Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Dig Dis Sci ; 68(6): 2303-2314, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36929309

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: After COVID-19 restrictions on nonessential procedures were lifted and safety protocols established, utilization rates of endoscopic procedures remained reduced. AIMS: This study assessed patient attitudes and barriers to scheduling endoscopy during the pandemic. METHODS: A survey was administered to patients with ordered procedures at a hospital-based setting (7/21/2020-2/19/2021) collecting demographic data, body mass index, COVID-19 relevant comorbidities, level of procedural urgency (defined by recommended scheduling window), scheduling and attendance, concerns, and awareness of safety measures. RESULTS: The average respondent was female (63.8%), age 57.6 ± 14, White (72.3%), married (76.7%), insured (99.3%), affluent English speakers (92.3%) and highly educated (at least college 90.2%). Most reported moderate to excellent COVID-19 knowledge (96.6%). Of 1039 procedures scheduled, emergent cases accounted for 5.1%, urgent 55.3% and elective 39.4%. Respondents identified appointment convenience (48.53%) as the most frequent factor impacting scheduling, also noting concern for results (28.4%). Age (p = .022), native language (p = .04), education (p = .007), self-reported COVID knowledge (p = .002), and a desire to be COVID tested pre-procedure (p = .023) were associated with arrival, more commonly in an ambulatory surgical center than hospital (p = .008). Diabetes mellitus (p = .004) and an immunocompromised state (p = .009) were adversely related to attendance. Attitudes towards safety protocols did not affect scheduling. Multivariate analysis demonstrated age, education and COVID knowledgeability were associated with procedure completion. CONCLUSIONS: Safety protocols and urgency levels were not associated with procedure completion. Pre-pandemic barriers to endoscopy persisted as dominant factors amid pandemic concerns.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Pandemics/prevention & control , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal , Endoscopy , Appointments and Schedules , Ambulatory Care Facilities
2.
ACG Case Rep J ; 9(12): e00895, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36561491

ABSTRACT

Gastric adenomyoma is a rare tumor composed of smooth muscle fibers and glandular tissue. Usual presentations include nausea, bloating, and gastric outlet obstruction. We describe a case of a 60-year-old woman who presented with abdominal pain and melena. Endoscopy showed a 1.5 cm polyp in the stomach body that was resected using snare polypectomy. Biopsy showed glands mixed with fibromuscular tissue consistent with gastric adenomyoma. We conclude that gastric adenomyoma, although rare, may present as a bleeding polyp in the stomach body and may be treated with excisional polypectomy.

4.
Gut ; 56(6): 749-55, 2007 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17127706

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Obesity has been associated with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD); however, the mechanism by which obesity may cause GERD is unclear. AIM: To examine the association between oesophageal acid exposure and total body or abdominal anthropometric measures. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of consecutive patients undergoing 24 h pH-metry was conducted. Standardised measurements of body weight and height as well as waist and hip circumference were obtained. The association between several parameters of oesophageal acid exposures and anthropometric measures were examined in univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: 206 patients (63% women) with a mean age of 51.4 years who were not on acid-suppressing drugs were enrolled. A body mass index (BMI) of >30 kg/m(2) (compared with BMI<25 kg/m(2)) was associated with a significant increase in acid reflux episodes, long reflux episodes (>5 min), time with pH<4, and a calculated summary score. These significant associations have affected total, postprandial, upright and supine pH measurements. Waist circumference was also associated with oesophageal acid exposure, but was not as significant or consistent as BMI. When adjusted for waist circumference by including it in the same model, the association between BMI>30 kg/m(2) and measures of oesophageal acid exposure became attenuated for all, and not significant for some, thus indicating that waist circumference may mediate a large part of the effect of obesity on oesophageal acid exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Obesity increases the risk of GERD, at least partly, by increasing oesophageal acid exposure. Waist circumference partly explains the association between obesity and oesophageal acid exposure.


Subject(s)
Gastroesophageal Reflux/etiology , Obesity/complications , Adult , Anthropometry , Body Height , Body Mass Index , Body Weight , Cross-Sectional Studies , Esophagus/metabolism , Female , Gastroesophageal Reflux/metabolism , Gastroesophageal Reflux/physiopathology , Humans , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Male , Middle Aged , Monitoring, Ambulatory/methods , Obesity/metabolism , Obesity/physiopathology , Overweight , Risk Factors , Waist-Hip Ratio
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...