Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
BJS Open ; 6(3)2022 05 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35639564

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Low functional capacity, malnutrition, and anaemia are associated with an increased risk of complications after surgery. These high-risk indicators can be improved through preoperative interventions. The aim of the study was to examine the effect of screening for modifiable high-risk factors combined with targeted interventions on postoperative complications in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery. METHODS: A controlled before-and-after study was conducted including patients with colorectal cancer undergoing elective curative surgery between August 2015 and October 2018, in two institutions (intervention and control hospital). The intervention consisted of a screening for anaemia, low functional capacity, and nutritional status and their implementation (iron supplementation, prehabilitation, nutritional supplements, and consultation with a dietician), for a minimum of 4 weeks before surgery. The primary outcome was a composite measure consisting of unplanned admission to the intensive care unit, complications with Clavien-Dindo score of 3a or above, length of hospital stay less than 10 days, readmission, or death within 30 days during the postoperative course. RESULTS: A total of 1591 patients were included for analysis with 839 at the intervention hospital and 752 at the control hospital. In a difference-in-difference analysis, adjusted for age, sex, smoking, stage of disease, ASA score, surgical approach, and surgical procedure, the intervention was associated with a 10.9 per cent (95 per cent c.i. 2.1 to 19.7 per cent) absolute risk reduction of a complicated postoperative course, primarily due to a reduction in severe complications. CONCLUSION: The combined intervention of screening and prehabilitation was associated with a decreased risk of a complicated course, primarily in a reduction of severe complications.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Digestive System Surgical Procedures , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Humans , Preoperative Care/methods , Preoperative Exercise , Risk Factors
2.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 63(2): 171-177, 2019 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30094811

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Orthostatic hypotension (OH) and intolerance (OI) are common findings in the early postoperative period after major surgery and may delay early mobilization. The mechanism of impaired orthostatic competence and OI symptoms is not fully understood, and specific data after colorectal surgery with well-defined perioperative care regimens and mobilization protocols are lacking. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence, possible risk factors and the impact of OI in patients undergoing elective minimal invasive colorectal cancer resection. METHODS: A prospective single-centre study with an optimal enhanced recovery program and multimodal analgesic treatment. OI and OH were evaluated using a well-defined mobilization protocol preoperatively and 6 hour and 24 hour postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients were included in the data analysis. The overall median length of stay was 3 days (1-38). OI was observed in 53% of the patients 6 hour postoperatively and in 24% at 24 hour. OI at 6 hour postoperatively was associated with younger age, lower BMI, and female gender. At 24 hour postoperatively, female gender and ASA class >1 was associated with OI. Opioid consumption and intravenous fluid during the first 24 hour was not associated with OI. Postoperative complications were equally observed between patients with and without OI. Although not statistically significant, patients with OI at 24 hour postoperatively had prolonged LOS (mean 4.0 vs 7.5 days, P = 0.069) compared with patients without OI. CONCLUSION: Postoperative orthostatic intolerance is a common problem during the first 24 hour following laparoscopic colorectal resection and may be followed by delayed recovery.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Surgery/adverse effects , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Orthostatic Intolerance/etiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anesthesia Recovery Period , Body Mass Index , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Female , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sex Factors
3.
Ann Surg ; 244(2): 310-4, 2006 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16858196

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To develop an evidence-based virtual reality laparoscopic training curriculum for novice laparoscopic surgeons to achieve a proficient level of skill prior to participating in live cases. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Technical skills for laparoscopic surgery must be acquired within a competency-based curriculum that begins in the surgical skills laboratory. Implementation of this program necessitates the definition of the validity, learning curves and proficiency criteria on the training tool. METHODS: The study recruited 40 surgeons, classified into experienced (performed >100 laparoscopic cholecystectomies) or novice groups (<10 laparoscopic cholecystectomies). Ten novices and 10 experienced surgeons were tested on basic tasks, and 11 novices and 9 experienced surgeons on a procedural module for dissection of Calot triangle. Performance of the 2 groups was assessed using time, error, and economy of movement parameters. RESULTS: All basic tasks demonstrated construct validity (Mann-Whitney U test, P < 0.05), and learning curves for novices plateaued at a median of 7 repetitions (Friedman's test, P < 0.05). Expert surgeons demonstrated a learning rate at a median of 2 repetitions (P < 0.05). Performance on the dissection module demonstrated significant differences between experts and novices (P < 0.002); learning curves for novice subjects plateaued at the fourth repetition (P < 0.05). Expert benchmark criteria were defined for validated parameters on each task. CONCLUSION: A competency-based training curriculum for novice laparoscopic surgeons has been defined. This can serve to ensure that junior trainees have acquired prerequisite levels of skill prior to entering the operating room, and put them directly into practice.


Subject(s)
Curriculum , General Surgery/education , Laparoscopy , User-Computer Interface , Benchmarking , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic , Clinical Competence , Competency-Based Education , Computer Simulation , Dissection , Ergonomics , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...