Exploring women's self-reported health problems in pregnancy in the UK and Norway.

Women usually conceptualize pregnancy as a normal physiological state. In contrast, formal maternity care provision tends to be focused on pathology and risk. The authors aim to explore the extent to which childbearing women apply a sickness lens to pregnancy. We have therefore examined antenatal problems spontaneously reported by 4,000 UK and Norwegian women who responded to the international social media-based Babies Born Better survey. We coded and classified the free-text comments of the respondents as either complaint or disease. We found striking differences in the rates and types of problems reported by the women. We discuss our findings by applying different perspectives of medicalization and of lay and biomedical knowledge.

Births in freestanding midwifery-led units in Norway: What women view as important aspects of care.

OBJECTIVE: To describe what women view as important aspects of care when giving birth in freestanding midwifery-led units in Norway. METHODS: Data from four open-ended questions in the Babies Born Better survey, Version 1, 2 and 3 was used. We performed inductive content analysis to explore and describe women's experiences with the care they received. RESULTS: In all, 190 women who had given birth in midwifery-led units in Norway between 2010 and 2020 responded to the B3 survey. The final sample comprised 182 respondents. The analysis yielded three main categories: 1) The immediate birth surroundings, 2) Personal and safe support, and 3) Organisational conditions. CONCLUSION: This study adds valuable knowledge regarding what women describe as important aspects of care in free-standing midwifery-led units. Women experience maternity services in these units as peaceful, flexible and family-friendly. However, some women perceive the freestanding midwifery-led unit as a vulnerable service, mainly due to lack of midwives on call and uncertainty around temporary closure of the freestanding midwifery-led units. This finding points to the importance of staffing of birth facilities to ensure that all women giving birth have available midwifery care at all times, which is recommended in the National guidelines for care during labour and birth. Predictability around place of birth for the upcoming birth is crucial for every woman and her family. These goals might be achieved by a stable, continuous maternity service in all geographical areas of the country.

Experiences of Norwegian co-parents during COVID-19 pandemic restrictions: A qualitative study.

PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic restrictions have had a major impact on the organization of health services in Europe. Co-parents' experiences of not being allowed to fully participate during pregnancy, childbirth, and the postpartum period is poorly understood. We investigated how the non-birthing partner experienced becoming a parent during the pandemic. METHODS: We applied a qualitative design. We recruited the participants from all part of the country by using snowball sampling. 18 individual interviews were conducted by using videotelephony software program/telephone. The transcripts were analysed using a six-step model for thematic analysis. RESULTS: The non-birthing participants were not considered by the healthcare system to be equal partners in terms of their involvement in the process of becoming parents. Three themes were constructed from the interview analysis- deprivation of the opportunity of "doing their part" of the job; participation by proxy to enhance togetherness; and choosing between obedience or opposition to the restrictions. CONCLUSION: The non-birthing co-parents felt deprived of doing what they considered to be their most important job-namely, to support and comfort their partners during pregnancy and childbirth. The healthcare system's decision to exclude co-parents from being physically present thus requires further reflection and discussion.

Important aspects of intrapartum care described by first-time mothers giving birth in specialised obstetric units in Norway: A qualitative analysis of two questions from the Babies Born Better study.

OBJECTIVE: To explore aspects of intrapartum care that were importanrt for primiparous women who had given birth in large obstetric units in Norway. METHODS: We used data from the Babies Born Better (B3) survey, version 1, which is an international, web-based qualitative survey. We performed a reflexive, thematic analysis of the responses to two questions about descriptions of aspects of positive care and areas of care requiring improvement during the intrapartum period. The responders could give up to three responses to each question and there were no word limits. RESULTS: In all, 677 first time mothers who gave birth at the five largest specialised obstetric units in Norway during 2014-2015 were included in the study. The thematic analysis of the 2 205 responses resulted in three final themes: 'Communication and positive interactions with the caregivers', 'Autonomy and active involvement in the labour process', and 'Safety, competence and quality of labour care'. CONCLUSION: For women who give birth for the first time in specialised obstetric units both relational aspect such as communication and respect, and environmental aspects such as facilities, are of importance. First-time mothers might be particularly vulnerable to absence of positive interactions with caregivers because they lack the resources former birthing experience can give. It is essential to give unexperienced birthing women special attention during childbirth because the first birth may influence decisions in following pregnancies.

Women's negative childbirth experiences and socioeconomic factors: Results from the Babies Born Better survey.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between women's socioeconomic status and overall childbirth experience and to explore how women reporting an overall negative birth experience describe their experiences of intrapartum care. METHODS: We used both quantitative and qualitative data from the Babies Born Better (B3) survey version 2, including a total of 8317 women. First, we performed regression analyses to explore the association between women's socioeconomic status and labour and birth experience, and then a thematic analysis of three open-ended questions from women reporting a negative childbirth experience (n = 917). RESULTS: In total 11.7% reported an overall negative labour and birth experience. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) of a negative childbirth experience was elevated for women with non-tertiary education, for unemployed, students and not married or cohabiting. Women with lower subjective living standard had an adjusted OR of 1.70 (95% CI 1.44-2.00) for a negative birth experience, compared with those with average subjective living standard. The qualitative analysis generated three themes: 1) Uncompassionate care: lack of sensitivity and empathy, 2) Impersonal care: feeling objectified, and 3) Critical situations: feeling unsafe and loss of control. CONCLUSION: Important socioeconomic disparities in women's childbirth experiences exist even in the Norwegian setting. Women reporting a negative childbirth experience described disrespect and mistreatment as well as experiences of insufficient attention and lack of awareness of individual and emotional needs during childbirth. The study shows that women with lower socioeconomic status are more exposed to these types of experiences during labour and birth. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Women with lower socioeconomic status are more exposed to negative experiences during labour and birth.

What women identify as positive aspects and areas for improvement of maternity care and services in Ireland: An online survey.

BACKGROUND: An important aspect of achieving the provision of woman-centred maternity services is to seek women's experiences of maternity care. AIM: To explore women's experiences of the care received within the Irish maternity system and to identify aspects of positive care and areas requiring improvement. METHODS: The Babies Born Better pan-European online survey asked open-ended questions on positive aspects of care and aspects of care that could be improved. Data from women who birthed in Ireland within the previous five years were included. Socio-demographic data were analysed descriptively, and descriptive content analysis was conducted for the qualitative comments. FINDINGS: Data from 736 participants were included. Four categories were generated from the analysis: Women's interactions with healthcare professionals included five sub-categories of competence and expertise, continuity and consistency, respectful care, communication, and shared decision-making; Interventions and procedures included the five sub-categories of medical interventions, breastfeeding support, pain relief, birth partner's presence and involvement, and facilitating mother and baby attachment; Organisational and infrastructural issues contained three sub-categories of facilities and services, environment and atmosphere, and staffing levels; and the fourth category, Overall evaluations and specific statements, showed the diversity of women's experiences within the services. CONCLUSIONS: Several positive aspects of care within the Irish maternity services were identified, many of which related to interpersonal factors and interactions with healthcare professionals. The findings also revealed what could be changed, some of which would require minimal resources or effort, so that women would experience positive care.