of carotid body tumors in the modern era.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the perioperative and long-term outcomes of carotid body tumor (CBT) resection with a multispecialty (head and neck surgery/vascular surgery) approach. METHODS: Our institutional data registry was queried for Current Procedural Terminology codes (60600, 60605) pertaining to CBT excision. These patient records and operative reports were individually reviewed to determine laterality, preoperative tumor embolization, operative time, estimated blood loss, need for intraoperative transfusion, intraoperative electroencephalogram changes, intraoperative division of the external carotid artery, carotid artery repair, resection of the carotid bifurcation, tumor volume, final pathology, cranial nerve injury, stroke, death, and clinical or radiographic evidence of recurrence. RESULTS: From 1996 to 2018, 74 CBT resections were identified in 68 patients (41 [60%] females; mean age, 50.83 years). The mean tumor volume was 9.92 ± 14.26 cm3 (range, 0.0250-71.0627 cm3). Embolization was performed by a neurointerventional specialist in 27 CBT resections (36%) based on size (embolization 14.27 ± 16.84 cm3 vs 7.17 ± 11.86 cm3; P = .063) and superior extension. This practice resulted in one asymptomatic vertebral dissection, which postponed the surgery. There was a trend toward greater blood loss in the embolization group (embolization 437 ± 545 mL vs 262 ± 222 mL; P = .17); however, no transfusions were required in any patient. The mean operative time was also significantly longer in the embolization group (198.33 ± 61.13 minutes vs 161.5 ± 55.56 minutes; P = .03). Three resections had reversible intraoperative electroencephalogram changes, one of which occurred during carotid clamping. These changes resolved with shunting. Eight external carotid resections (11%) and 6 carotid reconstructions (8.1%; two primary, two patch, and two primary anastomosis) were required. Malignancy was identified in four tumors (5.4%), accounting for four of the six carotid reconstructions. There were no postoperative cranial nerve injuries, no strokes, no reexplorations, and no deaths. One patient developed transient dysphagia from pharyngeal tumor infiltration. Long-term follow-up (mean, 43 ± 54 months), available in 61 of the 68 patients (89.7%), revealed three (4.4%) recurrences. CONCLUSIONS: This large, single-institution series demonstrates that a multispecialty team combining two surgical skill sets for the treatment of this rare, challenging condition yields unparalleled low complication rates with short operative times. This approach, including long-term surveillance for recurrent disease, should be considered to optimize outcomes of CBT resection.

Presentation, surgical intervention, and long-term survival in patients with Marfan syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS) often present with acute catastrophic aortic events at a young age and have a shortened life span. This study examines the impact of presentation and demographics on late survival in patients with MFS. METHODS: Adults with confirmed MFS in our thoracic aortic center dataset were identified and statistical analysis performed to identify the incidence and predictors of aortic interventions and late mortality. RESULTS: We identified 301 patients with a MFS initial diagnosis at age 17 years (interquartile range, 4-30 years) with presentation into our thoracic aortic center at 21 years (interquartile range, 8-34 years). The average follow-up in our center was 10 ± 10 years. Clinical features were 41% male, 86% white race, coronary artery disease 28%, hypertension 40%, peripheral vascular disease 19%, and anti-impulse agent in 51% (ß-blocker, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker, calcium channel blocker). Distribution of operative aortic pathology was isolated to the ascending aorta (70%) and descending aorta (8%). One hundred seventy-eight patients (59%) required primary aortic surgery (36% emergent). Primary procedures were cardiac (aortic valve/root) in nature in 94%. Seventy-four patients (42%) required multiple aortic procedures at a mean of 9.2 ± 6.9 years, involving the thoracoabdominal aorta in 65%, thoracic aorta in 37%, and abdominal aorta in 21%. Patients who required multiple aortic procedures were more likely (P < .05) to have coronary artery disease (50% vs 30%), and peripheral vascular disease (43% vs 18%). Multiple aortic procedures were also more likely (P < .05) in patients who developed de novo distal dissection (14% vs 0%), had prior dissection (47% vs 18%), or unknown MFS at the time of the initial procedure (27% vs 63%). Multivariable analysis identified prior dissection as an independent predictor of need for emergent surgery (odds ratio, 13.20; 95% confidence interval, 4.64-37.30; P < .05), as well as additional aortic surgery (odds ratio, 4.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.87-10.50; P < .05). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed similar 10-year survival with or without aortic interventions (82% with vs 89% without; P = .08). Late survival was decreased in patients undergoing emergent initial procedures (66% vs 89%; P < .01), as well as those undergoing multiple operations (74% vs 86%; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that, in the modern era, the mode of presentation and need for multiple procedures have a detrimental impact on late survival. Additionally, the presence of acute or chronic dissection predicts the need for additional aortic procedures during follow-up.

Contralateral Occlusion and Concomitant Procedures Drive Risk of Non-ipsilateral Stroke After Carotid Endarterectomy.

OBJECTIVES: Stroke after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been assessed widely. However, factors enhancing non-ipsilateral stroke risk are poorly defined. The aim of this study was to identify drivers of 30 day non-ipsilateral stroke after CEA in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) and assess long-term survival based on laterality of post-operative stroke. METHODS: The VQI was queried between April 1, 2003, and March 31, 2017, for all CEA. Bilateral carotid procedures within 30 days were excluded. Thirty day non-ipsilateral strokes were identified. Factors were examined to discriminate between patients with and without non-ipsilateral stroke. Univariable analysis followed by multivariable logistic regression was performed. Kaplan-Meier and log rank methods were used to estimate and compare survival. RESULTS: During this 14 year period, 80,230 CEA in 74,928 patients met the criteria. The average age was 70.3 ± 9.3 years. Most were male (48,506; 60%), Caucasian (73,967; 92%), smokers (60,543; 76%), and asymptomatic (43,074; 54%). Contralateral stenosis ≥70% was present in 8033 (10%) with 2239 (3%) having contralateral occlusion. In 491 (0.6%) patients, peri-operative non-ipsilateral stroke occurred. After characterising univariable associations, logistic regression identified independent drivers of non-ipsilateral stroke after CEA. Operative urgency (p = .001), symptomatic disease (p < .001) and contralateral occlusion (p = .001) were pre-operative drivers. Operative predictors included shunt use (p = .008), CEA with cardiac surgery (p = .013), and CEA with concomitant proximal ipsilateral endovascular intervention (p = .01). Use of dextran (p = .005) and anti-angiotensin therapy (p = .03) were protective. Reperfusion syndrome (p < .001), re-exploration (p < .001), myocardial infarction (p < .001), and intravenous treatment of hypotension (p < .001) or hypertension (p < .001) were post-operative correlates. Non-ipsilateral stroke 30 day mortality was less than ipsilateral stroke (6.1% vs. 10.3%; p = .007). Five year survival after non-ipsilateral stroke was 73%, and no different from ipsilateral stroke 76% (p = .16). Both were worse than without stroke (88%; p < .001). CONCLUSION: Non-ipsilateral stroke after CEA is rare. Features driving risk surround global disease burden, combined procedures, and haemodynamic fluctuations. Contralateral occlusion independently increases non-ipsilateral stroke risk. Regardless of laterality or location, effects of stroke after CEA on long-term survival are similar.

The effect of combining coronary bypass with carotid endarterectomy in patients with unrevascularized severe coronary disease.

OBJECTIVE: Management of significant carotid stenosis in those with symptomatic coronary disease remains controversial. Staged and combined carotid endarterectomy (CEA) with coronary artery bypass grafting has been described. Yet, an understanding of the additive risks of these approaches is poor. This study sought to assess outcomes in patients with clinically relevant coronary disease undergoing either isolated CEA (ICEA) or combined CEA and coronary artery bypass (concurrent coronary artery bypass [CCAB]). METHODS: All CEAs in the Vascular Quality Initiative from 2003 to 2017 were reviewed. CCABs were identified, as were ICEAs in patients with unrevascularized stable angina, unstable angina, or myocardial infarction (MI) within 6 months of operation. CCABs were compared with ICEAs as well as with a risk-matched cohort of ICEAs. Primary outcomes included perioperative stroke, all-cause death, MI, and these as composite (SDM). Univariate analysis and logistic regression were performed. RESULTS: There were 4042 patients identified, including 2582 ICEA patients (64%) and 1460 CCAB patients (36%); 61% were male, 91% were white, and 39% had symptomatic carotid disease. Overall stroke was 3.5%, death 1.8%, and SDM 6.0%. ICEA had higher rates of postoperative MI (1.9% vs 0.9%; P = .01) but lower rates of stroke (2.8% vs 4.7%; P = .002), death (1.0% vs 3.0%; P < .001), and SDM (5.1% vs 7.5%; P = .002). After regression, predictors of SDM were congestive heart failure (odds ratio [OR], 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-2.4; P < .001), urgent operation (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2-2.2; P = .001), and CCAB (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.01-1.7; P = .04). After propensity matching, ICEA continued to have higher rates of perioperative MI (2.6% vs 1.0%; P = .01) and lower rates of death (1.0% vs 3.0%; P = .001). However, there were no longer differences in stroke (3.2% vs 4.6%; P = .10) or SDM (6.3% vs 7.8%; P = .18). Within the matched cohort, predictors of SDM included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1-2.2; P = .01), congestive heart failure (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1-2.5; P = .01), and symptomatic carotid disease (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.03-2.1; P = .03). CCAB was not significant (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.9-1.8; P = .18). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with unrevascularized, clinically relevant coronary disease, CCAB reduces operative MI but increases risk of stroke and death. After risk adjustment, MI remains higher in ICEA, but differences in 30-day stroke and SDM between ICEA and CCAB are no longer appreciated. These data suggest that CEA risk undertaken in patients with unrevascularized coronary disease is not inconsequential, and outcomes are similar to those of CCAB.

Regional variation in use and outcomes of combined carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass.

OBJECTIVE: In treating concomitant carotid and coronary disease, some recommend staged carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and coronary artery bypass grafting, whereas others favor the combined approach (CCAB). Pressure to reduce surgical variation and to improve quality is real, yet little is known about how geographic practice differences affect outcomes. Using the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI), this study evaluated regional variation in use and outcomes of CCAB. METHODS: All CCAB procedures in the VQI from 2003 to 2017 were reviewed and stratified into four regions, as defined by the United States Census Bureau. Primary outcomes included perioperative stroke, death, myocardial infarction (MI), and these as composite (SDM). A χ2 analysis was performed. RESULTS: There were 1495 CCAB procedures identified, representing 1.8% of the VQI CEAs. Regions included the following: Midwest (MW), 32%; Northeast (NE), 39%; South (S), 25%; and West (W), 4%. Most were male (70%) and white (92%). There was significant regional variation in proportional volume of CCABs to all CEAs (0.7% [W] to 2.5% [MW]; P < .001). Regional variation in patch use (78% [W] to 93% [MW]; P < .001), shunting (29% [W] to 71% [MW]; P < .001), and electroencephalography monitoring (13% [W] to 52% [NE]; P < .001) was also significant. Overall perioperative stroke was 3.6%; death, 3.0%; and SDM, 6.8%. No regional difference was seen in outcomes of mortality (1.5% [MW] to 4.2% [NE]; P = .05), stroke (2.8% [NE] to 4.4% [MW]; P = .52), and MI (0.6% [MW] to 1.8% [W]; P = .62). When the Bonferroni correction was used, there remained no difference in stroke, MI, or SDM across regions, but mortality became significant. Using the Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines for consideration of CCAB, the minority of patients fell within the symptomatic carotid stenosis (SYMP, 15%; n = 218) or severe (≥70%) asymptomatic bilateral carotid disease (BIL, 18%; n = 267) categories. The most common indication was asymptomatic unilateral severe carotid stenosis (UNI, 37%; n = 552). There were no differences in regional outcomes stratified by indication (SYMP, BIL, UNI). Overall, when SYMP and BIL were compared with UNI, UNI had lower rates of stroke (2.4% vs 4.9%; P = .03) but similar MI (0.7% vs 1.2%; P = .40) and mortality (2.2% vs 2.5%; P = .75). CONCLUSIONS: Significant variation exists across VQI centers in the use of CCAB. Despite differences in volume and practices, regional perioperative outcomes are similar. UNI is the most commonly used indication and has lower stroke rates relative to SYMP and BIL. CCAB is performed well across the United States, but most patients fall outside of Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines.

Durability of open surgical repair of type I-III thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm.

OBJECTIVE: Early outcomes and late mortality after open repair of extent I to III thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) are described, but late graft and aortic events are seldom detailed. This study investigated long-term aortic and graft outcomes as these data are increasingly important as endovascular repair matures. METHODS: During 28 years, 516 patients underwent repair (type I, n = 177 [34%]; type II, n = 100 [20%]; type III, n = 239 [46%]). Patients were monitored for late events. Late aortic events were defined as native aortic disease leading to death or further intervention. Planned secondary procedures were excluded. Graft complications included anastomotic aneurysm, graft infection, and branch occlusions. Variables were assessed for association with end points using log-rank methods and Cox proportional hazards regression. Time-to-event analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS: In-hospital death occurred in 40 patients (8%), leaving 476 for surveillance. Mean age was 69.8 ± 10.5 years. Mean follow-up was 4.9 ± 4.6 years. Repair conduct included distal aortic perfusion and motor evoked potential monitoring (n = 169 [35.5%]), clamp and sew (n = 307 [64.5%]), and selectively applied in-line mesenteric shunting (n = 172 [36.1%]). At the time of repair, 117 patients (24.6%) had 122 synchronous, noncontiguous aortic aneurysms. There were 98 late aortic and graft events in 89 patients (18.7%); 62 aortic-related events occurred in 56 patients (12%; elective repair, n = 47; emergent repair, n = 14; type A dissection, n = 1) at a mean of 4.4 ± 4.2 years after repair. Variables independently predictive of an aortic event were aortic clamp time (hazard ratio [HR], 1.02/min; P = .001), type III extent (HR, 2.5; P = .008), and expansion of retained aorta (HR, 10.4; P < .0005). There were 33 patients (7%) who experienced 36 graft-related events (anastomotic aneurysm, n = 14 [3% of cohort; aortic, n = 7; visceral patch, n = 6; side graft, n = 1]; graft infection, n = 12; renovisceral occlusion/repair, n = 9 [1.9%; side-arm graft, n = 8; native, n = 1]; and anastomotic stricture, n = 1) occurring at 4.7 ± 4.5 years. Variables predictive of graft-related complication were type II extent (HR, 3.4; P = .002) and distal aortic perfusion and motor evoked potential monitoring (HR, 3.6; P = .02). Freedom from aortic- or graft-related event was 80% at 5 years. Freedom from any aortic or graft reintervention was 84% at 5 years. Aortic-related mortality after discharge was 2.7% and estimated to be 3.1% at 5 years. Overall survival was 67% and 44% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: After type I-III TAAA repair, late aortic and graft-related events occur in 19% of patients. Native aortic disease sequelae are more common than graft complication. Aortic events are predicted by complex operation and degree of remaining aorta. Extensive reconstruction drives graft-related events. Ultimately, reintervention is rare and aorta-related mortality low. These findings verify durability of extensive TAAA repair, serving as benchmarks for endovascular repair.

Durability of open surgical repair of type IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm.

OBJECTIVE: Perioperative outcomes and late mortality after open type IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair are known, yet risk of late graft and subsequent aortic events is infrequently described. Such data are increasingly important as endovascular repair becomes an option and are the subject of this study. METHODS: During a 27-year interval, 233 patients underwent open surgical repair of type IV TAAA. Surviving patients were monitored for late aortic or graft-related events. Late aortic events were defined as native aortic disease unrelated to the prior reconstruction leading to death or further intervention. Graft-related complications included anastomotic aneurysm, graft infection, and branch occlusion. Variables were assessed for association with study end points using univariate log-rank methods and Cox proportional hazards regression. Time-to-event analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier techniques. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality occurred in 7 patients (3%), leaving 226 available for surveillance. Mean age was 72 ± 9 years; 50 patients (21%) had 52 synchronous, noncontiguous aortic aneurysms at time of repair (n = 11 ascending aorta/arch; n = 41 descending thoracic aorta). Mean follow-up was 4.3 ± 3.7 years (median, 3.5 years; interquartile range, 5 years). Aortic events (n = 19 [8%]) included elective aortic repair (n = 15), emergent repair (n = 2), and atheroembolic embolization (n = 2) at a mean of 2.6 ± 2.2 years after type IV TAAA repair. There were 17 patients (8%) who experienced graft-related events (renovisceral occlusion [n = 10; 4% of cohort], anastomotic aneurysm repair [n = 5], graft infection [n = 1], and graft-caval fistula [n = 1]) occurring at 1.7 ± 1.9 years after repair. Variables independently predictive of an aortic event were initial rupture (hazard ratio, 5.6; P = .02) and native aortic expansion during surveillance (hazard ratio, 3.9; P = .04). No independent predictors of graft-related complication were identified. Freedom from an aortic or graft-related event was 93% at 1 year and 66% at 5 years. Freedom from graft or aortic reintervention was 86% at 5 years. Aortic-related mortality in follow-up was 2% and estimated to be 5% at 5 years after type IV TAAA repair. Overall survival was 92% and 66% at 1 year and 5 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: After open type IV TAAA repair, late aortic and graft-related events are uncommon. Native aortic disease sequelae and graft complications occur with equal frequency and with similar temporal relation to repair. Need for reintervention is infrequent, and aortic-related mortality is low. These findings verify durability of open type IV TAAA repair and serve as long-term comparative results for endovascular repair.

A Regional Experience with Carotid Endarterectomy in Patients with a History of Neck Radiation.

BACKGROUND: Historically, a history of neck radiation has been considered as an anatomic risk factor for poor outcomes after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). However, this is based on small and primarily single institution reports with few comparative series. This study uses a regional quality database to compare perioperative outcomes of CEA in patients with and without a history of neck radiation (RAD and NORAD, respectively). METHODS: The Vascular Study Group of New England database was queried for all CEA from 2003 to 2017. The RAD group included a history of neck radiation. Primary end points included perioperative stroke (30-day), myocardial infarction (MI) (in-hospital), death (30-day), a composite end point including major adverse events (MAEs: stroke, MI, and death), and long-term survival. RESULTS: Overall, 18,832 patients underwent CEA (18,551 NORAD, 281 RAD). Baseline demographics differed in the following: the RAD group more frequently had a history of contralateral carotid artery stenting (1.4% vs. 0.3%, P = 0.009), anatomic high risk features (12.8% vs. 1.3%, P < 0.001), and contralateral carotid occlusion (5.3% vs. 2.4%, P = 0.005). The NORAD cohort comprised mostly women (38.9% vs. 29.5%, P < 0.001), had American Society of Anesthesiologists class 4 or 5 (8.0% vs. 4.6%, P = 0.035), had higher body mass index (28.3 ± 5.6 vs. 27.1 ± 5.4, P < 0.001), on a beta blocker preoperatively (68.0% vs. 62.3%, P = 0.042), and had major cardiovascular comorbidities including coronary artery disease (29.6% vs. 22.1%, P = 0.006). There were no differences in the percent stenosis, proportion symptomatic (37.4% vs. 34.2%, P = 0.259), use of preoperative antiplatelet agents or statins. Electroencephalography monitoring was more frequently used in RAD (54.5% vs. 46.0%, P = 0.005). There was no difference in perioperative complications, including stroke (RAD 0.4% vs. NORAD 0.7%, P > 0.999), MI (0.4% vs. 0.9%, P = 0.736), death (0.7% vs. 0.6%, P = 0.683), MAE (2.1% vs. 2.2%, P > 0.999), or long-term survival (79.9% vs. 85.0%, P = 0.357). When only symptomatic or asymptomatic stenosis was considered, there remained no difference in primary end points. However, perioperative neurologic events (transient ischemic attack or stroke) was higher in symptomatic RAD versus symptomatic NORAD (6.7% vs. 2.6%, P = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: This regional experience with CEA in RAD patients shows similar perioperative morbidity, mortality, and long-term survival when compared with CEA for standard surgical patients (NORAD). Symptomatic presentation was associated with higher perioperative neurologic events, but this was not reflected in stroke rates. RAD is not always a contraindication to CEA and select patients can expect outcomes comparable to standard surgical patients.

Addition of proximal intervention to carotid endarterectomy increases risk of stroke and death.

OBJECTIVE: Adding ipsilateral, proximal endovascular (IPE) intervention to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for the treatment of tandem bifurcation and supra-aortic trunk disease is controversial. Some suggest that this combined strategy (CEA + IPE) confers no risk over isolated CEA (ICEA). Others disagree, reserving CEA + IPE for symptomatic patients. Using the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI), this study assessed the effect of adding IPE to CEA on stroke and death risk. We further weighed CEA + IPE outcomes in the context of symptomatic status and Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines. METHODS: All CEAs in the VQI database from 2003 to 2017 were reviewed. Urgent and redo CEAs were excluded. CEA + IPE procedures were identified. To isolate the effect of IPE, patients undergoing other concurrent procedures were removed, providing an ICEA cohort. Primary end points were perioperative (30-day) stroke and death. Univariate and logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: After exclusion and identification of CEA + IPE, 66,519 procedures were available for analysis. Of these, 66,115 represented ICEA and 404 represented CEA + IPE. Most patients (60%) were male, 93% were white, and 41% were symptomatic. Average age was 70 ± 9 years. Those undergoing CEA + IPE were more likely to be female (50% vs 40%; P < .001) and smokers (87% vs 76%; P < .001), and they were more likely to have coronary artery disease (32% vs 27%; P = .04), congestive heart failure (14% vs 10%; P = .01), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (30% vs 22%; P < .001). ICEA patients were more likely to have severe ipsilateral stenosis (86% vs 80%; P = .002) and to undergo intraoperative shunting (53% vs 49%; P = .05). There was no difference in 30-day mortality between cohorts (1% vs 1%; P = .23). However, CEA + IPE had higher rates of perioperative stroke (3.0% vs 1.4%; P = .01) and combined 30-day stroke and death (3.5% vs 1.8%; P = .02). When patients were stratified by symptomatic status, there were no differences in primary end points between cohorts in asymptomatic patients. In symptomatic patients, CEA + IPE carried significantly higher stroke (4.9% vs 1.9%; P = .002) and stroke and death risk (6.0% vs 2.4%; P = .002). After risk adjustment, predictors of stroke and death were diabetes (odds ratio [OR], 1.2; P = .001), symptomatic status (OR, 1.7; P < .001), and CEA + IPE (OR, 1.9; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of IPE to CEA confers increased stroke and death risk over ICEA. Risk is largely in symptomatic patients. Although CEA + IPE increases risk compared with ICEA, overall risk remains low. Based on this VQI analysis, CEA + IPE outcomes for asymptomatic patients fall within Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines for ICEA. Those for symptomatic patients do not, and consideration should be given to other surgical bypass, cerebral protection, and staged strategies.

Risk factor profile and anatomic features of previously asymptomatic patients presenting with carotid-related stroke.

OBJECTIVE: Although carotid atherosclerotic-mediated stroke remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality, some have suggested intervention in carotid stenosis should be limited to symptomatic patients given the advances in medical therapy. The present study was conducted to assess the atherosclerotic risk factor profiles, anatomic features, and clinical outcomes of previously asymptomatic patients admitted with stroke of carotid etiology. METHODS: We reviewed the data from 3382 patients admitted to a tertiary referral center with an ischemic stroke during 2005 to 2015. We focused on patients admitted with a radiographically confirmed infarct ipsilateral to a documented carotid artery stenosis ≥50%, with the admitting neurology team adjudicating the stroke etiology as carotid related. Patients were excluded if they had had a previous transient ischemic attack, previous infarct ipsilateral to any carotid lesion, or previous carotid revascularization, intracranial hemorrhage, or malignancy. Patient demographic data, medical treatments before stroke, stroke admission carotid imaging, and stroke treatments and outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 219 carotid stroke patients (7% of all strokes) were identified, of whom 61% were white and 66% were men, with a mean age of 68 ± 12 years. Hypertension (79%) and smoking (33% current; 29% former) were predominant risk factors. On admission, 50% were receiving antiplatelet therapy (aspirin, n = 92 [41%]; clopidogrel, n = 9 [4%]; dual therapy, n = 11 [5%]) and 55% were receiving lipid-lowering agents (statin, n = 115 [53%]; other, n = 6 [2%]); 77 patients (35%) were receiving both antiplatelet and lipid-lowering therapy. Of the 219 patients, 156 (71%) presented with a moderate or severe stroke (National Institutes of Health stroke scale ≥5 at admission), 54 (25%) received lytic therapy, 96 (43%) presented with an occluded ipsilateral internal carotid artery, and 117 (53%) ultimately underwent carotid revascularization at a median of 4 days. Individuals receiving both antiplatelet and lipid-lowering therapy were significantly less likely to experience a moderate or severe stroke (44% vs 78%; P = .006). CONCLUSIONS: Internal carotid artery occlusion is the culprit lesion in 43% of carotid-related strokes in those without previous symptoms. Previously asymptomatic patients not receiving combined antiplatelet and lipid-lowering medical therapy presenting with carotid-related stroke are significantly more likely to experience a severe, debilitating stroke. However, those receiving appropriate risk-reduction medical therapy are still at risk of carotid-mediated stroke. These results suggest medical therapy alone is unlikely to be sufficient stroke prevention for patients with significant carotid stenosis.

Use of extracorporeal bypass is associated with improved outcomes in open thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: There is no consensus on the use or benefit of extracorporeal circulation (EC) during aneurysm repair of the descending thoracic aorta (DTA) or thoracoabdominal aorta (TAA). We evaluated the role of EC during DTA or TAA aneurysm repair using U.S. Medicare data. METHODS: Medicare (2004-2007) patients undergoing open repair of nonruptured DTA or TAA aneurysm were identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision code. Specific exclusions included ascending aortic or arch repairs, concomitant cardiac procedures, and procedures employing deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. The impact of EC (code 3961) on early and late outcomes was analyzed using univariate analysis and multivariable regression. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS: There were 4230 patients who had repair of intact DTA or TAA aneurysms, 2433 (57%) of which employed EC. Differences in baseline clinical features of EC and non-EC patients showed that patients undergoing aortic reconstruction with EC were older (73 ± 1 years vs 72 ± 1 years; P = .002), were more likely to be female (53% vs 47%; P < .001), and had more hypertension (56% vs 53%; P = .02); they had less chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (28% vs 34%; P < .0001), peripheral vascular disease (5.7% vs 11.3%; P < .001), and chronic kidney disease (7.7% vs 5.5%; P = .003). The 30-day mortality (9.7% for EC vs 12.2%; P = .02) and any major complication (49% for EC vs 58%; P < .001) were significantly reduced with EC use. EC use was associated with a shorter length of stay (13.5 ± 13 days vs 17.2 ± 18 days; P < .01) and lower total hospital charges ($151,000 ± 140,000 vs $180,000 ± 190,000; P < .01) compared with non-EC patients. EC patients were more likely to be discharged home instead of to an extended care facility (67% vs 56%; P < .01). Multivariable regression modeling to adjust for baseline clinical differences showed EC to independently reduce the risk of operative mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-0.97; P = .02), any complication (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.59-0.76; P < .01), pulmonary complications (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.59-0.79; P < .01), and acute renal failure (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.44-0.61; P < .01). Long-term survival was higher (log-rank, P < .01) in EC patients at 1 year (81% ± 0.8% vs 73% ± 1%) and 5 years (67% ± 1% vs 52% ± 1%). Risk-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression also showed that EC was independently associated with improved long-term survival (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.63-0.74; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Although important clinical variables such as DTA or TAA aneurysm extent and spinal cord ischemic complications cannot be assessed with the Medicare database, EC use during open DTA and TAA aneurysm repair is associated with improved late survival and a significant reduction in operative mortality, morbidity, and procedural costs. These data indicate that EC should be a more widely applied adjunct in open DTA or TAA aneurysm repair.

Risk and outcome profile of carotid endarterectomy with proximal intervention is concerning in multi-institutional assessment.

OBJECTIVE: Approaching tandem bifurcation and brachiocephalic disease using carotid endarterectomy (CEA) with ipsilateral proximal endovascular intervention (IPE) has been promulgated as safe and durable. There have been recent concerns about neurologic risk with this technique. The goal of this study was to define stroke and perioperative risk with this uncommon procedure across multiple centers. METHODS: Between August 2002 and July 2016, patients who underwent CEA + IPE were identified by operative records at three institutions. Primary end points were perioperative stroke and death, restenosis, freedom from neurologic event, and need for reintervention. Factors related to these end points were analyzed. RESULTS: There were 62 patients who underwent CEA + IPE. The average age was 69 ± 9 years. Most were female 34 (55%); 56 (90%) were taking a statin and at least one antiplatelet agent. Bilateral internal carotid stenosis (>50%) was present in 32 (52%); 26 (42%) patients were symptomatic and 12 (19%) had undergone prior ipsilateral CEA. Bifurcation operations included longitudinal CEA/patch (38 [61%]), eversion CEA (20 [32%]), bypass graft (3 [5%]), and CEA/primary repair (1 [2%]). CEA was performed first in 53 (85%). All IPEs included stenting, with a single stent used in 58 (94%). Balloon-expandable stents were placed in the majority of patients (51 [82%]). Proximal arteries treated included the innominate (20 [32%]), left common carotid (32 [52%]), right common carotid (8 [13%]) and both innominate and right common carotid (2 [3%]). IPE was protected by carotid cross-clamp in 48 (77%). Shunting occurred in 14 (23%). There were four (6.5%) perioperative ipsilateral strokes and two hyperperfusion events. There were three (4.8%) operative deaths, one from stroke and two cardiovascular. Combined stroke and death rate was 11.3% and was not different between centers. Mean clinical follow-up was 6 ± 4 years. Mean imaging follow-up was 3 ± 4 years. Restenosis ≥50% at either intervention occurred in 20 (34%). Reintervention was performed for five proximal and three bifurcation failures (14%). Symptomatic status, redo operation, carotid clamp protection, multiple stents, and procedural order were not associated with operative stroke. Carotid clamp protection was associated with less restenosis (P = .003). Redo operation (P = .04) and hyperlipidemia (P = .05) were associated with reintervention. The 5-year actuarial survival was 81%, whereas freedom from stroke and reintervention were 94% and 81%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative stroke and death with CEA + IPE are substantial and consistent across centers. It is strikingly different from isolated CEA or CEA added to open brachiocephalic reconstruction. Restenosis is frequent, and reintervention at either the proximal stent or bifurcation is common. This technical strategy should be used cautiously and selectively reserved for those who are symptomatic with hemodynamically relevant tandem lesions and unfit for open revascularization.

Aneurysm sac expansion is independently associated with late mortality in patients treated with endovascular aneurysm repair.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysms can exhibit variations in sac behavior ranging from complete regression to expansion. We evaluated the impact of sac behavior at 1-year follow-up on late survival. METHODS: We used the Vascular Study Group of New England (VSGNE) registry from 2003 to 2011 to identify EVAR patients with 1-year computed tomography follow-up. Aneurysm sac enlargement ≥5 mm (sac expansion) and decrease ≥5 mm (sac regression) were defined per Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines. Predictors of change in sac diameter and impact of sac behavior on long-term mortality were assessed by multivariable methods. RESULTS: Of 2437 patients who underwent EVAR, 1802 (74%) had complete 1-year follow-up data and were included in the study. At 1 year, 162 (9%) experienced sac expansion, 709 (39%) had a stable sac, and 931 (52%) experienced sac regression. Sac expansion was associated with preoperative renal insufficiency (odds ratio [OR], 3.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-8.0; P < .01), urgent repair (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.4-5.1; P < .01), hypogastric coverage (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1-2.7; P = .02), and type I/III (OR, 16.8; 95% CI, 7.3-39.0; P < .001) or type II (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 2.0-4.3; P < .001) endoleak at follow-up, and sac expansion was inversely associated with smoking (OR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.4-0.96; P = .03) and baseline aneurysm diameter (OR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.6-0.9; P < .001). Sac regression (vs expansion or stable sac) was associated with female gender (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.4-2.4; P < .001) and larger baseline aneurysm diameter (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.2-1.5; P < .001) and inversely associated with type I/III (OR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.1-0.5; P < .01) or type II endoleak at follow-up (OR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.2-0.3; P < .001). After risk-adjusted Cox regression, sac expansion was independently associated with late mortality (hazard ratio, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-2.0; P = .01), even with adjustment for reinterventions and endoleak during follow-up. Sac regression was associated with lower late mortality (hazard ratio, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.5-0.7; P < .001). Long-term survival was lower (log-rank, P < .001) in patients with sac expansion (98% 1-year and 68% 5-year survival) compared with all others (99% 1-year and 83% 5-year survival). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that an abdominal aortic aneurysm sac diameter increase of at least 5 mm at 1 year, although infrequent, is independently associated with late mortality regardless of the presence or absence of endoleak and warrants close observation and perhaps early intervention.

Medical management of acute superficial vein thrombosis of the saphenous vein.

OBJECTIVE: Acute superficial vein thrombosis (SVT) of the axial veins, such as the great saphenous vein (GSV), is a common clinical condition that carries with it significant risk of propagation of thrombus, recurrence, and, most concerning, subsequent venous thromboembolism (VTE). Conservative therapy with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medication and heat does not prevent extension of thrombus or protect against recurrent or future VTE in patients with extensive SVT (thrombotic segment of at least 5 cm in length). To prevent future thromboembolic events, anticoagulation has become the treatment of choice for extensive acute SVT in the GSV. In spite of this, the dose and duration of anticoagulation in the treatment of SVT vary widely. This review summarizes the evidence from large prospective, randomized clinical trials on the treatment of SVT with anticoagulation (vs placebo or different doses and durations of anticoagulation) with respect to the outcome measures of thrombus extension, SVT recurrence, and future VTE. METHODS: A systematic search was performed using the MEDLINE database to identify all prospective, randomized controlled trials of treatment with anticoagulation in patients with SVT in the GSV. Six prospective, randomized trials were identified that met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed in detail. RESULTS: Treatment of acute SVT was most commonly managed in an outpatient setting using either low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in four studies or, alternatively, a factor Xa inhibitor in one large multicenter trial. LMWH was associated with a lower rate of thrombus extension and subsequent recurrence, especially when an intermediate dose (defined as a dose between prophylactic and therapeutic doses) was used for a period of 30 days. The full effect of treatment with LMWH on the risk of subsequent VTE remains unclear, as do the optimal dose and duration of this drug. Prophylactic doses of fondaparinux, a factor Xa inhibitor, were found to be beneficial in reducing the rate of thrombus extension and recurrence as well as in reducing the risk of subsequent VTE both during treatment and after cessation of anticoagulation in the short term. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that treatment of acute SVT of the GSV with anticoagulation, at doses below therapeutic levels, does offer the benefit of decreased risk of thrombus propagation, recurrence, and, at least in one large randomized clinical trial, subsequent VTE. Future studies to refine optimal dose and duration of anticoagulation to lower the rate of subsequent thromboembolic events and SVT recurrence are needed.

Characterization of perioperative contralateral stroke after carotid endarterectomy.

OBJECTIVE: Contralateral stroke is an infrequent cause of perioperative stroke after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Whereas the risks of ipsilateral stroke complicating CEA have been discriminated, factors that lead to contralateral stroke are poorly defined. The purpose of this study was to identify the risk of perioperative (30-day) contralateral stroke after CEA as well as predisposing preoperative and operative factors. Its specific effect on long-term survival was interrogated. METHODS: The Vascular Study Group of New England (VSGNE) was queried from April 1, 2003, to February 29, 2016, for all CEAs. Duplicated patients and those without complete data were excluded. Patients sustaining contralateral stroke after CEA in the 30-day postoperative period were identified. Demographic, preoperative, and operative factors were analyzed to identify discriminators between those with and those without contralateral stroke. Logistic regression modeling was performed to identify factors independently associated with contralateral stroke. The effect of contralateral stroke on 5-year survival was compared with patients with ipsilateral stroke and no stroke using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank testing compared survival curves. RESULTS: There were 10,837 CEAs performed during the study. Average age was 70.4 ± 9.3 years; 6605 (61%) patients were male, and 40% (n = 4324) were performed for symptoms. Most were current or former smokers (n = 8619 [80%]). Coronary artery disease and congestive heart failure were identified in 31% and 8.6%, respectively. Overall, there were 190 strokes within 30 days of CEA (1.8%); 131 were ipsilateral (1.3%), and 59 (0.5%) patients were identified as having contralateral perioperative stroke. Thirteen patients sustained bilateral stroke (0.1%). Significant univariate associations included urgency (P = .0001), ipsilateral stenosis severity (P = .004), length of operation (P = .0001), CEA with coronary artery bypass graft (P = .0001), CEA with other arterial surgery (P = .01), and CEA with proximal endovascular procedure (P = .03). Contralateral occlusion (P = .06) and degree of contralateral carotid stenosis (P = .14) did not correlate. After logistic regression analysis of significant univariate anatomic and operative factors, length of procedure (odds ratio [OR], 1.08/15 minutes; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.15; P = .02), urgency of operation (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.3-4.6; P = .006), and concomitant proximal endovascular intervention (OR, 8.7; 95% CI, 4.5-31.2; P = .001) remained predictors of contralateral stroke after CEA. Occurrence of both ipsilateral (P < .001) and contralateral (P = .023) stroke significantly reduced 5-year survival compared with those without stroke. There was no difference in the negative survival effect based on laterality of stroke (P = .24). CONCLUSIONS: Contralateral stroke after CEA is rare, affecting 0.5% of patients. Traditional risk reduction medical therapy does not affect occurrence. Degree of contralateral stenosis, including contralateral occlusion, does not predict perioperative contralateral stroke. Urgency of operation, length of operation, and performance of concomitant, ipsilateral endovascular intervention predict contralateral stroke risk with CEA. Contralateral stroke affects long-term survival similar to ipsilateral stroke after CEA.

The Natural History and Outcomes of Endovascular Therapy for Claudication.

BACKGROUND: The natural history of claudication is well-characterized and traditional therapy includes risk factor modification and exercise protocols with revascularization reserved for patients who are severely impaired. However, the reduced periprocedural morbidity with endovascular therapy has led physicians to broaden the indications for intervention for peripheral artery disease, and more claudicants are undergoing procedures for disease that is moderately limiting to their lifestyle. This study sought to assess the natural history of patients who have undergone peripheral vascular intervention for claudication. METHODS: All patients who underwent at least 1 peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) for claudication at a single institution from January 2007 to December 2013 were identified. Patient demographics were assessed using the hospital record. Outcomes included secondary endovascular intervention, secondary bypass intervention, amputation, and survival. Cox proportional hazards models were created to assess risk factors for further intervention. RESULTS: Five hundred fifteen patients were identified as having undergone PVI for claudication during the study period. Forty-three percent were female, 37% had diabetes, 31% had coronary artery disease, 26% were current smokers, 6.6% had congestive heart failure, 8.2% had a tibial lesion that was intervened upon, and 35% had a Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus Document (TASC) II C/D lesion. Actuarial survival at 5 years was 79.9% and 62.5% of patients had primary patency. The limb salvage rate was 97.2%. Over the follow-up period, 21.8% required some type of further intervention: either endovascular (17.7%) or open bypass (7.2%). A Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for age, sex, and other comorbidities showed that the two largest risk factors for requiring reintervention were angioplasty only (no stent; hazard ratio [HR] 1.36, P = 0.02) and TASC C/D lesion (HR 1.52, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: With 5-year follow-up, patients have a primary patency that is comparable to an open prosthetic bypass to an above knee target. In addition, the secondary patency rate was over 90% and the major amputation rate as less than 3%. The presence of a TASC C/D lesion was predictive of failure of endovascular therapy, and surgical bypass should be considered in these patients.

The presentation and management of aneurysms of the pancreaticoduodenal arcade.

OBJECTIVE: Gastroduodenal artery aneurysms (GDAAs) and pancreaticoduodenal artery aneurysms (PDAAs) are uncommon lesions associated, however, with a significant risk of rupture. This study describes the clinical presentation, associated imaging findings, and operative strategies for these aneurysms. METHODS: The records of all patients with GDAAs or PDAAs identified through an institutional database by axial imaging between 1994 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Data on presenting symptoms, comorbid conditions, imaging findings, and outcomes after operative intervention were collected and examined. RESULTS: We identified 11 GDAAs and 25 PDAAs in 35 patients. Mean size of the GDAAs was 31.1 mm (range, 10-60 mm) and mean size of the PDAAs was 19.1 mm (range, 10-48 mm). At presentation, 13 aneurysms (36%) were symptomatic and seven aneurysms (19.4%) were ruptured. Median size of ruptured aneurysms was 20 mm (range, 10-60 mm). On axial imaging, 24 aneurysms (67%) were associated with a severe stenosis or occlusion of the celiac axis origin, and 11 aneurysms (31%) were thought to be associated with compression of the celiac axis in the setting of median arcuate ligament syndrome. Twenty-four aneurysms (67%) underwent repair. Of these aneurysms, 18 (75%) were successfully managed with primary endovascular repair (coil embolization with or without celiac stent), whereas endovascular therapy failed in two (8%) and required open repair. Four aneurysms (17%) were treated with primary open repair. Overall 30-day morbidity and mortality after aneurysm repair were 29% and 4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: GDAAs and PDAAs are uncommon lesions that are often associated with a celiac axis stenosis/occlusion leading to altered hemodynamics in the pancreaticoduodenal arcade. These aneurysms are prone to rupture regardless of size, and intervention is accordingly recommended for all aneurysms upon recognition. Despite the concordant celiac axis obstruction and concern for maintenance of hepatic circulation, endovascular repair of these aneurysms is generally successful and should be considered as the initial operative approach.

Chronic Kidney Disease Class Predicts Mortality After Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Propensity-matched Cohorts From the Medicare Population.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) predicts mortality after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. Few studies are adequately powered to stratify outcomes by CKD severity. This study assesses the effect of CKD severity on survival after AAA repair. METHODS: Patients who underwent AAA repair from 2006 to 2007 were retrospectively identified in the Medicare database and stratified by CKD class as follows: normal (CKD class 1 and 2), moderate (CKD class 3), and severe (CKD class 4 and 5). Propensity matching (30:1) by clinical factors and procedure type was performed to derive well-matched comparative cohorts. Primary outcomes were 30-day and long-term mortality; secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay and cost. RESULTS: A total of 47,715 patients were included (96.7% normal, 1.88% moderate, and 1.65% severe). Propensity matching was corrected for differences between cohorts. Thirty-day mortality was higher in moderate (5.7% vs normal 2.5%; P < 0.01) and severe (9.9% vs normal 1.8%; P < 0.01) groups. Hospital length of stay increased with CKD severity (4.4 ±â€Š3.7 days normal vs 6.5 ±â€Š4.2 days moderate CKD; P < 0.01/4.7 ±â€Š3.8 days normal vs 9.1 ±â€Š4.5 days severe CKD; P < 0.01) as did cost ($23 ±â€Š14K normal vs $25 ±â€Š16K moderate; P < 0.01 /$22 ±â€Š11K normal vs $29 ±â€Š22K severe; P < 0.01). Three-year survival favored the normal cohort (80% vs 64% moderate; log rank P < 0.01 /82% normal vs 44% severe; log rank P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: CKD severity is an important predictor of perioperative mortality and long-term survival after AAA repair in propensity-matched cohorts. The 5-fold increase in 30-day mortality and 44% in 3-year survival suggest that elective AAA repair is contraindicated in most severe CKD patients.

Retrograde stenting of proximal lesions with carotid endarterectomy increases risk.

OBJECTIVE: Concomitant carotid bifurcation and proximal ipsilateral arch branch disease is uncommon. A combined approach using carotid endarterectomy (CEA) with ipsilateral proximal endovascular (IPE) intervention (CEA+IPE) has been proposed as safe and durable, with similar results to isolated CEA. This study was conducted to identify diagnostic modalities and outcomes of this uncommon procedure at our institution. METHODS: Operative records were used to identify patients who underwent CEA+IPE between May 2003 and July 2014. Patients were excluded if they underwent open retrograde access for endovascular intervention only, without CEA. The primary end points were freedom from neurologic event and need for reintervention. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (15 women [65%]) underwent CEA+IPE. Mean clinical follow-up was 44 ± 35 months. Average age was 69 ± 9 years. Most patients (22 [96%]) were taking a statin and at least one antiplatelet agent. Bilateral internal carotid stenosis (>50%) was present in 12 patients (52%), and eight (35%) were symptomatic. Seven patients (30%) had prior ipsilateral CEA. All patients underwent preoperative carotid duplex and axial imaging. Computed tomography angiography was the initial imaging assessment in 10 patients (43%). The proximal lesion was identified in 19 (83%) by blunted waveforms on carotid duplex. Most bifurcation operations were CEA with patch (20 [87%]), and 21 (91%) underwent the bifurcation procedure first, followed by IPE. All IPE included balloon-expandable stenting (22 of 23 [96%] bare-metal, 7 [30%] innominate artery, 16 [70%] left common carotid artery). Electroencephalographic changes occurred in two patients (9%). Shunting was used in three (13%). Three vessel dissections (13%) occurred at the IPE site; two required further stenting and one was complicated by stroke and death. There were two perioperative strokes (9%) and one death (4%). Mean imaging follow-up was 30.6. ± 27.2 months, with restenosis identified in five patients (23%; four bifurcation, one IPE in-stent). One patient required open reintervention with subclavian-carotid bypass at 13 months for recurrent transient ischemic attack. The 4-year actuarial survival was 85%. Stroke-free survival and freedom from reintervention were 80% and 90% at 36 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The stroke and death rate for CEA+IPE is higher than that of isolated CEA at our institution. Duplex findings can suggest proximal stenosis; however, confirmation with physical examination in conjunction with axial imaging are integral. This combined treatment strategy should be reserved for those with evident hemodynamically significant proximal stenosis and approached with caution in asymptomatic patients.