Detection of Babesia RNA and DNA in whole blood samples from US blood donations.

BACKGROUND: Human babesiosis is a zoonotic infection caused by an intraerythrocytic parasite. The highest incidence of babesiosis is in the United States, although cases have been reported in other parts of the world. Due to concerns of transfusion-transmitted babesiosis, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommended year-round regional testing for Babesia by nucleic acid testing or use of an FDA-approved device for pathogen reduction. A new molecular test, cobas Babesia (Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.), was evaluated for the detection of the four species that cause human disease, Babesia microti, Babesia duncani, Babesia divergens, and Babesia venatorum. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Analytical performance was evaluated followed by clinical studies on whole blood samples from US blood donations collected in a special tube containing a chaotropic reagent that lyses the red cells and preserves nucleic acid. Sensitivity and specificity of the test in individual samples (individual donation testing [IDT]) and in pools of six donations were determined. RESULTS: Based on analytical studies, the claimed limit of detection of cobas Babesia for B. microti is 6.1 infected red blood cells (iRBC)/mL (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.0, 7.9); B. duncani was 50.2 iRBC/mL (95% CI: 44.2, 58.8); B. divergens was 26.1 (95% CI: 22.3, 31.8); and B. venatorum was 40.0 iRBC/mL (95% CI: 34.1, 48.7). The clinical specificity for IDT was 99.999% (95% CI: 99.996, 100) and 100% (95% CI: 99.987, 100) for pools of six donations. CONCLUSION: cobas Babesia enables donor screening for Babesia species with high sensitivity and specificity.

Predonation fears identify young donors at risk for vasovagal reactions.

BACKGROUND: Extending existing research on the relationship between predonation fear of having blood drawn and risk for vasovagal reactions among young donors, this study assessed the predictive power of specific donation-related fears. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: After the health screening, high school whole blood donors (59.5% female) were randomly assigned into one of three groups. Group 1 (n = 881) answered a control question about their prior night's sleep. Group 2 (n = 911) answered the sleep question and a question about fear of having blood drawn. Group 3 (n = 924) answered the sleep question, the fear of having blood drawn question, and four questions about specific donation-related fears (seeing blood, needles, pain, and fainting). RESULTS: The proportion of vasovagal reactions did not differ significantly among the groups, indicating that asking one or more fear questions before donation did not promote reactions. Fearful donors were more likely to have a vasovagal reaction, even after controlling for other important demographic and health predictors, with odds ratios ranging from 2.17 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.44-3.27) for fear of fainting to 3.50 (95% CI, 2.34-5.23) for fear of seeing blood. Hours of sleep was not significantly related to vasovagal reaction risk. CONCLUSION: Predonation fear identifies donors who are more likely to experience a vasovagal reaction and does so without increasing the risk of such reactions. Accordingly, fear should be assessed during screening to identify those who could benefit from instruction in anxiety management and who might require greater attention to help prevent donor injury.

Evaluation of a new West Nile virus nucleic acid test for screening of blood donations.

BACKGROUND: West Nile virus (WNV) is transmitted to humans through mosquito bites and can be further transmitted to humans through transfusion or transplantation. Because most infected individuals are asymptomatic, blood donor screening is important in areas where WNV is endemic. These studies evaluated the performance of a new test for detection of WNV RNA in blood donations. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Analytical performance evaluation included sensitivity, specificity, inclusivity, and correlation. A clinical specificity study was conducted at four blood donor testing laboratories in parallel with the cobas TaqScreen WNV Test (Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.). RESULTS: The 95% and 50% limit of detection for cobas WNV was 12.9 copies/mL (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.8-16.3) and 2.1 copies/mL (95% CI, 1.9-2.4) for WNV lineage 1, respectively, and 6.2 copies/mL (95% CI, 4.8-8.9) and 1.1 copies/mL (95% CI, 0.8-1.3) for WNV lineage 2, respectively. Clinical specificity was 100% in 10,823 donor samples tested individually (95% CI, 99.966%-100%) and 63,243 tested in pools of 6 (95% CI, 99.994%-100%). Samples of other members of the Japanese encephalitis virus serocomplex, including St Louis encephalitis, Japanese encephalitis, Murray Valley encephalitis, Usutu, and Kunjin viruses were detected by cobas WNV. CONCLUSION: The cobas WNV test for use on the cobas 6800/8800 System, a fully automated test system, demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity and is suitable for the detection of WNV in blood donors.

Sensitivity and specificity of a new automated system for the detection of hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, and human immunodeficiency virus nucleic acid in blood and plasma donations.

BACKGROUND: Use of nucleic acid testing (NAT) in donor infectious disease screening improves transfusion safety. Advances in NAT technology include improvements in assay sensitivity and system automation, and real-time viral target discrimination in multiplex assays. This article describes the sensitivity and specificity of cobas MPX, a multiplex assay for detection of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 Group M, HIV-2 and HIV-1 Group O RNA, HCV RNA, and HBV DNA, for use on the cobas 6800/8800 Systems. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The specificity of cobas MPX was evaluated in samples from donors of blood and source plasma in the United States. Analytic sensitivity was determined with reference standards. Infectious window periods (WPs) before NAT detectability were calculated for current donor screening assays. RESULTS: The specificity of cobas MPX was 99.946% (99.883%-99.980%) in 11,203 blood donor samples tested individually (IDT), 100% (99.994%-100%) in 63,012 donor samples tested in pools of 6, and 99.994% (99.988%-99.998%) in 108,306 source plasma donations tested in pools of 96. Seven HCV NAT-yield donations and one seronegative occult HBV infection were detected. Ninety-five percent and 50% detection limits in plasma (IU/mL) were 25.7 and 3.8 for HIV-1M, 7.0 and 1.3 for HCV, and 1.4 and 0.3 for HBV. The HBV WP was 1 to 4 days shorter than other donor screening assays by IDT. CONCLUSION: cobas MPX demonstrated high specificity in blood and source plasma donations tested individually and in pools. High sensitivity, in particular for HBV, shortens the WP and may enhance detection of occult HBV.

Elevated procalcitonin and C-reactive protein as potential biomarkers of sepsis in a subpopulation of thrombotic microangiopathy patients.

Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) comprises a group of microvascular thrombosis syndromes associated with multiple pathogenic factors. Deficient activity of ADAMTS13 is a pathogenic factor in a subset of TMA patients that provides a strong rationale for plasma exchange treatment. However, the subset of TMA patients with normal ADAMTS13 activity remains a heterogeneous group of patients in which the appropriate treatment is not well understood. In addition to the common forms of TMA thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and the hemolytic uremic syndrome, the differential diagnosis of TMA may include sepsis, autoimmune disorders, and disseminated intravascular coagulation. Optimal treatment of TMA depends on timely recognition of treatable pathogenic factors. We hypothesized that sepsis is a rapidly identifiable pathogenic factor in a subset of TMA patients. To test this hypothesis, we retrospectively measured the rapid biomarkers of sepsis C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT), in a repository of pretreatment plasma samples from 61 TMA patients treated with plasma exchange. Levels were analyzed in 31 severely ADAMTS13-deficient and 30 ADAMTS13-normal patients. None of the 31 patients with severe deficiency of ADAMTS13 had elevated PCT. However, 11 of 30 (37%) non-ADAMTS13-deficient patient samples were strongly positive for PCT. These patient samples also had a >10-fold higher median CRP level than patients with normal PCT. We conclude that rapid assays may help identify sepsis in a subset of TMA patients.

Improved peripheral blood stem cell collection following plasma exchange in a patient with elevated viscosity and coagulopathy.

We report a case of improved CD34+ cell yields from peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection following therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) in a patient with elevated viscosity and coagulopathy. The patient was a 46-year-old male diagnosed with IgM lambda multiple myeloma that was largely unresponsive to standard chemotherapy. He had coagulopathy due to lymphoproliferative disease-associated acquired von Willebrand Factor (vWF) deficiency. The patient underwent two rounds of PBSC collections over 3 consecutive weeks (five total collections) prior to planned tandem transplant for multiple myeloma. Both rounds resulted in poor collections due to processing difficulties. It was decided to perform three TPEs daily immediately prior to attempting additional PBSC collections, to treat the patient's elevated viscosity and thereby potentially improve the efficiency of collections. Immediately following the three TPEs, two additional PBSC collections resulted in sufficient CD34+ cells to proceed to transplant. Lower IgM and/or viscosity levels present after the three TPEs likely permitted successful collection of stem cells.

Comparative sensitivity of solid phase versus PEG enhancement assays for detection and identification of RBC antibodies.

Blood banks require a sensitive, specific, and efficient method to detect clinically significant RBC antibodies. Solid phase antibody screening methods are popular due to high sensitivity and automation. However, the high degree of reactivity detects "false positive" antibodies of questionable clinical significance leading to additional testing. We studied positive rates of Capture-R vs. PEG methods and categorized RBC antibodies identified by initial test results of 33,564 consecutive samples by Capture-R method. Capture-R was positive in 1,084/33,564 (3.2%) of samples. Using PEG as our "gold standard", PEG confirmed true positivity (i.e., > or = 1 cell reacting) in 710 Capture-R positive samples (65.5%); 374 Capture-R positive samples (34.5%) did not react in PEG (i.e., false positives). Of the 710 samples with true positivity, only 510 showed clinically significant alloantibodies. Using PEG as our "gold standard", only 2/3 of reactions by Capture-R were considered true positives. Because of ease and automation, Capture-R is popular as a screening test, but a more specific method may be helpful in order to identify truly significant alloantibodies.