Mechanisms Contributing to Acquired Activated Protein C Resistance in Patients Treated with Thalidomide: A Molecular Dynamics Study.

INTRODUCTION: There is a high incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM), however; until now, the exact mechanisms behind VTE in MM are unknown, and some of the elements that may play a significant role are the treatment with an immunomodulator (IMiD) and acquired resistance to activated protein C (APC). OBJECTIVE: The study aims to reveal the possible mechanisms linked to the reduced antithrombotic activity of APC associated with thalidomide. METHODS: The molecular docking approach was used to ascertain the in silico inhibitory potential of thalidomide on the APC protease domain in the architecture of the catalytic triad and its interaction with major substrate binding sites. RESULTS: The coupling showed that the inhibitory activity of thalidomide depends on the induction of structural changes in the protease domain of APC, at the level of the Ser/His/Asp catalytic triad, as a result of a significant increase between the distances of CαAsp102 and Cα Ser195 (11.175 angstroms, increase 14.83%) and between CαSer195 and CαHis57 (9.478 angstroms, increase 13.78 %). This can result in an inefficient transfer of the proton between these residues, the other possible mechanism of inhibition, is a potential reduced binding of the substrate as a result of a direct interaction through a carbon-hydrogen bond on His57, an H-bond on Arg306, and a carbon hydrogen bond on Arg506. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate the in silico inhibitory potential of thalidomide on APC, through two possible inhibition mechanisms, a pathophysiologically relevant finding to understand the factors that can affect the stability and functions of APC in vivo.

Rivaroxaban plus aspirin versus acenocoumarol to manage recurrent venous thromboembolic events despite systemic anticoagulation with rivaroxaban.

INTRODUCTION: The evaluation and management of patients who sustain recurrent thromboembolic events while taking therapeutic anticoagulation have not been well characterized; moreover, there has been no systematic review or randomized trial focused on treating patients with recurrent deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) during anticoagulant treatment. Therefore, we developed a pilot trial to compare rivaroxaban plus aspirin versus acenocoumarol in patients with recurrent venous thromboembolism despite ongoing anticoagulation with rivaroxaban. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was a multicenter, randomized clinical trial. We randomly assigned patients with objectively documented recurrent venous thromboembolism to receive rivaroxaban (20 mg once a day) plus aspirin (300 mg once a day) or an adjusted dose of acenocoumarol. The study was designed to evaluate the incidence of recurrent thromboembolic events (recurrent ipsilateral or contralateral DVT, PE, ischemic stroke, and myocardial infarction) and hemorrhagic events. RESULTS: A total of 58 patients were randomized: 28 were allocated to the rivaroxaban plus aspirin group and 30 to the acenocoumarol group. After 90 days of follow-up, three recurrent thromboembolic events (primary outcome) occurred in the acenocoumarol group - two DVTs and one ischemic stroke - and zero events in the rivaroxaban plus aspirin group (risk ratio [RR] 0.15; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.008-2.83; P = 0.20). Minor bleeding occurred in five patients in the acenocoumarol group and zero in the rivaroxaban plus aspirin group (RR 0.09; 95 % CI 0.005-1.68; p = 0.10). There was one non-fatal gastrointestinal major bleed in the rivaroxaban plus aspirin group. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, there were no significant differences in any outcome assessed; however, recurrent thromboembolic events and minor bleeding events occurred numerically less frequently in the rivaroxaban plus aspirin group. These data suggest the need to carry out more extensive randomized studies with sufficient statistical power to clarify these results.