Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Mol Nutr Food Res ; 66(6): e2100260, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35072987

ABSTRACT

SCOPE: Biomarkers for intake of green leafy vegetables such as spinach can help investigate their health effects. However, only few potential intake markers have been reported in the literature so far. METHODS AND RESULTS: Based on a cross-over study on whole leaf and minced spinach, we investigate changes in metabolites before and after spinach intake and differences between the two treatments and health status. Nineteen volunteers (12 healthy subjects and 7 short bowel patients) completed the study within 48 days. Urine samples (24-h intervals before and after spinach intake) and serum samples (baseline, post 8 d, and post 15 d) are collected and analyzed by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UHPLC-QTOF-MS). The acquired data is analyzed by multivariate and univariate analyses. Three candidate biomarkers are observed in urine only after the spinach intake, including des-amino arginine pentenol ester, D/L-malic acid ester of cis-p-coumarate, D/L-malic acid ester of trans-p-coumarate, and 69 metabolites are present before spinach intake but showing an altered level after treatment. These metabolites are related to dietary habits or meal structure, and some changes are possibly affected by spinach intake. The candidate biomarkers are independent of spinach pre-processing and healthy status. No markers are discovered in serum samples. CONCLUSION: We propose structures for three candidate spinach intake biomarkers; these markers will need further validation in independent studies.


Subject(s)
Spinacia oleracea , Tandem Mass Spectrometry , Biomarkers , Chromatography, Liquid , Cross-Over Studies , Esters , Humans , Metabolomics/methods
3.
Am J Clin Nutr ; 109(1): 29-42, 2019 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30615110

ABSTRACT

Background: Various mechanisms link higher total homocysteine to higher insulin resistance (IR) and risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Folate supplementation is recognized as a way to lower homocysteine. However, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) show inconsistent results on IR and T2D outcomes. Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the effect of folate supplementation on IR and T2D outcomes. Design: We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE and prior systematic reviews and meta-analyses and identified 29 RCTs (22,250 participants) that assessed the effect of placebo-controlled folate supplementation alone or in combination with other B vitamins on fasting glucose, insulin, homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), or risk of T2D. The meta-analysis was conducted using both random- and fixed-effects models to calculate weighted mean differences (WMDs) or risk ratios with 95% CIs. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on intervention type (folate alone or in combination with other B vitamins), as well as analysis based on population characteristics, duration, dose, and change in homocysteine. Results: When compared with placebo, folate supplementation lowered fasting insulin (WMD: -13.47 pmol/L; 95% CI: -21.41, -5.53 pmol/L; P < 0.001) and HOMA-IR (WMD: -0.57 units; 95% CI: -0.76, -0.37 units; P < 0.0001), but no overall effects were observed for fasting glucose or HbA1c. Heterogeneity was low in all meta-analyses, and subgroup analysis showed no signs of effect modification except for change in homocysteine, with the most pronounced effects in trials with a change of >2.5 µmol/L. Changes in homocysteine after folate supplementation correlated with changes in fasting glucose (ß = 0.07; 95% CI: 0.01, 0.14; P = 0.025) and HbA1c (ß = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.06, 0.85; P = 0.02). Only 2 studies examined folate supplementation on risk of T2D, and they found no change in RR (pooled RR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.80, 1.04; P = 0.16). Conclusion: Folate supplementation might be beneficial for glucose homeostasis and lowering IR, but at present there are insufficient data to conclusively determine the effect on development of T2D. This trial was registered on the Prospero database as CRD42016048254.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/prevention & control , Folic Acid/administration & dosage , Insulin Resistance , Insulin , Blood Glucose/analysis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/blood , Dietary Supplements , Fasting , Female , Glycated Hemoglobin/analysis , Homocysteine/blood , Humans , Insulin/blood , Male , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...